[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 183 (Thursday, December 1, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8139-S8140]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TEMPORARY TAX HOLIDAY AND GOVERNMENT REDUCTION ACT--MOTION TO PROCEED
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, there is 2 minutes
of debate equally divided on the motion to proceed to S. 1931.
The Senator from Nevada.
Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, the Senate today has an opportunity to put
aside some of the partisan differences and come together and do
something that will benefit all Americans. The legislation I propose is
a solution, and I support solutions which Republicans, Democrats, and
Independents can all support.
By supporting my legislation and imposing tax increases on employers,
Congress can also preserve opportunity for job growth in the future.
Increasing taxes on small businesses will not help my State overcome
the highest unemployment rate in the Nation. By asking millionaires and
billionaires to pay higher premiums for government health care, my
proposal asks the richest Americans to do more, just like my colleagues
on the other side of the aisle ask that they should.
Lastly, this proposal is the only one that has a chance of passing
the House of Representatives and be signed into law. I urge all of my
colleagues to support this piece of legislation and this effort to help
Americans already struggling to make ends meet.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Pennsylvania.
Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, the problem with this proposal--and I hope
we are reaching the point where we are actually coming together in a
bipartisan way--is that it does not help small business. What we should
be doing is cutting the payroll tax in half for employees and cutting
it in half for employers so we can help small businesses.
This bill does not do that. All it does is take the existing cut in
the payroll tax and keep that in place.
We like that part of it. We should expand the tax cut for workers and
also have a separate cut in the payroll tax for employers, so 160
million workers and lots of businesses can get the benefit of this
payroll tax cut to put money in people's pockets, grow the economy, and
move the economy forward. I urge a ``no'' vote.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion.
Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There is a sufficient second.
Under the previous order, 60 votes are required to adopt the motion
to proceed.
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr.
Kerry) is necessarily absent.
Mr. KYL. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator
from Arizona (Mr. McCain).
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 20, nays 78, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 220 Leg.]
YEAS--20
Ayotte
Barrasso
Brown (MA)
Collins
Crapo
Enzi
Grassley
Heller
Hoeven
Hutchison
Lugar
McConnell
Murkowski
Paul
Portman
Risch
Rubio
Snowe
Vitter
Wicker
NAYS--78
Akaka
Alexander
Baucus
Begich
Bennet
Bingaman
Blumenthal
Blunt
Boozman
Boxer
Brown (OH)
Burr
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Chambliss
Coats
Coburn
Cochran
Conrad
Coons
Corker
Cornyn
DeMint
Durbin
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Graham
Hagan
Harkin
Hatch
Inhofe
Inouye
Isakson
Johanns
Johnson (SD)
Johnson (WI)
Kirk
Klobuchar
Kohl
Kyl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Lee
Levin
Lieberman
Manchin
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Moran
Murray
Nelson (NE)
Nelson (FL)
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Roberts
Rockefeller
Sanders
Schumer
Sessions
Shaheen
Shelby
Stabenow
Tester
Thune
Toomey
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Warner
Webb
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--2
Kerry
McCain
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Coons). Under the previous order requiring
60 votes for the adoption of this motion, the motion is rejected.
[[Page S8140]]
____________________