[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 36 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S1543]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SBIR/STTR REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2011--MOTION TO PROCEED
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I move to proceed to Calendar No. 17, S.
493.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the motion.
The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
Motion to proceed to Calendar No. 17, (S. 493), a bill to
reauthorize and improve the SBIR and STTR programs, and for
other purposes.
Cloture Motion
Mr. REID. I have a cloture motion at the desk. I ask that it be
reported.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under
rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.
The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to
proceed to Calendar No. 17, S. 493, a bill to reauthorize and
improve the SBIR and STTR programs, and for other purposes.
Harry Reid, Mary L. Landrieu, Benjamin L. Cardin, Charles
E. Schumer, Daniel K. Inouye, Joseph I. Lieberman,
Bernard Sanders, Debbie Stabenow, Patrick J. Leahy, Tom
Harkin, Kay R. Hagan, Michael F. Bennet, Al Franken,
Herb Kohl, Sheldon Whitehouse, Thomas R. Carper,
Richard J. Durbin.
Mr. REID. I now ask unanimous consent that the cloture vote occur
immediately following the Senate's action in executive session on
Monday, March 14; further, that the mandatory quorum call under rule
XXII be waived.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. REID. I now withdraw my motion.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has that right.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I am disappointed that I had to file cloture
on a bill as important as this one. We were going to have a new day in
the Senate. I think it is really too bad. This is the small business
innovation bill, and everyone knows we have had an open amendment
process. People can offer amendments on anything they want. I think
this is suggestive of maybe something I do not understand.
Why wouldn't my Republican colleagues want us to move to a small
business bill to help create jobs? We are told that 85 percent of all
jobs in America are small business jobs. Should we not be trying to
help them? That is what we have been working on. We have not been doing
all of these things, these ``messages,'' cutting out programs for
little boys and girls who want to learn to read, cutting Pell grants
for young men and women who are in college, cutting the ability of
renewable energy projects to go forward, and all of these other
messages they are sending the American people. We are trying to create
jobs.
We have spent this Congress, over here in the Senate, on bipartisan
issues creating jobs: FAA, 280,000 jobs. We just finished, within the
last few hours, the bill that will change the patent system in this
country. That has needed changing for 60 years, and we have done that.
Now they are blocking our going to a small business bill, another
bipartisan bill. Senator Snowe, the ranking member of that committee,
has worked with Senator Landrieu to move this bill forward. Who is
holding up our going to this very important jobs bill? I hope the
Republicans in the House are understanding what we are doing over here,
creating jobs.
With those two bills I have just mentioned, the patent bill and the
bill dealing with the Federal Aviation Administration, that is 580,000
jobs. So I am very disappointed I had to file cloture on proceeding to
a small business jobs bill.
____________________