[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 65 (Thursday, May 12, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2918-S2920]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BIG OIL
Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, as I stand here today, I am trying to
figure out what our activities look like to the average American. They
know we still have serious economic problems, though we are on a good
track, and I think it is fair to say we are feeling a little bit
better. But we were cautioned
[[Page S2919]]
by President Obama the other day--those of us who had a chance to sit
in a room with him--that while things are looking up, there is still a
long way to go before our people are back to work and before they can
afford the basics they need to take care of their families.
While this is going on we have seen the most incredible courage, the
most well-developed military plan imaginable, and the courage of our
people who went in to apprehend Osama bin Laden. Thank goodness, nobody
was hurt. It was a job well done, and the execution of a plan to bring
to justice a man who helped kill almost 3,000 people at the World Trade
Center and hundreds more in other attacks on American facilities--the
Embassy in Tanzania, the Embassy in Kenya, the ship USS Cole--taking
American lives. That is what they were determined to do.
President Obama, after lots of previous administrations looking at
things, trying to figure out what to do to stop these terrorist attacks
on America, had the courage to make a decision that would have rested
so heavily on anyone in that governing position. He decided to take the
risk knowing that our people were so well trained, so well committed
that the chance of their failure was very slim but very real.
Good things have happened in America. Not only did this operation
against bin Laden succeed in at least slowing down, if not eliminating,
some of the terrorist threats in America, it also lifted the spirits of
Americans across the country. We all felt better about it because we
fought back against this terror threat.
But now I look at where we are and listen to the debate and look at
what the House of Representatives has done with their majority. At this
point in time, when we are still reeling from shock, having had perhaps
the greatest recession since the Great Depression of the twenties and
thirties, instead of trying to figure out ways to solve the problems,
our colleagues on the Republican side are trying to figure out ways to
punish the public. They would say to them: OK, so you don't have enough
jobs--we are going to try to reduce the possibility that we will have
enough, to reduce the possibility that a person who can learn but is
not well off can get an education. They want to take away those
opportunities. They want to take away programs that have succeeded.
We look back at our history in the last 90 years and ask: How did we
get here? How did we get where we are? Mr. President, 400,000 Americans
were killed in World War II. Then we saw growth in our country because
of planning during President Roosevelt's days in the New Deal and the
planning that President Johnson offered. We had Social Security
developed, and then came Medicare, and then came Medicaid--programs
that help people.
On a personal basis, for me, those years I am talking about were
particularly significant. I was born to a poor family. My father found
it very difficult to earn a living, as did millions of other Americans.
He worked in a silk factory in the city of Paterson, NJ. He was a man
very conscious of his health. But the problem was that the environment
was such that he contracted cancer when he was 42. He died when he was
43 years old. His brother, working in the same type of facility, died
when he was 52. My grandfather, who worked in the mills, died when he
was 56 years old. That was life as I saw it. Things were bleak.
My mother was a 37-year-old widow, and she had to carry on through my
father's sickness. They bought a store to make ends meet. It did not do
very well, but it kept her going for a while. When all was over and my
father died, I was already enlisted in the Army. My mother had no
resources left. She owed doctors, owed pharmacists, owed hospitals.
Every penny she had was gone. I looked at this experience and thought:
Something is not fair. But I was lucky. I was able to get my education
under the GI bill, as did 8 million other people who wore the American
uniform during those dark days.
What happened? I got an education. I went to Columbia University. I
was lucky. My tuition was paid for. I even got some money for books and
some things I might have needed along the way were provided. It made a
world of difference.
I was able, with two friends, to start a business. The company is
fairly well known. It is called ADP. The three of us started with
nothing, the two brothers with whom I was associated. Their father also
worked in the factories of Paterson. They were immigrants as were my
grandparents. But along came this educational opportunity, and with
that came an opportunity to start a business. Today that company, ADP,
is one of the four most creditworthy companies in the United States.
They are listed as a three-star company.
ADP has 45,000 employees. They work in 21 countries. Most of the
operation is in America but some of it is outside. It employs over
45,000 employees and helps businesses by taking over a particular part
of their recordkeeping needs. It helps make things operate better in
these companies.
Every month there is a labor statistic that is put out. It is done by
ADP, my old company. The numbers are more reliable than those of the
Bureau of Labor Statistics because the data is fresher. Every week,
some 35 million people get their paychecks and that is where the data
comes from. I left the company when I came here 29 years ago.
From all these experiences, I saw an America that gave people like me
a chance to do things and created what is called the greatest
generation in the history of America. Now, Mr. President, I am
beginning to see what I believe is a great generation developing--the
number of people getting to work, fewer claims for unemployment
insurance, more consumer spending, and retail sales are up. The signs
are good.
So when I look at what is going on in the House of Representatives, I
see the stubbornness of our colleagues who refuse to step in and say:
Look, we have to keep the government strong, we have to make sure we
supply the kind of energy to the government that can move America
along. Their response is cut, cut, cut, when all the critical social
programs I mentioned were a needed expansion of government services. I
am not one of those who want to cut valuable programs. I am one of
those who want to reduce the deficit.
Mr. President, when you look at a balance sheet, a financial
statement, it carries two parts: One part is expenses--costs--and the
other part is revenues. You can cut expenses all you want, but if the
revenues don't improve, you go bankrupt. It is pretty simple. And that
is where we are being asked to put our future on the line. Hold the
debt ceiling as ransom? For what? For what? It will destroy the
competence in America. It will destroy our ability to be the country we
are, the country that still leads the world despite competition.
When I left home this morning, I passed an Exxon station that is
fairly near my home. There was a sign on the pump that gave the price
of their gas--$4.79 a gallon. For people who have any distance to
travel, this is painful. This is painful. This is part of the income
they can use for basic things that are needed.
But what do we see? We see major gasoline companies, and we ask
ourselves: Whose side are our colleagues on? It appears they are on the
side of the gasoline companies. I think we ought to be more
conscientious about this and make sure the public understands we are
there for them, for the majority of people in this country who are sick
and tired of seeing the price-gouging we have seen from the gasoline
companies.
There was a Finance Committee hearing today, and I watched and heard
the heads of these companies--the five big oil companies--say what they
are worried about. Well, they are worried about the prospect of losing
$4 billion a year they get in subsidies. And there was even kind of a
caustic comment that it might be un-American to take away the subsidies
these people get. Mr. President, $4 billion a year in subsidies.
When you look at what is going on with these companies, you see
astounding results. Make no mistake, greed is fueling their appetite,
and the bigger it gets, the more they want.
During the years of World War II, there was an excess profits tax
that said companies shouldn't be feeding off of the opportunity the war
presented and taking advantage of the public. Well, we are at war, in
case people have forgotten about it. Afghanistan is a
[[Page S2920]]
real war. We still have the remnants of the difficulties in Iraq, we
have piracy on the seas, and we have all kinds of things we have to
keep fighting for. So there ought to be some recompense for our country
for the opportunity they have to make this kind of money.
These are their earnings during the first 3 months of 2011, which is
still part of the recession time: Exxon, their end-of-quarter profits
were over $10 billion. Shell, almost $9 billion. BP, $7.1 billion--that
is after their foul mistake in the Gulf of Mexico that cost plenty of
money. They still made that kind of money. And Chevron made $6.2
billion. Little ConocoPhillips only made $3 billion in that quarter.
When you think about it, the irony is how well BP has done--a company
that spewed 200 million gallons of oil into the ocean last year. Why is
our government shoving billions of dollars into the pockets of their
executives, their lawyers? Why don't we use the money to invest in a
stronger America and pay down our debt? I would like to see us doing
that.
Big Oil's greed is helping to inflate our deficit. Every day,
Americans are footing the bill. You would think our colleagues on the
other side of the aisle would want to put a stop to this madness, to
step up for the average person. Well, so far we are not doing what I
would like to see being done for the public, for the average citizen.
Big Oil is doing everything in its power to protect its subsidies, and
the Republicans are doing everything in their power to help them. The
Republicans say that eliminating these wasteful subsidies will raise
gas prices. That is wrong. That is plain wrong.
Look at the compensation of the CEOs here. Now, they are not selling
pretzels or making potato chips; they are dealing with a commodity that
is essential to the functioning of our society, of mankind. The CEO at
Exxon got $29 million; ConocoPhillips, $18 million; Chevron, $16
million. These are all in 2010, for the year just recently concluded. I
want to make certain people understand that companies paying their fair
share in taxes isn't going to hurt the industry. It just means Big Oil
executives may have to make do with a smaller swimming pool or maybe
smaller yacht, but no real pain or punishment there.
The fact is, the Big Oil CEOs aren't feeling this recession. But
instead of making our government more fiscally responsible by ending
the giveaways to Big Oil, the Republicans have another idea: They want
to cut the deficit by ending Medicare as we know it. That won't save us
any money in the long term. It will simply increase the expenditures,
as many are forced to pay more out of their own pockets for their
health. Seniors are struggling. The big oil companies aren't.
I wish the other side would listen a little more closely to the
wishes of the American people. Almost three-quarters of Americans say
we should stop giving billions in tax breaks to the big oil companies
each year. The American people know these subsidies are unnecessary,
ineffective, and immoral. And it is not as if the oil industry is
taking its annual $4 billion windfall and investing it in our country's
future. No. In addition to going into the paychecks of the Big Oil
executives, this money is being used to line the pockets of the
industry's lawyers and lobbyists who are seen frequently and obviously
around here.
I have seen this time and time again during my career in the Senate.
I was the first Senator on the scene at the Exxon Valdez when it rammed
into the Alaskan shoreline in 1989. Instead of being forthcoming and
doing what they should have done, Exxon fought over every penny with
the communities in Alaska--the families and the fishermen whose lives
it destroyed. Instead of stepping up to pay the court-awarded damages--
$5 billion--Exxon said: To heck with that verdict. We will fight it. We
will fight it all the way. And they did, for years. They knocked down
the amount from $5 billion in punitive damages to $500 million. I
guarantee you they paid a lot of money to the lawyers and lobbyists,
but they would rather give it to them than to the American people. That
is what that shows. In the end, it took more than 20 years for Exxon to
pay for what it had done. Some victims died while waiting for the
company to make things right.
So we should not be giving Big Oil $4 billion in tax breaks each
year. Their profits, which last year exceeded $100 billion, are larger
than lots of countries. We should be investing in ways to break our
dangerous addiction to oil. We should be investing in innovative
approaches to moving people and goods, including increasing funds for
transit, creating a world-class high-speed rail network, and expanding
the number of electric cars on our roads. We should also boost our
country's promising clean energy industry, making sure we lead the
world in the export of environmental products that are proudly stamped
with the ``Made in the USA'' label.
Don't be fooled--drilling will not, in the final analysis, get us out
of our energy problems. We use almost a quarter of the world's oil, but
we sit on less than 3 percent of the world's reserve. So drilling is
going to just quickly bring the end of our ability to produce oil. That
will be the conclusion. According to the U.S. Energy Information
Administration, even if we open every offshore drilling area in the
continental United States, the average price of gasoline would drop by
just 3 cents a gallon by the year 2030. Here, we see it: The benefit of
increased drilling will save us 3 cents a gallon in two decades. That
is not very promising for people who have to rely on the automobile for
all kinds of things in their lives.
Continuing to subsidize oil companies only increases our dependence
on dirty fuels. And even as our children pay a heavy price--with asthma
victims and other respiratory problems--it keeps us on a dead-end road
to sky-high energy bills, more oil spills like the one we saw in the
gulf, and dangerous pollution levels. Investing in clean alternatives
to oil, cars that go further on a gallon of gas, and smart
transportation, such as mass transit, are the only realistic solutions
to our energy challenges.
Beyond clean energy investments, we should take the $4 billion we
give away to Big Oil each year and use that money to pay down our
deficit. It is pretty clear that we cannot restore fiscal sanity to our
government unless we start paying more attention to the revenue column
in our ledger.
I was a CEO for many years. I know you cannot run a company or a
country without a strong revenue flow. Ending the government's wasteful
oil industry subsidies will not be enough to erase our deficit, but it
is a good place to start.
I call on my colleagues, have a citizen's heart. Look at this as you
would any other obligation you have in your life. Make sure our country
is strong and that our middle-class and our modest earners can look
ahead for a decent life for themselves, educating their children and
protecting their parents with proper health care. Get Big Oil off the
welfare rolls. Let's end the industry's tax breaks and end our
country's addiction to oil and other dirty fuels.
Let's invest in clean energy and smart transportation--and cut the
windfalls for the oil industry lobbyists and lawyers. I want to make
sure--and I am sure all of us do, down deep--our grandchildren and
children inherit a country that is fiscally sound and morally
responsible.
I yield the floor.
____________________