[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 100 (Thursday, July 7, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S4447]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RESPONSIBLE ELECTRONICS RECYCLING ACT
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I rise to make remarks on the
introduction of the Responsible Electronics Recycling Act. I would like
to thank Senators Sherrod Brown and Lisa Murkowski for joining me in
this bipartisan effort, as well as the House sponsors, Representatives
Gene Green, Mike Thompson, Steven LaTourette, and Lee Terry.
Significant amounts of U.S. electronic waste are currently exported
to developing countries that handle the waste in an unsafe manner. Much
of this waste contains toxic materials, such as lead and mercury, and
the workers who disassemble and process the electronics use crude,
unsafe methods that can lead to health problems. This legislation would
put an end to these dangerous practices. The Responsible Electronics
Recycling Act would restrict the export of electronic waste, help boost
the U.S. recycling industry, and support efforts to domestically
recover rare earth materials found in electronics.
The United States is the only developed country that has not ratified
the Basel Convention, which prohibits exports of hazardous waste to
developing countries. Under the convention, much of the U.S.
exportation of electronic waste to developing countries is illegal
under the laws of the receiving countries but unfortunately, these laws
are poorly enforced.
If we recycled these materials in the U.S., it would create recycling
jobs for U.S. workers. Companies recycling in the U.S. often operate
under capacity because they cannot compete with the cheaper option of
exporting electronic waste to developing countries. We should be
processing this waste using U.S. workers, and many companies stand at
the ready to begin recycling additional electronic waste.
Moreover, the dumping of used electronics in the developing world can
come back to haunt us. Some countries have active underground markets
for U.S. hard drives, contributing to identity theft, as documented in
a 2009 Frontline investigation. Business Week reported in 2010 that
used computer chips from old personal computers are fraudulently re-
marked in China as ``military grade'' chips and sold to U.S. military
suppliers. Given the risks to our armed forces from defective
equipment, I have also introduced the Combating Military Counterfeits
Act to enhance the ability of prosecutors to keep counterfeit goods out
of the military supply chain.
One of the benefits of recycling electronic waste domestically is the
potential to recover rare elements in the process. Rare earth materials
are vital to a number of manufacturing processes, including for
products such as hybrid car batteries and solar panels, yet prices have
skyrocketed as global supply has tightened. According to the Department
of Energy, recycled content from electronics could be a valuable
secondary source of rare earth materials, but additional research is
required on recovery techniques and collection of electronic waste.
This act would establish the Rare Earth Materials Recycling Research
Initiative at the Department of Energy to coordinate research into the
recovery of rare earth materials used in electronics.
The Responsible Electronics Recycling Act would also address the
health, environmental, and national security concerns by amending the
Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit the export of electronic waste to
developing countries, with certain exceptions. These exceptions include
legitimate exports of tested and working equipment, warranty returns,
and recalls. There is also a de minimis exception to allow the export
of materials that have so little toxicity they would not pose a risk to
human health or the environment. Exporting under the exceptions would
require a license and notice to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Additional restrictions apply to exports for warranties or recalls,
including written consent from the receiving country. The act creates a
criminal penalty for knowingly exporting electronic waste, and provides
the EPA the authority to inspect establishments handling electronic
waste.
Twenty-five States, including Rhode Island, have passed electronic
waste recycling laws. States such as Rhode Island already seek to
ensure that their downstream recyclers do not export the electronic
waste but instead responsibly recycle it here in the U.S. But States
can only do so much and a federal law is needed to restrict these
harmful exports.
We are pleased to have the support of a number of electronics
manufacturers and retailers, including Hewlett Packard, Dell, Apple,
Samsung, and Best Buy. We are also pleased to have the endorsement of
29 recyclers representing 74 recycling operations in 34 states. The
breadth of our coalition is a testament to the consensus that the
harmful export of these products must stop.
With more and more Americans relying on new technologies and
generating a growing amount of electronic waste each year, we must take
steps to properly dispose of this material. This legislation will crack
down on the dumping of electronic waste on developing countries,
protect American consumers from counterfeit schemes and identity theft,
and support the growth of electronic waste recycling jobs in Rhode
Island and across the country.
____________________