[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 113 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4888-S4889]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE MILITARY PAY ACT OF 2011
Mrs. HUTCHISON. Madam President, I rise today to speak about the
Military Pay Act of 2011. We were on the brink of closing down
government earlier this year, this spring, and we came to a responsible
conclusion and continued our government. We were also able to continue
the tax cuts that have helped spur our economy as best they could in
light of the spending and the debt that has been accumulated. Now we
are looking at yet another potential government shutdown. It is so
important that we make priorities.
We know what is happening right now in Washington. Everyone is
focused on whether there is going to be an agreement to lift the debt
ceiling because if there is not, then we have the potential for
default, depending on the decision of what gets paid first. We do have
revenue coming in that can be spent even if the debt ceiling is not
lifted. However, the President can choose the priorities. What I am
asking we do today is set some of those priorities. What I am asking is
we take our military personnel out of any limbo. Let's go back to what
we did earlier this year when we were in the continuing resolution
debate which also had the potential for shutting down government. When
that happened in April, I joined with my colleague on the House side,
Representative Louie Gohmert. We both introduced a bill, the Ensuring
Pay for Our Military Act, Senate bill 724. We have 80 cosponsors of
that legislation. We have 80 out of 100 in the Senate who stepped up to
the plate and said: Yes, we need to take care of our military even if
government shuts down. That was April. Since then, I have introduced a
new bill. The new bill is Senate bill 1365, the Protecting Military Pay
Act of 2011. That one sets two priorities. It sets paying our debt, the
interest on our debt and our military. Those are the two priorities.
Social Security is in a different account, and it will automatically be
paid from that account. I actually am cosponsoring another bill that is
also cosponsored by many Senators and many House Members that would
require the President pay our debt, interest on our debt, our active-
duty military and also Social Security recipients even though that
would automatically happen. The legislation I introduced in April that
would take care of our active-duty military is supported by the
Military Officers Association of America; the AMVETS, the American
Veterans; and the National Military Family Association. The new bill I
have introduced that has the debt to be paid off along with our
military sets the priorities, and here is what it does: It says if we
have any kind of government shutdown or we have a situation where we do
not lift the debt ceiling and, therefore, we have to prioritize our
spending according to the revenue that is coming in, there are two
things that will be done: We want to pass the law so there can be no
discretion that you will pay the debts and you will pay the military.
You will pay the active-duty military. That is what the bill does
simply and clearly.
Here is the situation: If the debt ceiling is reached, $29 billion
would be set aside for August to the payment of our debts, $2.9 billion
would be added to that for active-duty military pay. So you are
allocating out of the billions that would be coming in in August, you
would allocate those as the first two priorities and Social Security
would be paid out of the Social Security fund. I am going to ask our
majority leader to let these bills come up--at least one of them that
says we will pay the debt, we will pay our military, and we know that
Social Security will be paid.
It is tremendously damaging for our military to be getting the news
in Afghanistan and Iraq of all the upheaval in Washington because they
are getting the news, of course. For them to worry: Oh, my gosh, what
happens August 2 if my paycheck isn't there for my wife or my husband
to be able to use that to pay the mortgage or the basic expenses? I
want to put it in perspective. We have people in the military with
boots on the ground by the thousands who are making under $20,000 a
year. Those are people who are living paycheck to paycheck. They don't
have the luxury of having a big savings account with that kind of
income, especially if they have children. My goodness, they are making
under $18,000 a year, some of these younger junior members of the
enlisted corps, so I don't think we ought to make them worry for 10
seconds if they can pay their basic bills for their housing and the
food for their families.
In my State of Texas there are 28,000 brave men and women deployed in
the support of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. There are more than
97,000 servicemembers deployed who are married and have children
waiting for them at home. There are 145,000 troops deployed in Iraq and
Afghanistan who are working long hours every day in the desert heat to
protect our freedom, to make sure we are doing everything we can to
root out the terrorists who
[[Page S4889]]
have attacked America. These men and women all raised their right hand
and volunteered to go to defend this Nation. The very least we can do
while we are in this kind of budget negotiation, which is making a lot
of people nervous--I have faith that we are going to do the right thing
in the end, but it is not clear yet and we are a week away. I don't
think we ought to make these people think about whether it is going to
happen and if there is going to be a delay in a paycheck.
I hope we will be able to bring this bill up. I can guarantee if the
majority leader will bring up my bill, it will pass. It has 80
cosponsors. The new bill is the same thing except it makes the debt
payment the priority, which you would hope would not have to be done,
but nevertheless let's assure that our debtors know we are going to pay
the interest on the debt, and our military--who are in harm's way right
now--will not worry about their family having the paycheck they need.
We have about a week. All of us had hoped it wouldn't take this long,
but we have our different views, there is no question about it. I am
one who believes we should raise the debt ceiling only with reforms
that will assure the markets not just for the next week or the next 6
months, but for the long term, that not only are we going to pay our
debts but we are going to bring down the cost of government so we will
not have to raise the debt limit again.
We must take the reform actions we can take right now. We can fix
Social Security for 75 years with relatively little cuts in increases
with Social Security COLAs and with a trajectory that will put us on an
actuarial table for an age that has certainly changed since Social
Security passed. Very little change. It wouldn't affect anyone who is
in the upper area of going into Social Security. The bill I have
introduced wouldn't affect anyone age 58 and above or 55 and above. We
can do the big things that will show our debtors and the rest of the
world we can live within our means and our democracy can work to do the
things that will make us good not for the next week, not for the next 6
months, but for our children and grandchildren. That is what we ought
to be doing right now, and I have faith. We are going to have to do
something temporary for the next few months while we work out the
details, but I know if we get together, we can do this. I don't want
our military to have to worry about it for 1 week or 3 months or 6
months because they deserve better.
Thank you, Madam President.
I yield the floor.
Mr. THUNE. Madam President.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from South Dakota.
____________________