[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 36 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H1671-H1672]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




           NUCLEAR WASTE AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN: OVER MY DEAD BODY

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from 
Nevada (Ms. Berkley) for 5 minutes.
  Ms. BERKLEY. Mr. Speaker, I have been in Congress now for 12 years. 
The very first speech I made on the floor of the House was why nuclear 
waste should not be stored at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. I cannot believe 
12 years from when I first made that speech, I am back in the well of 
the House talking about why Nevada should not be

[[Page H1672]]

the site for the nuclear repository for this country.
  President Obama defunded the Yucca Mountain project, and let me tell 
you why he took this very bold step: because 77 percent of the people 
of the State of Nevada do not want nuclear waste stored at Yucca 
Mountain. There are groundwater issues, seismic activity, volcanic 
activity, and it is 90 miles from the major population center of Las 
Vegas.
  It is dangerous. There are no current EPA standards. And why is that? 
No current EPA radiation standards, because there is no way to set 
radiation standards for material that has a radioactive half shelf life 
of 300,000 years. But the Republican budget that has just been 
submitted resurrects Yucca Mountain and starts the process of dumping 
another $100 billion into a hole in the Nevada desert where there will 
never, ever be any nuclear waste stored.
  At the same time that the majority is calling for spending more money 
to dump nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, they are also pushing for 
devastating cuts that will end the loan guarantees for a new solar 
power plant in the State of Nevada near the community of Tonopah. The 
result will be the loss of 600 jobs at a time when the Silver State has 
double-digit unemployment. Almost 15 percent of the people who live in 
Nevada have no job, and they are going to take away 600 more by this 
very foolish act. Construction of this new solar plant will not only 
provide hundreds of paychecks to Nevada workers, it will also supply 
enough clean and renewable energy to power 75,000 homes in the State of 
Nevada. Without these loan guarantees that are now on the Republican 
chopping block, this solar project's bright future is looking mighty, 
mighty dim.
  Tapping renewable energy sources, like the wind and solar and 
geothermal, all in great abundance in the State of Nevada, is where the 
future of this Nation and certainly Nevada's energy needs are.
  Do we want to continue to rely on the Saudis and the Venezuelans and 
the Libyans for our energy needs to be met? I don't think so. Renewable 
is the way to go.
  This Nation and Nevada's future is in clean energy, not in nuclear 
waste stored at Yucca Mountain, yet the Republicans want to cut funding 
for solar and other renewable resources that can be harnessed to 
provide clean energy and jobs for our local workers. And they are 
pushing these cuts while calling for $100 billion to be dumped down a 
hole in the middle of the Nevada desert, as I said, 90 miles from a 
major population center.
  I reject these efforts to restore the funding to Yucca Mountain. It 
is more wasteful spending at a time when they are talking about fixing 
the deficit. This is no way to do it by adding an extra $100 billion. 
And I will make this pledge to you now: There will be no nuclear waste 
shipped to Yucca Mountain because it will be shipped over my dead body. 
I will lay across those railroad tracks and stop that train from 
depositing nuclear waste in my great State.
  I oppose the cuts as much as I oppose the funding of Yucca Mountain. 
I oppose the cuts in the solar energy loan guarantee program that will 
cut 600 jobs from the State of Nevada and prevent us from moving 
forward for a bright, renewable energy future.

                          ____________________