[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 136 (Wednesday, September 14, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H6143-H6144]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
A REFLECTION ON THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SYSTEM AND LABOR UNIONS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) for 5 minutes.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. It is unfortunate there is an attempt to scapegoat
America's unions for the economic problems that beset us.
After all, it was not America's grocery clerks, nurses, teachers,
postal workers, and electricians who nearly caused the meltdown of the
economy. It wasn't America's labor unions that were pushing for tax
loopholes that made our revenue system a hopeless, inefficient mess. It
wasn't unions that pushed for shortcuts for worker safety that produced
the tragedy that we've seen in our mines. America's working men and
women didn't engineer poor loans, systematically cheat consumers, and
transform financial institutions into giant casinos.
No doubt there were some consumers who took unfair advantage as well
as others who were not as vigilant as they should have been in the
financial meltdown; but the truth is they were part of an unprecedented
economic scheme that played on those weaknesses, the gullibility and
some individual greed to make it into a vast industry.
Are there some areas where unions are too effective in securing
benefits for their members? That probably depends on who you ask about
the give and take of the collective bargaining process. The leadership
of unions are, in fact, much more democratic than their corporate
counterparts. Union officials are routinely challenged for reelection.
There are insurgents even in the most powerful and entrenched unions,
something one seldom sees on the boards of public corporations. How
many business directors are defeated? It's not easy to even have
opposing nominees through today's shareholder democracy. It's pretty
sketchy compared with what happens with unions.
There is a very direct remedy for union power in the negotiation
process. For 18 years, I was a local elected official, part of that
time responsible for a collective bargaining program. I like to think
that I bargained tough but that I bargained fair--but I bargained. I've
supported collective bargaining rights for public employees since I was
first in the Oregon legislature and still believe that honest, tough,
principled negotiations will lead to the best results.
Having someone attempt to dictate working conditions unilaterally is
not calculated to produce enhanced productivity. It matters how people
are treated and how they feel. Employee-owned corporations illustrate
this principle in spades, some of which are not only employee-owned but
have unions in addition. One of the best performing of the world's
economy is Germany, where they still manufacture and have a huge export
market for high-value products. The Germans work hard to integrate
labor and business with government in the decision-making process,
something that is, sadly, too rare in the United States.
Unions are not the answer for every employee and every company, but
every employee and every company ought to have that option. Even
companies that are nonunion benefit. I've had executives from
successful companies candidly tell me that they treat their employees
right because they don't want them to unionize. Even these nonunion
company employees benefit from higher wages, better benefits, and a
system that respects worker rights because of the competition with the
unions.
Instead of treating employees fairly by allowing them to organize,
far too many corporations have chosen instead to attack the
fundamentals of collective bargaining. It is today an art form in some
companies to stall, delay, intimidate, even to flagrantly violate the
[[Page H6144]]
laws of collective bargaining in this country, weak as they are and as
ineffectively as they are enforced.
Collective bargaining has been systematically under attack by my
Republican friends in Congress as Republican administrations have
fought to make a National Labor Relations Board that is toothless,
passive and unable or unwilling to protect the rights of employees to
organize. This is not calculated to produce a spirit of cooperation. It
is not clear that people need to cheat in order to avoid any excesses
of collective bargaining.
I would argue the opposite.
It's not just workers in companies, union and nonunion, who benefit
from unions. American society benefits. It was organized labor that
spearheaded the effort for a 40-hour workweek. It is not just rhetoric
that unions brought you the weekend. Unions have played a key role in
extending security to millions of Americans in the workplace, in
consumer safety and in environmental protections.
Again I don't pretend unions are perfect and I've had some
differences with them over the years. But make no mistake: Unions are
amongst the few who stand up to some of the more egregious economic
follies, for justice in the workplace, for protecting the unorganized,
fighting for a minimum wage, even a living wage.
It's important to reflect about our collective bargaining system. I'm
all for fine tuning, but I am adamantly opposed to gutting rights and
protection of workers.
I think we all should start by acknowledging the debt we owe to
unions and work to stop this wholesale assault on America's workers.
____________________