[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 110 (Thursday, July 21, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H5295-H5296]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1110
LET OUR EYES REST UPON WHAT POVERTY IN AMERICA TRULY IS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from
Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee) for 5 minutes.
Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas. I would like to particularly thank the Out
of Poverty Caucus: Congresswoman Lee, Congressmen Towns, Conyers,
Honda, and a number of other Members who have joined that caucus and
all of us who are here on the floor who are members of that caucus and
who believe that this could not be a more important time.
A few days ago, I got on the floor to rename the Cut, Cap, and
Balance legislation that was passed that would cut $6 trillion out of
the hearts and needs of the American people. I called it the ``Tap
Dance, Losers' Club, and Bust the Benefits'' bill because this is not a
question of Members who are standing here today, wanting to recklessly
spend your money. In fact, we are excited about opportunities that help
boost the middle class, but we want to remind our colleagues that there
are Americans who are impoverished.
Do you know that there are Americans who are on the front lines--
young soldiers of the ages of 18, 19, 20, and 21 who have come out of
places like the Delta in Mississippi or the Fifth Ward in Texas or the
Appalachian Mountains or from the urban centers around the Nation--who
are suffering from the highest degree of poverty, not poverty that they
have generated on themselves?
Yes, there are issues sometimes with legacy poverty: families that
have never broken the cycle, who are living in public housing or, even
worse, who are living in housing that is not fit to be lived in. Travel
in some of the shoes that many of us travel in, and go to places in
America where there is no running water.
So we come today to acknowledge the fact that there is poverty in
America.
[[Page H5296]]
In my own State, the people who are living in poverty rose to 16.3
percent in 2007 and to 17.2 percent in 2009--and we happen to be the
second largest State in the Nation. Those are large numbers of
individuals. We have the highest number of soldiers in the State of
Texas who have come back from Iraq and Afghanistan, some of whom have
had to access food stamps. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that
there are currently 5.6 million Texans living in poverty. 2.2 million
of them are children.
So I stand here today.
Let our eyes rest upon what poverty truly is.
This little one is a symbol of what poverty really is. It is the
innocent and those who cannot speak for themselves.
Over 50 percent of the children who are in foster care in Harris
County--that is in Texas--happen to be minority children, African
American children. I remember my late colleague Mickey Leland was so
overwhelmed by the depth of children who were in crisis and in need
that he organized something called the ``crisis cradles'' so that, when
babies had to be taken out of a distressed home in the middle of the
night, they could come to a comforting place. Those babies were in
poverty, were in crisis, and they became part of the foster care
system. That is a system that needs money, not because they're
deadbeats, but because they are innocent children who have come into
home situations where women are impoverished, where there may be abuse.
Poverty comes in all forms. 3.9 million residents of Texas rely on
the Supplemental Nutrition Access Program. This is all discretionary
funding which the $6 trillion would devastate--again, tap dancing
around lifting the debt ceiling. President Reagan said to Majority
Leader Baker that it would be an incalculable devastating result if, at
the time that he was President, the debt ceiling was not raised. By the
way, it was raised 17 times.
Does anyone understand that, constitutionally, the debt ceiling may
be unconstitutional? The 14th Amendment, section 4--read your
Constitution--says that all debt of the United States, public debt,
should be recognized.
So just to conclude, Mr. Speaker, we come today to let America know:
Should we let this little baby be part of the losers' club or should we
let our soldiers and their families and grandmothers and grandfathers
be part of the losers' club?
We are standing here today for the impoverished, and we are committed
to fighting for them.
I would like to thank my friend from California for managing this
time and drawing attention to the millions of Americans living in
poverty.
In the coming weeks and months, this Congress will continue to debate
the debt ceiling and budget. However, as we discuss cuts, it is
imperative that we not lose sight of how funding reductions affect the
American people.
CFPB regulations enacted by the bureau are designed to protect the
average consumer from fraud and abuse, and prevent financial
institutions from employing unfair practices.
In 2009, there were 43.6 million Americans throughout the nation
living in poverty. The 2010 Federal poverty threshold, determined by
the U.S. Census, is that a family of four is considered impoverished if
they are living on less than $22,314 per year.
Children represent a disproportionate amount of the United States'
poor population. In 2008, there were 15.45 million impoverished
children in the Nation, 20.7 percent of America's youth.
In my home state of Texas, where I represent the 18th Congressional
District, the percentage of people living in poverty rose from 16.3
percent in 2007 to 17.2 percent in 2009. The Kaiser Family Foundation
estimates that there are currently 5.6 million Texans living in
poverty, 2.2 million of them children, and that 17.4 percent of
households in the state struggle with food insecurity.
We must not, we cannot, at a time when the Census Bureau places the
number of Americans living in poverty at the highest rate in over 50
years, cut vital social services, not when in the wake of the 2008
financial crisis and persistent unemployment so many rely on Federal
benefits to survive.
In April 2011, 3.9 million residents of Texas relied on the
Supplemental Nutrition Access Program (SNAP) and other food stamp
programs to feed their families.
The Republican budget reforms SNAP benefits into block grants, and
caps the amount of Federal funding available to the program, with no
guarantee that the allocated funding will be sufficient to meet the
demand of low income families struggling with hunger.
The Republican budget also cuts $504 million from the Women, Infant
and Children (WIC) Program, which provides nutritious food to
struggling mothers and children. The USDA reports that more than
990,000 Texas families rely on WIC for essential nutrition to keep
mothers and their children healthy.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates changes to Medicare under
the Republican budget plan will triple the cost for new beneficiaries
by 2030 and increase costs for current recipients, including the 2.9
million people in Texas who received Medicare in 2010.
The Republican proposal will enact damaging changes to Medicaid,
threatening healthcare resources for the 60 million people, half of
them children, that rely on this program to stay healthy. A block grant
for funding or a cap on federal Medicaid spending would increase the
cost for states and the low income families who benefit from the
program.
Harris County has one of the highest Medicaid enrollment records in
Texas. Limits and cuts to Medicaid funds would significantly hurt the
citizens of Texas's 18th District. Harris County averages between
500,000 and 600,000 Medicaid recipients monthly, thousands of people
who may not have access to healthcare under this budget.
Yes, we must take steps to balance the budget and reduce the national
debt, but not at the expense of vital social programs. It is
unconscionable that in our Nation of vast resources, my Republican
colleagues would pass a budget that cuts funding for essential social
programs benefitting children and the elderly in order to finance $800
billion in new tax cuts for the wealthiest among us.
Perhaps my friends on the other side of the aisle are content to
conclude that life simply is not fair, equality is not accessible to
everyone, and the less advantaged among us are condemned to remain as
they are, but I do not accept that. That kind of complacency is not
fitting for America.
I firmly believe that all Americans can come together to protect the
most vulnerable citizens in the Nation, to provide relief for the poor
and the hungry, because 43 million of our fellow countrymen living in
poverty, 15 million of them children, is simply unacceptable. Finally,
where are the jobs--cutting $6 trillion will not create jobs. I am here
to create jobs for the poor and our American families.
I urge every Member in this Chamber to look at what unites us rather
than what divides us. We are linked by our compassion, and bound by the
fundamental edict of the American dream that says we will strive to
provide our children with a better life than we had. We can, and we
must reach a compromise that will not cut valuable services from those
who need government the most.
I thank my friend, the gentlelady from California.
____________________