[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 74 (Thursday, May 26, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3419-S3420]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INTENT TO OBJECT
Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, consistent with Senate Standing Orders and
my policy of publishing in the Congressional Record a statement
whenever I place a hold on legislation, I am announcing my intention to
object to any unanimous consent request to proceed to S. 968, the
PROTECT IP Act.
In December of last year I placed a hold on similar legislation,
commonly called COICA, because I felt the costs of the legislation far
outweighed the benefits. After careful analysis of the Protect IP Act,
or PIPA, I am compelled to draw the same conclusion. I understand and
agree with the goal of the legislation, to protect intellectual
property and combat commerce in counterfeit goods, but I am not willing
to muzzle speech and stifle innovation and economic growth to achieve
this objective. At the expense of legitimate commerce, PIPA's
prescription takes an overreaching approach to policing the Internet
when a more balanced and targeted approach would be more effective. The
collateral damage of this approach is speech, innovation and the very
integrity of the Internet.
The Internet represents the shipping lane of the 21st century. It is
increasingly in America's economic interest to ensure that the Internet
is a viable means for American innovation, commerce, and the
advancement of our ideals that empower people all around the world. By
ceding control of the Internet to corporations through a private right
of action, and to government agencies that do not sufficiently
understand and value the Internet, PIPA represents a threat our
economic future and to our international objectives. Until the many
issues that I and others have raised with this legislation are
addressed, I will object to a unanimous consent request to proceed to
the legislation.
[[Page S3420]]
____________________