[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 157 (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6703-S6704]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FEMA
Mr. PRYOR. Madam President, in some ways, I hate to come to the floor
and talk about this because I very seldom do, but I am announcing to
all my colleagues and to the administration that I am putting a hold on
all Treasury Department nominations until I get something resolved.
Let me back up and tell the story. Some of my colleagues are familiar
with this story because this has come up a few times before and I have
already spoken on the floor a couple times about this and certainly in
the Homeland Security Committee I have spoken about this.
A few years ago, in Arkansas, we had some floods. In this one
particular area around Mountain View, AR, some people's houses were
flooded. FEMA came in. In one particular case--in the Guglielmanas
case, which is a family there--they talked to this couple. They are on
Social Security. They talked to this couple about how they are entitled
to some FEMA recovery money to repair their home. FEMA was actually in
the home, took pictures, helped them fill out the paperwork, walked
them through the entire process, and they ended up getting $27,000 in
FEMA money for disaster recovery. The Guglielmanas did everything
absolutely by the book. They followed all of
[[Page S6704]]
FEMA's directions. They did it picture perfect, exactly the way we
would think all citizens should conduct their business.
Then, 3 years later, they got a notice in the mail and FEMA said: Oh,
we messed up. We shouldn't have given you that money because of some
technical reason and because of that we now want all that money back.
They worked a great hardship on this family. This is supposed to be
government of the people, by the people, and for the people. That is
not what has happened in this case. This has worked a great hardship on
this family.
There are lots of community efforts around these floods: local civic
clubs, churches, the community at large rolled out to help people. The
Guglielmanas said they didn't need that because they had FEMA's help.
So they have foregone a lot of local assistance, a lot of charity
assistance, general help from their friends and neighbors because of
FEMA. Now FEMA has come back and said they owe them the entire $27,000.
This could ruin them financially.
I have met with FEMA Director Fugate. He and I have had what I would
think of as productive conversations, although this matter hasn't been
resolved. One of the things we talked about is to get an amendment to
the existing statute. We are working on that. We are working that bill
through the system right now in the Senate. I have worked with
colleagues on the Homeland Security Committee and also the
Appropriations Committee. I am not saying we would have unanimous
agreement on my approach, but certainly I have been trying to work with
anybody in the Senate to make this bill better.
Unfortunately, what has happened in the last few days is FEMA has now
taken the additional step of turning this matter over to the Department
of Treasury for debt collection. To add insult to injury and to rub
salt in the wounds, this $27,000 debt, now with fines and penalties and
interest, has gone to $37,000--$37,000 in debt after these folks were
assured by the government they were completely entitled to because this
was flood recovery; and the only reason they are not entitled to it is
because of some technical issues that FEMA should have recognized from
day one. They should have never offered to help these people, but what
they have done is, they have now caused them great injury.
This is a matter of equity and fairness. Enough is enough. We have
been talking to FEMA for months about this. Now Treasury is involved.
Enough is enough. We need to get this resolved for this family and
maybe a few others.
It is not just localized in Arkansas. We are going to see this happen
over and over around the country because FEMA has a backlog of these
cases--it is a long story--that got tied up in litigation for a few
years and I can almost guarantee that virtually every Senator in this
Chamber at some point is going to have to deal with this.
I hope all will listen to what I am saying and, hopefully, help me
get this resolved. But that is why I am putting a hold on all the
Treasury nominees. We need to get this resolved, and we are going to do
whatever it takes to get it resolved. We want to resolve this situation
fairly for this family in Arkansas. Again, they are just the first of
many whom we are going to see who have this same type problem.
FEMA has done them harm. Our government has done them harm and put
them at a disadvantage. There is a principle in law called detrimental
reliance. These people clearly relied on the government and relied on
FEMA to their detriment and they are paying the price and the penalty
for that now. When the IRS and Treasury gets involved, there are
penalties and interest. American citizens should not be treated this
way, especially those who are playing by the rules and don't have any
other recourse.
That is all I wanted to say in my morning business--I see we have
several in the Chamber to talk on other matters--that I am putting
Treasury on notice that I am going to hold all their nominees until we
sit down and work through this and, hopefully, get a good and fair
result for this one family in Arkansas.
I yield the floor.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Nebraska.
____________________