[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 89 (Tuesday, June 21, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3972-S3976]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS
By Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal):
S. 1240. A bill to support the establishment and operation of
Teachers Professional Development Institutes; to the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, today I am introducing legislation,
along with my colleague from Connecticut, Senator Blumenthal, which
will strengthen the content knowledge and instructional skills of our
present K-12 teacher workforce. Our goal with this legislation, like
any education legislation I support, is to ultimately raise student
achievement.
The Teachers Professional Development Institutes Act would establish
up to eight new Teachers Professional Development Institutes throughout
the nation each year over the next 5 years based on the successful
model that has been operating at Yale University for over thirty years.
Every Teachers Institute would consist of a partnership between an
institution of higher education and the local public school system in
which a significant proportion of the students come from low-income
households. These Institutes will strengthen the present teacher
workforce by giving each participant an opportunity to gain more
sophisticated content knowledge and a chance to develop curriculum
units with other colleagues that can be directly applied in their
classrooms. We know that teachers gain confidence and enthusiasm when
they have a deeper understanding of the subject matter that they teach
and this translates into higher expectations for their students and an
increase in student achievement.
The Teachers Professional Development Institutes are based on the
Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute model that has been in existence
since 1978. For over 30 years, the Institute has offered, five or six
13 session seminars each year, led by Yale faculty, on topics that
teachers have selected to enhance their mastery of the subject areas
they teach. The subject selection process begins with representatives
from the Institutes soliciting ideas from teachers throughout the
school district for topics on which teachers feel they need to have
additional preparation, topics that will assist them in preparing
materials they need for their students, or topics that will assist them
in addressing the standards that the school district requires. As a
consensus emerges about desired seminar subjects, the Institute
director identifies university faculty members with the appropriate
expertise, interest and desire to lead the seminar. University faculty
members, especially those who have led Institute seminars before, may
sometimes suggest seminars they would like to lead, and these ideas are
circulated by the representatives as well. The final decisions on which
seminar topics are offered are ultimately
[[Page S3973]]
made by the teachers who participate. In this way, the offerings are
designed to respond to what teachers believe is needed and useful for
both themselves and their students.
The cooperative nature of the Institute seminar planning process
ensures its success. Institutes offer seminars and relevant materials
on topics teachers have identified and feel are needed for their own
preparation, as well as what they know will motivate and engage their
students. Teachers enthusiastically take part in rigorous seminars they
have requested, and practice using the materials they have obtained and
developed. This helps ensure that the experience not only increases
their preparation in the subjects they are assigned to teach, but also
their participation in an Institute seminar gives them immediate hands-
on active learning materials that can be used in the classroom. All of
this is a very empowering experience for teachers.
The Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute conducted a National
Demonstration Project from 1999-2002 that showed that similar
Institutes could be created rapidly at diverse sites with large
concentrations of disadvantaged students. After 2 years of research and
planning, and based on the success of that project, the Institute in
2005 launched the Yale National Initiative to strengthen teaching in
public schools, a long-term endeavor to assist with the establishment
of Teachers Institutes of this specific type in most states. As a
result, new Institutes already have been established in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, Charlotte, North Carolina, and New Castle County,
Delaware. Nine other school districts in 6 states, including
California, Arizona, Oklahoma, Illinois, Virginia, and Georgia, are
currently participating in the Initiative to learn how to develop a new
Institute.
The teachers surveyed for the National Demonstration Project reported
that student motivation, student interest, and student mastery were
higher during the Institute-developed unit than during other work.
Subsequently, the findings of a 2009 Report on Teachers Institute
Experiences found that teachers participated out of desires to obtain
curricula that suited their needs, increased subject mastery, and
motivated students. Mr. President, 96 percent of the teachers rated the
Institute seminars as useful, partly due to the reported increase in
knowledge and in raising expectations for their students.
A retrospective study showed that over 5 years, Teachers Institute
participants were almost twice as likely as non-participants to remain
teaching in the district 5 years later. Research has shown that
longevity in a district leads to increased teacher effectiveness.
Many agree that teacher quality is the single most important school-
related factor in determining student achievement. High-quality teacher
professional development programs that focus on subject and pedagogy
knowledge are a proven method for enhancing the effectiveness of a
teacher in the classroom. A recent review of professional development
studies by the Department of Education's Institute of Education
Sciences found that, and I quote ``teachers who receive substantial
professional development, an average of 49 hours in the 9 studies, can
boost their students' achievement by about twenty-one percentile
points.''
The Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute model enhances teachers' basic
writing, math, and presentation skills. It increases expectations of
student achievement and enthusiasm for teaching while developing skills
for motivating students. These are key features that research suggests
are effective in producing gains in both teacher knowledge and practice
and student achievement. The Teachers Institutes lead to student
achievement gains through a proven approach distinguished from both
conventional professional development offerings of school districts and
from traditional continuing education and outreach programs of colleges
and universities.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan said recently, and I quote, ``the
practices of high-performing countries show clearly that America in
particular has to do much more to elevate the teaching profession, from
the recruitment and training of teachers to their evaluation and
professional development.''
This is precisely what the Teachers Professional Development
Institutes Act strives to accomplish. The need for effective teachers
with deep content knowledge is most apparent and urgent in schools and
school districts that enroll a high proportion of students from low-
income families, exactly the schools and school districts that Teachers
Institutes serve.
The Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute has already proven to be a
successful model for teacher professional development as demonstrated
by the high caliber curriculum unit plans that teacher participants
have developed and placed on the web, and by the evaluations that
support the conclusion that virtually all the teacher participants felt
substantially strengthened in their mastery of content knowledge and
their teaching skills. The finding that Institute participants were
almost twice as likely as non-participants to remain teaching in high-
need schools is especially encouraging. Our proposal would open this
opportunity to many more teachers in high-need schools throughout the
nation.
I urge my colleagues to act favorably on this measure.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be
printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be
printed in the Record, as follows:
S. 1240
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTES.
(a) In General.--Part A of title II of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6601 et seq.) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Subpart 6--Teachers Professional Development Institutes
``SEC. 2161. SHORT TITLE.
``This subpart may be cited as the `Teachers Professional
Development Institutes Act'.
``SEC. 2162. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
``(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
``(1) Teaching is central to the educational process and
the ongoing professional development of teachers in the
subjects they teach is essential for improved student
learning.
``(2) Attaining the goal of the No Child Left Behind Act of
2001 (Public Law 107-110)--having a classroom teacher who is
highly effective in every academic subject the teacher
teaches--will require innovative approaches to improve the
effectiveness of teachers in the classroom.
``(3) The Teachers Institute Model focuses on the
continuing academic preparation of schoolteachers and the
application of what the teachers study to their classrooms
and potentially to the classrooms of other teachers.
``(4) The Teachers Institute Model was developed initially
by the Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute and has successfully
operated in New Haven, Connecticut, for more than 30 years.
``(5) The Teachers Institute Model has also been
successfully implemented in cities larger than New Haven.
``(6) In the spring of 2009, a report entitled `An
Evaluation of Teachers Institute Experiences' concluded
that--
``(A) Teachers Institutes enhance precisely those teacher
qualities known to improve student achievement;
``(B) Teachers Institutes exemplify the crucial
characteristics of high-quality teacher professional
development; and
``(C) Teachers Institute participation is strongly related
to teacher retention in high-poverty schools.
``(b) Purpose.--The purpose of this subpart is to provide
Federal assistance to support the establishment and operation
of Teachers Institutes for local educational agencies that
serve significant low-income student populations in States
throughout the Nation, in order to--
``(1) improve student learning; and
``(2) enhance the quality and effectiveness of teaching and
strengthen the subject matter mastery and the pedagogical
skills of current teachers through continuing teacher
preparation.
``SEC. 2163. DEFINITIONS.
``In this subpart:
``(1) Significant low-income student population.--The term
`significant low-income student population' means a student
population of which not less than 40 percent of the students
included are eligible for free or reduced price lunches under
the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act.
``(2) Teachers institute.--The term `Teachers Institute'
means a partnership or joint venture--
``(A) between or among--
``(i) 1 or more institutions of higher education; and
[[Page S3974]]
``(ii) 1 or more local educational agencies that serve 1 or
more schools with significant low-income student populations;
and
``(B) that improves the effectiveness of teachers in the
classroom, and the quality of teaching and learning, through
collaborative seminars designed to enhance both the subject
matter and the pedagogical resources of the seminar
participants.
``SEC. 2164. PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.
``(a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to award
grants under this subpart in order to encourage the
establishment and operation of Teachers Institutes.
``(b) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary may reserve not
more than 50 percent of the funds appropriated to carry out
this subpart to provide technical assistance to facilitate
the establishment and operation of Teachers Institutes. The
Secretary may contract with the Yale-New Haven Teachers
Institute to provide all or part of the technical assistance
under this subsection.
``(c) Selection Criteria.--In selecting Teachers Institutes
to support through grants under this subpart, the Secretary
shall consider--
``(1) the extent to which a proposed Teachers Institute
will serve schools that have significant low-income student
populations;
``(2) the extent to which a proposed Teachers Institute
will follow the understandings and necessary procedures
described in section 2166;
``(3) the extent to which each local educational agency
participating in the Teachers Institute has a high percentage
of teachers who are unprepared or underprepared to teach the
core academic subjects the teachers are assigned to teach;
and
``(4) the extent to which a proposed Teachers Institute
will receive a level of support from the community and other
sources that will ensure the requisite long-term commitment
for the success of a Teachers Institute.
``(d) Consultation.--
``(1) In general.--In evaluating applications using the
criteria under subsection (c), the Secretary may request the
advice and assistance of the Yale-New Haven Teachers
Institute or other Teachers Institutes.
``(2) State agencies.--If the Secretary receives 2 or more
applications for grants under this subpart from local
educational agencies within the same State, the Secretary
shall consult with the State educational agency regarding the
applications.
``(e) Fiscal Agent.--The fiscal agent for the receipt of
grant funds under this subpart shall be an institution of
higher education participating in the partnership or joint
venture, as described in section 2163(2)(A), that is
establishing or operating the Teachers Institute.
``(f) Limitations.--A grant under this subpart--
``(1) shall provide grant funds for a period of not more
than 5 years; and
``(2) shall be in an amount that is not more than 50
percent of the total costs of the eligible activities
supported under the grant, as determined by the Secretary.
``SEC. 2165. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.
``Grant funds under this subpart may be used--
``(1) for the planning, development, establishment, and
operation of a Teachers Institute;
``(2) for additional assistance to an established Teachers
Institute for its further development and for its support of
the planning, development, establishment, and operation of a
Teachers Institute under paragraph (1);
``(3) for the salary and necessary expenses of a full-time
director for a Teachers Institute to plan and manage the
Teachers Institute and to act as a liaison between all local
educational agencies and institutions of higher education
participating in the Teachers Institute;
``(4) to provide suitable office space, staff, equipment,
and supplies, and to pay other operating expenses, for the
Teachers Institute;
``(5) to provide a stipend for teachers participating in
the collaborative seminars conducted by the Institute in the
sciences and humanities and to provide remuneration for
members of the faculty of the participating institution of
higher education leading the seminars; and
``(6) to provide for the dissemination, through print and
electronic means, of curriculum units prepared in the
seminars conducted by the Teachers Institute.
``SEC. 2166. UNDERSTANDINGS AND PROCEDURES.
``A grantee receiving a grant under this subpart shall
abide by the following understandings and procedures:
``(1) Partnership.--The essential relationship of a
Teachers Institute is a partnership between a local
educational agency and an institution of higher education. A
grantee shall demonstrate a long-term commitment on behalf of
the participating local educational agency and institution of
higher education to the support, including the financial
support, of the work of the Teachers Institute.
``(2) Seminars.--A Teachers Institute sponsors seminars led
by faculty of the institution of higher education partner and
attended by teachers from the local educational agency
partner. A grantee shall provide participating teachers the
ability to play an essential role in planning, organizing,
conducting, and evaluating the seminars and in encouraging
the future participation of other teachers.
``(3) Curriculum unit.--A seminar described in paragraph
(2) uses a collaborative process, in a collegial environment,
to develop a curriculum unit for use by participating
teachers that sets forth the subject matter to be presented
and the pedagogical strategies to be employed. A grantee
shall enable participating teachers to develop a curriculum
unit, based on the subject matter presented, for use in the
teachers' classrooms.
``(4) Eligibility and remuneration.--Seminars are open to
all partnership teachers with teaching assignments relevant
to the seminar topics. Seminar leaders receive remuneration
for their work and participating teachers receive an
honorarium or stipend upon the successful completion of the
seminar. A grantee shall provide seminar leaders and
participating teachers with remuneration to allow them to
participate in the Teachers Institute.
``(5) Direction.--The operations of a Teachers Institute
are managed by a full-time director who reports to both
partners but is accountable to the institution of higher
education partner. A grantee shall appoint a director to
manage and coordinate the work of the Teachers Institute.
``(6) Evaluation.--A grantee shall annually review the
activities of the Teachers Institute and disseminate the
results to members of the Teachers Institute's partnership
community.
``SEC. 2167. APPLICATION, APPROVAL, AND AGREEMENT.
``(a) In General.--To receive a grant under this subpart, a
Teachers Institute, or a partnership or joint venture
described in section 2163(2)(A) that is proposing to
establish a Teachers Institute, shall submit an application
to the Secretary that--
``(1) meets the requirement of this subpart and any
regulations under this subpart;
``(2) includes a description of how the applicant intends
to use funds provided under the grant;
``(3) includes such information as the Secretary may
require to apply the criteria described in section 2164(c);
``(4) includes measurable objectives for the use of the
funds provided under the grant; and
``(5) contains such other information and assurances as the
Secretary may require.
``(b) Approval.--The Secretary shall--
``(1) promptly evaluate an application received for a grant
under this subpart; and
``(2) notify the applicant, within 90 days of the receipt
of a completed application, of the Secretary's determination.
``(c) Agreement.--Upon approval of an application, the
Secretary and the applicant shall enter into a comprehensive
agreement covering the entire period of the grant.
``SEC. 2168. REPORTS AND EVALUATIONS.
``(a) Report.--Each grantee under this subpart shall report
annually to the Secretary on the progress of the Teachers
Institute in achieving the purpose of this subpart.
``(b) Evaluation and Dissemination.--The Secretary shall
evaluate the activities funded under this subpart and submit
an annual report regarding the activities assisted under this
subpart to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Education and the
Workforce of the House of Representatives. The Secretary
shall broadly disseminate successful practices developed by
Teachers Institutes.
``(c) Revocation.--If the Secretary determines that a
grantee is not making substantial progress in meeting the
purposes of the grant by the end of the second year of the
grant under this subpart, the Secretary may take appropriate
action, including revocation of further payments under the
grant, to ensure that the funds available under this subpart
are used in the most effective manner.
``SEC. 2169. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
``There are authorized to be appropriated, for grants
(including planning grants) and technical assistance under
this subpart, such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year
2012 and each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years.''.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 2151 the
following:
``subpart 6--teachers professional development institutes
``Sec. 2161. Short title.
``Sec. 2162. Findings and purpose.
``Sec. 2163. Definitions.
``Sec. 2164. Program authorized.
``Sec. 2165. Eligible activities.
``Sec. 2166. Understandings and procedures.
``Sec. 2167. Application, approval, and agreement.
``Sec. 2168. Reports and evaluations.''.
______
By Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Blunt, Mr.
Burr, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Coats, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cornyn, Mr.
DeMint, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Graham, Mr. Grassley, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr.
Johanns, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, Mr. Moran, Mr. Risch,
Mr. Sessions, Mr. Thune, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Vitter, and Mr. Paul):
S. 1241. A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit
taking
[[Page S3975]]
minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the
involvement of parents in abortion decisions; to the Committee on the
Judiciary.
Mr. RUBIO. Mr. President, it is an honor to stand alongside Senator
Hatch today as we introduce the Child Interstate Abortion Notification
Act. This bill, which would help States enforce laws requiring that
parents be notified before their child has an abortion, is supported by
many pro-life groups and organizations. But perhaps most importantly,
it is supported by a broad majority of parents, who are in a much
better position to help children with tough decisions than virtually
anyone else.
Many States require that a parent be notified before a minor has an
abortion, while even more require the consent of a parent before a
physician can legally perform an abortion. Unfortunately, these laws
are undermined and circumvented by those simply willing to travel to a
State without these restrictions.
This important legislation would put an end to this practice
permanently by simply enabling States to enforce their existing laws,
which are designed to protect our children and defend parents' rights.
While this legislation serves that goal, it also promotes a culture of
life in our nation that is critical to ensuring we continue to cherish
and defend the self-evident, fundamental right to life, especially as
it applies to the unborn.
Specifically, this bill has two parts: First, it prohibits the act of
knowingly taking a minor across State lines with the intent of
obtaining an abortion if this action evades the parental involvement
law in her home State. Second, it would require abortion providers to
notify a parent of an out-of-State minor before performing an abortion.
Sadly, many are willing to circumvent State law and shuttle young
girls across State lines in order to avoid parental notification laws.
With the help of my Senate colleagues, we will put a stop to this and
ensure that parents are aware of profound medical operations involving
their children. With that thought in mind, I ask you to support this
legislation to help keep parents informed.
Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, today I am proud to stand with my friend
from Florida, Senator Rubio, as he introduces an important piece of
legislation, the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act. This bill,
which today is being introduced in the House by Representative Ileana
Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, is based on the belief that children should
not make profound life-changing decisions by themselves and that
parents are generally in the best and most responsible position to help
them.
One of the many disturbing ironies in the abortion debate is that
parental consent is needed for such things as tattoos or school
fieldtrips but not always for abortions that will end one life and
change another forever. Abortion advocates say that abortion should be
treated as any other surgical procedure, but many of them oppose
requiring the same parental consent for abortion that is required for
any other procedure.
What is worse, there are individuals and organizations out there who
appear to care more about money an about kids. They are willing to help
young girls get abortions by any means necessary, including taking them
to other States without the knowledge or consent of their parents. Mind
you, those same parents will be responsible for the aftermath, for the
physical, emotional, and spiritual consequences of the abortion. If
parents are to be responsible at the end, they have the right to be
there at the beginning.
If it were possible, just for a moment, to take the abortion politics
out of the picture, every parent knows that kids have to develop over
time the judgment and maturity to make decisions. No one is more
committed to them, no one has more love for them, no one has more
responsibility for them than their parents.
This bill has two parts. First, it prohibits taking a minor across
State lines for an abortion if doing so evades the parental involvement
law in her home State. In the 109th Congress, this portion of our bill
passed the Senate with 65 bipartisan votes. More than 80 percent of our
fellow Americans support it. Second, this bill requires abortionists to
notify parents of an out-of-State minor before performing an abortion.
Fifty-seven Senators voted for cloture on this combined bill in 2006.
I urge my colleagues to read the bill. It does not apply when an
abortion is necessary to save a girl's life or if the girl is a victim
of abuse or neglect. Again, please read the bill. It is carefully
drafted with the appropriate exceptions and safeguards in order to
focus on what unites the vast majority of Americans, that parents
should be involved before their child has an abortion. The majority of
States have laws requiring parental involvement and, with its
interstate component, this bill is a legitimate and constitutional way
for Congress to help protect children and support parents.
______
By Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself and Mr. Manchin):
S. 1242. A bill to provide for the treatment of certain hospitals
under the Medicare program; to the Committee on Finance.
Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, I, along with my colleague Senator
Manchin, rise today to introduce the Fair Competition for Hospitals Act
of 2011, legislation that will level the playing field for a handful of
hospitals in the Northern Panhandle of West Virginia who are burdened
by a payment disparity as compared to hospitals in neighboring States
serving the same patient population. This legislation will adjust the
wage index determination for these hospitals to make sure they are
treated the same as the nearby facilities in other States. It will also
help hospitals in other areas of the country facing a similar
situation.
Medicare's hospital wage index system was created to reflect the
variation in the price of labor across the country. Usually, hospitals
in different States are located far enough apart that they do not
compete for the same patients or workforce, within the same labor
market. However, the geography in the Northern Panhandle of West
Virginia presents a unique situation; with a geographic area as little
as 6 miles wide, hospitals in West Virginia are much more akin to
hospitals in Ohio and Pennsylvania, on either side of the panhandle.
Therefore, this small group of hospitals is competitively disadvantaged
because of wage index differences across state borders. This
competitive disadvantage is causing these hospitals to struggle under
the weight of providing the same care for a lower payment and making it
more difficult to continue the high level of care for which they have
become known.
These hospitals are vital cornerstones to the people in their
communities. They employ more than 4,000 people and provide health care
for tens of thousands more. As an essential part of the community, they
should not be significantly disadvantaged by a payment structure that
does not take into account the unique makeup of this area.
The solution I am introducing today is budget neutral and fair. It
will make sure that these hospitals in my State are treated on a level
playing field with their competitors and not disadvantaged by an
economically meaningless State border. I urge my colleagues to support
this legislation.
______
By Mrs. HAGAN:
S. 1243. A bill to require that certain Federal job training and
career education programs give priority to programs that provide an
industry-recognized and nationally portable credential; to the
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Mrs. HAGAN. Mr. President, I am pleased to reintroduce a very
important piece of legislation to accelerate job growth across America,
the American Manufacturing Efficiency and Retraining Investment
Collaboration Achievement Works Act, also known as the AMERICA Works
Act. This bill is part of the solution to the Nation's economic and
unemployment problem.
We all know that American families, as well as the manufacturing
industry, have faced difficult times over the last few years. But the
truth is that the manufacturing industry will always be a vital part of
our Nation's economy.
The national unemployment rate has stabilized somewhat, but almost 14
million Americans remain out of work. We still have a long way to go.
In my home
[[Page S3976]]
State of North Carolina, unemployment hovers at 9.7 percent, with
several counties facing double-digit unemployment rates. Job creation
is my number one priority and this legislation is an innovative way to
get Americans back into the workforce.
The United States needs a strong technical workforce. The AMERICA
Works Act would encourage national industries, such as biotechnology,
construction, and machinery, to come together and agree on the skill
sets they most value in prospective employees. Community colleges would
participate, creating the appropriate curricula to meet those needs.
Students who complete the programs would receive an industry-recognized
credential. Workers who carry these industry-backed credentials would
be able to market themselves in any area of the country. Businesses
could count on the fact that workers with these credentials have the
expertise and skills they are looking for.
The AMERICA Works Act would require certain Federal job training and
career development education programs to give priority to programs that
provide an industry-recognized and nationally portable credential. This
credentialing system starts out with basic competencies that prepare
individuals for the workplace. Once basic competencies are completed,
individuals can work toward high performance technical competencies and
then progress further to highly skilled technical and management
competencies. The credentialing levels are stackable, allowing workers
flexibility along their career tracks. Stackable credentials provide
straightforward paths, with clear entry and exit points, for workers to
advance their careers and attain high quality jobs.
In North Carolina, we have an advanced manufacturing skills program
at Forsyth Technical Community College in Winston-Salem. Forsyth Tech
is participating in the National Association of Manufacturers'
Manufacturing Skills Certification System, which offers credit programs
toward nationally recognized, stackable credentials. They have had
hundreds of students enroll in their programs. Forsyth Tech has already
collaborated with state and local businesses to begin the process of
incorporating their credentials into job descriptions. They believe
that introducing graduates with skill certifications into the local
workforce will help improve the hiring process, and the nationally
recognized credentials will improve employment opportunities.
When the President's Jobs Council met earlier this month in North
Carolina, a leading topic of discussion, and something the President
himself mentioned, is the need to improve job training for American
industries so that our workers can be competitive in the global
economy.
The AMERICA Works Act will help job seekers and employers keep
America competitive in every industry, from textiles to aerospace,
high-tech to biotech, and connect programs like those offered at
Forsyth Tech with employers in the community, region, and across the
United States.
As I mentioned before, job creation is my number one priority. I want
to do everything I can to create jobs and make sure our workers have
the skills necessary to help our businesses grow and thrive. By
incentivizing industry-recognized, nationally portable, stackable
credentials, we can ensure that America has the best businesses, with
the best-trained workers leading the world.
I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this important bill to
expand employment opportunities for hardworking Americans.
____________________