[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 105 (Thursday, July 14, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S4605]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INTERNET GAMBLING
Mr. REID. Mr. President, per the request of Senator Kyl's office, I
ask unanimous consent that a letter from myself and Senator Kyl to the
Attorney General be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC, July 14, 2011.
Hon. Eric Holder,
Department of Justice,
Washington, DC.
Dear Attorney General Holder: As you know, several weeks
ago, the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York
indicted various individuals associated with online poker
sites for violations of various laws. Additional indictments
were unveiled in Baltimore at the end of May.
These indictments came after many years in which the
entities operated Internet poker websites to Americans in an
open and notorious way with apparently no repercussions from
law enforcement. Leading up to the indictments, this lack of
activity by law enforcement led to a significant and growing
perception that operating Internet poker and other Internet
gambling did not violate U.S. laws, or at least that the
Department of Justice thought that the case was uncertain
enough that it chose not to pursue enforcement actions. In
turn, this perception allowed this activity to spread
substantially, so that at least 1,700 foreign sites continue
to offer Internet gambling to U.S. players. We think it is
important that the Department of Justice pursue aggressively
and consistently those offering illegal Internet gambling in
the United States.
In addition, we have two further concerns: the spread of
efforts to legalize intra-state Internet gambling and the
spread of efforts to offer such intra-state Internet gambling
through state-sponsored lotteries.
We believe that the Department of Justice's longstanding
position has been that all forms of Internet gambling are
illegal--including intra-state Internet gambling, because
activity over the Internet inherently crosses state lines,
implicating federal anti-gambling laws such as the Wire Act.
Yet efforts are underway in about a dozen states to legalize
some form of intra-state Internet gambling. In many cases,
Internet gambling advocates in those states cite the silence
of the Department of Justice in the face of these efforts as
acquiescence. In fact, we have heard that at a major
conference in May, several officials from various state
lotteries boasted that they have obtained the Department of
Justice's effective consent by writing letters of their plans
that stated that if no objection was received they would
proceed with their Internet gambling plans--and no objection
has been received despite many months or years.
This is troubling. We respectfully request that you
reiterate the Department's longstanding position that federal
law prohibits gambling over the Internet, including intra-
state gambling (e.g., lotteries). Conversely, if for some
reason the Department is reconsidering its longstanding
position, then we respectfully request that you consult with
Congress before finalizing a new position that would open the
floodgates to Internet gambling.
Finally, we would like to work with you to strengthen the
penalties for those who violate the law and to see what
modifications would be helpful to the Department to enhance
its ability to fight Internet gambling.
Sincerely,
Harry Reid,
U.S. Senator.
Jon Kyl
U.S. Senator.
____________________