[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 120 (Tuesday, August 2, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S5236]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
H.R. 2715
Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, I rise to engage in a colloquy with
my colleagues, Senators Durbin and Pryor, over the passage of H.R.
2715, a bill that passed on the House suspension calendar by a vote of
421-2 and the Senate by unanimous consent. Due to the fact that this
bill bypassed regular order and failed to receive consideration in the
Commerce Committee, I believe it is important to explain our intent in
passing this bill.
Mr. DURBIN. I am frustrated that the Consumer Product Safety
Commission has taken too long to promulgate rules required by the
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, CPSIA, including the rules on
third-party testing obligations and the component part testing rule. I
did not oppose H.R. 2715, because it does not delay or impede the
Commission's ability to implement those rules--although it may place
some increased costs on the Commission due to actions required as a
result of new CPSC mandates and authorities--and I urge the Commission
to complete its work expeditiously.
Mr. ROCKEFELLER. I share the Senator's concerns about the CPSC's
delay in promulgating its regulations in accordance with the mandates
of CPSIA. While I sympathize with the CPSC over its resource
constraints, the Commission must accelerate its efforts and complete
the important regulations required under CPSIA. The provisions in
section 2 of H.R. 2715 were not intended to delay or stop the
Commission's current rulemaking under section 102 (d)(2) of the
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act to implement the critical
provision related to the third-party testing of children's products. I
fully expect the Commission to go forward with these important
rulemakings with no disruption from the passage of this bill.
Given the limited resources of the Commission and recognizing the
length of time it has taken to implement the provisions of the Consumer
Product Safety Improvement Act, it is intended that most of H.R. 2715's
new mandates on the CPSC are not rulemakings. Some of the new
authority, such as the functional purpose exemption and the authority
to restrict the scope of the used products exemption, are subject to a
notice and hearing requirement, but not to a rulemaking. Others, such
as the creation of a new public registry for small batch manufacturers,
can be implemented without notice and comment or even a hearing. As
such, the Commission should act to effectuate the new mandates of this
bill in a most expeditious manner.
Mr. PRYOR. I also share the Senator's view that nothing in H.R. 2715
is intended to delay the Commission's rulemaking with respect to third
party testing and believe that Commission should conclude its testing
rulemakings in the next 2 months. I supported H.R. 2715 because it made
minor modifications to an important consumer product safety law and
supported implementation of important aspect of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act such as the consumer product database. This bill
will require the CPSC to extend the deadline for posting reports on
defective products by 5 days if a business asserts that the information
in the report is not accurate. However, this change does not alter the
fact that the Commission still must post the report in the database
after those 5 days even if it is still reviewing the merits of the
complaint.
____________________