[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 78 (Thursday, June 2, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H3945-H3964]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2012
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 287 and rule
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House
on the state of the Union for the further consideration of the bill,
H.R. 2017.
{time} 1612
In the Committee of the Whole
Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of
the bill (H.R. 2017) making appropriations for the Department of
Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, and
for other purposes, with Mr. Dreier in the chair.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The CHAIR. When the Committee of the Whole rose earlier today, a
request for a recorded vote on an amendment offered by the gentleman
from Florida (Mr. Mica) had been postponed and the bill had been read
through page 92, line 7.
Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Alabama is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Chairman, as we had talked earlier about this
legislation, this bill is about putting priority on limited dollars and
robustly supporting the most essential functions of the Department of
Homeland Security and to make sure that our homeland is safe.
The Department of Homeland Security, with all of its critical
missions, is not immune from fiscal discipline. That has been the theme
that we have been talking about since we started the bill yesterday
afternoon. That means that the Department has to find the most cost-
effective way to meet its mission requirements.
The American people, quite honestly, are demanding no less in this
regard.
Again, we started yesterday afternoon at around 3:30, we went until
about 12:30 this morning, we started again about 12:30 today, this
afternoon, and we are continuing with this legislation. It will
probably take us a couple of more hours this evening before we finish.
A lot of people have done a lot of work to make this bill happen and
for it to take place.
I just again would want to thank each of them for their hard work.
Again, the ranking member, Mr. Price, has been a true partner in this
as we have worked together, and I want to thank him for his
contribution that he has made.
Also, I would like to thank the full committee chairman and the
ranking member, Mr. Hal Rogers and Mr. Dicks, for their support. They
have both been very helpful as we have gone through this process, and
they have had to make some very difficult choices as they have to work
with all 12 subcommittees. I want to congratulate them, as we have
kicked off the start of a new appropriations season, and we have nearly
the first appropriation bill to come to the floor.
But I do want to take a moment and thank the committee staff for
their hard work, namely, I want to thank Stephanie Gupta and Paul Cox
on the minority side; and, of course, the majority staff has worked
very, very closely with the minority, and we do appreciate their hard
work.
But on the majority staff, Jeff Ashford, Kris Mallard, Kathy
Kraninger, Miles Taylor, and Rebecca Ore have all done a tremendous job
in their work and, of course, last but not least, Ben Nicholson. Ben
Nicholson serves as the clerk of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on
Appropriations and Ben has done a tremendous job as he has helped me up
here as I have managed the time on this particular piece of
legislation.
{time} 1620
Also, on the appropriations staff, Jennifer Miller and Mike Robinson
have done a great job, and also Jim Kulikowski. They have been very
helpful in making sure this process moves forward. As you can imagine,
there's a lot of moving parts. And so I do want to thank Mike,
Jennifer, and Jim for their hard work.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. I move to strike the last word.
The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the chance as
we enter the homestretch of this debate to also express my appreciation
to the many colleagues and staff members who have brought us to this
point.
I want to commend Chairman Aderholt for this first voyage that he has
taken as the subcommittee chairman and for the professional approach
that he has brought to this, the careful process, the inclusive
process. We are very grateful to him.
We had a good, full season of hearings and an open process in the
Appropriations Committee, at markup, and we've had an open process here
on the floor. That's the way Appropriations is supposed to work. And so
I do commend the chairman and the leadership for that.
We have had a good, robust debate here. I certainly wish that we were
in closer agreement on this bill. I have always believed that on
Appropriations we should look out for the institutional role of this
House in holding the executive accountable, on a bipartisan basis, no
matter which party is in charge either here or in the White House.
And so when the partisan divisions that inevitably characterize our
work here, when those partisan divisions are evident on Appropriations,
we try our best to overcome them. Historically, we have tried our best
to overcome them. That has been very difficult this year, and we have a
bill that we are divided on--but not on the entire bill by any means.
As I said in my opening statement yesterday, the chairman and the
majority have done a good job in keeping the frontline operations of
the Homeland Security Department intact, keeping those operations
strong.
Where they've fallen down is, I believe, to pass a budget resolution
that contains a Homeland Security allocation that is simply inadequate.
That has been compounded by the treatment of disaster funds beyond the
President's request, a refusal to designate those as emergency funds.
And so we are left with a bill that's severely squeezed. I won't
elaborate except to say that this is the bigger picture we are dealing
with, the radical shortfall in the State and local grants, a challenge
we will have to continue to work on.
[[Page H3946]]
We will move on from this point today and be working with our
colleagues in the other body and with the White House to come up with a
final product that hopefully keeps faith with the States and local
communities who depend on us for a reliable partnership.
Mr. DICKS. Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. I yield to the gentleman from
Washington.
Mr. DICKS. One of the things that worries me about this bill is the
role that the Department of Homeland Security plays in cybersecurity,
and the fact that we have cut the S&T budget worries me because there
were a number of projects, science and technology projects, underway to
help us deal with this great threat to our country.
I serve on the Defense Subcommittee. I have served on the
Intelligence Committee. Cybersecurity gives an asymmetrical advantage
to others--China, Russia, and Iran--penetrating the networks of our
major defense companies. We've had stories just this week about
Lockheed. They say this has been going on since the nineties, and this
issue worries me. And I am concerned. You have bioterrorism, you have
the threat of nuclear weapons, and you have the threat of cyber
attacks. And this last one is where we're most vulnerable.
And we have critical infrastructure in this country where homeland
security is supposed to be taking care of it. The Defense Department
has a Cyber Command. NSA has signed an agreement between the Defense
Department and Homeland Security about sharing people so we get some of
the expertise from the NSA over in Homeland Security.
My concern is that we still don't have a real plan for our utilities
and our critical infrastructure in this country. This is something that
Homeland Security has to be involved in. And, as I said, they support
the rest of the government.
The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman from North Carolina has expired.
(On the request of Mr. Dicks, and by unanimous consent, Mr. Price of
North Carolina was allowed to proceed for 2 additional minutes.)
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. I yield to the gentleman from
Washington.
Mr. DICKS. Regarding this cybersecurity vulnerability, I think our
financial institutions make a major effort at trying to protect
themselves. But I have been told that our corporate intellectual
property, over the last few years, $1 trillion has been stolen through
these cyber attacks from the free world to others. Some of these people
are simply criminals. Some of them are acting under state authority.
This is one of those issues that we are still vulnerable to. I just
hope that these dramatic cuts in science and technology won't undermine
our ability to come up with solutions on this cyber issue.
I also believe the administration, the President, his people and the
Department of Homeland Security have a responsibility to make certain
that we have a plan and we have an approach and we work with the
private sector in a way that will make sure that we are protecting our
critical infrastructure.
So I just urge you, Mr. Price, as the ranking member, and the
chairman, Mr. Aderholt, to see if we can't make certain that, in
conference, we keep some of this money in there for the cybersecurity
programs that I know Dr. O'Toole is concerned about.
And I appreciate the gentleman yielding.
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. I thank the gentleman for his comments.
I certainly share the commitment to developing a more comprehensive
approach to cybersecurity, in particular, and to the research and
development budget, in general.
With that, let me reiterate my thanks for all who have brought us to
this point on both sides of the aisle, for our fine staff whom we
always depend on, and the way the staff has scrambled with this
amendment process----
The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman has expired.
(By unanimous consent, Mr. Price of North Carolina was allowed to
proceed for 30 additional seconds.)
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. At a time like this floor debate when
we've had such a flurry of amendments from all sorts of sources, we
realize anew how dependent we are on our staff for staying on top of
all this and helping guide us, and we are very grateful to our staff on
both sides of the aisle.
With that, we are ready to proceed, Mr. Chairman.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Amendment No. 23 Offered by Mr. Polis
Mr. POLIS. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the
following:
Sec. __. None of the funds made available by this Act may
be used to carry out section 287(g) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)).
{time} 1630
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Colorado is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. POLIS. Mr. Chairman, I thank the Rules Committee for allowing an
open rule, including the offering of my commonsense amendment which
would save millions of dollars by cutting funding to 287(g), something
that is called an immigration enforcement program which actually
increases crime by expanding the mandate of our local crime-fighting
officials.
This program effectively adds responsibilities, which should be
Federal responsibilities, to local law enforcement so that they
effectively engage in Federal immigration enforcement. So instead of
keeping serious criminals from threatening our communities, the 287(g)
program forces police to waste their time trying to figure out the
immigration status of noncriminals, as well as opening them up to
charges of racial profiling which can be expensive to defend.
Instead of using our precious national security dollars on these
kinds of programs, this bill has estimated savings of $6.4 million for
the next year alone. The inspector general found this program cost $68
million.
These programs force local law enforcement officers to follow and
enforce Federal laws even though they are not trained to do so. That is
why law enforcement officers from across the country have spoken out
against it. The IG found 33 problems the first time they investigated
287(g) last year. The biggest problem was that they found the program
did not focus on noncitizens who actually pose a threat to public
safety. Instead, it focused on noncitizens who pose no threat to public
safety.
Mr. Chairman, 287(g) forces police officers to enforce laws that they
are not trained to do, which is why law enforcement leaders across the
board tend to oppose this law. Chief Acevedo from Austin said: ``It's a
matter of resources and priority. My priority is dealing with criminals
and terrorism issues, not dealing with civil matters.''
I would point out that the failure to enforce our Federal immigration
laws is a Federal failure. It is a national failure. It is a national
disgrace. But the answer is not to add an additional burden to our
hardworking men and women who are working at local law enforcement to
keep our communities safe at a time when their budgets are being
constrained, both the money they receive from Washington as well as
their local and State revenue.
Why are we not listening to our local law enforcement officials?
Instead of cutting funding for firefighters and police, we should stop
wasting taxpayer funds on failed programs like 287(g).
I would like to show the detrimental effect of the 287(g) program.
You can see across Arizona, Statewide, incidents of violent crime went
down 12 percent in the last 10 years. But they have one particular
sheriff who does a particularly bad job of protecting his community.
His name is Sheriff Arpaio. He is one of the notorious abusers of the
287(g) program. In his community, Maricopa County, crime went up 58
percent. So you have a 12 percent decrease, and then you have this
incompetent sheriff who has a 58 percent increase. Now he might be
incompetent in other areas as well, but one of the main reasons crime
has gone up in Maricopa County is because he has diverted law
enforcement resources to try to enforce Federal laws that we in this
body are irresponsibly ignoring day in and day out and that this bill
does nothing to fix.
[[Page H3947]]
In recent years, local law enforcement has increased community
policing efforts, working with our residents, both documented and
undocumented, to finally defeat violent crime and keep our communities
safe. This is the reason why law enforcement officers across my
community, including sheriffs and police chiefs, are strongly opposed
to 287(g), which stretches local police forces beyond the breaking
point, hinders law enforcement, and causes real harm and danger to
American citizens living in our communities.
I call on Congress to fix our broken immigration system. We need to
enforce our Federal laws. We need better border security. Nobody from
either side of the aisle disagrees with that. But it is time to stop
playing politics with this issue and stop trying to foist a Federal
responsibility into our already overtaxed local community law
enforcement efforts, increasing crime and putting innocent Americans in
harm's way at the risk of violent crime. I strongly urge a ``yes'' vote
on my amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. CARTER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the gentleman's
amendment.
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. CARTER. Mr. Chairman, I strongly endorse robust enforcement of
our Nation's immigration laws. I happen to be from the State that has
more of the Mexican border than any other State in the union. We are
very familiar with that border. We have been living with it for our
entire lives, and for the life of our State, from before the time when
it was a State when it was a republic.
Our law enforcement officers see an epidemic of lawlessness flowing
across the southern border of the United States, and our law
enforcement officers in our area want to be involved in protecting the
life, liberty, and property of Texans, and they are perfectly willing
to be involved in protecting the life, liberty, and property of every
American citizen. They are deeply concerned with what is going on at
the border, and they want to be involved. They have volunteered to go
into the 287(g) program, which gives them the kind of training which
this Congress believes, and has made it a point to believe, that they
should have, to know how to deal with immigrants who are looked upon as
having special law enforcement needs.
The best I've been able to figure, I don't know who's imposing this
on the people of Boulder, Colorado, but it is not being imposed on
anybody else that I know of. It's a volunteer program. Law enforcement
officers go and seek 287(g) training so that they can meet the
standards that those who deal in immigration issues want them to know
and understand. That's why we created 287(g), to make knowledgeable law
enforcement officers at the local level who could be effective in
assisting those who have the Federal requirement and the Federal duty
to protect our borders.
I only agree with one thing that I have heard from my colleague: I
agree we are failing at protecting our borders. And I would argue that
this committee has done everything and continues to do everything that
we can do to protect our borders, and this bill does everything it can
do and does not short the people who protect our borders any because of
the dangerousness that we are aware of on our southern border.
I don't understand why enlisting volunteers to assist in law
enforcement would be offensive to anyone. Now if the folks in Colorado
don't want to be part of the 287(g) program, don't volunteer. This is
not hard stuff. But, you know, if you are one or two lone border
patrolmen out in the middle of Brewster County in Texas, you've got a
lonely, dangerous job. You've got some people coming through for
economic reasons, and other people coming through who are clearly
violators of the laws of the State of Texas and the laws of the United
States, and our law enforcement officers who believe in their oath of
office to protect people that they are there to protect. They volunteer
for this program so that they can assist the border patrolmen in the
effort both of the economic immigrants and the criminal immigrants that
come across our border.
And don't tell a law enforcement officer that he's not happy to see a
sheriff when he sees a body of armed men packing packs across open
country in Texas.
This is a good program. It is a program that has effectively trained
law enforcement to understand the rules that Federal agents have to
play by, and still gives them the authority to assist people who need
their assistance.
I would argue that the safest part of the Texas border is the part of
the border where local law enforcement and local sheriffs and Operation
Stonegarden in other areas--the safest part is where local law
enforcement has joined with Federal law enforcement to enforce the laws
of this land. I think anything short of that is leaving resources on
the table that will protect the United States of America.
So I very much oppose this gentleman's amendment, and I very much
hope that our colleagues will realize that we need every resource
available, and in my opinion even troops, to protect the American
border and make sure Americans citizens and their property and their
lives are safe. So I urge my colleagues to not support this gentleman's
amendment, to oppose this gentleman's amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
{time} 1640
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last
word.
The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. PRICE of North Carolina. Mr. Chairman, I want to commend our
colleague from Colorado for offering this amendment and for calling
attention to some of the deficiencies in the 287(g) program and some of
the ways that we need to do things better. I would have wished for an
amendment, though, that would have given the Department of Homeland
Security more direction.
If not 287(g), then what should immigration enforcement look like,
and what should the interface between the Federal Government and local
authorities look like?
I'm afraid the amendment doesn't really address that very
conclusively, but I want to offer just a few reflections on the 287(g)
program and the ways in which I think we might transition to something
more positive in the area of immigration enforcement.
The gentleman from Colorado has already described the 287(g) program.
It delegates Federal immigration authority to local law enforcement in
many respects, supposedly to identify criminals in their communities.
At the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal year '10, the 287(g) program
had established partnerships with 72 local jurisdictions; but both the
DHS Inspector General and the GAO have raised serious concerns about
the 287(g) program, particularly related to the lack of oversight by
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the fact that it was not really
living up, in many cases, to its stated goal of focusing on serious
criminals who pose a threat to the community. The Inspector General
found 33 major deficiencies in the program last year, and found 16 more
when he recently reassessed the program. Based on these concerns, I
believe we do need to take a hard look at 287(g) and make sure that
that authority is being exercised properly before we simply appropriate
more money for the program.
Now, Mr. Chairman, when I chaired the Appropriations Subcommittee on
Homeland Security, we pushed ICE to place a much greater emphasis on
the identification and removal of criminal aliens. Part of ICE's
response has been the Secure Communities Program, which we fully
supported and continue to do so in this bill. Since 2008, resources
have consistently grown for ICE to make progress in finding aliens in
local and State custody and in removing them at the completion of their
criminal sentences.
This bill supports the continued expansion of Secure Communities,
which already covers many more prisons than 287(g). Now, Secure
Communities isn't perfect either, by any means, but at least it does
draw that bright line between the Federal role and the local role in
immigration enforcement. It sorts that role out much more effectively
than the 287(g) program. I think we should concentrate on making the
Secure Communities Program work
[[Page H3948]]
well. It accomplishes the objectives of 287(g) but much more
efficiently, much less problematically, and without deputizing local
police to enforce immigration law. That is a proposition that is rife
with complications and potential abuses.
So I believe--and our subcommittee determined last year--that it is
desirable to transition from 287(g) into the Secure Communities format.
As it stands now, it's a duplicative program. It is a program that is
highly problematic. If we work on Secure Communities--make sure it
works responsibly and monitor it carefully--I believe it can accomplish
the task more efficiently to identify and remove dangerous criminals
from our communities, which I think we very widely agree should be the
main priority of immigration enforcement.
With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. I move to strike the last word.
The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky. Mr. Chairman, for those who want to be sure
that we send away from our borders illegal aliens who are criminals,
they surely would understand that the 287(g) program gives us a hugely
better opportunity to do that.
We've got a few thousand ICE agents, Border Patrol agents, doing a
wonderful job, and they are dedicated public servants; but there are so
few of them, relatively speaking, to deal with the millions of illegals
crossing our borders, many of whom are here in a criminal nature. A few
thousand Federal agents. By working with local law enforcement, we can
multiply that by hundreds of thousands of enforcers of America's laws,
and we can get rid of the criminal aliens in this country. That's what
287(g) empowers localities to do.
Now, it is entirely up to the local communities. If they don't want
to participate in the 287(g) program and receive funds from the Federal
Government to train their local officials on how to enforce the Federal
law, it's their choice. They don't have to do it. We don't make them do
it. It's purely a local option. Many communities have. However, if they
want to and if they decide to seek Federal assistance, it is there for
them through this program to help train their local officials. We need
to better empower States and localities, and through this program,
that's exactly what we do.
Everyone admits we are failing to protect our borders. There is a
consensus around that. We have not protected America's borders
yesterday, today or probably tomorrow. The reason we can't do it is
that we are outnumbered, and there is just not the Federal manpower to
stop it. If you're going to want to try to stop it, particularly keep
criminal aliens out, I don't understand why you would not want to gain
some extra help from the local law enforcement officers, properly
trained under this program and financed. I don't understand that.
In 1996, this section was added as an amendment to the Immigration
and Nationality Act for the express purpose to provide necessary
immigration enforcement assistance to State and local law enforcement
entities. It authorizes the department to enter into agreements with
State and local law enforcement, equipping them through thorough
training to perform important immigration enforcement functions. Local
law enforcement agencies that are closest to the problem are more
threatened by the criminality involved, and have more motivation to try
to stop the criminal activity flowing across the border.
To date, the ICE agency has trained more than 1,240 State and local
officers nationwide pursuant to this program. Since 2006, the 287(g)
program has, according to ICE, resulted in the identification of more
than 200,300 potentially removable aliens, mostly at local jails. Law
enforcement agencies participate in the program in 24 different States:
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota,
Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Virginia. Those
States say to keep this program in place because it's helping us keep
criminal aliens out of our local communities--no longer selling drugs
to our kids, no longer engaging in any criminal activity in their
communities.
So I urge the defeat of this amendment. This program works. It is the
only program that has allowed us to engage tens of thousands of local
law enforcement officers to help with this consuming problem we have
with criminal aliens.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman
from Colorado (Mr. Polis).
The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. POLIS. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on
the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado will be postponed.
{time} 1650
Mr. ELLISON. I move to strike the last word.
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Minnesota is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. ELLISON. Mr. Chair, I rise today to shed some light on an
amendment that was offered by the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. King) last
night which the House will vote on later today.
The gentleman from Iowa came to the floor at approximately 11:30 p.m.
last night and under the open rule offered an amendment prohibiting any
funds from the Homeland Security bill to be used for ACORN and ACORN-
affiliated community organizations. Besides the fact is that it is
clear that ACORN or ACORN-affiliated community organizations are not
eligible for funds from the Homeland Security appropriations bill,
because as far as I know, ACORN is not in the business of homeland
security.
In addition to going after ACORN, the gentleman from Iowa in his
amendment goes after 300 organizations. Let me quote from Ranking
Member Norm Dicks' eloquent words during debate last night:
You're asking this House to vote on something that you haven't
verified, and you don't know what these groups are all about.
The gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Price), ranking member of
Homeland Security appropriations, also asked a good question when he
asked for specific information on what was the wrongdoing of these
organizations. The gentleman from Iowa's response was that he didn't
know.
So, Mr. Chair, to highlight the ridiculous nature of this amendment,
the gentleman from Iowa is asking this body to vote on an amendment to
beat up on ACORN and ACORN-affiliated organizations and cannot produce
a single item of evidence for the record of wrongdoing by these
organizations in his amendment.
Mr. Chair, one of the organizations listed, and the reason I take
certain umbrage to this amendment is that it's an organization in my
own district, is known as Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for
Change. Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change are people who
are known to me. They work hard every day. They work on foreclosure.
They work on trying to get people to vote. They work with poor people
in particular.
Let me read from their Web site to describe to you what they actually
do:
Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change is a new nonprofit
committed to building power in low-income and moderate-income
neighborhoods through community organizing, civic engagement, political
mobilization, and education. NOC is a member-funded and member-run
organization that takes on the social and economic justice issues that
impact our community the most. Whether it's huge issues like health
care and bank reform or a small neighborhood concern like getting a
stop sign installed at a dangerous intersection, NOC members work
together to apply their collective strength and get things done.
This is a good, decent civic service organization, Mr. Chair, and I
resent them being slandered in the way they were last night.
So how did Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change get on the
gentleman from Iowa's hit list? Well, they used to be an affiliate of
ACORN. Now they're an independent organization. So I guess there is
guilt by association.
Also, Mr. Chair, since the gentleman from Iowa wants this body to
talk
[[Page H3949]]
about ACORN, a community organizing group, on the Homeland Security
bill, I think it's fair to talk about ACORN.
The House, in 2009, voted to defund ACORN. I voted against that
defunding amendment because it was unconstitutional and based on
politics of fear and guilt by association. It was a good vote, and I'm
proud I voted that way, because a Federal court, Mr. Chair, in December
2009, found the House ban on ACORN grants unconstitutional, and I'm
proud I was not on the side of that unconstitutional vote.
Finally, the GAO, in a study released in June 2010, found, quote, no
evidence of ACORN mismanaging Federal funds. Again, we held this
organization up for ridicule and destruction, and we, the Congress,
were wrong.
Mr. DICKS. Will the gentleman yield?
Mr. ELLISON. I yield to the gentleman from Washington.
Mr. DICKS. I want to commend the gentleman. I hope other Members who
are watching this tonight will look at this amendment that the
gentleman from Iowa offered last evening. There are over 300
organizations. And what the gentleman has said here is why the
gentleman from North Carolina and I so vehemently opposed this
amendment.
This is guilt by association; there is no question about it. These
various groups, some of which were just mentioned in the media, the
author of this amendment said repeatedly when asked about some of these
groups by Mr. Price:
I have no facts; I have no information. The Government Oversight
Committee put together this list and we added some more names that we
found in the media.
And he couldn't describe one of these groups that had had a problem.
So I hope that the Members will carefully look at this list.
The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman from Minnesota has expired.
(On request of Mr. Dicks, and by unanimous consent, Mr. Ellison was
allowed to proceed for 1 additional minute.)
Mr. ELLISON. I yield to the gentleman from Washington.
Mr. DICKS. I appreciate the gentleman yielding.
Again, this is a very serious amendment. I hope it will be defeated.
I appreciate the gentleman rising to tell us about this group in
Minnesota, and I am sure that there are other groups here that are
doing good work, helping people, and that would hurt them, I think, in
other areas. I think people would say, You're banned from being able to
get a contract at Homeland Security even if you're doing good work
helping people. That, I think, is a serious mistake.
Mr. ELLISON. Let me say quickly, I pulled some articles about this
whole thing:
``House Ban on ACORN Grants is Ruled Unconstitutional.''
``ACORN Workers Cleared of Illegality by Outside Probe.''
``ACORN Did Nothing Wrong,'' is another headline.
``All You Need to Know About the ACORN Scandal and Who is Behind
It.''
Who was behind it? A young man named James O'Keefe, who was found
guilty of a Federal crime.
[From NY Times.Com., Dec. 11, 2009]
House Ban on Acorn Grants Is Ruled Unconstitutional
(By Janie Lorber)
Washington.--The federal government must continue to
provide grant money to the national community organizing
group Acorn, a federal court ruled Friday, saying that the
House violated the Constitution when it passed a resolution
barring the group from receiving federal dollars.
A judge at the United States District Court in Brooklyn
issued a preliminary injunction that nullifies the resolution
and requires the government to honor existing contracts with
the group and review its applications for new grants unless
the Obama administration appeals the decision.
The court ruled that the resolution amounted to a ``bill of
attainder,'' a legislative determination of guilt without
trial, because it specifically punishes one group.
That provision plays a crucial, but rarely necessary, role
in maintaining the balance of powers, said Eric M. Freedman,
a professor of constitutional law at Hofstra Law School. ``It
says that the Congress may not act as judge, jury and
executioner. That is precisely what the Congress sought to do
in this case, and the district court was entirely right to
enjoin it.''
In the opinion, Judge Nina Gershon wrote of Acorn, ``They
have been singled out by Congress for punishment that
directly and immediately affects their ability to continue to
obtain federal funding, in the absence of any judicial, or
even administrative, process adjudicating guilt.''
The Justice Department said it was still reviewing the
ruling Friday night.
Judge Gershon's opinion made a point of separating the
court's ruling from the controversy surrounding Acorn, which
is short for Association of Community Organizations for
Reform Now.
The House acted after the organization came under fire for
a series of embarrassing scandals, most notably the
disclosure by conservative activists of videotape showing
Acorn counselors giving mortgage advice to people posing as a
pimp and a prostitute interested in setting up a brothel.
Even before that, Republicans attacked the group, accusing it
of voter registration fraud in 2008.
Jules Lobel, a lawyer at the Center for Constitutional
Rights, which brought the suit on behalf of Acorn, said the
resolution was the first time Congress had ever singled out
one group for punishment. ``Whenever you challenge a statute
of Congress, it's always a significant political battle,''
Mr. Lobel said.
The chief executive of Acorn, Bertha Lewis, issued a
statement calling the ruling a victory for the group and
``the citizens who work through Acorn to improve their
communities and promote responsible lending and
homeownership.''
In a lawsuit filed last month, Acorn that it was penalized
by Congress ``without an investigation'' and had been forced
to cut programs that counsel struggling homeowners and to lay
off workers.
____
[From The Two-Way--NPR's News Blog, Dec. 7, 2009]
(ACORN Workers Cleared of Illegality by Outside Probe)
(By Frank James)
ACORN, the community organizing group which found itself
embroiled in the latest of several controversies after some
of its workers were recorded providing advice to a couple
posing as a pimp and prostitute, was cleared of illegality in
the matter by the former Massachusetts attorney general.
But Scott Harshbarger, the lawyer ACORN hired to conduct a
review, criticized the organization for bad management which
it said contributed to the ACORN's problems. A major problem,
he said, was that the organization grew too quickly,
neglecting training of its workers and other essentials.
An excerpt of Harshbarger's report:
The serious management challenges detailed in our report
are the fault of ACORN's founder and a cadre of leaders who,
in their drive for growth, failed to commit the organization
to the basic, appropriate standards of governance and
accountability. As a result, ACORN not only fell short of
living its principles but also left itself vulnerable to
public embarrassment. This hidden camera controversy is an
apt example.
While some of the advice and counsel given by ACORN
employees and volunteers was clearly inappropriate and
unprofessional, we did not find a pattern of intentional,
illegal conduct by ACORN staff; in fact, there is no evidence
that action, illegal or otherwise, was taken by any ACORN
employee on behalf of the videographers. Instead, the videos
represent the byproduct of ACORN's longstanding management
weaknesses, including a lack of training, a lack of
procedures, and a lack of on-site supervision.
Harshbarger provided ACORN with nine recommendations:
1. ACORN should return its organizational focus to its core
competency-- community organizing and citizen engagement
empowerment, with related services--and transition away from
the provision of services that may be provided more
effectively and efficiently by others.
2. ACORN should consolidate, simplify and centralize its
local and national organizational staffing, monitoring and
supervision.
3. ACORN should develop a simplified national organization
and board structure consisting of just two entities--a
501(c)(3) for charitable, non-profit fundraising, advocacy
and education with a majority of independent members, and a
501(c)(4) for support of ACORN community organization and
political activity, with at least one-third independent
members.
4. ACORN should continue to implement the comprehensive
internal governance program and strategy, including internal
controls, compliance and codes of ethics, designed to educate
and guide staff, volunteers and board members, that was
recommended and has been adopted within the past year.
5. ACORN should recruit an independent ethics officer and/
or independent inspector general to oversee and implement the
governance and compliance program at the national level, and
an independent member of the national board should chair a
board-level ethics and governance committee.
6. ACORN should hire an appropriately qualified and
experienced chief operating and financial officer,
comptroller and in-house auditing staff.
7. ACORN should continue to strengthen its legal capacity
to guide its governance reforms, coordinate the dissolution
of all extraneous ACORN organizations and represent the
organization's interests in litigation and investigations.
[[Page H3950]]
8. ACORN should require all of its state and local
affiliates to agree to oversight by the national staff and
board, and to adhere to appropriate national standards,
including financial audits, training and supervision.
9. ACORN should formalize a strong, independent national
advisory group and charge it with the responsibility to
report within six months, and thereafter annually for two
years, to the national board on the progress of the reform
action plan.
After the videos by a conservative videographer went viral
on the Internet, Congress passed legislation to prevent ACORN
from receiving federal funding. ACORN is suing the federal
government on the grounds that the legislation is an
unconstitutional ``bill of attainder'' since it targets for
punishment an individual group. ACORN fired some of the
workers caught on video.
ACORN welcomed the report as an important step in its
redemption. In a statement, ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis is quoted
as saying:
``The report is part vindication, part constructive
criticism and 100% roadmap to the future,'' ACORN CEO Bertha
Lewis said.
``ACORN's leadership is pleased that this evaluation shows
even the low-level employees portrayed in the videos did not
engage in any illegal activity or seek to encourage it,''
Lewis continued. ``Mr. Harshbarger was tough but fair in
examining where ACORN has been and what we still need to
accomplish in having the most effective possible organization
to represent the interests of the communities we represent--
low and moderate income, African American and Latino families
across America.''
It's unlikely the Harshbarger report will silence the
group's conservative critics, however.
____
[From the NJ.com, June 15, 2010]
ACORN Did Nothing Wrong. So Says the Congressional Watchdog Office
(By John D. Atlas/NJ Voices)
On Monday, June 14, a preliminary probe by the U.S.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) of ACORN has found no
evidence the association or related organizations mishandled
the $40 million in federal money they received in recent
years.
A review of grants by nine federal agencies found no
problems with ACORN's grants. In my book Seeds of Change I
document how ACORN, the largest most successful national
anti-poverty organization in America, was forced to close its
door.
The GAO interviewed and obtained documentation from grant
program managers and staff from nine agencies; NeighborWorks,
the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), the Corporation for
Public Broadcasting (CPB), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the Department of the Treasury (Treasury), and
the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), Department of
Homeland Security and (DHS), the Department of Justice (DOJ),
and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Most of the grants were for housing-related purposes during
fiscal years 2005 through 2009.
The GAO, an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for
Congress, is often called the ``congressional watchdog.'' It
investigates how the federal government spends taxpayer
dollars. Nearly two dozen members of Congress requested an
investigation after a series of complaints against ACORN and
its affiliates. The complaints included an embezzlement
matter, several cases of voter registration fraud, and the
release of edited and misleading videotapes, secretly made by
conservative activists that appeared to implicate ACORN
workers in several offices facilitating prostitution. In fact
the staff in most of ACORN's offices turned the pair away,
reported the couple to the police, refused to provide them
any aid, and in one case tried to convince the phony
prostitute to get counseling. In no ACORN office did
employees file any paperwork or do anything illegal on the
duo's behalf.
But Fox News broadcasted the deceptive tapes nearly around
the clock for several days defaming ACORN.
While Republicans in Congress, who for years had accused
ACORN of corruption, used the phony tapes to lead an effort
to successfully strip the group of federal funding in 2009.
Months later the group was exonerated from any wrongdoing by
every official and independent investigation.
After the broadcast of the videotapes on Fox and CNN, the
New York Times and Washington Post inaccurately reported that
the ACORN workers in several offices facilitated
prostitution. The papers also reported that O'Keefe was
dressed up in a cartoonish pimp garb when he entered the
ACORN offices, when he actually wore a dress shirt and slacks
and identified himself as a student or friend of the young
woman who posed as a prostitute. As a result of the
conservative's smear campaign and the media's erroneous
reporting of the smears as true, the U. S. Congress defunded
ACORN, which led to many of its funders and allies to
withdraw their support.
An independent investigation by the Brooklyn District
Attorney's office and the Attorney General of California
vindicated ACORN of any wrongdoing. A federal judge ruled
that the law barring the group's receipt of federal funds was
unconstitutional. Although Acorn had internal problems, it
has never been convicted of wrongdoing. I capture the story
of this incident as well as the history of ACORN, in my new
book, Seeds of Change, The Story of ACORN, America's most
controversial anti-poverty community organizing group. What
happened to Acorn is one of the most bizarre incidents in
recent history.
One of the activists, James O'Keefe recently pleaded guilty
to charges of entering federal property under false pretenses
when he attempted to embarrass Senator Mary Landrieu because
of her support for national health care legislation. Acorn
has never been convicted of a crime. But the right wing
activist trying to entrap Acorn into committing an unlawful
act, becomes a criminal.
____
[From the Huffingtonpost.com, Oct. 22, 2009]
All You Need to Know About the ACORN Scandal and Who Is Behind It
(By Mike Stark)
Andrew Breitbart says he cares a lot about the truth, but
it appears that's only true when he isn't the one being
questioned.
You remember Breitbart as Matt Drudge's junior partner, the
proprietor of BigGovernment.com, and, apparently, babysitter
for juvenile delinquents James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles, the
conservative, hidden-camera-wielding duo that went undercover
to obtain footage of low-level ACORN staffers.
They continued their media assault yesterday at the
National Press Club. With assists from Republican Congressmen
Steve King and Thad McCotter, Fox News and the aforementioned
Andrew Breitbart, O'Keefe and Giles unleashed their most
recent attack.
Let's review their story:
O'Keefe, dressed as a pimp, and Giles, disguised as a
prostitute, visited ACORN offices where they asked for
assistance purchasing a home. They claimed to have difficulty
documenting income derived from the streets. But they had so
much money! In fact, it wasn't just the two of them--they had
a whole crew of underage girls from El Salvador turning
tricks for them. Hell, they had so much money, they needed
help laundering it for the pimp's run for Congress.
Now let's tell the truth.
The truth is that O'Keefe never wore the pimp outfit into
an ACORN office. Instead, he posed as a candidate for
Congress that wanted to help a young woman caught in the
trappings of prostitution. Supposedly, he wanted to help her,
and her fellow prostitutes, escape the clutches of a brutal
pimp by finding a place for them to live.
Look, the ACORN personnel aren't blameless. Some did and
said some pretty stupid things and deserved to be fired. But
the world in which they work is vastly different from the
world most readers of this blog post recognize. CNN,
Desperate Housewives, even The Wire aren't going to begin to
convey the social chaos that defines the neighborhoods ACORN
often serves.
Breitbart and his crew would have you believe that the
ACORN staffers should have called the police when confronted
with a prostitute.
I hope the staffers, at first, were celebrating. It's not
often you see a prostitute assert control over her life and
try to break free from a pimp. The idea that this one was
trying to take a whole crew of vulnerable underage women with
her must have been amazing!
In the first video below, Breitbart asks me if I'm
disturbed by what I saw in the videos.
If he had let me answer, I would have told him that I
perceive ACORN's mission to be helping the underserved. That
I don't understand how helping women out of sexual slavery is
something that deserves to be condemned. That what I'm
disturbed by is the behavior being demonstrated by those up
on the stage that would demonize people trying to make a real
difference in people's lives.
In the end, I think I ruined their little press conference.
Evidently, it hadn't occurred to them that they might face
serious scrutiny. Why, for example, does O'Keefe dress up in
the ridiculous pimp garb for the bumpers of the video when he
didn't wear that costume into the ACORN offices? Why is
Breitbart attaching his name and credibility to someone that
was kicked out of his Rutgers dorm for refusing to cease his
use of racial slurs? Exactly why would Breitbart expect an
ACORN staffer to call the police on a Congressional candidate
trying to rescue a young prostitute from her vicious pimp?
Finally, in the second video, we learn all we need to know
After hiding behind the lawsuit and using it as a shield to
deflect questions they did not want to answer, they refuse to
commit to releasing every full and unedited tape they have in
exchange for ACORN dropping all of its lawsuits.
If they really wanted the truth out there, why do they need
to edit these tapes in the first place? Why aren't the
unedited videos already in the public domain?
UPDATE: I've been questioned regarding my sourcing for the
claim that O'Keefe was kicked out of his Rutgers dorm for
frequently using racial slurs.
After checking with my sources, neither of which were James
O'Keefe or any of his public comments, writings or other
communication regarding the matter, I do not feel compelled
to change anything about my post.
You may believe I should have informed my readers that Mr.
O'Keefe denies the allegations, but frankly, as a matter of
my own personal judgment, Mr. O'Keefe is not credible. As
such, it would be irresponsible for me to report what I
consider to be O'Keefe's prevarications. in the business of
reporting
[[Page H3951]]
the truth as best as I know it. ``Balancing'' the truth with
lies is not a practice I subscribe to.
____
[From Nola.com, May 25, 2011]
James O'Keefe Denied Permission to Travel Outside New Jersey
(By The Associated Press)
A federal magistrate in New Orleans has refused to let
conservative activist James O'Keefe make several trips
outside New Jersey while he's on probation for a case in
which he was accused of trying to tamper with the phones in
Sen. Mary Landrieu's office.
Last week, O'Keefe asked for permission from Magistrate
Daniel Knowles III to attend a conference in Washington,
travel to Charleston, S.C., and Baltimore for paid speeches
and make several personal trips to Maryland.
Knowles, who denied that request Monday without
explanation, had approved several previous requests by
O'Keefe to travel outside New Jersey. O'Keefe's attorney,
Michael Madigan, said in court papers that prosecutors and
his client's probation officer didn't object to his latest
request.
On Tuesday, Madigan said he hadn't seen Monday's order.
``All his prior travel had been approved,'' Madigan said.
``Obviously, the young man needs to travel to make a
living.''
O'Keefe and three others pleaded guilty last year to
misdemeanor charges of entering federal property under false
pretenses.
The FBI has said O'Keefe used his cell phone to try to
capture video of two others who posed as telephone repairmen
and asked to see the phones at Landrieu's office. O'Keefe has
said the group was trying to investigate complaints that
constituents calling Landrieu's office couldn't get through
to criticize the Democrat's support of a health care reform
bill.
O'Keefe is famous for wearing a pimp costume in a video
that embarrassed the community organizing group ACORN.
Knowles sentenced him last May to three years of probation,
100 hours of community service and a $1,500 fine.
____
[From Scoop.co.nz, June 2, 2011]
Federal Judge Denies First Amendment in ACORN Worker Lawsuit
(By Brad Friedman)
Rightwing activists and propagandists James O'Keefe and
Hannah Giles, employees of con-artist and propagandist Andrew
Breitbart, may not use the First Amendment as an excuse for
breaking the law in California, according to a federal
judge's ruling this week.
Judge M. James Lorenz rejected the defendants' argument and
motion for summary judgment in federal court, as part of the
civil lawsuit filed against them by former San Diego ACORN
worker Juan Carlos Vera.
Giles had previously thrown O'Keefe under a bus by arguing
that she should not be held accountable at all for violating
California's Invasion of Privacy Act [CA Penal Code
Sec. 632], since he, not she, was actually wearing the hidden
video camera used to secretly tape their conversations with
Vera, even after they had asked if their meeting would be
kept confidential.
For his part, O'Keefe, a convicted federal criminal, argued
that he was allowed to violate the law because the U.S.
Constitution's First Amendment protected him as a
``journalist''. The judge ruled against the defendants on all
points . . .
According to Maria Dinzeo of Courthouse News Service:
Juan Carlos Vera claimed James O'Keefe III and Hannah Giles
visited his office in August 2009, and conspired to create
video and audio tapes of him, even after asking him if their
conversation would be confidential.
[Lorenz ruled] that the law ``is directed to the
surreptitious recording of confidential communications and
not the manner or method of recording the conversation.''
Given the meaning of the word ``record,'' Lorenz found Giles
equally responsible.
Lorenz also rejected O'Keefe's motion for judgment on the
pleadings, in which he argued that First Amendment
protections for journalists supersede the California Privacy
Act. Since there was a mutual understanding that the
conversation was confidential, Lorenz found that the privacy
law ``is not an overbroad intrusion on expose newsgathering
in which O'Keefe participates.''
``Expose newsgathering'' is not what O'Keefe traffics in,
as demonstrated again most recently by, ironically enough,
the ``news'' website of Fox ``News'' host Glenn Beck after a
similarly deceptive and secretly video taped smear of an NPR
employee by O'Keefe last March.
But O'Keefe's long track record of deceptive video hit-jobs
was not at issue in this particular legal argument.
In his ruling [PDF], Judge Lorenz highlighted specific
portions of the CA law which is violated by ``Every person
who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to
a confidential communication, by means of any electronic
amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records
the confidential communication.''
The ruling goes on to further cite the statute which reads
``The term `confidential communication' includes any
communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably
indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be
confined to the parties thereto.''
``California's law is quite clear,'' Lorenz wrote in
response to the First Amendment arguments by O'Keefe and
Giles, ``that persons who engage in news gathering are not
permitted to violate criminal laws in the process.''
O'Keefe and Giles were sued by Vera last summer, after an
investigation by California's Attorney General found that the
pair had likely violated the CA Privacy Act by secretly
taping workers at ACORN. The duo were spared criminal charges
for violation of the same law after bargaining for immunity
in exchange for finally providing law enforcement with the
unedited videos of their secretly taped meetings with ACORN
employees.
After examining the unedited video tapes, the CA AG echoed
all other independent investigations of the tapes published
by Breitbart, to determine that they had been ``severely
edited'' to present a false portrait of ACORN and of the
meetings with workers there.
The AG found the CA ACORN workers ``committed no violation
of criminal law.'' Previously, a New York District Attorney
investigation also found ``no criminality'' in the ``highly
edited'' video tapes of ACORN workers there.
Similarly findings were also offered by a former
Massachusetts attorney general and an investigation by the
Congressional Research Service.
Vera, however, and other ACORN employees across the
country, were fired by the organization shortly after
Breitbart's publication of the falsely edited video tapes on
his Rightwing political websites.
No employees of ACORN have been charged with any crimes in
relation to the O'Keefe/Giles/Breitbart hit-jobs carried out
during the summer of 2009 in which Breitbart and O'Keefe had
purported to the media that he had played a pimp during
meetings with ACORN to Giles, who was dressed as a prostitute
during those encounters. In fact, ACORN workers had been told
that O'Keefe, playing her conservatively dressed boyfriend,
was hoping to rescue Giles from an abusive pimp who had been
threatening her life and stealing her money. (One of the
videos was deceptively edited to make it appear that ACORN
workers had told Giles to bury her money in the backyard, so
the government couldn't get at it for tax purposes. In fact,
as the actual transcripts revealed, the worker was advising
her on how to keep the abusive pimp from stealing it from
her. Giles blatantly lied about that point on Fox ``News.'')
Their hoax was successful, however, resulting in the loss
of federal funding for ACORN which led to a loss of private
donations, eventually forcing the four-decade-old community
organization to close its doors.
ACORN had long been targeted by Rightwingers due largely to
their years-long success in legally registering millions of
legal low- and middle-income citizens to vote. Most such
voters tend to vote for Democrats.
Despite persistent, yet evidence-free, claims by the Right
over many years that ACORN participated in ``voter fraud,''
there is no known evidence of even a single fraudulent vote
ever having been cast in any election due to an improper
registration by any ACORN worker.
The BRAD BLOG spent a fair portion of 2010 demonstrating to
the New York Times and other media outlets that they had
repeatedly misreported the story of the hoax carried out by
O'Keefe, Giles and Breitbart. In fact, O'Keefe neither
dressed as a ``pimp'' nor represented himself as one in the
secretly-taped meetings with ACORN workers, even as he
famously lied to the public and media about having done so.
Following our numerous exposes, the NY Times was eventually
forced to issue corrections for some of their reporting after
their Public Editor admitted both he and the paper had been
``wrong'' about O'Keefe's version of the story which they had
reported uncritically.
In addition to the civil lawsuit O'Keefe and Giles are
facing in San Diego, O'Keefe's high-powered Republican
attorneys were able to obtain a plea deal for him in another
case, in which felony counts were lowered to misdemeanor
charges in exchange for his guilty plea.
That case involved a scam similar to the one carried out
against ACORN. O'Keefe and his fellow conspirators were
caught secretly taping federal employees at the New Orleans
office of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) after entering the
property under false pretenses and attempting to access her
phone system.
For his part, admitted liar Breitbart is busy defending
himself against a lawsuit brought by former USDA official
Shirley Sherrod. She was fired after Breitbart published yet
another deceptively edited video, purporting to serve as
evidence that the African-American Sherrod was discriminating
against white farmers in her role as a federal worker.
The unedited version of the tape demonstrated that Sherrod
had been doing the complete opposite of what Breitbart
attempted to illustrate her as doing.
Though an apology was quickly issued to Sherrod by the
White House, they have never apologized for having defunded
ACORN under the fraudulent pretenses knowingly presented to
the public by O'Keefe, Giles and Breitbart.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Amendment Offered by Ms. Eshoo
Ms. ESHOO. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
[[Page H3952]]
The CHAIR. The Clerk will report the amendment.
The Clerk read as follows:
At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the
following:
Sec. __. None of the funds made available in this Act may
be used to enter into a contract with a corporation or other
business entity that does not disclose its political
expenditures.
Mr. CARTER. Mr. Chairman, I reserve a point of order on the
gentlewoman's amendment.
The CHAIR. The gentleman reserves a point of order.
The gentlewoman from California is recognized for 5 minutes in
support of her amendment.
Ms. ESHOO. I thank the Chairman.
Mr. Chairman, I rise today to speak about what I think is a very,
very important undertaking. It deals with our democratic system and
what works against it.
My amendment would require that anyone that receives an
appropriation, a contract, doing business with the Federal Government
produce full disclosure relative to political expenditures.
I raised this because I think there is a dark corner of our system
that is not being addressed, and it is an issue that is as much about
deficit reduction as it is about our democracy. We know that there are
political expenditures that are made. Some are disclosed; some aren't.
I think it's important to state that I think, I really believe, that
this could have been a bipartisan agreement. It's important to remember
that our Republican colleagues were for disclosure before they were
against it.
In 2000, Senator Mitch McConnell asked, ``Why would a little
disclosure be better than a lot of disclosure?''
In 2007, on Meet the Press, Speaker John Boehner said, we need ``full
disclosure of all the money that we raise and how it's spent. And I
think sunlight is the best disinfectant.''
I agree with what the Speaker said in 2007, but since then our
colleagues have changed their minds. Not a single Republican voted for
the DISCLOSE Act. And when I offered an amendment similar to this one
in February, it wasn't even allowed to be brought up for a vote. Since
then, Republicans have gone on high alert at the news that the
President is considering an Executive order to create the same kind of
disclosure they used to favor.
{time} 1700
I know that the National Chamber of Commerce has weighed in, and
they've raised First Amendment. I'm really interested in this new
effort and interest of the National Chamber of Commerce, and I hope
they'll come to my office and talk to me about forming a coalition on
First Amendment rights. This is not about that. This is not about that,
and no one can say that with a straight face.
My constituents are very smart; they can think for themselves. But
even the smartest people can't make a decision without critical
information, and today's broken system leaves millions of Americans in
the dark. They don't know who's paying for what; they don't know who is
being paid to say what because there is not disclosure at the Federal
level.
So this levels this out. It very simply says that we're on the side
of taxpayers, that we are going to make sure that whether it's
procurement or contracts or appropriations, that we want to be on the
side of the taxpayer, on the side of the taxpayer having full
disclosure so that they not only know who's doing business with the
Federal Government, but where these tax dollars are going.
There's a requirement at the SEC, Mr. Chairman, where boards of
directors, who essentially are the congress of a corporation, must
disclose their financial interests. Why? So that shareholders know.
Well, guess who the shareholders are in the country? The taxpayers, the
citizens. This is in many ways a backdoor earmark, and we need to get
rid of it.
So I hope that this will be made in order. And I also think that this
is a very important effort for full disclosure at the Federal level,
whoever does business with the Federal Government, that they disclose.
It's a fair requirement, it's a simple requirement, and I think it's
something we should all agree on: disclosure, disclosure, disclosure.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Point of Order
Mr. CARTER. Mr. Chairman, I insist on my point of order.
The CHAIR. The gentleman will state his point of order.
Mr. CARTER. Mr. Chairman, I make a point of order against the
amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes
legislation in an appropriation bill and therefore violates clause 2 of
rule XXI.
The rule states, in pertinent part: An amendment to a general
appropriations bill shall not be in order if changing existing law and
it requires a new determination.
I ask for a ruling from the Chair.
The CHAIR. Does any Member seek to speak on the point of order? If
not, the Chair is prepared to rule.
The Chair finds that this amendment includes language requiring a new
determination of whether a corporation discloses certain contributions.
The amendment, therefore, constitutes legislation in violation of
clause 2 of rule XXI.
The point of order is sustained and the amendment is not in order.
Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word.
The CHAIR. The gentleman from New Jersey is recognized for 5 minutes.
(Mr. ANDREWS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his
remarks.)
Mr. ANDREWS. Mr. Chairman, I believe this bill would be improved by
an amendment similar to that which Ms. Eshoo just offered, and here's
why. Justice Brandeis said sunlight is the great antiseptic of
democracy, and we have followed his teaching to a great extent in
conducting our democracy.
Mr. Chairman, you and I and every other Member on this floor must
disclose every dollar we raise and every dollar we spend in the pursuit
of our politics, so must the National Republican Campaign Committee, so
must the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, so must people
running for the United States Senate and for the Office of Presidency.
And I think our democracy is strengthened by this.
Now, we have a disagreement over whether there should be limitations
on what people may spend. I, frankly, believe that limitations are
appropriate, but I know that some of our colleagues who follow the
libertarian principle believe that limitations on what someone may
spend is a violation of someone's right of free speech. I respectfully
disagree, but I understand it. There should be no disagreement, though,
over a universal requirement to disclose who has spent what.
If you're proud of what you say, then you ought to let people know
who it was that said it. But instead we have, as my friend from
California said, a dark corner of American politics where people who
wish to manipulate the outcome of elections and influence legislation
have a special privilege that Republicans and Democrats in this House
do not have, that Members of the Senate do not have, that the
Presidential candidates do not have. They can say what they want to say
but not say who they are. They can hide behind corporate veils and
within corporate shadows to fail to disclose who they are. Now, I find
this to be puzzling.
I think the Members of this House are proud of what we say. I think
the Members of this House want the public to know whom we support and
whom we oppose because we believe in what we say. Who are these people
who want to spend hundreds of millions, maybe billions, of dollars to
influence elections but are afraid the public will find out who they
are? And why should they enjoy this special privilege?
So I think we do need an amendment like that that Ms. Eshoo put
forward that says that if you want the privilege of doing business with
the United States Government, then one of the conditions is to
participate in a healthy democracy that runs that United States
Government. And that healthy democracy would include a requirement that
people winning business with our government meet the same level of
disclosure that every single one of us does.
I'm proud of the things that my party and my friends say on the
floor; and I'm, frankly, proud of what our adversaries say on the floor
because they believe in good faith that what they say is right for the
country. And they
[[Page H3953]]
don't hide a thing--maybe the public thinks we should hide sometimes
when we say the things we do, but we don't hide a thing. Why should
there be a special class of Americans who have the prerogative of free
speech, but not the obligation to identify themselves when they speak?
This is an insipid, insidious threat to the free exchange of ideas.
We should use every tool within our constitutional purview to stop this
threat. I think Ms. Eshoo has a great idea, and I hope that under a
truly open rule the day will come when we can consider her idea.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, proceedings will now
resume on those amendments on which further proceedings were postponed,
in the following order:
An amendment by Mr. Scalise of Louisiana.
An amendment by Mr. King of Iowa.
An amendment by Mr. Cravaack of Minnesota.
Amendment No. 1 by Mr. Amash of Michigan.
Amendment No. 2 by Mr. Amash of Michigan.
Amendment No. 3 by Mr. Amash of Michigan.
Amendment No. 1 by Mr. Rokita of Indiana.
Amendment No. 2 by Mr. Rokita of Indiana.
Amendment No. 42 by Mr. Cole of Oklahoma.
An amendment by Mr. Gohmert of Texas.
An amendment by Mr. Mica of Florida.
Amendment No. 23 by Mr. Polis of Colorado.
The Chair will reduce to 2 minutes the time for any electronic vote
after the first vote in this series.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Scalise
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Scalise)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the ayes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 207,
noes 213, not voting 12, as follows:
[Roll No. 396]
AYES--207
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Amash
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Landry
Latham
Latta
Lewis (CA)
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Marchant
Marino
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reed
Rehberg
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ross (FL)
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Walberg
Walden
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOES--213
Ackerman
Altmire
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Chandler
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Grimm
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
King (NY)
Kissell
Kucinich
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
LaTourette
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McCotter
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McKinley
McNerney
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Petri
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reichert
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schmidt
Schock
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walsh (IL)
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Whitfield
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (AK)
NOT VOTING--12
Castor (FL)
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Johnson (GA)
Lankford
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
{time} 1735
Messrs. SIRES, CARNEY, ROSKAM, HOLT, FATTAH, TURNER and PETRI changed
their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
(By unanimous consent, Mr. Bishop of Utah was allowed to speak out of
order.)
Farewell to the Pages
Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Fellow Members of the House, if you would turn
your attention to the back rail there, you will see the pages who have
served us for this past semester.
Thank you. You are supposed to applaud after I speak.
These are the kids who still get up in the middle of the night--at
times which I thought was only a rumor--so they can go to an accredited
high school in the Library of Congress and complete a full day of
studies before they are here at 10 o'clock to serve us.
They have learned the process of government by watching us, which is
a scary thought, but in the process of doing that, they have gained a
healthy respect for our system, and they have learned lessons that they
will take with them and made friendships they will take with them
through the rest of their lives, and they have served this body well.
Mr. Chairman, I yield to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Kildee).
Mr. KILDEE. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, I would like to take this opportunity to express my
personal gratitude to all of the pages for
[[Page H3954]]
what they have done to serve this House of Representatives.
These groups of young people who come from all across the Nation
represent what is good about our country. To become a page, Mr.
Chairman, these young people have proven themselves to be academically
qualified. They have ventured away from the security of their homes and
families to spend time in an unfamiliar city. Through this experience,
they have witnessed a new culture, made new friends and learned the
details of how our government operates.
As we all know the job of congressional page is not an easy one.
Along with being away from home, the pages must possess the maturity to
balance competing demands for their time and their energy. In addition,
they must have the dedication to work long hours and the ability to
interact with people at a personal level. At the same time they face a
challenging academic schedule of classes in the House page school.
The pages have witnessed the House debate issues of war and peace,
hunger and poverty, justice and civil rights. You have lived through
history. You have seen Congress at moments of greatness, and you have
seen Congress with its frailties. You have witnessed the workings of an
institution that has endured well over 200 years.
No one has seen Congress and Members of Congress as close up as have
you, and I am sure that you will consider your time spent in
Washington, D.C., to be one of the most valuable and exciting
experiences of your lives. With this experience, you will all move
ahead to lead successful and productive lives.
I would like to thank the members of the House Page Board, who
provide such a service to this body: Congressman Rob Bishop, not only a
member of the board but a dear friend; Diana DeGette, also a very good
friend; and my good friend on the other side of the aisle, Virginia
Foxx.
I don't think we have ever had a disagreement in the page board. We
reach unanimity there.
{time} 1740
I also thank the Clerk of the House, Karen Haas; the Sergeant at
Arms, Bill Livingood; and Ms. Lynn Silversmith Klein. I want to thank
them for their service on the House Page Board. And I thank all our
departing pages.
spring 2011 page class
Daniel Ryan Ackerman, MI
Aram Ambartsumyan, WA
Dina Asfaha, CA
Thomas B. Ashe, MA
Jihad Barnes, PA
Ryan Andrew Beeson, NC
Eliana Marie Bencosme, MA
Annabelle Boyd, IL
Erin Brewer, TX
Michael S. Brinkley, GA
Emily M. Bull, PA
Ashley Burke, VA
Edgar Byrum Davis Camacho, II, TX
Olivia Campbell, CA
Wesley Lanier Colston, GA
D'ymond Shanty'l Dantzler, MD
Stephen Delahunt, WI
Timothy Desmarais, RI
Anna Dietderich, WA
William Powell Eddins, NC
Jeremy-Clay Fauchier, CA
Brad Fingeroot, MI
Maria G. Garcia, CA
Christopher W. Gardner, CA
Kari Ellen Gibson, IL
Therese Gildea, CT
Julian Alexander Gilyard, NC
Micah C. Goodman, NC
Neshaun Grady, IN
Lauren Harper, OH
Branden Haynes, VA
Sophia Hoog, SC
P.K. Isacs, CT
Aminata Jamina, MA
Stella Joh, CA
Alia Khan, IL
Anna Mather, WA
Giovana Meza, CA
Thomas McKee, NC
Andrew Robert Mumford, MI
Alexander Murphy, NY
Nicholas Jacob Ensign Murphy, NY
Frances Diane Murray, WY
Imani Nicole Phillips, CT
Dante Michael Procopio, RI
Brendan Coltrane Browner
Pulsford, KY
Natalie Queally, CA
Kiwanda Robinson, MD
Molly Rose, IL
Shayna Saliman, CA
Jack Sanders, IA
Sarah Suchower, WA
Shayna Talbott, FL
Adriana Threlkeld, CA
Daisy Torres, CA
Julie Towbin, FL
Amanda Trosen, MO
Allie Vreeman, MN
Ervis Vukaj, CT
Kel Walters, TX
Scott Weber, OH
Avery Weisel, NC
Conor Winters, NC
Allison Zwierlein, CA
Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Reclaiming my time, I would like to yield to the
gentlewoman from North Carolina, who is also a member of the Page
Board.
Ms. FOXX. Mr. Chairman, I simply want to add my congratulations to
the pages and my great thanks to them for their service to us. They
really do a tremendous amount to help this House work effectively. And
I also want to say a thank you to the page coordinators, Ms. Keating
and Ms. Sampson who are with them, who help facilitate their activities
here. They also do a tremendous job and work long hours. And I'm very
grateful to them.
Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Mr. Chairman, once again, we thank the pages who
will be having their graduation ceremony tomorrow and then leaving us.
We wish you very well on your further endeavors. Thank you very much.
Amendment Offered by Mr. King of Iowa
The CHAIR. Without objection, 2-minute voting will continue.
There was no objection.
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. King) on which
further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes prevailed by
voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 251,
noes 168, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 12, as follows:
[Roll No. 397]
AYES--251
Adams
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bartlett
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chandler
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Hochul
Holden
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kissell
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lewis (CA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Peters
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOES--168
Ackerman
Aderholt
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
[[Page H3955]]
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Courtney
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Edwards
Engel
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Gosar
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Simpson
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
ANSWERED ``PRESENT''--1
Amash
NOT VOTING--12
Barton (TX)
Chaffetz
Ellison
Eshoo
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
{time} 1747
Mr. HIGGINS changed his vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated against:
Ms. ESHOO. Mr. Chair, on rollcall No. 397, had I been present, I
would have voted ``no.''
Mr. ELLISON. Mr. Chair, on rollcall No. 397 I put my card in the
slot, but didn't check whether my vote registered. It so happens that
the vote was not recorded. Had I been present, I would have voted
``no.''
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR. The Chair wishes to remind Members this is a series of 2-
minute votes.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Cravaack
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Cravaack)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the ayes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 289,
noes 131, not voting 12, as follows:
[Roll No. 398]
AYES--289
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Amash
Austria
Baca
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Berkley
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boswell
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Capito
Carnahan
Carney
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chandler
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Connolly (VA)
Cooper
Costello
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Critz
Cuellar
Culberson
Davis (KY)
DeFazio
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Heinrich
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Hochul
Holden
Hoyer
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Israel
Issa
Jackson Lee (TX)
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kissell
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lewis (CA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Long
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Mack
Marchant
Marino
Markey
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
Meehan
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, Gary
Moran
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Price (NC)
Quayle
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Richardson
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (WI)
Sarbanes
Scalise
Schiff
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Van Hollen
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Wu
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOES--131
Ackerman
Andrews
Baldwin
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Conyers
Costa
Courtney
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Holt
Honda
Inslee
Jackson (IL)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kildee
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lujan
Maloney
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
Meeks
Moore
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richmond
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Schakowsky
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sires
Slaughter
Speier
Stark
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Yarmuth
NOT VOTING--12
Canseco
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Miller, George
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Sutton
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in this
vote.
{time} 1750
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Amash
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 1 offered by the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Amash)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 127,
noes 295, not voting 10, as follows:
[[Page H3956]]
[Roll No. 399]
AYES--127
Adams
Amash
Baldwin
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Benishek
Bishop (UT)
Black
Broun (GA)
Buerkle
Burgess
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cardoza
Cassidy
Chabot
Chu
Coble
Coffman (CO)
DesJarlais
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Farenthold
Filner
Fincher
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Gardner
Garrett
Gibbs
Gibson
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Graves (GA)
Griffith (VA)
Grijalva
Guinta
Guthrie
Gutierrez
Hall
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Heck
Herrera Beutler
Holt
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Johnson (IL)
Jones
Jordan
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kucinich
Labrador
Lamborn
Landry
Lankford
Lee (CA)
Mack
Marchant
McCaul
McClintock
McGovern
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Miller, George
Mulvaney
Nunnelee
Pallone
Pastor (AZ)
Paul
Payne
Pearce
Petri
Pingree (ME)
Poe (TX)
Polis
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reichert
Ribble
Rigell
Roe (TN)
Rooney
Roskam
Roybal-Allard
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Speier
Stearns
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Tipton
Tonko
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walsh (IL)
Webster
Wilson (SC)
Wu
Young (AK)
NOES--295
Ackerman
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Andrews
Austria
Baca
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Bass (NH)
Becerra
Berg
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boswell
Boustany
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Braley (IA)
Brooks
Brown (FL)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Carter
Castor (FL)
Chandler
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Cole
Conaway
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Davis (KY)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Denham
Dent
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Dreier
Edwards
Ellison
Ellmers
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flores
Foxx
Frank (MA)
Franks (AZ)
Fudge
Gallegly
Garamendi
Gerlach
Gingrey (GA)
Gonzalez
Granger
Graves (MO)
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Grimm
Hanabusa
Hanna
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heinrich
Hensarling
Herger
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hochul
Holden
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Jenkins
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly
Kildee
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kissell
Kline
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Long
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lujan
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Maloney
Marino
Markey
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (CA)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McCotter
McDermott
McHenry
McIntyre
McKinley
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Olson
Olver
Owens
Palazzo
Pascrell
Paulsen
Pelosi
Pence
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pitts
Platts
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Rehberg
Renacci
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rivera
Roby
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Rothman (NJ)
Royce
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schilling
Schock
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sessions
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Stark
Stivers
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tierney
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walden
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (FL)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Woolsey
Yarmuth
Yoder
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOT VOTING--10
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Hirono
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in the vote.
{time} 1753
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Amash
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 2 offered by the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Amash)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the ayes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 123,
noes 300, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 400]
AYES--123
Amash
Baldwin
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Benishek
Bishop (UT)
Black
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Buerkle
Burgess
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cardoza
Cassidy
Chabot
Clarke (MI)
Crenshaw
DesJarlais
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Farenthold
Filner
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Garrett
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gowdy
Graves (GA)
Griffith (VA)
Guinta
Guthrie
Gutierrez
Harris
Hartzler
Heck
Heinrich
Herrera Beutler
Holt
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kucinich
Labrador
Lamborn
Landry
Lankford
LaTourette
Lee (CA)
Lipinski
Marchant
McClintock
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Murphy (CT)
Pallone
Paul
Pearce
Petri
Pingree (ME)
Platts
Poe (TX)
Polis
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reichert
Ribble
Rigell
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rooney
Roskam
Roybal-Allard
Ryan (WI)
Sanchez, Loretta
Scalise
Schmidt
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Sensenbrenner
Slaughter
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Southerland
Stark
Stearns
Terry
Tiberi
Tipton
Tonko
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Walsh (IL)
Webster
Wilson (SC)
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
NOES--300
Ackerman
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Andrews
Austria
Baca
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Bass (NH)
Becerra
Berg
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boswell
Boustany
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Braley (IA)
Brooks
Brown (FL)
Bucshon
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Carter
Castor (FL)
Chandler
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cohen
Cole
Conaway
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Cravaack
Crawford
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Davis (KY)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Denham
Dent
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Dreier
Edwards
Ellison
Ellmers
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flores
Foxx
Frank (MA)
Franks (AZ)
Fudge
Gallegly
Garamendi
Gardner
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gonzalez
Gosar
Granger
Graves (MO)
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Grijalva
Grimm
Hall
Hanabusa
Hanna
Harper
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Hensarling
Herger
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Jenkins
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly
Kildee
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kissell
Kline
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
Latta
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Long
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lujan
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
[[Page H3957]]
Mack
Maloney
Marino
Markey
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (CA)
McCarthy (NY)
McCaul
McCollum
McCotter
McDermott
McGovern
McHenry
McIntyre
McKinley
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Olver
Owens
Palazzo
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Paulsen
Payne
Pelosi
Pence
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pitts
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Rehberg
Renacci
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rivera
Roby
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Rothman (NJ)
Royce
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schilling
Schock
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Serrano
Sessions
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Sires
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tierney
Towns
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walberg
Walden
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (FL)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Woolsey
Yoder
Young (IN)
NOT VOTING--9
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in the vote.
{time} 1757
Mr. HIGGINS and Ms. HOCHUL changed their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Amash
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 3 offered by the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Amash)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the ayes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 257,
noes 164, not voting 11, as follows:
[Roll No. 401]
AYES--257
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Amash
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Cardoza
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chandler
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Costello
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Gutierrez
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Himes
Holden
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kissell
Kline
Kucinich
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lewis (CA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Mack
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Speier
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Walz (MN)
Waters
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOES--164
Ackerman
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Calvert
Capps
Capuano
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Dicks
Dingell
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Green, Al
Grijalva
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Maloney
Markey
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McKeon
McNerney
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Wasserman Schultz
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
NOT VOTING--11
Bishop (UT)
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schilling
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in this
vote.
{time} 1800
Mr. LYNCH changed his vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Rokita
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 1 offered by the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Rokita)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 110,
noes 312, not voting 10, as follows:
[Roll No. 402]
AYES--110
Amash
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Benishek
Bishop (UT)
Bono Mack
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Campbell
Canseco
Chabot
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Conaway
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Farenthold
Flake
Flores
Foxx
Gardner
Garrett
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Graves (GA)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Hall
[[Page H3958]]
Harris
Hensarling
Herger
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hunter
Hurt
Inslee
Issa
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Kingston
Labrador
Lamborn
Landry
Lankford
Latta
Lummis
Marchant
McCarthy (CA)
McClintock
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Neugebauer
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Paul
Pearce
Pence
Petri
Pitts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Roskam
Ross (FL)
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shuster
Smith (NE)
Southerland
Stearns
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thornberry
Tipton
Walberg
Walsh (IL)
Westmoreland
Wilson (SC)
Yoder
Young (AK)
NOES--312
Ackerman
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Andrews
Austria
Baca
Bachmann
Bachus
Baldwin
Barletta
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Bass (NH)
Becerra
Berg
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Black
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Bonner
Boren
Boswell
Boustany
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Bucshon
Buerkle
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Carter
Cassidy
Castor (FL)
Chandler
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Cole
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Davis (KY)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Dreier
Edwards
Ellison
Ellmers
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Frank (MA)
Franks (AZ)
Fudge
Gallegly
Garamendi
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gonzalez
Granger
Graves (MO)
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hanna
Harper
Hartzler
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Heinrich
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Hultgren
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jenkins
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly
Kildee
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kinzinger (IL)
Kissell
Kline
Kucinich
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
LaTourette
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Long
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lujan
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Mack
Maloney
Marino
Markey
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCaul
McCollum
McCotter
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McKinley
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Noem
Olson
Olver
Owens
Palazzo
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Paulsen
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Platts
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross (AR)
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schilling
Schock
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Simpson
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stark
Stivers
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Tiberi
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walden
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Webster
Weiner
Welch
West
Whitfield
Wilson (FL)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOT VOTING--10
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Jackson Lee (TX)
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in this
vote.
{time} 1803
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Rokita
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on amendment No. 2 offered by the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Rokita)
on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 218,
noes 205, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 403]
AYES--218
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Amash
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Cantor
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Dold
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Farenthold
Fincher
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Guinta
Guthrie
Gutierrez
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
Latta
Lewis (CA)
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Marchant
Marino
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Rehberg
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Roskam
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOES--205
Ackerman
Altmire
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Barletta
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boren
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chandler
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Fitzpatrick
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gibson
Gonzalez
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Grimm
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
Kissell
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
LaTourette
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McKinley
[[Page H3959]]
McNerney
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Petri
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Reichert
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross (AR)
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Turner
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
NOT VOTING--9
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in this
vote.
{time} 1806
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment No. 42 Offered by Mr. Cole
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Cole) on
which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 252,
noes 170, not voting 10, as follows:
[Roll No. 404]
AYES--252
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Amash
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chandler
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cooper
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Critz
Cuellar
Culberson
Davis (KY)
DeFazio
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dold
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Hochul
Holden
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lewis (CA)
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Pastor (AZ)
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Rahall
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Speier
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOES--170
Ackerman
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Green, Al
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
Kissell
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Pallone
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
NOT VOTING--10
Burgess
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in this
vote.
{time} 1810
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated for:
Mr. SHIMKUS. Mr. Chair, on rollcall No. 404 I inadvertently voted
``no'' when I intended to vote ``yes.''
Amendment Offered by Mr. Gohmert
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gohmert) on
which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 199,
noes 224, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 405]
AYES--199
Adams
Akin
Alexander
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Benishek
Berg
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
DesJarlais
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grijalva
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Herger
[[Page H3960]]
Herrera Beutler
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
Kingston
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Landry
Lankford
Latta
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Mack
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (FL)
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shimkus
Shuster
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Womack
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (IN)
NOES--224
Ackerman
Aderholt
Altmire
Amash
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Bass (NH)
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bilbray
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boren
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brooks
Brown (FL)
Bucshon
Butterfield
Calvert
Cantor
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chandler
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Denham
Dent
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Forbes
Fortenberry
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Gowdy
Green, Al
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Hensarling
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
King (NY)
Kinzinger (IL)
Kissell
Kucinich
Lance
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
LaTourette
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCaul
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Mulvaney
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Nugent
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rigell
Ross (AR)
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Shuler
Simpson
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Wittman
Wolf
Woodall
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (FL)
NOT VOTING--9
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in this
vote.
{time} 1813
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment Offered by Mr. Mica
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) on
which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 219,
noes 204, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 406]
AYES--219
Adams
Akin
Alexander
Amash
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Biggert
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Conaway
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Denham
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dold
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
LoBiondo
Long
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Mack
Marchant
Marino
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Paul
Pearce
Pence
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reed
Rehberg
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Roskam
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stark
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (IN)
NOES--204
Ackerman
Aderholt
Altmire
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bilbray
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boren
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chandler
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Cole
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Davis (KY)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Dent
Deutch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
King (NY)
Kissell
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lowey
Lucas
Lujan
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matheson
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Paulsen
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reichert
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rogers (AL)
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross (AR)
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
[[Page H3961]]
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (FL)
NOT VOTING--9
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining in this
vote.
{time} 1817
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment No. 23 Offered by Mr. Polis
The CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote
on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Polis) on
which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The CHAIR. This is a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 107,
noes 313, not voting 12, as follows:
[Roll No. 407]
AYES--107
Ackerman
Baca
Baldwin
Bass (CA)
Becerra
Blumenauer
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capps
Carnahan
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Cohen
Courtney
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (CA)
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Gonzalez
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Jackson (IL)
Johnson (GA)
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lowey
Lujan
Maloney
Markey
Matsui
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
Meeks
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rangel
Reyes
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Slaughter
Speier
Stark
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
NOES--313
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Amash
Andrews
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boswell
Boustany
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Campbell
Cantor
Capito
Capuano
Cardoza
Carney
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chandler
Clarke (MI)
Clyburn
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Critz
Cuellar
Culberson
Davis (IL)
Davis (KY)
DeFazio
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Frank (MA)
Franks (AZ)
Fudge
Gallegly
Garamendi
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Hochul
Holden
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Inslee
Israel
Issa
Jackson Lee (TX)
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly
Kildee
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kissell
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Mack
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCarthy (NY)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
Meehan
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Palazzo
Pascrell
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Pence
Peters
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Rahall
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Richardson
Richmond
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Rothman (NJ)
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schiff
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schrader
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Sewell
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Sires
Smith (NE)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Sutton
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Visclosky
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
Welch
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Wu
Yarmuth
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOT VOTING--12
Camp
Canseco
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Rush
Schwartz
Smith (NJ)
Announcement by the Chair
The CHAIR (during the vote). One minute remains in this vote.
{time} 1821
Ms. TSONGAS changed her vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
The CHAIR. The Clerk will read.
The Clerk read as follows:
This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Homeland
Security Appropriations Act, 2012''.
Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Chairman, I move that the Committee do now rise and
report the bill back to the House with sundry amendments, with the
recommendation that the amendments be agreed to and that the bill, as
amended, do pass.
The motion was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr.
Gingrey of Georgia) having assumed the chair, Mr. Dreier, Chair of the
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported that
that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 2017)
making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, and for other purposes, reported
the bill back to the House with sundry amendments adopted in the
Committee of the Whole, with the recommendation that the amendments be
agreed to and that the bill, as amended, do pass.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under House Resolution 287, the previous
question is ordered.
Is a separate vote demanded on any amendment reported from the
Committee of the Whole? If not, the Chair will put them en gros.
The amendments were agreed to.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the engrossment and third
reading of the bill.
The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, and was
read the third time.
Motion to Recommit
Mr. BISHOP of New York. Mr. Speaker, I have a motion to recommit at
the desk.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the gentleman opposed to the bill?
Mr. BISHOP of New York. In its current form, I am.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion to
recommit.
The Clerk read as follows:
Mr. BISHOP of New York moves to recommit the bill H.R. 2017
to the Committee on Appropriations with instructions to
report the same back to the House forthwith with the
following amendment:
[[Page H3962]]
Page 45, line 18, after the dollar amount insert
``(increased by $75,000,000)''.
Page 64, lines 2 and 4, after each of the dollar amounts
insert ``(reduced by $75,000,000)''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes in
support of his motion.
Mr. BISHOP of New York. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this final
amendment, the Bishop-Holt motion to recommit, in order to increase
funding for grants for transportation security and counterterrorism.
Intelligence seized from Osama bin Laden's compound indicates that al
Qaeda was targeting America's railroads on the 10th anniversary of the
9/11 attacks. Earlier, in 2009, the FBI disrupted a plot to blow up
trains in New York City and in Washington, D.C.
The 9/11 Commission placed some of the blame for the intelligence
breakdown before the 9/11 attacks on a failure of imagination; but
today, we don't have to imagine the damage a terrorist could do on a
rush-hour commuter train. That is evident from the tragedies in Madrid,
London, and Mumbai. An even more deadly attack could occur on a train
carrying hazardous chemicals through a major city, including trains
that pass regularly only a stone's throw from the U.S. Capitol.
While airline security upgrades over the past 10 years can help
prevent another 9/11, we still face an evolving threat to multiple
modes of transportation. In fact, trips by rail exceed air travel by 18
times. Yet air travel receives over 200 times more Federal security
funding per passenger than rail.
Still, the bill before us today makes deep cuts to rail security. It
provides no specific funding for transit, rail, or bus security grants
in 2012. Instead, it rolls nine grant programs together to compete for
funding that has already been cut 55 percent. That's not a failure of
imagination; that's a dereliction of duty.
In response, the Bishop-Holt amendment would increase funding for
grants for transportation security and counterterrorism by $75 million,
fully offset with a reduction in funding for the National Bio and Agro-
defense facility, otherwise known as NBAF.
While DHS insists that a new billion-dollar animal disease research
lab in the heart both of cattle country and tornado alley is completely
safe, both the GAO and the National Academy of Sciences have found many
faults in safety and in cost overruns. In fact, most of us agree with
the National Academy of Sciences that the risk of a release of foot-
and-mouth disease in America's heartland must be better addressed
before DHS proceeds with construction. We have much higher homeland
security priorities than beginning a new billion-dollar facility that
will replicate many of the existing functions already conducted at our
Federal labs.
Fourteen million Americans ride mass transit every day in our
Nation's urban areas, with millions more riding commuter or passenger
rail each year. If we understand the clear threat to these passengers
and accepted efforts to protect them are underfunded, we must do more
to keep them safe.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to make the right choice and
support this final amendment to increase funding for grants for
transportation security and terrorism.
Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Holt).
Mr. HOLT. Mr. Speaker, this proposed amendment has a simple purpose:
to prevent the reckless cuts to passenger rail security.
Mr. Speaker, you probably read that at the time the al Qaeda leader
bin Laden was killed he was planning attacks on U.S. passenger rail
systems. Even as we debate this bill, our intelligence and law
enforcement communities are running to ground leads about these and
other potential terrorist plots. This discovery underscores the need to
sustain, not to cut, transit security funding.
Following the terrible events of 2001, our Nation took unprecedented
steps to secure our Nation's airlines--appropriately so. However,
transit security grant programs remain badly underfunded. We need these
funds to field canine teams, install surveillance cameras and security
fencing, provide the resources for incident response training, and a
host of other mission-critical activities that are required to help
secure our trains and buses.
Transit provides 18 times as many passenger trips as aviation, but
receives 12 times less security funding. In other words, aviation
security receives 215 times as much Federal funding per passenger as
land transit. We have to do much, much better because the threat is
real. In 2004, terrorist cells conducted successful and deadly bombings
in Spain; the next year in the U.K.; in India; in Belarus, hundreds of
people killed, thousands of people wounded. Let's not put off the
necessary rail security steps until after the tragedy here. Let's
thwart bin Laden's plans.
I urge support for this amendment.
Mr. BISHOP of New York. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my
time.
Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the gentleman's
motion.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Alabama is recognized for
5 minutes.
Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Speaker, this bill is about priorities, fiscal
discipline priorities as our Nation grapples with a genuine budget
crisis, and security priorities in the aftermath of Osama bin Laden's
death and as we approach the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
This bill includes robust spending reductions on bureaucracy and on
programs that are not producing, cutting waste, reducing spending, and
instilling genuine budget discipline.
{time} 1830
Mr. ADERHOLT. In addition, this bill puts money where it matters:
frontline operations, intelligence, counterterrorism, and disaster
relief.
Mr. Speaker, the gentleman's motion is simply a political ploy at the
end of an open process on a bill that delivers the Nation's spending
restraints and robust security that our Nation needs.
And furthermore, under Speaker Boehner's leadership, as executed by
Chairman Dreier and Chairman Rogers, we have just completed 2 days of
floor debate under a completely open rule. It is the most open possible
debate before the people's House.
We have repeatedly addressed the issues that the gentleman is raising
with this motion and thoroughly debated the merits of this shortcoming
of his points.
In short, it is time to vote, Mr. Speaker. It's time to deliver
fiscal discipline, and it's time to deliver robust security. The
American people are demanding no less.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, the previous question is
ordered on the motion to recommit.
There was no objection.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion to recommit.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the noes appeared to have it.
Recorded Vote
Mr. BISHOP of New York. Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair
will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on
the question of passage.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 187,
noes 234, not voting 11, as follows:
[Roll No. 408]
AYES--187
Ackerman
Altmire
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Barrow
Bass (CA)
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boren
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown (FL)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chandler
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Critz
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
King (NY)
Kissell
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matheson
[[Page H3963]]
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McNerney
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Ross (AR)
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Serrano
Sewell
Sherman
Shuler
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Speier
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
NOES--234
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Amash
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Broun (GA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dold
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Flake
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Harris
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lewis (CA)
LoBiondo
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Marchant
Marino
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mulvaney
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Paul
Paulsen
Pearce
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Walsh (IL)
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NOT VOTING--11
Becerra
Chaffetz
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Myrick
Neal
Pence
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Speaker Pro Tempore
The SPEAKER pro tempore (during the vote). There are 2 minutes
remaining in this vote.
{time} 1853
So the motion to recommit was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the passage of the bill.
Under clause 10 of rule XX, the yeas and nays are ordered.
This is a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 231,
nays 188, not voting 13, as follows:
[Roll No. 409]
YEAS--231
Adams
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barletta
Barrow
Bass (NH)
Benishek
Berg
Berkley
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boren
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brooks
Buchanan
Bucshon
Buerkle
Burton (IN)
Calvert
Camp
Canseco
Cantor
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Chabot
Chandler
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Cravaack
Crawford
Crenshaw
Critz
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Denham
Dent
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dold
Donnelly (IN)
Dreier
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Ellmers
Emerson
Farenthold
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Gardner
Garrett
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Gosar
Gowdy
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Guinta
Guthrie
Hall
Hanna
Harper
Hartzler
Hastings (WA)
Hayworth
Heck
Hensarling
Herger
Herrera Beutler
Holden
Huelskamp
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Inslee
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
Jordan
Kelly
King (IA)
Kingston
Kinzinger (IL)
Kline
Labrador
Lamborn
Lance
Landry
Lankford
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lewis (CA)
Long
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Marchant
Marino
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McKinley
McMorris Rodgers
Meehan
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Murphy (PA)
Neugebauer
Noem
Nugent
Nunes
Nunnelee
Olson
Owens
Palazzo
Paulsen
Pearce
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Price (GA)
Quayle
Reed
Rehberg
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rigell
Rivera
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross (AR)
Ross (FL)
Royce
Runyan
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schilling
Schmidt
Schock
Schrader
Schweikert
Scott (SC)
Scott, Austin
Sessions
Sewell
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Stearns
Stivers
Stutzman
Sullivan
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tipton
Turner
Upton
Walberg
Walden
Webster
West
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yoder
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)
NAYS--188
Ackerman
Amash
Andrews
Baca
Baldwin
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Bass (CA)
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Broun (GA)
Brown (FL)
Burgess
Butterfield
Campbell
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
DeLauro
Deutch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duncan (TN)
Edwards
Ellison
Engel
Eshoo
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Flake
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Gonzalez
Goodlatte
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Grimm
Gutierrez
Hanabusa
Harris
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hochul
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones
Kaptur
Keating
Kildee
Kind
King (NY)
Kissell
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Lowey
Lujan
Lynch
Maloney
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McClintock
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meeks
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Mulvaney
Murphy (CT)
Nadler
Napolitano
Olver
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Paul
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peters
Peterson
Pingree (ME)
Polis
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Richmond
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Sanchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schiff
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Speier
Stark
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velazquez
Visclosky
Walsh (IL)
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (FL)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
NOT VOTING--13
Becerra
Chaffetz
Conyers
Frelinghuysen
Giffords
Lofgren, Zoe
Manzullo
Markey
Myrick
Neal
Pence
Rush
Schwartz
Announcement by the Speaker Pro Tempore
The SPEAKER pro tempore (during the vote). There are 2 minutes
remaining in this vote.
[[Page H3964]]
{time} 1859
So the bill was passed.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________