[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 54 (Wednesday, April 13, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2448-S2454]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




          STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

      By Mr. INHOFE:
  S. 802. A bill to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to allow 
the storage and conveyance of nonproject water at the Norman project in 
Oklahoma, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and 
Natural Resources.
  Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, I would like to bring to the Senate's 
attention The Lake Thunderbird Efficient Use Act of 2011.
  This bill allows the Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District to 
import and store non-project water into Lake Thunderbird, if the 
Secretary of the Interior determines there is enough capacity to do so. 
Allowing additional water to be stored at Lake Thunderbird would help 
increase municipal and industrial supplies for the cities served by the 
District, which include Norman, Midwest City, and Del City.
  There is no cost associated with this bill. Any additional 
infrastructure needs will be the responsibility of the non-Federal 
establishment contracting with the Secretary.
  This legislation does not change the capacity of Lake Thunderbird and 
will help increase water supplies in a growing metropolitan area. Over 
the last decade, the Norman area grew by 15 percent making it one of 
the fastest growing areas in the State. As the area continues to grow, 
and as Tinker Air Force Base requires a growing water supply, there 
will be a greater need for access to the water supplies of the Lake 
Thunderbird reservoir.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. Tester):
  S. 806. A bill to require the Secretary of the Army to conduct levee 
system evaluations and certifications on receipt of requests from non-
Federal interests; to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
  Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of 
the bill be printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be 
printed in the Record, as follows:

                                 S. 806

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Community Flood 
     Protection Act of 2011''.

     SEC. 2. RURAL COMMUNITY FLOOD PROTECTION.

       (a) In General.--On receipt of a request from a non-Federal 
     interest, the Secretary of the Army (referred to in this 
     section as the ``Secretary'') shall conduct a levee system 
     evaluation and certification of a federally authorized levee 
     or a non-federally authorized levee for purposes of the 
     National Flood Insurance Program established under chapter 1 
     of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4011 
     et seq.).
       (b) Requirements.--A levee system evaluation and 
     certification under subsection (a) shall--
       (1) at a minimum, comply with the requirements of section 
     65.10 of title 44, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect 
     on the date of enactment of this Act); and
       (2) be carried out in accordance with such procedures as 
     the Secretary, in consultation with the Director of the 
     Federal Emergency Management Agency, may establish.
       (c) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) Non-federal share.--Subject to paragraph (2), the non-
     Federal share of the cost of carrying out a levee system 
     evaluation and certification under this section shall be 35 
     percent.
       (2) Adjustment.--The Secretary shall adjust the non-Federal 
     share under paragraph (1) to zero if--
       (A) the non-Federal interest is located in an area with a 
     population of 10,000 or fewer individuals; or
       (B) the division of the non-Federal interest with 
     responsibility for the applicable levee is staffed by 
     individuals operating on a volunteer basis.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. ENZI (for himself, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. 
        Coburn):
  S. 807. A bill to authorize the Department of Labor's voluntary 
protection program and to expand the program to include more small 
businesses; to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
  Mr. ENZI. Mr. President, I rise today to introduce legislation with 
Senator Landrieu known as the Voluntary Protection Program Act. This 
bill will codify the Voluntary Protection Programs, or VPP, expand it 
to include more small businesses, and incorporate recent GAO 
recommendations for program improvements.
  No program has been more successful in creating such a culture of 
safety in the workplace than VPP. Since it was created in 1982, 
Republican and Democrat administrations alike have fostered its growth 
to more than 2,500 worksites, a quarter of which are unionized, and it 
covers approximately one million employees. The bipartisan support for 
VPP continues into this Congress. Last year, the Senate Budget 
Committee unanimously approved an amendment to preserve VPP budget 
authority and I have been pleased to work with the Chair of the Senate 
Small Business Committee, Senator Landrieu, on this bill again this 
Congress. Our bill is also drawing bipartisan support in the House of 
Representatives. Congressmen Tom Petri and Gene Green are introducing 
companion legislation today and 1 thank them for their strong support 
on this important issue.
  Worksites that pass the rigorous evaluation process and become VPP 
sites have an average Days Away Restricted or Transferred, DART, case 
rate of 52 percent below the average for its industry. In recent years, 
smaller worksites have made significant strides in VPP, increasing from 
28 percent of VPP sites in 2003 to 44 percent in 2010.
  The innovative program doesn't just keep employees safer; as I have 
noted, it also saves both the VPP companies and the taxpayer's money. 
In 2007, Federal Agency VPP participants saved the government more than 
$59 million by avoiding injuries and private sector VPP participants 
saved more than $300 million. The Department of Defense has estimated 
that it saves between $73,000 and $8.8 million per site because of VPP. 
Additionally, when workplaces make the significant commitment to safety 
required by VPP, it allows OSHA to focus its resources where they are 
most needed. VPP Participant employers contribute a great deal to the 
VPP program expenditures. VPP participants have assigned approximately 
1,200 of their own employees to act as OSHA Special Government 
Employees, SGEs, who conduct onsite evaluations for OSHA.
  Despite the strong bipartisan support for VPP and its very positive 
results, the need for this legislation has become painfully clear. Last 
year, the administration's fiscal year 2011 Budget Request proposed 
eliminating the small amount it takes to administer VPP--$3.125 
million--and sought to transfer the 35 FTE it takes to run the program 
to other functions. The failure to complete the appropriations process 
last year thwarted that plan, and the administration did not renew the 
request in their fiscal year 2012 budget proposal. I hope that 
Department of Labor officials will note the bipartisan support VPP has 
and maintain support for the program. Surely, this proven life and 
cost-saving program is something we can all get behind.

[[Page S2449]]

  I would like to thank Senator Landrieu for working with me on this 
important legislation and add the following Senators as original 
cosponsors: Sen. Landrieu, Sen. Isakson and Sen. Coburn.
  Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be 
printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be 
printed in the Record, as follows:

                                 S. 807

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Voluntary Protection Program 
     Act''.

     SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM.

       (a) Cooperative Agreements.--The Secretary of Labor shall 
     establish a program of entering into cooperative agreements 
     with employers to encourage the establishment of 
     comprehensive safety and health management systems that 
     include--
       (1) requirements for systematic assessment of hazards;
       (2) comprehensive hazard prevention, mitigation, and 
     control programs;
       (3) active and meaningful management and employee 
     participation in the voluntary program described in 
     subsection (b); and
       (4) employee safety and health training.
       (b) Voluntary Protection Program.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of Labor shall establish and 
     carry out a voluntary protection program (consistent with 
     subsection (a)) to encourage excellence and recognize the 
     achievement of excellence in both the technical and 
     managerial protection of employees from occupational hazards.
       (2) Program requirements.--The voluntary protection program 
     shall include the following:
       (A) Application.--Employers who volunteer under the program 
     shall be required to submit an application to the Secretary 
     of Labor demonstrating that the worksite with respect to 
     which the application is made meets such requirements as the 
     Secretary of Labor may require for participation in the 
     program.
       (B) Onsite evaluations.--There shall be onsite evaluations 
     by representatives of the Secretary of Labor to ensure a high 
     level of protection of employees. The onsite visits shall not 
     result in enforcement of citations under the Occupational 
     Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.).
       (C) Information.--Employers who are approved by the 
     Secretary of Labor for participation in the program shall 
     assure the Secretary of Labor that information about the 
     safety and health program shall be made readily available to 
     the Secretary of Labor to share with employees.
       (D) Reevaluations.--Periodic reevaluations by the Secretary 
     of Labor of the employers shall be required for continued 
     participation in the program.
       (3) Monitoring.--To ensure proper controls and measurement 
     of program performance for the voluntary protection program 
     under this section, the Secretary of Labor shall direct the 
     Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and 
     Health to take the following actions:
       (A) Develop a documentation policy regarding information on 
     follow-up actions taken by the regional offices of the 
     Occupational Safety and Health Administration in response to 
     fatalities and serious injuries at worksites participating in 
     the voluntary protection program.
       (B) Establish internal controls that ensure consistent 
     compliance by the regional offices of the Occupational Safety 
     and Health Administration with the voluntary protection 
     program policies of the Occupational Safety and Health 
     Administration for conducting onsite reviews and monitoring 
     injury and illness rates, to ensure that only qualified 
     worksites participate in the program.
       (C) Establish a system for monitoring the performance of 
     the voluntary protection program by developing specific 
     performance goals and measures for the program.
       (4) Exemptions.--A site with respect to which a voluntary 
     protection program has been approved shall, during 
     participation in the program, be exempt from inspections or 
     investigations and certain paperwork requirements to be 
     determined by the Secretary of Labor, except that this 
     paragraph shall not apply to inspections or investigations 
     arising from employee complaints, fatalities, catastrophes, 
     or significant toxic releases.
       (5) No payments required.--The Secretary of Labor shall not 
     require any form of payment for an employer to qualify or 
     participate in the voluntary protection program.
       (c) Transition.--The Secretary of Labor shall take such 
     steps as may be necessary for the orderly transition from the 
     cooperative agreements and voluntary protection programs 
     carried out by the Occupational Safety and Health 
     Administration as of the day before the date of enactment of 
     this Act, to the cooperative agreements and voluntary 
     protection program authorized under this section. In making 
     such transition, the Secretary shall ensure that--
       (1) the voluntary protection program authorized under this 
     section is based upon and consistent with the voluntary 
     protection programs carried out on the day before the date of 
     enactment of this Act; and
       (2) each employer that, as of the day before the date of 
     enactment of this Act, had an active cooperative agreement 
     under the voluntary protection programs carried out by the 
     Occupational Safety and Health Administration and was in good 
     standing with respect to the duties and responsibilities 
     under such agreement, shall have the option to continue 
     participating in the voluntary protection program authorized 
     under this section.
       (d) Regulations and Implementation.--Not later than 2 years 
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
     Labor shall issue final regulations for the voluntary 
     protection program authorized under this section and shall 
     begin implementation of the program.

     SEC. 3. EXPANDED ACCESS TO VOLUNTARY PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR 
                   SMALL BUSINESSES.

       The Secretary of Labor shall establish and implement, by 
     regulation, a program to increase participation by small 
     businesses (as the term is defined by the Administrator of 
     the Small Business Administration) in the voluntary 
     protection program established under section 2 through 
     outreach and assistance initiatives and the development of 
     program requirements that address the needs of small 
     businesses.

     SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
     Act such sums as may be necessary.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. Kirk, and Ms. Landrieu):
  S. 809. A bill to provide high-quality charter school options for 
students by enabling such public charter schools to expand and 
replicate; to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, today I am introducing legislation 
designed to improve educational opportunities for struggling students. 
The All Students Achieving Through Reform Act, or All-STAR Act, would 
provide Federal resources to the most successful charter schools to 
help them grow and replicate.
  Across the nation, public charter schools are achieving extraordinary 
results in low-income communities. I have been particularly impressed 
by the Noble Street schools in Chicago. Since opening its first campus 
in 1999, Noble Street has expanded to 10 charter high schools educating 
over 13,000 students in some of Chicago's most difficult neighborhoods. 
Noble Street has achieved phenomenal results. Even though more than 75 
percent of students enter the schools below grade level, Noble students 
have the highest ACT scores among Chicago open-enrollment schools. 
Every year, more than 99 percent of Noble Street's seniors graduate and 
more than 85 percent go on to college. I see this success in action 
when I visit Noble Street schools. As soon as you walk in the door, you 
can tell that everyone in the building is focused on academic success. 
The students are actively engaged in their learning. Their teachers and 
principals are demanding and inspiring. Noble Street would like to 
continue to grow and educate more students in Chicago.
  Not all charter schools are excellent. Poor-performing charter 
schools should be closed. But we also need to replicate and expand the 
ones that are beating the odds, and we need to learn from their 
lessons. We need more excellent charters, like the Noble Street 
schools, in Illinois and around the country.
  The bill I am introducing today would help make that possible. 
Currently, Federal funding for charter schools can only be used to 
create new schools, not expand or replicate existing schools. My bill 
would create new grants within the existing charter school program to 
fund the expansion and replication of the most successful charter 
schools. Schools that have achieved results with their students will be 
able to apply for Federal grants to expand their schools to include 
additional grades or to replicate the model to a new school. Successful 
charters across the country will be able to grow, providing better 
educational opportunities to thousands of students.
  The bill also incentivizes the adoption of strong charter school 
policies by states. We know that successful charter schools thrive when 
they have autonomy, freedom to grow, and strong accountability based on 
meeting performance targets. The bill would give grant priority to 
states that provide that environment. The bill also requires new levels 
of charter school authorizer reporting and accountability to ensure 
that good charter schools are able to succeed while bad charter schools 
are improved or shut down.

[[Page S2450]]

  This bill will improve educational opportunities for students across 
the nation. Charter schools represent some of the brightest spots in 
urban education today, and successful models have the full support of 
the President and Secretary Duncan. We need to help these schools grow 
and bring their best lessons into our regular public schools so that 
all students can benefit. Supporting the growth of successful charter 
schools should be a part of the conversation when we take up 
reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. I thank 
Senator Kirk, Senator Landrieu, and Representative Polis in the House 
for joining me in this effort.
  Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be 
printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordered to be 
printed in the Record, as follows:

                                 S. 809

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``All Students Achieving 
     through Reform Act of 2011'' or ``All-STAR Act of 2011''.

     SEC. 2. CHARTER SCHOOL EXPANSION AND REPLICATION.

       (a) In General.--Subpart 1 of part B of title V of the 
     Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
     7221 et seq.) is amended--
       (1) by striking section 5211;
       (2) by redesignating section 5210 as section 5211; and
       (3) by inserting after section 5209 the following:

     ``SEC. 5210. CHARTER SCHOOL EXPANSION AND REPLICATION.

       ``(a) Purpose.--It is the purpose of this section to 
     support State efforts to expand and replicate high-quality 
     public charter schools to enable such schools to serve 
     additional students, with a priority to serve those students 
     who attend identified schools or schools with a low 
     graduation rate.
       ``(b) Support for Proven Charter Schools and Increasing the 
     Supply of High-Quality Charter Schools.--
       ``(1) Grants authorized.--From the amounts appropriated 
     under section 5200 for any fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
     award grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities to 
     enable the eligible entities to make subgrants to eligible 
     public charter schools under subsection (e)(1) and carry out 
     the other activities described in subsection (e), in order to 
     allow the eligible public charter schools to serve additional 
     students through the expansion and replication of such 
     schools.
       ``(2) Amount of grants.--In determining the grant amount to 
     be awarded under this subsection to an eligible entity, the 
     Secretary shall consider--
       ``(A) the number of eligible public charter schools under 
     the jurisdiction or in the service area of the eligible 
     entity that are operating;
       ``(B) the number of openings for new students that could be 
     created in such schools with such grant;
       ``(C) the number of students eligible for free or reduced 
     price lunches under the Richard B. Russell National School 
     Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) who are on waiting lists 
     for charter schools under the jurisdiction or in the service 
     area of the eligible entity, and other information with 
     respect to charter schools in such jurisdiction or service 
     area that suggest the interest of parents in charter school 
     enrollment for their children;
       ``(D) the number of students attending identified schools 
     or schools with a low graduation rate in the State or area 
     where an eligible entity intends to replicate or expand 
     eligible public charter schools; and
       ``(E) the success of the eligible entity in overseeing 
     public charter schools and the likelihood of continued or 
     increased success because of the grant under this section.
       ``(3) Duration of grants.--A grant under this section shall 
     be for a period of not more than 3 years, except that an 
     eligible entity receiving such grant may, at the discretion 
     of the Secretary, continue to expend grant funds after the 
     end of the grant period. An eligible entity that has received 
     a grant under this section may receive subsequent grants 
     under this section.
       ``(c) Application Requirements.--
       ``(1) Application requirements.--To be considered for a 
     grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit an 
     application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, 
     and containing such information as the Secretary may require.
       ``(2) Contents.--The application described in paragraph (1) 
     shall include, at a minimum, the following:
       ``(A) Record of success.--Documentation of the record of 
     success of the eligible entity in overseeing or operating 
     public charter schools, including--
       ``(i) the performance of the students of such public 
     charter schools on the student academic assessments described 
     in section 1111(b)(3) of the State where such school is 
     located (including a measurement of the students' average 
     academic longitudinal growth at each such school, if such 
     measurement is required by a Federal or State law applicable 
     to the entity), disaggregated by--

       ``(I) economic disadvantage;
       ``(II) race and ethnicity;
       ``(III) disability status; and
       ``(IV) status as a student with limited English 
     proficiency;

       ``(ii) the status of such schools under section 1116 in 
     making adequate yearly progress or as identified schools;
       ``(iii) documentation of demonstrated success by such 
     public charter schools in closing historic achievement gaps 
     between groups of students; and
       ``(iv) in the case of such public charter schools that are 
     secondary schools, the graduation rates and rates of student 
     acceptance, enrollment, and persistence in institutions of 
     higher education, where possible.
       ``(B) Plan.--A plan for--
       ``(i) replicating and expanding eligible public charter 
     schools operated or overseen by the eligible entity;
       ``(ii) identifying eligible public charter schools, or 
     networks of eligible public charter schools, to receive 
     subgrants under this section;
       ``(iii) increasing the number of openings in eligible 
     public charter schools for students attending identified 
     schools and schools with a low graduation rate;
       ``(iv) ensuring that eligible public charter schools 
     receiving a subgrant under this section enroll students 
     through a random lottery for admission, unless the charter 
     school is using the subgrant to expand the school to serve 
     additional grades, in which case such school may reserve 
     seats in the additional grades for--

       ``(I) each student enrolled in the grade preceding each 
     such additional grade;
       ``(II) siblings of students enrolled in the charter school, 
     if such siblings desire to enroll in such grade; and
       ``(III) children of the charter school's founders, staff, 
     or employees;

       ``(v)(I) in the case of an eligible entity described in 
     subparagraph (A) or (C) of subsection (k)(4), the manner in 
     which the eligible entity will work with identified schools 
     and schools with a low graduation rate that are eligible to 
     enroll students in a public charter school receiving a 
     subgrant under this section and that are under the eligible 
     entity's jurisdiction, and the local educational agencies 
     serving such schools, to--

       ``(aa) engage in community outreach, provide information in 
     a language that the parents can understand, and communicate 
     with parents of students at identified schools and schools 
     with a low graduation rate who are eligible to attend a 
     public charter school receiving a subgrant under this section 
     about the opportunity to enroll in or transfer to such 
     school, in a manner consistent with section 444 of the 
     General Education Provisions Act (commonly known as the 
     `Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974'); and
       ``(bb) ensure that a student can transfer to an eligible 
     public charter school if the public charter school such 
     student was attending in the previous school year is no 
     longer an eligible public charter school; and

       ``(II) in the case of an eligible entity described in 
     subparagraph (B) or (D) of subsection (k)(4), the manner in 
     which the eligible entity will work with the local 
     educational agency to carry out the activities described in 
     items (aa) and (bb) of subclause (I);
       ``(vi) disseminating to public schools under the 
     jurisdiction or in the service area of the eligible entity, 
     in a manner consistent with section 444 of the General 
     Education Provisions Act (commonly known as the `Family 
     Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974'), the best 
     practices, programs, or strategies learned by awarding 
     subgrants to eligible public charter schools under this 
     section, with particular emphasis on the best practices with 
     respect to--

       ``(I) focusing on closing the achievement gap; or
       ``(II) successfully addressing the education needs of low-
     income students; and

       ``(vii) in the case of an eligible entity described in 
     subsection (k)(4)(D)--

       ``(I) supporting the short-term and long-term success of 
     the proposed project, by--

       ``(aa) developing a multi-year financial and operating 
     model for the eligible entity; and
       ``(bb) including, with the plan, evidence of the 
     demonstrated commitment of current partners, as of the time 
     of the application, for the proposed project and of broad 
     support from stakeholders critical to the project's long-term 
     success;

       ``(II) closing public charter schools that do not meet 
     acceptable standards of performance; and
       ``(III) achieving the objectives of the proposed project on 
     time and within budget, which shall include the use of 
     clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones 
     for accomplishing project tasks.

       ``(C) Charter school information.--The number of--
       ``(i) eligible public charter schools that are operating in 
     the State in which the eligible entity intends to award 
     subgrants under this section;
       ``(ii) public charter schools approved to open or likely to 
     open during the grant period in such State;
       ``(iii) available openings in eligible public charter 
     schools in such State that could be created through the 
     replication or expansion of such schools if the grant is 
     awarded to the eligible entity;
       ``(iv) students on public charter school waiting lists (if 
     such lists are available) in--

[[Page S2451]]

       ``(I) the State in which the eligible entity intends to 
     award subgrants under this section; and
       ``(II) each local educational agency serving an eligible 
     public charter school that may receive a subgrant under this 
     section from the eligible entity; and

       ``(v) students, and the percentage of students, in a local 
     educational agency who are attending eligible public charter 
     schools that may receive a subgrant under this section from 
     the eligible entity.
       ``(D) Traditional public school information.--In the case 
     of an eligible entity described in subparagraph (A) or (C) of 
     subsection (k)(4), a list of the following schools under the 
     jurisdiction of the eligible entity, including the name and 
     location of each such school, the number and percentage of 
     students under the jurisdiction of the eligible entity who 
     are attending such school, and such demographic and 
     socioeconomic information as the Secretary may require:
       ``(i) Identified schools.
       ``(ii) Schools with a low graduation rate.
       ``(E) Assurance.--In the case of an eligible entity 
     described in subsection (k)(4)(A), an assurance that the 
     eligible entity will include in the notifications provided 
     under section 1116(c)(6) to parents of each student enrolled 
     in a school served by a local educational agency identified 
     for school improvement or corrective action under paragraph 
     (1) or (7) of section 1116(c), information (in a language 
     that the parents can understand) about the eligible public 
     charter schools receiving subgrants under this section.
       ``(3) Modifications.--The Secretary may modify or waive any 
     information requirement under paragraph (2)(C) for an 
     eligible entity that demonstrates that the eligible entity 
     cannot reasonably obtain the information.
       ``(d) Priorities for Awarding Grants.--
       ``(1) In general.--In awarding grants under this section, 
     the Secretary shall give priority to an eligible entity 
     that--
       ``(A) serves or plans to serve a large percentage of low-
     income students from identified schools or public schools 
     with a low graduation rate;
       ``(B) oversees or plans to oversee one or more eligible 
     public charter schools;
       ``(C) provides evidence of effective monitoring of the 
     academic success of students who attend public charter 
     schools under the jurisdiction of the eligible entity;
       ``(D) has established goals, objectives, and outcomes for 
     the proposed project that are clearly specified, measurable, 
     and attainable;
       ``(E) in the case of an eligible entity that is a local 
     educational agency under State law, has a cooperative 
     agreement under section 1116(b)(11); and
       ``(F) is under the jurisdiction of, or plans to award 
     subgrants under this section in, a State that--
       ``(i) ensures that all public charter schools (including 
     such schools served by a local educational agency and such 
     schools considered to be a local educational agency under 
     State law) receive, in a timely manner, the Federal, State, 
     and local funds to which such schools are entitled under 
     applicable law;
       ``(ii) does not have a cap that restricts the growth of 
     public charter schools in the State;
       ``(iii) provides funding (such as capital aid distributed 
     through a formula or access to revenue generated bonds, and 
     including funding for school facilities) on a per-pupil basis 
     to public charter schools commensurate with the amount of 
     funding (including funding for school facilities) provided to 
     traditional public schools;
       ``(iv) provides strong evidence of support for public 
     charter schools and has in place innovative policies that 
     support academically successful charter school growth;
       ``(v) authorizes public charter schools to offer early 
     childhood education programs, including prekindergarten, in 
     accordance with State law;
       ``(vi) authorizes or allows public charter schools to serve 
     as school food authorities;
       ``(vii) ensures that each public charter school in the 
     State--

       ``(I) has a high degree of autonomy over the public charter 
     school's budget and expenditures;
       ``(II) has a written performance contract with an 
     authorized public chartering agency that ensures that the 
     school has an independent governing board with a high degree 
     of autonomy; and
       ``(III) in the case of an eligible public charter school 
     receiving a subgrant under this section, amends its charter 
     to reflect the growth activities described in subsection (e);

       ``(viii) has an appeals process for the denial of an 
     application for a public charter school;
       ``(ix) provides that an authorized public chartering agency 
     that is not a local educational agency, such as a State 
     chartering board, is available for each individual or entity 
     seeking to operate a public charter school pursuant to such 
     State law;
       ``(x) allows any public charter school to be a local 
     educational agency in accordance with State law;
       ``(xi) ensures that each authorized public chartering 
     agency in the State submits annual reports to the State 
     educational agency, and makes such reports available to the 
     public, on the performance of the schools authorized or 
     approved by such public chartering agency, which reports 
     shall include--

       ``(I) the authorized public chartering agency's strategic 
     plan for authorizing or approving public charter schools and 
     any progress toward achieving the objectives of the strategic 
     plan;
       ``(II) the authorized public chartering agency's policies 
     for authorizing or approving public charter schools, 
     including how such policies examine a school's--

       ``(aa) financial plan and policies, including financial 
     controls and audit requirements;
       ``(bb) plan for identifying and successfully (in compliance 
     with all applicable laws and regulations) serving students 
     with disabilities, students who are English language 
     learners, students who are academically behind their peers, 
     and gifted students; and
       ``(cc) capacity and capability to successfully launch and 
     subsequently operate a public charter school, including the 
     backgrounds of the individuals applying to the agency to 
     operate such school and any record of such individuals 
     operating a school;

       ``(III) the authorized public chartering agency's policies 
     for renewing, not renewing, and revoking a public charter 
     school's charter, including the role of student academic 
     achievement in such decisions;
       ``(IV) the authorized public chartering agency's 
     transparent, timely, and effective process for closing down 
     academically unsuccessful public charter schools;
       ``(V) the academic performance of each operating public 
     charter school authorized or approved by the authorized 
     public chartering agency, including the information reported 
     by the State in the State annual report card under section 
     1111(h)(1)(C) for such school;
       ``(VI) the status of the authorized public chartering 
     agency's charter school portfolio, by identifying all charter 
     schools served by the public chartering agency in each of the 
     following categories: approved (but not yet open), operating, 
     renewed, transferred, revoked, not renewed, voluntarily 
     closed, or never opened;
       ``(VII) the authorizing functions provided by the 
     authorized public chartering agency to the public charter 
     schools under its purview, including such agency's operating 
     costs and expenses as detailed through annual auditing of 
     financial statements that conform with general accepted 
     accounting principles; and
       ``(VIII) the services purchased (such as accounting, 
     transportation, and data management and analysis) from the 
     authorized public chartering agency by the public charter 
     schools authorized or approved by such agency, including an 
     itemized accounting of the actual costs of such services; and

       ``(xii) has or will have (within 1 year after receiving a 
     grant under this section) a State policy and process for 
     overseeing and reviewing the effectiveness and quality of the 
     State's authorized public chartering agencies, including--

       ``(I) a process for reviewing and evaluating the 
     performance of the authorized public chartering agencies in 
     authorizing or approving public charter schools, including a 
     process that enables the authorized public chartering 
     agencies to respond to any State concerns; and
       ``(II) any other necessary policies to ensure effective 
     charter school authorizing in the State in accordance with 
     the principles of quality charter school authorizing, as 
     determined by the State in consultation with the charter 
     school community and stakeholders.

       ``(2) Special rule.--In awarding grants under this section, 
     the Secretary may determine how the priorities described in 
     paragraph (1) will apply to the different types of eligible 
     entities defined in subsection (k)(4).
       ``(e) Use of Funds.--An eligible entity receiving a grant 
     under this section shall use the grant funds for the 
     following:
       ``(1) Subgrants.--
       ``(A) In general.--To award subgrants, in such amount as 
     the eligible entity determines is appropriate, to eligible 
     public charter schools to replicate or expand such schools.
       ``(B) Application.--An eligible public charter school 
     desiring to receive a subgrant under this subsection shall 
     submit an application to the eligible entity at such time, in 
     such manner, and containing such information as the eligible 
     entity may require.
       ``(C) Uses of funds.--An eligible public charter school 
     receiving a subgrant under this subsection shall use the 
     subgrant funds to provide for an increase in the school's 
     enrollment of students through the replication or expansion 
     of the school, which may include use of funds to--
       ``(i) support the physical expansion of school buildings, 
     including financing the development of new buildings and 
     campuses to meet increased enrollment needs;
       ``(ii) pay costs associated with hiring additional teachers 
     to serve additional students;
       ``(iii) provide transportation to additional students to 
     and from the school, including providing transportation to 
     students who transfer to the school under a cooperative 
     agreement established under section 1116(b)(11);
       ``(iv) purchase instructional materials, implement teacher 
     and principal professional development programs, and hire 
     additional non-teaching staff; and
       ``(v) support any necessary activities associated with the 
     school carrying out the purposes of this section.
       ``(D) Priority.--In awarding subgrants under this 
     subsection, an eligible entity shall give priority to an 
     eligible public charter school--
       ``(i) that has significantly closed any achievement gap on 
     the State academic assessments described in section 
     1111(b)(3)

[[Page S2452]]

     among the groups of students described in section 
     1111(b)(2)(C)(v) by improving scores;
       ``(ii) that--

       ``(I)(aa) ranks in at least the top 25th percentile of the 
     schools in the State, as ranked by the percentage of students 
     in the proficient or advanced level of achievement on the 
     State academic assessments in mathematics and reading or 
     language arts described in section 1111(b)(3); or
       ``(bb) has an average student score on an examination 
     (chosen by the Secretary) that is at least in the 60th 
     percentile in reading and at least in the 75th percentile in 
     mathematics; and
       ``(II) serves a high-need student population and is 
     eligible to participate in a schoolwide program under section 
     1114, with additional priority given to schools that serve, 
     as compared to other schools that have submitted an 
     application under this subsection--

       ``(aa) a greater percentage of low-income students; and
       ``(bb) a greater percentage of not less than 2 groups of 
     students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II); and
       ``(iii) that meets the criteria described in clause (i) and 
     serves low-income students who have transferred to such 
     school under a cooperative agreement described in section 
     1116(b)(11).
       ``(E) Duration of subgrant.--A subgrant under this 
     subsection shall be awarded for a period of not more than 3 
     years, except that an eligible public charter school 
     receiving a subgrant under this subsection may, at the 
     discretion of the eligible entity, continue to expend 
     subgrant funds after the end of the subgrant period.
       ``(2) Facility financing and revolving loan fund.--An 
     eligible entity may use not more than 25 percent of the 
     amount of the grant funds received under this section to 
     establish a reserve account described in subsection (f) to 
     facilitate public charter school facility acquisition and 
     development by--
       ``(A) conducting credit enhancement initiatives (as 
     referred to in subpart 2) in support of the development of 
     facilities for eligible public charter schools serving 
     students;
       ``(B) establishing a revolving loan fund for use by an 
     eligible public charter school receiving a subgrant under 
     this subsection from the eligible entity under such terms as 
     may be determined by the eligible entity to allow such school 
     to expand to serve additional students;
       ``(C) facilitating, through direct expenditure or 
     financing, the acquisition or development of public charter 
     school buildings by the eligible entity or an eligible public 
     charter school receiving a subgrant under this subsection 
     from the eligible entity, which may be used as both permanent 
     locations for eligible public charter schools or incubators 
     for growing charter schools; or
       ``(D) establishing a partnership with 1 or more community 
     development financial institutions (as defined in section 103 
     of the Community Development Banking and Financial 
     Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4702)) or other mission-
     based financial institutions to carry out the activities 
     described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C).
       ``(3) Administrative tasks, dissemination activities, and 
     outreach.--
       ``(A) In general.--An eligible entity may use not more than 
     7.5 percent of the grant funds awarded under this section to 
     cover administrative tasks, dissemination activities, and 
     outreach.
       ``(B) Nonprofit assistance.--In carrying out the 
     administrative tasks, dissemination activities, and outreach 
     described in subparagraph (A), an eligible entity may 
     contract with an organization described in section 501(c)(3) 
     of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) 
     and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code (26 
     U.S.C. 501(a)).
       ``(f) Reserve Account.--
       ``(1) In general.--To assist eligible entities in the 
     development of new public charter school buildings or 
     facilities for eligible public charter schools, an eligible 
     entity receiving a grant under this section may, in 
     accordance with State and local law, directly or indirectly, 
     alone or in collaboration with others, deposit the amount of 
     funds described in subsection (e)(2) in a reserve account 
     established and maintained by the eligible entity.
       ``(2) Investment.--Funds received under this section and 
     deposited in the reserve account established under this 
     subsection shall be invested in obligations issued or 
     guaranteed by the United States or a State, or in other 
     similarly low-risk securities.
       ``(3) Reinvestment of earnings.--Any earnings on funds 
     received under this subsection shall be deposited in the 
     reserve account established under this section and used in 
     accordance with the purpose described in subsection (a).
       ``(4) Recovery of funds.--
       ``(A) In general.--The Secretary, in accordance with 
     chapter 37 of title 31, United States Code, shall collect--
       ``(i) all funds in a reserve account established by an 
     eligible entity under this subsection if the Secretary 
     determines, not earlier than 2 years after the date the 
     eligible entity first received funds under this section, that 
     the eligible entity has failed to make substantial progress 
     carrying out the purpose described in paragraph (1); or
       ``(ii) all or a portion of the funds in a reserve account 
     established by an eligible entity under this subsection if 
     the Secretary determines that the eligible entity has 
     permanently ceased to use all or a portion of funds in such 
     account to accomplish the purpose described in paragraph (1).
       ``(B) Exercise of authority.--The Secretary shall not 
     exercise the authority provided under subparagraph (A) to 
     collect from any eligible entity any funds that are being 
     properly used to achieve such purpose.
       ``(C) Procedures.--Sections 451, 452, and 458 of the 
     General Education Provisions Act shall apply to the recovery 
     of funds under subparagraph (A).
       ``(D) Construction.--This paragraph shall not be construed 
     to impair or affect the authority of the Secretary to recover 
     funds under part D of the General Education Provisions Act.
       ``(5) Reallocation.--Any funds collected by the Secretary 
     under paragraph (4) shall be awarded to eligible entities 
     receiving grants under this section in the next fiscal year.
       ``(g) Financial Responsibility.--The financial records of 
     each eligible entity and eligible public charter school 
     receiving a grant or subgrant, respectively, under this 
     section shall be maintained in accordance with generally 
     accepted accounting principles and shall be subject to an 
     annual audit by an independent public accountant.
       ``(h) National Evaluation.--
       ``(1) National evaluation.--From the amounts appropriated 
     under section 5200, the Secretary shall conduct an 
     independent, comprehensive, and scientifically sound 
     evaluation, by grant or contract and using the highest 
     quality research design available, of the impact of the 
     activities carried out under this section on--
       ``(A) student achievement, including State standardized 
     assessment scores and, if available, student academic 
     longitudinal growth (as described in subsection (c)(2)(A)(i)) 
     based on such assessments; and
       ``(B) other areas, as determined by the Secretary.
       ``(2) Report.--Not later than 4 years after the date of the 
     enactment of the All Students Achieving through Reform Act of 
     2011, and biannually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit 
     to Congress a report on the results of the evaluation 
     described in paragraph (1).
       ``(i) Reports.--Each eligible entity receiving a grant 
     under this section shall prepare and submit to the Secretary 
     the following:
       ``(1) Report.--A report that contains such information as 
     the Secretary may require concerning use of the grant funds 
     by the eligible entity, including the academic achievement of 
     the students attending eligible public charter schools as a 
     result of the grant. Such report shall be submitted before 
     the end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of 
     enactment of the All Students Achieving through Reform Act of 
     2011 and every 2 years thereafter.
       ``(2) Performance information.--Such performance 
     information as the Secretary may require for the national 
     evaluation conducted under subsection (h)(1).
       ``(j) Inapplicability.--The provisions of sections 5201 
     through 5209 shall not apply to the program under this 
     section.
       ``(k) Definitions.--In this section:
       ``(1) Adequate yearly progress.--The term `adequate yearly 
     progress' has the meaning given such term in a State's plan 
     in accordance with section 1111(b)(2)(C).
       ``(2) Administrative tasks, dissemination activities, and 
     outreach.--The term `administrative tasks, dissemination 
     activities, and outreach' includes costs and activities 
     associated with--
       ``(A) recruiting and selecting students to attend eligible 
     public charter schools;
       ``(B) outreach to parents of students enrolled in 
     identified schools or schools with low graduation rates;
       ``(C) providing information to such parents and school 
     officials at such schools regarding eligible public charter 
     schools receiving subgrants under this section;
       ``(D) necessary oversight of the grant program under this 
     section; and
       ``(E) initiatives and activities to disseminate the best 
     practices, programs, or strategies learned in eligible public 
     charter schools to other public schools operating in the 
     State where the eligible entity intends to award subgrants 
     under this section.
       ``(3) Charter school.--The term `charter school' means--
       ``(A) a charter school, as defined in section 5211(1); or
       ``(B) a school that meets the requirements of such section, 
     except for subparagraph (D) of the section, and provides 
     prekindergarten or adult education services.
       ``(4) Eligible entity.--The term `eligible entity' means--
       ``(A) a State educational agency;
       ``(B) an authorized public chartering agency;
       ``(C) a local educational agency that has authorized or is 
     planning to authorize a public charter school; or
       ``(D) an organization, including a nonprofit charter 
     management organization, that has an organizational mission 
     and record of success supporting the replication and 
     expansion of high-quality charter schools and is--
       ``(i) described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 
     Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)); and
       ``(ii) exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code 
     (26 U.S.C. 501(a)).
       ``(5) Eligible public charter school.--The term `eligible 
     public charter school' means a charter school, including a 
     public charter school that is being developed by a developer, 
     that--
       ``(A) has made adequate yearly progress for 2 of the last 3 
     consecutive school years; and

[[Page S2453]]

       ``(B) in the case of a public charter school that is a 
     secondary school, has, for the most recent school year for 
     which data is available, met or exceeded the graduation rate 
     required by the State in order to make adequate yearly 
     progress for such year.
       ``(6) Graduation rate.--The term `graduation rate' has the 
     meaning given the term in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(vi), as 
     clarified in section 200.19(b)(1) of title 34, Code of 
     Federal Regulations.
       ``(7) Identified school.--The term `identified school' 
     means a school identified for school improvement, corrective 
     action, or restructuring under paragraph (1), (7), or (8) of 
     section 1116(b).
       ``(8) Local educational agency.--The term `local 
     educational agency' includes any charter school that is a 
     local educational agency, as determined by State law.
       ``(9) Low-income student.--The term `low-income student' 
     means a student eligible for free or reduced price lunches 
     under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 
     U.S.C. 1751 et seq.).
       ``(10) School food authority.--The term `school food 
     authority' has the meaning given the term in section 250.3 of 
     title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding 
     similar regulation or ruling).
       ``(11) School year.--The term `school year' has the meaning 
     given such term in section 12(d) of the Richard B. Russell 
     National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(d)).
       ``(12) Traditional public school.--The term `traditional 
     public school' does not include any charter school, as 
     defined in section 5211.''.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Part B of title V of 
     the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
     7221 et seq.) is amended--
       (1) by striking section 5231; and
       (2) by inserting before subpart 1 the following:

     ``SEC. 5200. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR SUBPARTS 1 
                   AND 2.

       ``(a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated 
     to carry out subparts 1 and 2, $700,000,000 for fiscal year 
     2012 and such sums as may be necessary for each of the 5 
     succeeding fiscal years.
       ``(b) Allocation.--In allocating funds appropriated under 
     this section for any fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
     consider--
       ``(1) the relative need among the programs carried out 
     under sections 5202, 5205, 5210, and subpart 2; and
       ``(2) the quality of the applications submitted for such 
     programs.''.
       (c) Conforming Amendments.--The Elementary and Secondary 
     Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) is amended--
       (1) in section 2102(2) (20 U.S.C. 6602(2)), by striking 
     ``5210'' and inserting ``5211'';
       (2) in section 5204(e) (20 U.S.C. 7221c(e)), by striking 
     ``5210(1)'' and inserting ``5211(1)'';
       (3) in section 5211(1) (as redesignated by subsection 
     (a)(2)) (20 U.S.C. 7221i(1)), by striking ``The term'' and 
     inserting ``Except as otherwise provided, the term'';
       (4) in section 5230(1) (20 U.S.C. 7223i(1)), by striking 
     ``5210'' and inserting ``5211''; and
       (5) in section 5247(1) (20 U.S.C. 7225f(1)), by striking 
     ``5210'' and inserting ``5211''.
       (d) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of the 
     Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 is amended--
       (1) by inserting before the item relating to subpart 1 of 
     part B of title V the following:

``Sec. 5200. Authorization of appropriations for subparts 1 and 2.'';

       (2) by striking the items relating to sections 5210 and 
     5211;
       (3) by inserting after the item relating to section 5209 
     the following:

``Sec. 5210. Charter school expansion and replication.
``Sec. 5211. Definitions.'';

     and
       (4) by striking the item relating to section 5231.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Sanders, and Mr. 
        Lieberman):
  S. 810. A bill to prohibit the conducting of invasive research on 
great apes, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works.
  Ms. CANTWELL. Mr. President, I rise today to introduce legislation to 
end the use of Great Apes in invasive research and urge my Senate 
colleagues to support the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act.
  The Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act would prohibit invasive 
research on all Great Apes, including gorillas, orangutans, and 
chimpanzees--who are the primary Great Apes used in research today. The 
bill would also require the immediate retirement of 500 federally-owned 
chimpanzees to great ape sanctuaries.
  Today about 1,000 chimpanzees--half of them federally owned--languish 
at great taxpayer expense in eight research laboratories across the 
Nation.
  These chimpanzees are being held or used for invasive biomedical 
research, research that may cause death, bodily injury, pain, distress, 
fear, and trauma. Invasive research practices include techniques such 
as injecting a chimpanzee with a drug that would be detrimental to its 
health, infecting a chimp with a disease, cutting a chimp or removing 
body parts, and isolation or social deprivation.
  The vast majority of these animals--between 80 and 90 percent--aren't 
actually being used in research, but instead are warehoused, simply 
wasting away in these facilities. For example, approximately half of 
the government-owned chimpanzees are being held in a facility in New 
Mexico where no research is being conducted.
  Some chimpanzees have been in labs for more than 50 years, confined 
in steel cages for most of their lives and enduring sometimes painful 
and distressing experimental procedures.
  The fact that the vast majority of federally-owned chimpanzees are 
not being used in active research, but instead are warehoused in labs 
at the taxpayer expense, underlines the futility of their continued 
confinement.
  For a single chimpanzee, lifetime care in a research facility can 
cost over $1 million, compared with $340,000 for superior care in a 
sanctuary. Ending invasive research will mean a savings of more than 
$25 million per year for the American people.
  Chimpanzees are poor research models for human illness, and they have 
been of limited use in the study of human disease. Despite how similar 
they are to us, significant differences in their immunology and disease 
progression make them ineffective models for human diseases like HIV, 
cancer, and heart disease research.
  For example, research published in the Journal of Medical Primatology 
in 2009, on hepatitis C indicates that use of chimpanzees has produced 
poor results. And the National Center for Research Resources under the 
National Institutes of Health has prohibited breeding of government-
owned chimpanzees for research. In effect, NIH has already decided that 
the chimpanzee is not an essential animal model for human medical 
research.

  Significant genetic and physiological differences between great apes 
and humans also make chimpanzees a poor research model for human 
diseases. We have spent millions of dollars over several decades on 
chimpanzee-based HIV and Hepatitis C research with no resulting 
vaccines for those diseases. Chimpanzees largely failed as a model for 
HIV because the virus does not cause illness in chimpanzees as it does 
to humans.
  These are very social, highly intelligent animals--with the ability, 
for example, to learn American Sign Language. Their intelligence and 
ability to experience emotions so similar to humans underscores how 
chimpanzees suffer intensely under laboratory conditions.
  Their psychological suffering in laboratories produces human-like 
symptoms of stress, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder 
after decades of living in isolation in small cages.
  Given their social nature and capacity for suffering and boredom due 
to lack of stimulation, the 500 privately-owned chimpanzees and 500 
federally-owned chimpanzees being held in research laboratories would 
be better off in sanctuaries. And by doing so we would save more than 
$25 million taxpayer dollars each year. This is because the cost of 
caring for a chimpanzee in a sanctuary is a fraction of the cost of 
their housing and maintenance in a laboratory. And many in the 
scientific community believe this money could be allocated to more 
effective research.
  In my home State of Washington, I am proud that we have Chimpanzee 
Sanctuary Northwest. Chimpanzee Sanctuary Northwest provides 
sustainable sanctuary for seven chimpanzees retired in 2008 from 
decades in research facilities.
  The United States is currently behind the rest of the world in 
outlawing this sad practice.
  Australia, Austria, Belgium, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, 
Sweden, and the United Kingdom have all banned or severely limited 
experiments on great apes. And several other countries and the European 
Union are considering similar bans as well.
  We are the only country--besides Gabon in West Africa--that is still 
holding or using chimpanzees for invasive research. It's past time for 
the United States to catch up with the rest of the world by ending this 
antiquated use of this endangered species.

[[Page S2454]]

  We are lagging behind in action, but the desire to end invasive 
research on Great Apes has been present for more than a decade. In 
1997, the National Research Council concluded that there should be a 
moratorium on further chimpanzee breeding. And the National Institutes 
of Health (NIH) has already announced an end to funding for the 
breeding of federally-owned chimpanzees for research, but this should 
be codified.
  Government needs to take action to make invasive research on 
chimpanzees illegal.
  That is why today I am introducing the bipartisan Great Ape 
Protection and Cost Savings Act, along with my colleagues Senators 
Susan Collins, Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman.
  The Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act is a commonsense policy 
reform to protect our closest living relatives in the animal kingdom 
from physical and psychological harm, and help reduce government 
spending and our federal deficit.
  Specifically, this bill will phase out the use of chimpanzees in 
invasive research over a three-year period, require permanent 
retirement to suitable sanctuaries for the 500 federally-owned 
chimpanzees currently being warehoused in research laboratories, and 
codifies the current administrative moratorium on government-funded 
breeding of chimpanzees.
  We have been delaying this action for too long. It is time to get 
this done and end this type of harmful research and end this wasteful 
government spending.

                          ____________________