[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 185 (Monday, December 5, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8161-S8162]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PAYROLL TAX CUT
Mr. REID. Mr. President, last week, my friend the Republican leader
tried to convince us that Republicans realize it would be disastrous to
raise taxes on the middle class. Here on the Senate floor, he quoted
half a dozen news reports as evidence that the Senate Republicans
support an extension of payroll cuts for 160 million American workers.
I said at that time I was skeptical the Republicans support this tax
cut. It turns out I was right. Last Thursday the Republicans shot down
the Democrats' proposal to cut taxes for middle-class Americans,
supposedly on the grounds it raised taxes on the richest of the rich.
But a few minutes later the Republicans also shot down their own
proposal--one they had placed on the Senate floor--to expand the
payroll tax cuts even though it was paid for with their own hand-picked
reductions in government spending. Well, they shot that down. They only
got 19 votes plus the vote of the cosponsor.
Whatever my friend Senator McConnell may say, it is obvious that the
Republicans are not interested in preventing a $1,000 tax increase on
nearly every family in the Nation from taking effect on January 1.
Democrats will not relent on keeping taxes low for the middle class.
Today Senator Casey will unveil a modified version of the proposed
payroll tax cut that he introduced last week. Like our previous
proposal, it will cut back taxes for 160 million American workers. That
is 160 million workers, including 1.2 million Nevadans. This proposal
will allow the average family to keep $1,500 to spend on necessities
next year. Like our previous proposal, it will be fully paid for with a
mixture of spending cuts that Republicans have already agreed to and a
tiny surtax on the top .2 percent of Americans. Every spending
reduction was agreed to by a bicameral group of Republicans in the
supercommittee, so we know they support these cuts--or they should
support these cuts. In an effort to make our proposal more palpable to
Republicans, we conceded significantly to cut the tax on income above
$1 million and make it temporary.
Democrats know how important extending and expanding the payroll tax
cut is to working families. It is also important to our economy.
Economists of every political persuasion agree that if Republicans
block this proposal--raising taxes on American families by
[[Page S8162]]
$1,000 next month--it will have an immediate negative impact on our
economy. It will halt our still fragile recovery in its tracks and drag
us back into a recession.
We all know Congress cannot afford to play chicken with the economy.
That is why Democrats are committed to passing the tax cut. Republicans
need to be prepared to meet us part way. We are offering a serious
proposal with meaningful concessions, including spending cuts to which
Republicans have already agreed.
The scaled-back, temporary tax on the very richest Americans--a group
with an average income of $3 million a year--is also an attempt to get
Republicans onboard to pass what they say they want to do. We know a
few of them said publicly that they are open to asking millionaires and
billionaires to contribute to our economic recovery. I was happy to see
those press reports. I hope we have the courage to vote accordingly, as
one Republican did last Thursday. One Republican voted the right way.
I repeat, this is a serious proposal and the Republicans should take
it seriously. Here is why: Americans, regardless of political
affiliation, say they wholeheartedly support the Democrats' plan to cut
taxes for middle-class families. Fifty-eight percent of Republicans
agree we should extend payroll tax cuts for 160 million American
workers. Further, Americans overwhelmingly support our proposal to have
millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share to help this
country. Americans from every corner of the country agree. Democrats,
Republicans, and Independents agree. When asked if they support a plan
that would require people making more than $1 million to contribute a
little more to ensure this country's economic success, the results were
decisive: 75 percent, or three-quarters of Americans, said yes. Wealthy
Americans agree. Two-thirds of people making more than $1 million said
they would gladly contribute more. A supermajority of Republicans
agrees, with two-thirds supporting the idea. Even a majority of 52
percent of members of the tea party agree. It seems the only place in
the country they cannot find a majority of Republicans willing to speak
up for sacrifice are Republicans in the U.S. Senate. Republicans across
the country support our plan and the way to pay for it. Republicans in
Congress dismiss it at their peril. I repeat, Republicans dismiss this
at their peril. The American people are watching what my Republican
colleagues will do.
Mr. President, will the Acting President pro tempore be so kind as to
introduce the business of the day.
____________________