[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 87 (Thursday, June 16, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S3883]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENT EFFICIENCY AND STREAMLINING ACT OF 2011--
MOTION TO PROCEED--Continued
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate
resume consideration of the motion to proceed to Calendar No. 75, S.
679. I send a cloture motion to the desk and ask the clerk to report.
Cloture Motion
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The cloture motion having been presented under rule XXII, the Chair
directs the clerk to read the motion.
The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to
proceed to Calendar No. 75, S. 679, the Presidential
Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011:
Harry Reid, Joseph I. Lieberman, Thomas R. Carper, Frank
R. Lautenberg, Sherrod Brown, Barbara Boxer, Sheldon
Whitehouse, Patty Murray, Robert P. Casey, Jr.,
Christopher A. Coons, Joe Manchin III, Debbie Stabenow,
Jon Tester, Benjamin L. Cardin, Jeanne Shaheen, Kent
Conrad, Richard J. Durbin.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I am disappointed that we had to file
cloture again. I would hope, though, that in the ensuing days, the
Republicans on the other side will let us get on this bill.
This is a bill Senator McConnell and I started working on when we
were both whips many years ago. The purpose of the bill is to eliminate
the need to have all of these nominations to these relatively minor
posts confirmed by the Senate. And the work done by the chairman and
ranking member of the Budget Committee, Senators Schumer and Alexander,
has been exemplary.
We now will have--when this legislation passes, and I really think it
will pass, even if we have to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed
and on the bill itself--hopefully that will not be necessary, but if we
do, that is what we will have to do. This bill would take away the
necessity of our having to do some 200 nominations for some of these
minor posts I talked about.
I hope we can get on this bill when we come back next week. It will
be the right thing to do. There is so much to do. This would set the
tone of this work period that has not been so good to this point.
____________________