[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 115 (Thursday, July 28, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H5664-H5665]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BUDGET CONTROL ACT OF 2011
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Kansas (Mr. Pompeo) for 5 minutes.
Mr. POMPEO. Mr. Speaker, throughout history, great change has mostly
come from steady, determined hard work performed over long, long
periods of time. Think of our Revolution. It took years. Think of the
war that freed the slaves and the progression towards racial equality.
It has taken years. Think of the continued long march against radical
Islamic terrorism that continues today.
Today, the challenge we face is a frightening economic challenge. We
must put people back to work. We've got to grow our economy so we can
pay off the crushing debt that has been heaped upon the next generation
over the past 40 years. It is the fight of my generation. There are two
world views to tackle this problem that threaten our Republic.
The first, offered by the President and those who control Washington,
D.C. today, is more government, more spending, more redistribution of
wealth, and more physical and spiritual dependence on government. The
American people rejected this world view on November 2, 2010.
Then there is a second view. It is one that offers liberty and
freedom from government instead of control by government. It recognizes
that the left's morally misguided policies will expand government,
suffocate growth, further depress job creation, and push millions of
people farther away from any hope of rising out of poverty. These
policies negatively impact American culture by squelching individual
responsibility and initiative and work ethic. America has always had a
cultural bias in favor of productive work, and has disapproved of the
easy acceptance of charity and welfare payments when these are not
necessary and when one can provide for oneself.
These competing visions of America frame the debate over reducing our
Nation's spending addiction. It is the fight we're having today. So,
today, I will vote for a bill that for the first time in decades begins
to turn the tide against the radical job-killing spending of our
current President.
Now, it's true that the election of President Barack Obama in 2008
and the Democratic retention of the Senate in 2010 continue to have
consequences, so this bill is necessarily insufficient. It does not
complete the mission. If this plan is all we ever do, we plainly will
have failed the task that the new class of freshmen was sent to
Washington, D.C. to take on.
But it is not all we'll do. We will continue to execute the will of
the American people, and we will hold this Republic together by ending
this spending addiction that has afflicted this town for decades. This
bill is the Lexington and Concord of the American Revolution. It is
Antietam to our Civil War. It is D-day to World War II. It is the first
skirmish in a very long battle.
That great Kansan, General Eisenhower, did not declare victory on
June 6, 1944, after America successfully commenced its liberation of
Europe. Rather, he acknowledged a good day, that the battle had been
joined, and he had a deep recognition that he needed to continue to
execute his battle plan.
The American people spoke on November 2, 2010, and we now begin to do
what they demand that we do.
This bill we vote on today honors that commitment. We said we would
not raise taxes. This bill does not do that. Our President complains.
We said we would not increase the debt limit beyond the amount of
spending reductions that we undertake. This bill does that. Our
President complains.
These were bold commitments we made to the American people,
especially when Washington, D.C. continues to be controlled by liberal
Democrats. How could we be sure that a rump group of Republicans could
accomplish this? It had never been done
[[Page H5665]]
before--but today, we have an opportunity as this monumental struggle
begins.
How big will our Federal Government be? Will our country return to
its constitutional role of having bounded government?
In Kansas, I know that the battle sometimes looks messy--big
challenges often look that way. Today, however, I can say clearly that
we have stopped a President intent on growing government, and we have
begun to head down a path towards prosperity for our Nation and our
freedom. It's a good day.
____________________