[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 185 (Monday, December 5, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H8130-H8131]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROVIDING FOR OUR WORKFORCE AND ENERGY RESOURCES ACT
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules
and pass the bill (H.R. 2360) to amend the Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act to extend the Constitution, laws, and jurisdiction of the
United States to installations and devices attached to the seabed of
the Outer Continental Shelf for the production and support of
production of energy from sources other than oil and gas, and for other
purposes.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 2360
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Providing for Our Workforce
and Energy Resources Act'' or the ``POWER Act''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CONSTITUTION, LAWS, AND JURISDICTION OF
THE UNITED STATES TO ENERGY FACILITIES AND
DEVICES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.
Section 4(a)(1) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
(43 U.S.C. 1333(a)(1)) is amended by--
(1) inserting ``or producing or supporting production of
energy from sources other than oil and gas'' after
``therefrom'';
(2) inserting ``or transmitting such energy'' after
``transporting such resources''; and
(3) inserting ``and other energy'' after ``That mineral''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Washington (Mr. Hastings) and the gentleman from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan)
each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Washington.
General Leave
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that
all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their
remarks and include extraneous materials on the bill under
consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Washington?
There was no objection.
{time} 1540
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as
I may consume.
I appreciate the opportunity to bring to the floor the Providing for
Our Workforce and Energy Resources or POWER Act, introduced by our
colleague from Louisiana (Mr. Landry).
The House Natural Resources Committee is dedicated to creating
domestic American jobs and protecting the safety of our workers. When
we pass legislation that encourages safe and efficient energy
development on Federal lands, not only are we decreasing domestic
energy production, but we are also generating the millions of jobs that
support those industries; and when I say that, I mean all energy jobs.
Republicans in Congress are committed to an all-of-the-above energy
strategy. We are committed to promoting jobs in wind, solar, oil, gas,
hydro, and geothermal energy. Developing all of these resources to
ensure reliable and affordable energy for the American people will
benefit families and businesses across our country in the form of lower
energy costs and greater job growth.
To help foster this private sector job growth, eliminating regulatory
uncertainty can really clear the way to spur investment, protect
American workers, and spur job creation. The bill under consideration
does just that.
The POWER Act clarifies the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to
ensure the full and fair application of our Nation's laws to all
offshore energy development, including renewable energy, rather than
waiting for various rulings and interpretations by Federal agencies.
This simple, commonsense bill will provide greater certainty to those
looking to invest and develop renewable energy projects and the
infrastructure to support those projects off our shores.
I want everyone to be clear that this is not a major change in law.
It is merely a technical clarification to ensure that Federal agencies
have the important guidance they need to ensure that our Nation's laws
are applied in the manner in which they were intended.
Although not a major change, it is an important one, and Mr. Landry
should get the credit for putting this bill forward.
American companies are on the verge of investing hundreds of millions
of dollars in developing renewable energy on our Outer Continental
Shelf, and they need the certainty that our laws will be applied fairly
to their activities.
Developing our Nation's energy resources benefits our economy, our
people, and our national security. I believe this bill helps provide
the certainty needed to help move America down the path. I applaud Mr.
Landry for his work, and I urge my colleagues to support the bill.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LUJAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
(Mr. LUJAN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his
remarks.)
Mr. LUJAN. H.R. 2360 would clarify that U.S.-flagged vessels must be
used for the transportation of merchandise, supplies, construction
materials, and maintenance materials between the U.S. mainland and
offshore wind farms.
The American Wind Energy Association has indicated that their member
companies already operate in conformance with Jones Act requirements
for offshore wind farms. The Offshore Wind Development Coalition
testified on H.R. 2360 that wind developers already accept the
applicability of the Jones Act for offshore wind farms.
The Department of the Interior has testified that the relevant
statutes already apply to offshore renewable energy installations. In
addition, the Interior Department has also testified that H.R. 2360
would not expand current law, but that it would simply clarify that
section 4(a) of Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act applies to renewable
energy production offshore to the extent that there is any uncertainty.
Comments on this bill from Customs and Border Protection echo the
Interior Department's interpretation that H.R. 2360 would simply
clarify that the Jones Act applies to offshore wind farms. The Customs
and Border Protection comments also reaffirm the interpretation
that H.R. 2360 would not expand current law to cover vessels
responsible for laying transmission lines or other vessels assisting in
the construction process beyond what the current law already provides.
We share these interpretations of H.R. 2360 and of the underlying
statutes. However, to the extent that there may be any uncertainty that
would be aided by clarification, we have no problem with the
legislation.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the
author of this legislation, the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Landry).
Mr. LANDRY. Mr. Speaker, when I talk to business owners around the
country, there are two things that I hear prevent them from putting
Americans back to work, and that is regulatory uncertainty and inequity
in government regulations.
Both the industry and the administration have confirmed the existence
of ambiguity in the current law governing energy development on the
Outer Continental Shelf. This is creating uncertainty and inequity,
affecting job creation.
This bill corrects the problem and strengthens our renewable energy
industry by giving our stakeholders the information needed to make the
right business decisions and investments. It levels the playing field
for all industries operating on the Outer Continental Shelf.
[[Page H8131]]
We agree that to effectively rid ourselves of foreign oil we need an
all-of-the-above approach to energy development, and our laws should
follow suit as this industry develops.
Both sides of the aisle don't often agree on ways to strengthen our
energy independence and on ways to create jobs; however, this bill
affords us the opportunity to do just that.
I'm proud to have bipartisan support for this bill and want to thank
both the distinguished chairman from the State of Washington (Mr.
Hastings) and the distinguished gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Holt),
who helped us on this bill.
Mr. LUJAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I yield back my time and
urge adoption of the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Washington (Mr. Hastings) that the House suspend the
rules and pass the bill, H.R. 2360.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds
being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.
Mr. LUJAN. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground that a
quorum is not present and make the point of order that a quorum is not
present.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further
proceedings on this question will be postponed.
The point of no quorum is considered withdrawn.
____________________