[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 59 (Wednesday, May 4, 2011)]
[House]
[Page H3008]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ABORTION DEBATE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Oklahoma (Mr. Lankford) for 5 minutes.
Mr. LANKFORD. Abortion is one of the most divisive issues in America.
One side sees the child in the womb as nothing but tissue, like a skin
mole, and no one should tell a women when and if she can have an
unnecessary and inconvenient tissue removed from her body. The other
side looks at that ``tissue'' in the womb and sees it sucking its
thumb, reacting to her mother singing, and possessing unique DNA, and
asks the question: How can that not be a child?
The debate about life will not be resolved today, though for the sake
of millions of children who will die in the womb in abortion clinics, I
wish it could have been resolved yesterday. H.R. 3, which we will be
discussing all day today asks the question: Should the Federal
Government ever use taxpayer dollars to pay for or supplement
abortions?
When the Nation is so divided over this issue, isn't it common sense
not to force a person who is passionately opposed to the death of the
unborn to assist in paying for the procedure?
H.R. 3 also protects the conscience of health care providers to not
be forced to perform a procedure that they believe violates their most
basic oath: Do no harm.
Each year, this Congress votes to prohibit abortion funding through
our appropriations process. It's time that we settled this issue
permanently and clearly. No taxpayer funding, support, or tax
incentives of abortion in any way for this year, in any future year.
In a day of skyrocketing debt, how can we justify supplementing
abortion and saying that it's a necessary and essential element of
government? I think we cannot.
This is time to resolve this issue. I strongly encourage my
colleagues to support H.R. 3 today in that vote.
____________________