[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 176 (Thursday, November 17, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H7728-H7729]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE FAIR TAX
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Georgia (Mr. Woodall) for 5 minutes.
Mr. WOODALL. Mr. Speaker, it's always nice to come to the House floor
after someone has just said ``God bless America.'' It makes me feel
good, sir, and I want to associate myself with those remarks.
Candidly, I'm a little worried about what happens here in this
country. Mr. Speaker, I know you have the pleasures I do of seeing all
the folks from across America who come here to see the procedures that
go on here on the House floor, and I know folks often wonder and
probably ask you, Mr. Speaker, Where is everybody? What's going on?
Well, of course, with the exception of those of us on the House floor,
everybody is in their office watching on the
[[Page H7729]]
closed-circuit TV so you can multitask and do it all. I came down here
to bring words to those folks who are watching on TV.
But really, Mr. Speaker, it's about the youngest folks we have in the
country. It's about the economy that you and I are going to leave to
the next generation of Americans. And we can do things here in this
House today that guarantee a better economy in the years to come. Right
now--right now--I don't tweet. I don't use Twitter. I'm not that
interesting that I have something to say to folks every moment of the
day, but if I were tweeting, I would say that right now in the Joint
Economic Committee there's a hearing on fundamental tax reform, asking
the question can tax reform boost investment and job creation? And the
answer is absolutely, it can.
Here, in this country, what we tax, we destroy. Think about that. The
power to tax is the power to destroy.
Mr. Speaker, when I go to speak to high school students, I say, okay,
I've got a $20-an-hour job working in my congressional office. Who
wants to come work for me? Everybody raises their hand. I said, I'm
going to need to tax you about $19 an hour on that, so you're only
going to get to take home 1. Who wants to come work for me? And all the
hands go down. The hands go down because they don't want to work for $1
an hour. They want to keep what they earn.
The power to tax is the power to destroy. Today, in this country, we
tax income. We are the only Nation in the OECD that does not have a
consumption tax. We tax income. And when you tax income, which is
productivity, you destroy productivity.
I have a proposal that is the most widely cosponsored fundamental tax
reform proposal in either the House or the Senate, and it's called the
Fair Tax. It's H.R. 25 here on the House side. And I have the great
pleasure of working with so many of my colleagues to push that bill
forward. It abolishes the income tax in favor of a consumption tax.
Now, when we're in a tough economy like this, folks say, But Rob, I'm
cutting back on my consumption. Would we still be able to bring in the
revenue that we need with a consumption tax? Well, I bring charts. What
you see here in the blue line is personal consumption, and what you see
in the red line is personal income. The red line represents what we tax
in the income tax, and the blue line represents what we would tax in
the consumption tax. And what you see are two things. Number one, they
are roughly the same--roughly the same.
Yes, we can tax consumption and bring in the same revenue we get
today by taxing income, but when they're different, it's because the
volatility of the income is greater than the volatility of consumption.
When you tax income, all you get to tax is income. When you tax
consumption, you end up taxing income, plus savings people are
spending, plus borrowing that they're doing. It's a much more stable
tax.
Why is that important? Mr. Speaker, what you know in your time here
in the House, as I know from my time here in the House, is that if you
give this House more money, we're going to spend it. I don't want to
spend it. I wish we wouldn't. And I'm going to vote ``no,'' but I'm
going to lose.
If you tax something that's volatile, in the boom years, the money
comes pouring in. Do you think we save it for a rainy day? We don't. We
spend it. And then when the down year comes, folks are accustomed to a
high spending level. What do we do? We borrow it from our children and
our grandchildren and spend it anew.
Having a stable income stream that doesn't have the highs and doesn't
have the lows will lead to a better Federal budgeting process. And
taxing consumption, which is what we take out of the economy, instead
of taxing the income, which is what we put into the economy, will grow
it;
Mr. Speaker, a few years ago, the Joint Tax Committee here did a
study and said, How would we evaluate consumption tax? We don't even
have a model for it. How would we do it if we did away with the income
tax and brought in the consumption tax? They brought in economic groups
from the left and the right. Of course they disagreed about absolutely
everything, those groups from the left to the right, all the way across
the spectrum, except for one thing, Mr. Speaker. Every single economic
model and group agreed that if we moved to a consumption tax from
today's income tax, America's economy would grow faster.
Mr. Speaker, every dollar we can grow, every job we can create, they
matter today. And I encourage folks to take a look at H.R. 25, the Fair
Tax, as a mechanism for making that happen.
____________________