[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 48 (Tuesday, April 5, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S2111]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SBIR/STTR REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2011--Resumed
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the pending business.
The bill clerk read as follows:
A bill (S. 493) to reauthorize and improve the SBIR and
STTR programs, and for other purposes.
Pending:
McConnell amendment No. 183, to prohibit the Administrator
of the Environmental Protection Agency from promulgating any
regulation concerning, taking action relating to or taking
into consideration the emission of a greenhouse gas to
address climate change.
Vitter amendment No. 178, to require the Federal Government
to sell off unused Federal real property.
Inhofe (for Johanns) amendment No. 161, to amend the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the expansion of
information reporting requirements to payments made to
corporations, payments for property and other gross proceeds,
and rental property expense payments.
Cornyn amendment No. 186, to establish a bipartisan
commission for the purpose of improving oversight and
eliminating wasteful government spending.
Paul amendment No. 199, to cut $200,000,000,000 in spending
in fiscal year 2011.
Sanders amendment No. 207, to establish a point of order
against any efforts to reduce benefits paid to Social
Security recipients, raise the retirement age or create
private retirement accounts under title II of the Social
Security Act.
Hutchison amendment No. 197, to delay the implementation of
the health reform law in the United States until there is
final resolution in pending lawsuits.
Coburn amendment No. 184, to provide a list of programs
administered by every Federal department and agency.
Pryor amendment No. 229, to establish the Patriot Express
Loan Program under which the Small Business Administration
may make loans to members of the military community wanting
to start or expand small business concerns.
Landrieu amendment No. 244 (to amendment No. 183), to
change the enactment date.
Paul motion to commit the bill to the Committee on Foreign
Relations with instructions to report the same back to the
Senate forthwith with Paul amendment No. 276 (to the
instructions on Paul motion to commit the bill), of a
perfecting nature.
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, I rise to oppose the Paul amendment on the
President's constitutional authority to order the use of military
force. This amendment is flawed because it doesn't allow the President
to respond militarily to a completed attack and only allows action to
stop an actual or imminent threat to the Nation.
The amendment would in effect make it illegal for the President to
unilaterally order the use of military force to protect U.S. interests
except only in situations that involve preventing an actual threat to
the United States or an imminent threat to the United States.
Numerous Presidential decisions to order the use of military force
over the last 30 years would not meet the standard of the Paul
amendment.
For example, under the Paul amendment President Ronald Reagan would
have acted illegally in 1983 when he unilaterally ordered the invasion
of Grenada, which did not involve an ``actual'' or ``imminent'' threat
against the United States from Grenada.
Similarly President George H.W. Bush would have acted illegally under
the Paul amendment when he ordered the 1989 invasion of Panama.
President Bush justified the Panama invasion based on protecting the
lives of U.S. citizens, defending democracy and human rights in Panama,
and countering drug trafficking, not on an ``actual or imminent threat
to the nation.''
Also, President Reagan's ordering airstrikes against Libya in 1986,
11 days after Libyan terrorist agents bombed the LaBelle discotheque
and killed or wounded over 100 U.S. soldiers, might have been illegal
under the Paul amendment. The President's response to Libya's
sponsorship of terrorism arguably would not have met the standard of
``stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation'' because the
tragic act of terrorism had already happened days earlier.
Finally, according to this amendment, President Obama acted beyond
his constitutional authority when he authorized the use of deadly force
by Navy SEALs to rescue Captain Richard Phillips from Somali pirates on
April 10, 2010.
There are numerous other examples over the past decades when
Presidents have ordered the use of military force to protect U.S.
interests, but where such actions would not have met the standards of
the Paul amendment.
I urge my colleagues to vote to table this amendment.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, it is my understanding that the Paul
amendment is the pending business; is that right?
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Franken). The motion to commit by Senator
Paul is pending.
Mr. REID. I move to table that and ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There is a
sufficient second.
The yeas and nays are ordered.
The question is on agreeing to the motion.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
The result was announced--yeas 90, nays 10, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 50 Leg.]
YEAS--90
Akaka
Alexander
Ayotte
Barrasso
Baucus
Begich
Bennet
Bingaman
Blumenthal
Blunt
Boozman
Boxer
Brown (MA)
Brown (OH)
Burr
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Chambliss
Coats
Coburn
Cochran
Conrad
Coons
Corker
Cornyn
Crapo
Durbin
Enzi
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Graham
Grassley
Hagan
Harkin
Hatch
Hoeven
Hutchison
Inhofe
Inouye
Isakson
Johanns
Johnson (SD)
Kerry
Kirk
Klobuchar
Kohl
Kyl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Levin
Lieberman
Lugar
Manchin
McCain
McCaskill
McConnell
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Murkowski
Murray
Nelson (NE)
Nelson (FL)
Portman
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Risch
Roberts
Rockefeller
Rubio
Sanders
Schumer
Shaheen
Shelby
Stabenow
Tester
Thune
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Vitter
Warner
Webb
Whitehouse
Wicker
Wyden
NAYS--10
Collins
DeMint
Ensign
Johnson (WI)
Lee
Moran
Paul
Sessions
Snowe
Toomey
The motion was agreed to.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote, and I
move to lay that motion on the table.
The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Louisiana.
____________________