[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 36 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1541-S1542]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RESTORING DISCIPLINE TO THE BUDGET PROCESS
Mr. INOUYE. Madam President, today our Nation faces a very difficult
political landscape when it comes to addressing the major challenges to
our country, such as unemployment and the deficit. The American public
is demanding that the House and Senate work with the President to
address these concerns.
I believe the American people's understandable and growing concern
over the national debt is shared by every Member of this body. But in
order for the Congress to address our fiscal crisis, we must fix our
broken budget process.
Today, with fiscal year 2011 nearly halfway over, as a result of the
Congress's inability to finish its work, the Federal Government is
still operating on stopgap funding designed to avert a government
shutdown.
This is no way to govern. Continuing resolutions make it difficult
for Federal agencies to perform their duties. As the Secretary of
Defense, Mr. Gates, has stated very clearly, operating under a CR
places a great burden on the Department of Defense. The same can be
said for every Federal agency. Our failure to act responsibly makes the
everyday functioning of government more difficult and less responsive
to the needs of the American people.
Moreover, continuing resolutions make a mockery of our constitutional
responsibility to allocate taxpayer funding wisely. Putting the country
on budgetary autopilot is simply unacceptable. It is well past the time
to cast aside the blistering campaign rhetoric of the fall and find the
means to compromise.
Many new Members of this body were elected on the promise of a return
to fiscal responsibility. I would suggest that returning to regular
order in our budget process is a necessary component to achieve this
goal.
The Appropriations Committee produces 12 individual bipartisan
spending
[[Page S1542]]
bills, but when the Congress fails to act on them through regular
order, we wind up with a $1 trillion omnibus bill or a $1 trillion
continuing resolution that cedes the power of the purse to the
executive branch.
Neither the most liberal nor the most conservative Member of this
body should prefer an omnibus or a CR over the regular order in our
budget process.
Several weeks ago, I had the opportunity to sit down with the new
chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Congressman Hal Rogers
of Kentucky, to congratulate him on his new position.
During our discussion, we both agreed that the Congress needs to
reestablish regular order in the appropriations process. Both Chambers
need to pass its bills and allow us to work out our differences in
conference.
I believe if we adopt this approach, we can do our part to help this
Nation regain its economic health.
The first step in the process is the adoption of a budget to provide
the framework for appropriations bills. The House must step up to the
plate with a budget that is workable. It cannot hide behind vague
rhetoric and arbitrary spending caps, and it should not insist upon
irrational, problematic cuts that would devastate the lives of the
American people. Likewise, it is imperative that the Senate do its part
in moving a budget through a responsible and regular order process,
including the timely adoption of a budget resolution. If a budget
resolution is not adopted by early May, the appropriations process will
be delayed. Every week of delay further diminishes our ability to
finish our work prior to the end of the fiscal year.
In recent years, all too often appropriations bills have been held
hostage, as Members offered message amendments, knowing they would not
pass, while the time needed to complete 12 freestanding bills slipped
away. By September, we had abandoned any hope of finishing all 12 bills
as the calendar simply did not give us enough time.
We Democrats must recognize that regular order cannot exist without
bipartisan cooperation. Last year, despite the lack of a budget
resolution, the committee completed almost all of its work, preparing
11 of the 12 appropriations bills for full consideration in a timely
manner. However, gridlock on the Senate floor eliminated any further
progress.
If a more open amendment process for relevant amendments will enable
these bills to move forward, we should be open to such an approach even
if that means taking some uncomfortable votes. This Chamber is split 53
to 47. Both sides need to give a little bit, and in so doing, it is my
hope that we can get the bipartisan appropriations process back on
track.
Certainly, no Member of this body wants to explain to his or her
constituents why we have failed yet again to responsibly fund the
government or ceded our constitutional authority to the administration
or even why we are unable to work together responsibly to avoid a
disastrous government shutdown. We must find a way to accomplish the
tasks the Constitution has assigned to us. To do this, we need a budget
resolution, we need the House to send over appropriations bills in a
timely fashion, we need floor time, and we need a willingness to vote
on amendments. Without these four things, there is no doubt in my mind
that I will be standing in this Chamber in late September, yet again,
seeking passage of a continuing resolution in order to avoid shutting
down the government.
The House and the Senate need to find a way to work together to pass
our bills under the regular order and send them to the President. This
is the only way we can restore discipline to the budget process. It is
the only way we can maintain our constitutional responsibility to
determine how taxpayers dollars are spent. It is truly the only way we
can avoid repeating the catchall spending bills none of us wants.
I yield the floor, and I note the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Klobuchar). The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LEVIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________