[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 108 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[House]
[Page H5168]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                              BACK TO 1966

  (Mr. YARMUTH asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. YARMUTH. Mr. Speaker, we've heard at rallies all across the 
country over the last couple of years: We want to take our country 
back. Well, today, when we're voting on the so-called Cut, Cap, and 
Balance Act, we now know where they want to take our country back to--
1966. Those are the spending levels that would be required if we pass 
Cut, Cap, and Balance.
  Now, there were a lot of cool things about 1966. Gas was 25 cents a 
gallon. The average car cost about $3,400, a new car. A home was 
$20,000, and eggs were 55 cents a dozen. It would be nice if we could 
pay those prices again. It would be nice if our seniors who are cared 
for by doctors and hospitals could rely on that kind of 1966 pricing. 
Unfortunately, they can't.
  So what cut, cap, and balance would really mean is slash, shred, and 
punish. Slash the budget, shred the safety net, and punish the American 
citizens who can least afford it, all while protecting the wealthiest, 
most successful and the most specially treated people in this country--
our millionaires, billionaires, oil companies, and giant corporations.
  I urge all of our colleagues to reject the reckless Republican agenda 
known as ``cut, cap, and balance.''

                          ____________________