[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 51 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[House]
[Page H2544]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1100
TWO AMERICAS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Tennessee (Mr. Cohen) for 5 minutes.
Mr. COHEN. Mr. Speaker, that was great rhetoric but not reality.
Thank God when the Architect built this Capitol, he put a top on it
that attracts lightning rods; otherwise, who knows what would happen in
front of us.
The budget that was put up yesterday talked about defense, but it
also had one other element in it. That was restricting the District of
Columbia from using funds for low-income women to get family planning
or abortions.
If you really wanted to take care of the troops, you would fund a
spending proposal that took care of the troops and you wouldn't add a
rider to it that you know that no human being who cared about women's
choice would vote for. You eliminate a great percentage of your
possible supporters. If the troops are number one and number one only,
you don't put something on with DC abortion rights on it because that
eliminates part of your constituency.
Now, one of the previous speakers talked about this too, the one that
was back into Led Zeppelin. I haven't figured that one out yet. But it
was something about Planned Parenthood. Why is Planned Parenthood an
issue? Because the Republican majority made it an issue. They put in
their budget that there will be no funding for Planned Parenthood, a
specific organization. Not any organization that does family planning,
not any organization that might provide abortions, but Planned
Parenthood. And that is a sticking point in the negotiations.
It is wrong to single out a single organization that helps women with
their family planning and that does give low-income women opportunities
to get tests for HIV/AIDS and for breast cancer and for all other types
of women's health issues. The Republicans have made that an issue, and
they made it such an issue that they wouldn't have a clean CR proposal
yesterday.
Mr. Hoyer offered a proposal. He said, Let's just continue the budget
for a week at its current spending plans. No cuts, true. They could
come later. That was resoundingly rejected because they wanted to go
forward with their extreme social policy, and that's what matters to
them. They can hide behind what they want.
The fact is there are two America's today. I read about it when I was
a young person. Michael Harrington wrote a book decades ago called
``The Other America.'' It was about an America that didn't get the
support that it needed--Appalachia, poor people, regular folks that
didn't get what they needed and didn't have the opportunity that this
country should give everybody. The two Americas are the upper 1 percent
that aren't going to be paying more taxes and the other 99 percent that
do.
One gentleman said the Democrats want everybody to pay more taxes.
No, not everybody; just the millionaires. And they wouldn't go along
with that, because the millionaires are the party that control the
Republicans. That's what they're about. They won't fund--put a tax
proposal on that will tax millionaires because they want the middle
class to pay more. Their budget blueprint that's going to come out
lowers the overall rate to 25 percent--even more for millionaires.
And the billionaires, they're not watching today, Mr. Speaker,
because they've got their lobbyists working for them. They came here in
December and they took the estate tax from a million dollar exemption
to a $5 million exemption. And they took the rate that really mattered
to them from 55 to 35 percent so they can pass that wealth on and
continue the differences in America.
Two Americas: The upper 1 percent that the majority party represents,
and the other 99 percent that we represent.
Mr. Speaker, let's get abortion out of the debate. Let's protect our
troops. Let's keep this government moving.
____________________