[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 77 (Wednesday, June 1, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H3812-H3813]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEBT LIMIT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Florida (Mr. Stearns) for 5 minutes.
Mr. STEARNS. Lost in the hyperbolic statements and calls of doom--
``if Congress does not raise the current debt ceiling''--is the real
problem that our Nation faces: the out-of-control spending that has
become epidemic here in Congress. No doubt a technical default in
August surely would be problematic. But much worse would be the results
if Republicans caved to Democrats and no significant spending reforms
are implemented.
Today, my colleagues, 68 cents of every dollar is spent on
entitlement programs. By the year 2025, the government will spend 100
percent of every dollar of revenues on entitlements.
The United States is over $14 trillion in debt, and without spending
cuts in the deficit, our national debt will continue to grow. We must
begin to rein in spending and bring about the fiscal changes to protect
our children from this growing burden of debt.
Mr. Speaker, importantly, markets understand the difference between a
technical default in which investors may have to wait a short period of
time for an interest payment and an actual default in which a country
is unable to repay its debt. If Congress does not act appropriately
now, very soon the country will not face merely a technical default,
but instead a real default. Then the calls of doom will be appropriate.
Investors have every incentive to want Congress to balance its budget
and get its house in order finally. If this means investors will have
to wait a few days for an interest payment to be repaid, then so be it.
Because fixing the real problem now guarantees to investors that this
government can make its payments 10 years from now, a realization that
will comfort investors much more than preventing a mild delay--
particularly if that mild delay means future delays, future debt limit
debates, and future possible defaults.
The best solution, of course, is no default at all, not technical and
not actual. Congress must quickly come together and make some tough
decisions that will forever affect the future of our country. But we
will not be coerced into a position that fuels the spending addiction
that has landed us in this situation where we stand today. We will
[[Page H3813]]
not succumb to a vote to increase the debt limit if we are not
compensated with significant spending cuts.
As our Speaker John Boehner has said, ``It's true that allowing
America to default would be irresponsible, but it would be more
irresponsible to raise the debt ceiling without simultaneously taking
dramatic steps to reduce spending and reform the budget process''
itself. And it can be done.
We can look back to understand what will happen next. Several years
back, Russia had a real default, yet within 2 or 3 years they reached
all-time low interest rates. Earlier this year, the House passed a
budget resolution for fiscal year 2012 which set non-security
discretionary spending to below 2008 funding levels. It calls upon
repealing the costly and burdensome health care law and envisions
reforming some entitlement programs to contain costs and pay down the
national debt.
My colleagues across the aisle have criticized portions of this
legislation. But the question is asked, where is their alternative?
There can be no debate if the other side cannot produce a logical
document that seriously sets out to solve our Nation's crisis, the real
crisis. Just like the solution to a drug addiction is not to increase
one's intake, the solution to our Nation's spending addiction is not to
increase one's capacity to continue to accumulate debt.
The time is now for real reform. Only after we have curbed the
trillions of dollars of debt that we continue to pile up can we then
consider raising the debt limit.
____________________