Congressional Record, Volume 157 Issue 35 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)

[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 35 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1422-S1491]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

FULL-YEAR CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2011

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will
proceed to the consideration of H.R. 1, which the clerk will report by
title.
The legislative clerk read as follows:

A bill (H.R. 1) making appropriations for the Department of
Defense and other departments and agencies of the Government
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for other
purposes.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, there will now be 3
hours of debate, equally divided and controlled between the two leaders
or their designees.
The Senator from Hawaii.

[[Page S1423]]

Mr. INOUYE. Mr. President, the amendment I introduced on Friday cuts
$51 billion from the discretionary spending request submitted by the
President for fiscal year 2011. If this amendment were agreed to as
written, it would mean we would appropriate $51 billion less than the
President felt was necessary for the government to carry out its
duties.
I do not agree with every item this President or any President
requests in their budget. But I also know the President's budget
request did not contain $51 billion in frivolous or wasteful spending.
The cuts necessary to reach the $51-billion level required difficult
choices. This amendment makes real cuts to real programs.
Tens of thousands of Americans will feel the direct impact of the
proposed cuts. But the cuts included in this amendment are based on
hearings, testimony, and a thorough analysis of the current needs of
every agency and department the committee funds. By contrast, the
Republicans in the House have thrown together a proposal based not on
budgets, not on hearings, not on the demonstrated needs of agencies and
departments but rather based on the campaign promise to reduce spending
by $100 billion.
H.R. 1 shows clearly what happens when you run a bill based not on
analysis but on campaign speeches. Therefore, today, the Senate finds
itself responding to draconian cuts that would lead to furloughs,
disrupt the delivery of government agencies and services, and harm
America's children, our students, our working class, and our seniors.
An estimated 700,000 jobs would be lost.
All this pain delivered in the name of deficit reduction and growing
the economy. Yet the facts are clear. This is the wrong direction for
our Nation.
We face our current fiscal situation primarily because of falling
revenues brought about by unpaid-for tax cuts, especially for the
wealthiest Americans, and because of ever-rising entitlement costs.
Every nonpartisan report on finding a solution to our current fiscal
crisis stresses the need for a comprehensive solution, a solution that
includes cuts in discretionary spending, both defense and nondefense,
as well as cuts in entitlement spending, and, yes, the need for
additional revenues.
Just yesterday, the New York Times published a story about the
efforts of the junior Senator from Virginia and the senior Senator from
Georgia to honestly examine what it will take to solve our fiscal
challenges. According to that story, even if Congress cut discretionary
spending to zero, the senior Senator from Georgia was quoted as saying:
``We still couldn't solve the problem.''
I could not agree more. The solution to deficit reduction will not
come from huge cuts to a small portion of the Federal budget. But that
is what the House is proposing. What H.R. 1 will do instead is
jeopardize the economic recovery we are beginning to see.
This Democratic alternative attempts to make the best of a very bad
situation. The top line numbers tell a story. In this amendment, we are
$23 billion below the President's request for nonsecurity spending, and
we are $28 billion below his original request for spending related to
our Nation's security.
For the Department of Defense alone, we have reduced spending by
$19.4 billion, including a reduction of $2.1 billion for military
construction, and $17.3 billion for the rest of the Defense Department.
At this level, the bill is nearly $3 billion below the amounts proposed
by the House for these activities. The recommended amounts will cover
our defense requirements in this constrained fiscal environment.
However, my colleagues should all understand that with our troops
still serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, this is not the time to be
looking to defense for additional reductions. I feel that not all
Members understand the depths of the cuts we have had to take to get
$51 billion under the request.
They should be advised, for example, that the Senate amendment cuts
$355 million of State and local law enforcement grants. This will
result in some 1,400 fewer local and tribal law enforcement and
criminal justice jobs. In addition, the amendment cuts $526 million
from FBI salaries and expenses. These cuts will halt new national
security enhancements intended to improve our intelligence and
counterterrorism capabilities to protect U.S. information and
technology networks from cyber attacks and to assist in litigation of
intelligence and terrorism cases.
This amendment cuts science funding by $573 million at the National
Science Foundation and by $165 million at the National Institute of
Standards and Technology. As a result, the Nation will lose
opportunities for promising research in emerging fields such as cyber
security and nanotechnology. Instead of taking the lead, as we have
always done, we will slow down, allowing the rest of the world to catch
up.
When it comes to the critical area of education, the Senate amendment
eliminates 17 individual education programs totaling $370 million. It
cuts all Federal funding specifically targeted to education technology,
gifted and talented instruction, and family literacy. The list goes on
and on. But as significant as these cuts are, they stand in strong
contrast to the House Republican bill, which includes such severe
measures that the bill would undermine our security, endanger our
economy, while costing hundreds of thousands of American jobs.
H.R. 1 would cut transit security grants by 66 percent, despite the
fact that there have been over 1,300 attacks, killing or injuring over
18,000 people worldwide on trains and subways over the last 7 years.
The Senate bill would maintain the fiscal year 2010 enacted level of
$300 million.
The House Republican CR cuts discretionary funding for community
health centers by $1 billion compared to the fiscal year 2010 enacted
level. This cut would prevent any new clinic from opening. It will
eliminate funds for 127 clinics currently operating in 38 States and
reduce current services at another 1,096 centers across the country.
More than 2.8 million people will likely lose access to their current
primary care provider, and over 5,000 health center staff would lose
their jobs. The Senate bill restores the $1 billion cut, preserving
both the vital services being provided today and the planned expansion
of centers estimated to treat over 7\1/2\ million new patients this
year.
The House CR would eliminate all funding for the Transportation
Investment Generating Economic Recovery ``TIGER'' Grant Program. TIGER
grants are highly competitive and fund transportation projects that
make a significant contribution to the Nation, a region or a
metropolitan area. The House proposal would take funding away from 75
projects in 40 States across the country. Based on information from the
Transportation Department, cutting a total of $1.2 billion from the
TIGER Program will put 33,360 jobs at risk.
H.R. 1 cuts funding for the Social Security Administration
administrative expense by $125 million below the 2010 level. This would
cause the SSA to freeze hiring across the agency and possibly furlough
employees at a time when the number of Americans filing for disability
and retirement benefits is at record levels. The Senate bill, by
contrast, provides $600 million more than the House Republican
proposal. Compared to the House CR, it will allow SSA to process about
300,000 more initial disability claims and 150,000 more disability
hearings and prevent delays in new beneficiaries receiving their
retirement benefits.
The House bill slashes title I education funding by nearly $700
million, meaning 2,400 schools serving 1 million disadvantaged students
could lose funding, and approximately 10,000 teachers and aides would
lose their jobs. At a time when schools across the Nation are already
struggling with budget cuts, the title I grants program serves as the
foundation of Federal assistance to elementary and secondary schools
across the country, providing financial assistance to more than 90
percent of our Nation's school districts.
Finally, with regard to our Nation's security interests, the
devastating funding cuts in H.R. 1 undermine our ability to stabilize
Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq and to support General Petraeus's
counterinsurgency strategy. H.R. 1 provides $5.71 billion for the
Economic Support Fund, a 27-percent cut from the fiscal year 2011
request level.
As both Secretary Gates and Secretary Clinton have made clear in
repeated testimony before Congress, cuts

[[Page S1424]]

of this magnitude will seriously impede efforts to stabilize
Afghanistan and to transition responsibility for U.S. operations in
Iraq from the military to civilians.
There are many more examples of damage that would come should H.R. 1
be enacted into law, which is why the President has promised a veto and
why I know all my Democratic colleagues will reject it when it comes up
for a vote.
The Senate amendment I offer takes a responsible approach to funding
the government for the remainder of the fiscal year, making difficult
decisions but also ensuring minimal disruptions to the economic
recovery.
We are now almost halfway through fiscal year 2011, If we are to have
any chance of avoiding another series of continuing resolutions for
fiscal year 2012, we simply must finish our work on the current year
and move past this issue. Therefore, I strongly encourage my colleagues
to support my amendment as a prudent alternative to the House measure.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record
the following explanatory statement regarding Division A of my
Amendment No. 149, The Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2011.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:

Explanatory Statement Submitted by Senator Daniel K. Inouye Regarding
Division A of SA 149, The Department of Defense and Full-Year
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011

Reprogramming guidance

For fiscal year 2011, the Department of Defense is directed
to adhere to the definition of Program, Project and Activity,
and to follow the guidance for Congressional Special Interest
Items, Reprogrammings, Reprogramming Reporting Requirements,
and Funding Increases, as specified in the Explanatory
Statement, Division A, Department of Defense Appropriations
Act Fiscal Year 2010, Public Law 111-118.

Classified annex

A classified annex accompanying this Act will be forwarded
under separate cover.

(Rescissions)

Language is included that rescinds $1,213,536,000 from the
following programs:
2009 Appropriations:
Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
Future Combat Systems...................................$86,300,000
Other Procurement, Army:
Armored Security Vehicles................................55,000,000
Force XXII Battle Command Brigade and Below..............30,600,000
Semi-trailers, Flatbed...................................62,000,000
Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
KC-130J..................................................12,000,000
F/A-18E/F................................................14,100,000
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
Global Hawk excess funds.................................49,000,000
C-130 AMP................................................31,900,000
HC/MC updated pricing....................................36,000,000
2010 Appropriations:
Aircraft Procurement, Army:
Tactical SIGINT Payload..................................14,000,000
Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army:
Future Combat Systems spin-outs..........................19,600,000
Improved Recovery Vehicle.................................8,700,000
MK-19 Grenade Machine Gun Modifications...................7,700,000
Missile Procurement, Army:
GMLRS.....................................................9,171,000
Aircraft Procurement, Navy:
F-35 STOVL AP...........................................100,000,000
EA-18G MYP savings.......................................89,120,000
F/A-18E/F MYP savings....................................72,727,000
F-18 Series ECO..........................................17,000,000
E-6 Series................................................6,000,000
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps:
General Purpose Bombs....................................11,576,000
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy:
DDG-51 main reduction gear savings.......................22,000,000
Other Procurement, Navy:
Minesweeping System Replacement...........................5,400,000
Aircraft Launch Recovery..................................3,642,000
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force:
B-2A......................................................5,900,000
B-52.....................................................39,300,000
C-17 Modifications.......................................12,200,000
C-130J updated pricing....................................7,000,000
C-130 AP updated pricing.................................15,100,000
HC/MC-130 AP.............................................46,900,000
HC/MC-130 updated pricing................................13,200,000
Initial Spares--Joint Stars Re-engining..................11,700,000
Other Procurement, Air Force:
FAB-T....................................................36,600,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army:
Aircraft Avionics--JTRS AMF..............................10,200,000
HFDS.....................................................15,000,000
Future Combat System--Class IV UAV Program of Record.....12,000,000
TUAV-TSP.................................................16,300,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force:
B-2......................................................90,000,000
Classified Program.......................................10,000,000
Alternative Fuels........................................10,000,000
Small Diameter Bomb......................................22,000,000
Engine CIP...............................................15,000,000
JSTARS...................................................14,600,000
RQ-4 UAV.................................................18,000,000
C-5 Airlift Squadrons....................................19,000,000
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide:
BMD Hercules.............................................10,000,000
For the Department of Defense base budget, funds are to be available
for fiscal year 2011, as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M-1 Budget request Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS. ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 6,392,861 6,392,861
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 2,088,308 2,088,308
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 1,854,718 1,854,718
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 255,925 255,925
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 97,698 97,698
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 300,939 300,939
ALLOWANCES........................... 198,601 198,601
SEPARATION PAY....................... 61,798 61,798
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 487,469 487,469
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 11,738,317 11,738,317

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 13,682,488 13,682,488
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 4,470,859 4,470,859
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 4,395,850 4,395,850
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 102,851 102,851
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 1,269,047 1,129,047
Enlistment Bonuses--Excess to ....................... -40,000
Requirement.
Re-enlistment Bonuses--Excess to ....................... -100,000
Requirement.
ALLOWANCES........................... 806,471 806,471
SEPARATION PAY....................... 255,127 255,127
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 1,046,710 1,046,710
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 26,029,403 25,889,403

BA-3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS... ....................... .......................
ACADEMY CADETS....................... 74,773 74,773
TOTAL, BA-3.......................... 74,773 74,773

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 1,313,309 1,313,309
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND.................. 817,691 817,691
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL 748 748
ALLOWANCE.
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 2,131,748 2,131,748

[[Page S1425]]

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION ....................... .......................
TRAVEL.
ACCESSION TRAVEL..................... 202,699 202,699
TRAINING TRAVEL...................... 142,749 142,749
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL................... 494,937 494,937
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL.................... 674,831 674,831
SEPARATION TRAVEL.................... 198,439 198,439
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............ 12,137 12,137
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................ 12,639 12,639
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............ 38,931 38,931
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 1,777,362 1,777,362

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS... 2,233 2,233
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES 648 648
SAVINGS.
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 45,500 45,500
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 188,778 188,778
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 30,879 30,879
ADOPTION EXPENSES.................... 610 610
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY............... 8,007 8,007
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........ 338 338
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 138,731 138,731
(ROTC).
JUNIOR ROTC.......................... 50,201 50,201
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 465,925 465,925

LESS REIMBURSABLES................... -245,251 -245,251
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............ 0 -789,624
Undistributed Transfer to Title IX... ....................... -789,624
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY...... 41,972,277 41,042,653

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS. ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 3,680,703 3,680,703
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 1,202,462 1,202,462
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 1,263,675 1,263,675
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 143,344 143,344
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 155,148 155,148
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 355,821 355,821
ALLOWANCES........................... 104,291 104,291
SEPARATION PAY....................... 25,353 25,353
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 278,666 278,666
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 7,209,463 7,209,463

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 8,257,803 8,257,803
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 2,700,204 2,700,204
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 3,682,915 3,682,915
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 100,499 100,499
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 839,787 814,787
Re-enlistment Bonuses--Excess to ....................... -5,000
Requirement.
Enlistment Bonuses--Excess to ....................... -20,000
Requirement.
ALLOWANCES........................... 498,621 498,621
SEPARATION PAY....................... 127,343 127,343
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 631,722 631,722
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 16,838,894 16,813,894

BA-3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ....................... .......................
MIDSHIPMEN.
MIDSHIPMEN........................... 74,950 74,950
TOTAL, BA-3.......................... 74,950 74,950

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 685,085 685,085
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND.................. 419,333 419,333
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL 12 12
ALLOWANCE.
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 1,104,430 1,104,430

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION ....................... .......................
TRAVEL.
ACCESSION TRAVEL..................... 76,220 76,220
TRAINING TRAVEL...................... 71,814 71,814
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL................... 219,685 219,685
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL.................... 354,275 354,275
SEPARATION TRAVEL.................... 103,806 103,806
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............ 39,368 39,368
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................ 5,760 5,760
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............ 6,386 6,386
OTHER................................ 6,406 6,406
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 883,720 883,720

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS... 261 261
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES 1,427 1,427
SAVINGS.
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 17,700 17,700
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 88,350 88,350
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 21,515 21,515
ADOPTION EXPENSES.................... 271 271
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY............... 8,030 8,030
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........ 190 190
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 27,345 27,345
(ROTC).
JUNIOR R.O.T.C....................... 14,093 14,093
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 179,182 179,182

LESS REIMBURSABLES................... -339,690 -339,690
UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. 0 -13,500
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -13,500
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY...... 25,950,949 25,912,449

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS. ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 1,433,200 1,433,200
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 465,072 465,072
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 462,438 462,438
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 59,613 59,613
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 50,011 50,011
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 27,921 27,921
ALLOWANCES........................... 34,404 34,404
SEPARATION PAY....................... 13,299 13,299
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 109,014 109,014
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 2,654,972 2,654,972

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 4,910,560 4,910,560
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 1,591,322 1,591,322
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 1,660,161 1,660,161
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 9,158 9,158
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 288,654 288,654
ALLOWANCES........................... 278,060 278,060

[[Page S1426]]

SEPARATION PAY....................... 65,101 65,101
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 372,411 372,411
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 9,175,427 9,175,427

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 489,789 489,789
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND.................. 324,565 324,565
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL 750 750
ALLOWANCE.
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 815,104 815,104

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION ....................... .......................
TRAVEL.
ACCESSION TRAVEL..................... 79,378 79,378
TRAINING TRAVEL...................... 10,079 10,079
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL................... 239,442 239,442
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL.................... 115,330 115,330
SEPARATION TRAVEL.................... 55,528 55,528
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............ 742 742
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................ 6,305 6,305
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............ 13,818 13,818
OTHER................................ 2,683 2,683
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 523,305 523,305

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS... 1,823 1,823
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES 19 19
SAVINGS.
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 17,200 17,200
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 69,359 69,359
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 4,249 4,249
ADOPTION EXPENSES.................... 159 159
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY............... 2,853 2,853
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........ 278 278
JUNIOR R.O.T.C....................... 5,573 5,573
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 101,513 101,513

LESS REIMBURSABLES................... -20,160 -20,160

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. 0 -40,000
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -40,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE 13,250,161 13,210,161
CORPS.

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS. ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 4,687,593 4,687,593
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 1,522,644 1,522,644
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 1,347,403 1,347,403
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 182,253 182,253
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 239,121 239,121
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 322,642 322,642
ALLOWANCES........................... 128,157 128,157
SEPARATION PAY....................... 64,974 64,974
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 355,711 355,711
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 8,850,498 8,850,498

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 8,540,083 8,540,083
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 2,781,402 2,781,402
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 3,038,904 3,038,904
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 36,980 36,980
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 396,103 380,103
Re-enlistment Bonuses--Excess to ....................... -16,000
Requirement.
ALLOWANCES........................... 570,857 570,857
SEPARATION PAY....................... 124,411 124,411
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 653,317 653,317
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 16,142,057 16,126,057

BA-3: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CADETS... ....................... .......................
ACADEMY CADETS....................... 75,383 75,383
TOTAL, BA-3.......................... 75,383 75,383

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 872,055 872,055
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND.................. 169,924 169,924
FAMILY SUBSISTENCE SUPPLEMENTAL 37 37
ALLOWANCE.
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 1,042,016 1,042,016

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION.... ....................... .......................
ACCESSION TRAVEL..................... 87,377 87,377
TRAINING TRAVEL...................... 72,521 72,521
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL................... 296,604 296,604
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL.................... 505,198 505,198
SEPARATION TRAVEL.................... 176,549 176,549
TRAVEL OF ORGANIZED UNITS............ 23,561 23,561
NON-TEMPORARY STORAGE................ 40,772 40,772
TEMPORARY LODGING EXPENSE............ 28,936 28,936
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 1,231,518 1,231,518

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
APPREHENSION OF MILITARY DESERTERS... 131 131
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES 2,179 2,179
SAVINGS.
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 19,900 19,900
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 49,143 49,143
SURVIVOR BENEFITS.................... 1,760 1,760
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 484 484
ADOPTION EXPENSES.................... 395 395
TRANSPORTATION SUBSIDY............... 6,903 6,903
PARTIAL DISLOCATION ALLOWANCE........ 1,578 1,578
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 45,571 45,571
(ROTC).
JUNIOR ROTC.......................... 16,185 16,185
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 144,229 144,229

LESS REIMBURSABLES................... -363,946 -363,946
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE. 27,121,755 27,105,755

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND ....................... .......................
SUPPORT.
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 1,249,133 1,249,133
DRILLS 24/48).
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR 44,460 36,460
ACTIVE DUTY).
Projected Underexecution............. ....................... -8,000
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)...... 268,215 268,215
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE 8,830 8,830
RECRUITS).
MOBILIZATION TRAINING................ 21,460 10,460
Projected Underexecution............. ....................... -11,000
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 177,121 177,121
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 293,439 283,439
Excessive Growth..................... ....................... -10,000

[[Page S1427]]

ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 2,129,646 2,129,646
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 57,633 57,633
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP........ 66,940 66,940
OTHER PROGRAMS....................... 80,288 80,288
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 4,397,165 4,368,165

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. 0 -35,000
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -35,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY....... 4,397,165 4,333,165

RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND ....................... .......................
SUPPORT.
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 626,657 626,657
DRILLS 24/48).
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR 9,070 9,070
ACTIVE DUTY).
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)...... 45,603 45,603
MOBILIZATION TRAINING................ 8,434 8,434
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 45,930 45,930
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 89,647 89,647
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 1,061,128 1,061,128
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 3,780 3,780
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP........ 53,942 53,942
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 1,944,191 1,944,191

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. 0 -4,000
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -4,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY....... 1,944,191 1,940,191

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND ....................... .......................
SUPPORT.
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 196,974 196,974
DRILLS 24/48).
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR 36,116 36,116
ACTIVE DUTY).
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)...... 96,138 96,138
MOBILIZATION TRAINING................ 3,724 3,724
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 16,810 16,810
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 27,688 27,688
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 216,537 216,537
PLATOON LEADER CLASS................. 12,256 12,256
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 11,198 11,198
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 617,441 617,441

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............ 0 -5,250
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -1,250
MIP Marine Corps Reserve Intelligence ....................... -4,000
Program.
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE 617,441 612,191
CORPS.

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND ....................... .......................
SUPPORT.
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 670,341 670,341
DRILLS 24/48).
PAY GROUP B TRAINING (BACKFILL FOR 101,951 101,951
ACTIVE DUTY).
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)...... 54,850 54,850
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE 50 50
RECRUITS).
MOBILIZATION TRAINING................ 447 447
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 163,272 163,272
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 243,233 243,233
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 378,772 378,772
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 18,295 18,295
HEALTH PROFESSION SCHOLARSHIP........ 51,331 51,331
OTHER PROGRAMS (ADMINISTRATION and 4,255 4,255
SUPPORT).
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 1,686,797 1,686,797

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............ 0 -36,000
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -15,000
Below Budgeted End Strength.......... ....................... -21,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE.. 1,686,797 1,650,797

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND ....................... .......................
SUPPORT.
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 2,010,867 1,980,867
DRILLS 24/48).
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -30,000
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)...... 510,859 510,859
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE 71,222 71,222
RECRUITS).
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 577,600 577,600
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 534,954 521,954
Recruiter Mandays--Excess to ....................... -13,000
Requirement.
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 3,788,954 3,788,954
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 129,840 129,840
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 7,624,296 7,581,296

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............ 0 -70,000
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -70,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 7,624,296 7,511,296

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE

BA-1: RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AND ....................... .......................
SUPPORT.
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 939,636 931,636
DRILLS 24/48).
Inactive Duty Training--Unjustified ....................... -8,000
Growth.
PAY GROUP F TRAINING (RECRUITS)...... 99,839 99,839
PAY GROUP P TRAINING (PIPELINE 298 298
RECRUITS).
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 209,944 209,944
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 131,226 131,226
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 1,692,112 1,682,112
Bonuses--Unjustified Requirement..... ....................... -10,000
EDUCATION BENEFITS................... 30,543 30,543
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 3,103,598 3,085,598

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENTS............ 0 -25,500
Unobligated/Unexpended Balances...... ....................... -17,500
Lower than Budgeted Pay Grade Mix.... ....................... -8,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR 3,103,598 3,060,098
FORCE.
=================================================
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL............ 127,668,630 126,378,756
=================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M-1 Budget Request Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY

111.................... MANEUVER UNITS....................... 1,087,321 1,087,321

[[Page S1428]]

112.................... MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES............. 114,448 113,790
Deployment Offset.................... ....................... -658
113.................... ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES.............. 773,540 769,338
Deployment Offset.................... ....................... -4,202
114.................... THEATER LEVEL ASSETS................. 794,806 767,727
Aircraft Lease for Casualty ....................... -18,500
Evacuation Funded in fiscal year
2011 OCO.
Sustainment.......................... ....................... -8,579
115.................... LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT....... 1,399,332 1,392,912
Transfer to Title IX--MRAP Vehicle ....................... -6,420
Sustainment at Combat Training
Centers.
116.................... AVIATION ASSETS...................... 897,666 867,666
Deployment Offset.................... ....................... -30,000
121.................... FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 2,520,995 2,314,041
Unjustified Increase for Travel...... ....................... -91,000
Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010 ....................... -35,000
Costs.
Transfer to Title IX--Body Armor ....................... -71,660
Sustainment.
Transfer to Title IX--Rapid Equipping ....................... -9,294
Force Readiness.
122.................... LAND FORCES FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS. 596,117 574,946
Transfer to Title IX--Fixed Wing Life ....................... -21,171
Cycle Contract Support.
123.................... LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE........ 890,122 950,122
UH-60 A to L Conversions............. ....................... +60,000
131.................... BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT.............. 7,563,566 7,281,191
Transfer from the Defense Health ....................... +30,625
Program for Centralized Management
of the Substance Abuse Program.
Army Tenant Pentagon Rent ....................... -33,000
Requirements.
Reduced Requirement for Collateral ....................... -50,000
Equipment in fiscal year 2011.
Transfer to Title IX--Overseas ....................... -200,000
Security Guards.
Transfer to Title IX--Senior Leader-- ....................... -30,000
Initiative--Comprehensive Soldier
Fitness Program.
132.................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, 2,500,892 2,500,892
& MODERNIZATION.
133.................... MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL 390,004 390,004
HEADQUARTERS.
134.................... COMBATANT COMMANDER'S CORE OPERATIONS 167,758 167,758
138.................... COMBATANT COMMANDER'S DIRECT MISSION 464,851 464,851
SUPPORT.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 20,161,418 19,642,559

211.................... STRATEGIC MOBILITY................... 333,266 333,266
212.................... ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS............ 102,240 102,240
213.................... INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS.............. 5,736 5,736
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2.......... 441,242 441,242

311.................... OFFICER ACQUISITION.................. 129,902 129,902
312.................... RECRUIT TRAINING..................... 74,705 74,705
313.................... ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING............ 63,223 63,223
314.................... SENIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS 479,343 479,343
321.................... SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........... 1,082,517 1,027,334
Unjustified Growth in Supply and ....................... -40,000
Equipment Purchases.
Transfer to Title IX-Survivability ....................... -15,183
and Maneuverability Training.
322.................... FLIGHT TRAINING...................... 1,046,124 1,032,124
Budget Justification Does not Match ....................... -14,000
Summary of Price and Program Changes.
323.................... PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION... 163,607 163,607
324.................... TRAINING SUPPORT..................... 695,200 695,200
331.................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 544,014 524,014
Budget Justification Does not Match ....................... -20,000
Summary of Price and Program Changes.
332.................... EXAMINING............................ 153,091 153,091
333.................... OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..... 241,170 241,170
334.................... CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING...... 220,771 220,771
335.................... JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS 175,347 183,347
Program Increase-Junior ROTC......... ....................... +8,000
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3.......... 5,069,014 4,987,831

411.................... SECURITY PROGRAMS.................... 1,030,355 1,030,355
421.................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 587,952 557,826
First Destination Transportation Cost ....................... -30,126
of New Equipment is Financed in the
Cost of Equipment.
422.................... CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES............ 669,853 669,853
423.................... LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.......... 503,876 503,876
424.................... AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT................ 435,020 435,020
431.................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 912,355 902,355
Unjustified Growth for Headquarters ....................... -10,000
Accounts.
432.................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 1,528,371 1,528,371
433.................... MANPOWER MANAGEMENT.................. 368,480 328,480
Unsupported Request for 712 Temporary ....................... -40,000
Hires.
434.................... OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT.............. 261,829 261,829
435.................... OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT................ 1,145,902 1,149,822
Capitol 4th.......................... ....................... +3,920
436.................... ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES............... 205,967 205,967
437.................... REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT............... 168,664 168,664
441.................... INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS.. 462,488 476,888
Outfitting of NATO SOF Headquarters ....................... +14,400
Building.
442.................... MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT OF OTHER 19,179 16,179
NATIONS.
Information Operations............... ....................... -3,000
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 8,300,291 8,235,485

FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR ....................... -1,000
INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE,
ARMY.
33,971,965 33,306,117

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY
1A1A................... MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS.. 4,429,832 4,429,832
1A2A................... FLEET AIR TRAINING................... 81,345 1,605,720
Transfer of Fleet Air Training ....................... +958,200
funding from SAG 3B2K.
Unjustified Administrative Overhead ....................... -4,225
Cost Growth.
Transfer of Chief of Naval Air ....................... +570,400
Training from SAG 3B2K.
1A3A................... AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA AND 38,932 38,932
ENGINEERING SERVICES.
1A4A................... AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT.... 100,485 100,485
1A4N................... AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT.................. 355,520 355,520
1A5A................... AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........... 1,221,410 1,221,410
1A6A................... AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.... 27,448 27,448
1B1B................... MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.... 3,696,913 3,666,913
Unjustified Growth in Per Diem Days.. ....................... -30,000
1B2B................... SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND TRAINING. 728,983 728,983
1B4B................... SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............... 4,761,670 4,761,670
1B5B................... SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT........ 1,344,844 1,338,844
Transfer to RDTE, DW per Memorandum ....................... -1,500
of Agreement.
NAVSEA Process Requirements and ....................... -4,500
Improvement Office Budget
Realignment and Consolidation
Justified as Program Growth.
1C1C................... COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................ 615,069 550,069
Overstatement of DISA Pricing ....................... -65,000
Adjustment.
1C2C................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE................... 89,340 89,340
1C3C................... SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE....... 177,397 177,397
1C4C................... WARFARE TACTICS...................... 416,068 416,068
1C5C................... OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND 316,525 316,525
OCEANOGRAPHY.
1C6C................... COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................ 1,083,618 870,817
Unjustified Growth for Naval ....................... -20,000
Expeditionary Combat Command.
Transfer to Title IX--Naval ....................... -192,801
Expeditionary Combat Command
Increases.
1C7C................... EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................ 165,985 165,985
1C8C................... DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT............. 2,836 2,836
1CCH................... COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS. 208,250 208,250
1CCM................... COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 274,071 274,071
SUPPORT.
1D1D................... CRUISE MISSILE....................... 130,219 130,219

[[Page S1429]]

1D2D................... FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE.............. 1,138,418 1,138,418
1D3D................... IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT... 89,184 89,184
1D4D................... WEAPONS MAINTENANCE.................. 459,561 459,561
1D7D................... OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT......... 366,751 361,751
Civilian Personnel Over-Pricing...... ....................... -5,000
BSIT................... ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.... 820,507 1,031,207
Requested Transfer from OP,N line 147 ....................... +217,700
for NGEN Funding.
Overstatement of DISA Pricing ....................... -7,000
Adjustment.
BSM1................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 1,900,386 1,900,386
MODERNIZATION.
BSS1................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 4,502,857 4,452,857
Transfer to Title IX--Regional/ ....................... -50,000
Emergency Operations Center.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 29,544,424 30,910,698

2A1F................... SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE........ 424,047 424,047
2B1G................... AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS... 7,593 7,593
2B2G................... SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS....... 177,482 180,682
Program Increase-Ship Disposal ....................... +3,200
Program.
2C1H................... FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM............... 70,990 70,990
2C2H................... INDUSTRIAL READINESS................. 2,707 2,707
2C3H................... COAST GUARD SUPPORT.................. 23,845 23,845
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2.......... 706,664 709,864

3A1J................... OFFICER ACQUISITION.................. 141,057 141,057
3A2J................... RECRUIT TRAINING..................... 10,853 10,853
3A3J................... RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS...... 143,504 143,504
3B1K................... SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........... 533,004 530,004
Transfer to Title IX--NAVSEA VSSS/EOD ....................... -3,000
Training.
3B2K................... FLIGHT TRAINING...................... 1,538,171 9,571
Transfer of Fleet Air Training ....................... -958,200
funding to SAG 1A2A.
Transfer of Chief of Naval Air ....................... -570,400
Training to SAG 1A2A.
3B3K................... PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION... 162,844 162,844
3B4K................... TRAINING SUPPORT..................... 171,153 171,153
3C1L................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 261,287 261,922
Program Increase-Naval Sea Cadet ....................... +635
Corps.
3C3L................... OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..... 145,560 145,560
3C4L................... CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING...... 109,865 109,865
3C5L................... JUNIOR ROTC.......................... 50,369 53,369
Program Increase-Junior ROTC......... ....................... +3,000
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3.......... 3,267,667 1,739,702

4A1M................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 829,010 829,010
4A2M................... EXTERNAL RELATIONS................... 7,632 7,632
4A3M................... CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 118,838 111,838
MANAGEMENT.
Overstated Requirement for Other ....................... -7,000
Intragovernmental Purchases.
4A4M................... MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 194,775 194,775
MANAGEMENT.
4A5M................... OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT.............. 282,580 282,580
4A6M................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 503,067 496,089
Nuclear Command, Control and ....................... -6,978
Communications Systems Budget
Realignment and Consolidation
Justified as Program Growth.
4B1N................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 230,294 230,294
4B2N................... PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN..... 259,990 259,990
4B3N................... ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT... 868,069 856,069
Civilian Personnel Over-Pricing...... ....................... -12,000
4B5N................... HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL 55,217 55,217
SUPPORT.
4B6N................... COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS............... 19,053 19,053
4B7N................... SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS. 77,702 77,702
4C1P................... NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE.......... 549,484 546,484
Civilian Personnel Over-Pricing...... ....................... -3,000
4D1Q................... INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND 5,567 5,567
AGENCIES.
999.................... OTHER PROGRAMS....................... 614,275 607,475
Classified Adjustment................ ....................... -6,800
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 4,615,553 4,579,775

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -127,200
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR ....................... -3,600
INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 38,134,308 37,809,239
NAVY.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS

1A1A................... OPERATIONAL FORCES................... 745,678 745,678
1A2A................... FIELD LOGISTICS...................... 658,616 658,616
1A3A................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 78,891 78,891
1B1B................... MARITIME PREPOSITIONING.............. 72,344 72,344
BSM1................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 594,904 594,904
MODERNIZATION.
BSS1................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 2,206,137 2,198,437
Collateral Equipment Decrease in ....................... -7,700
fiscal year 2011 not Properly
Accounted for in Budget
Documentation.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 4,356,570 4,348,870

3A1C................... RECRUIT TRAINING..................... 16,096 16,096
3A2C................... OFFICER ACQUISITION.................. 420 420
3B1D................... SPECIALIZED SKILLS TRAINING.......... 91,197 91,197
3B3D................... PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION... 32,379 32,379
3B4D................... TRAINING SUPPORT..................... 319,742 319,742
3C1F................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 233,663 233,663
3C2F................... OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..... 61,980 61,980
3C3F................... JUNIOR ROTC.......................... 19,497 19,497
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3.......... 774,974 774,974

4A3G................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 29,569 29,569
4A4G................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 341,657 335,657
Administrative Efficiencies.......... ....................... -6,000
4B3N................... ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT... 87,570 87,570
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 458,796 452,796

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -34,400
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR ....................... -2,500
INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 5,590,340 5,539,740
MARINE CORPS.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE

011A................... PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES................ 4,261,115 4,218,222
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -34,408
Execution.
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -8,485
Personnel.
011C................... COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES............ 2,995,278 2,933,353
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -61,925
Execution.
011D................... AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING.............. 1,573,602 1,508,352
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -13,598
Execution.
Transfer of Range Maintenance funding ....................... -33,652
to SAG 011R.
Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010 ....................... -18,000
Cost for F-35A Beddown Costs.
011M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 2,189,481 2,176,793
Program Increase-Warner Robins Air ....................... +4,000
Logistics Center Aircraft Depot
Maintenance.
Air Force Requested Transfer to ....................... -10,879
OM,ANG for C-130s.
Air Force Requested Transfer to ....................... -5,809
OM,AFR for C-130s.
011R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 1,556,234 1,664,886
MODERNIZATION.
Transfer of Range Maintenance from ....................... +33,652
SAG 011D.
Adjustments to Meet Life, Health, ....................... +75,000
Safety and ADA Compliance Standards.
011Z................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 3,088,003 2,937,621

[[Page S1430]]

Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -91,675
Execution.
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -58,707
Personnel.
012A................... GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING......... 1,511,243 1,450,927
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -16,013
Personnel.
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -44,303
Execution.
012C................... OTHER COMBAT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,035,291 1,020,300
PROGRAMS.
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -12,268
Execution.
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -2,723
Personnel.
012F................... TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL 595,028 595,028
ACTIVITIES.
013A................... LAUNCH FACILITIES.................... 342,355 342,355
013C................... SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS................ 811,022 811,022
015A................... COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 797,754 791,754
SUPPORT.
Information Operations............... ....................... -6,000
015B................... COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS. 233,021 225,865
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -7,156
Personnel.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 20,989,427 20,676,478

021A................... AIRLIFT OPERATIONS................... 2,975,663 2,975,663
021D................... MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS............ 158,647 158,647
021M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 140,286 140,286
021R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 348,231 348,231
MODERNIZATION.
021Z................... BASE SUPPORT......................... 683,286 635,231
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -45,577
Personnel.
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -2,478
Execution.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 2.......... 4,306,113 4,258,058

031A................... OFFICER ACQUISITION.................. 114,403 114,403
031B................... RECRUIT TRAINING..................... 28,195 28,195
031D................... RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 90,453 90,453
031R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 411,570 400,652
MODERNIZATION.
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -10,918
Personnel.
031Z................... BASE SUPPORT (ACADEMIES ONLY)........ 902,323 845,576
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -16,216
Execution.
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -40,531
Personnel.
032A................... SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........... 510,065 470,584
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -11,481
Personnel.
Growth in Overhead Expenses not ....................... -28,000
Justified by Increases to Training
Metrics.
032B................... FLIGHT TRAINING...................... 1,012,816 1,012,816
032C................... PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION... 221,553 221,553
032D................... TRAINING SUPPORT..................... 126,784 123,260
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -3,524
Personnel.
032M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 619 619
033A................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 150,222 143,635
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -1,487
Personnel.
Air Force Recruiting Information ....................... -5,100
Support System Air Force Requested
Transfer to RDTE,AF.
033B................... EXAMINING............................ 409 409
033C................... OFF DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION..... 172,643 172,643
033D................... CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING...... 208,872 208,872
033E................... JUNIOR ROTC.......................... 77,692 81,692
Program Increase Junior ROTC......... ....................... +4,000
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3.......... 4,028,619 3,915,362

041A................... LOGISTICS OPERATIONS................. 1,110,471 1,082,427
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -28,044
Personnel.
041B................... TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES......... 949,018 937,913
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -5,866
Execution.
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -5,239
Personnel.
041M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 7,365 7,365
041R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 368,349 367,651
MODERNIZATION.
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -698
Personnel.
041Z................... BASE SUPPORT......................... 1,363,230 1,292,621
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -30,609
Personnel.
Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Fund ....................... -40,000
Pricing.
042A................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 657,268 657,268
042B................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 693,379 672,562
Unjustified Growth for Programming/ ....................... -20,817
Execution.
042G................... OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES......... 1,152,877 1,138,670
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -22,207
Personnel.
Analytical Support for the Executive ....................... +8,000
Agent for Space--Transfer from
RDTE,AF line 216.
042I................... CIVIL AIR PATROL CORPORATION......... 22,848 27,048
Civil Air Patrol Program Increase.... ....................... +4,200
043A................... SECURITY PROGRAMS.................... 1,159,342 1,141,160
Unsupported Request for Civilian ....................... -18,182
Personnel.
044A................... INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT................ 36,206 36,206
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 7,520,353 7,360,891

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -134,300
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR ....................... -13,500
INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 36,844,512 36,062,989
FORCE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF................ 420,940 420,940
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND........... 3,944,330 3,930,330
Non-Standard Aviation Platforms ....................... -5,000
Sustainment and Logistical Support.
Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010 ....................... -9,000
Congressional Increases.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 4,365,270 4,351,270

DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY....... 145,896 145,896
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY.......... 97,633 97,633
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 3.......... 243,529 243,529

CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS.............. 156,043 164,043
STARBASE Youth Program............... ....................... +8,000
BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION AGENCY....... 143,441 143,441
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY........ 486,143 482,643
Removal of One-Time fiscal year 2010 ....................... -3,500
Cost for Renewing Three Year License
for Software.
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING 1,593 1,593
SERVICE.
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY... 1,384,450 1,374,450
Multinational Information Sharing ....................... -10,000
Programs.
DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY........ 42,404 42,404
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY............. 448,043 396,395
Facilities Sustainment............... ....................... -58,848
Procurement Technical Assistance ....................... +7,200
Program.
DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY............... 255,878 255,878
DEFENSE POW /MISSING PERSONS OFFICE.. 24,155 24,155
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY AGENCY... 37,624 37,624
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY...... 463,522 445,682
Core Operational Support Activities-- ....................... -17,840
unnecessary increase.
DEFENSE DEPENDENTS EDUCATION......... 2,514,537 2,679,537
Military Spouse Career Advancement ....................... +165,000
Accounts.
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY..... 824,153 794,353
Joint Advertising, Market Research ....................... -29,800
and Studies.
DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY... 1,112,849 1,107,849
Overstatement of NSPS to GS ....................... -5,000
Conversion.
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY.. 683,853 539,369

[[Page S1431]]

Global Train and Equip (1206)........ ....................... -139,507
Stability Operations Fellowship ....................... -4,977
Program--not authorized.
DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE............. 518,743 518,743
OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT........ 50,811 50,811
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE... 2,245,300 2,232,986
Battlefield Information Collection ....................... -15,000
and Exploitation System.
Combatant Commander's Exercise ....................... -26,500
Engagement and Training
Transformation (CE2T2).
Readiness and Environmental ....................... +60,186
Protection Initiative.
Overstatement of Civilian Personnel ....................... -24,500
Pay Requirements.
AT&L-Integrated Acquisition ....................... -6,500
Environment Internal Realignment not
Properly Accounted for in Budget
Documentation.
WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES..... 604,130 594,330
Overstatement of Civilian Personnel ....................... -9,800
Pay Requirements.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 11,997,672 11,886,286

OTHER PROGRAMS....................... 13,977,425 13,685,725
Classified Adjustments............... ....................... -291,700
IMPACT AID........................... ....................... 40,000
IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE ....................... 4,000
DISABILITIES.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 30,583,896 30,210,810
DEFENSE-WIDE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE

111.................... MANEUVER UNITS....................... 1,282 1,282
112.................... MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES............. 12,413 12,413
113.................... ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADES.............. 460,814 460,814
114.................... THEATER LEVEL ASSETS................. 168,020 168,020
115.................... LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT....... 555,944 555,944
116.................... AVIATION ASSETS...................... 70,378 70,378
121.................... FORCES READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT.. 391,326 381,326
..................... Decrease Requested Growth for Travel. ....................... -10,000
122.................... LAND FORCES SYSTEM READINESS......... 108,093 108,093
123.................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 136,854 136,854
131.................... BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT.............. 577,146 567,146
..................... Unjustified Increase in Motor Pool ....................... -10,000
Operations Costs.
132.................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 234,486 234,486
MODERNIZATION.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 2,716,756 2,696,756

421.................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 12,717 12,717
431.................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 74,685 74,685
432.................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 3,797 3,797
433.................... PERSONNEL/FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION... 9,245 9,245
434.................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 61,877 61,877
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 162,321 162,321

..................... UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -18,650
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 2,879,077 2,840,427
ARMY RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE

1A1A................... MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS.. 599,649 599,649
1A3A................... INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE............. 13,209 13,209
1A4A................... AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT.... 2,668 2,668
1A5A................... AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........... 140,377 140,377
1A6A................... AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.... 309 309
1B1B................... MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.... 65,757 62,757
Mismatch of OPTEMPO and Steaming Day ....................... -3,000
Performance Data.
1B2B................... SHIP OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AND TRAINING 587 587
1B4B................... SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............... 91,054 91,054
1C1C................... COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................ 15,882 15,882
1C6C................... COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................ 140,186 140,186
1D4D................... WEAPONS MAINTENANCE.................. 5,492 5,492
BSIT................... ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.... 56,046 56,046
BSMR................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 81,407 81,407
MODERNIZATION.
BSSR................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 131,988 131,988
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 1,344,611 1,341,611

4A1M................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 3,276 3,276
4A4M................... MILITARY MANPOWER & PERSONNEL........ 13,698 13,698
4A6M................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 2,628 2,628
4B3N................... ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT... 3,551 3,551
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 23,153 23,153

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -20,500
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 1,367,764 1,344,264
NAVY RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE

1A1A................... OPERATING FORCES..................... 104,566 104,566
1A3A................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 16,392 16,392
BSM1................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 38,762 38,762
MODERNIZATION.
BSS1................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 99,924 92,424
Eliminate Growth in Administrative ....................... -7,500
Costs.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 259,644 252,144

BSM1................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 835 835
BSS1................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 15,871 15,871
3A1C................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 8,884 8,884
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 25,590 25,590

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -2,250
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 285,234 275,484
MARINE CORPS RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE

011A................... PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES................ 2,275,407 2,276,450
Air Force Requested Transfer to ....................... -2,017
OM,ANG for C-130s.
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +3,060
OM,AF for C-130s.
011G................... MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS........... 111,742 111,742
011M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 415,687 418,436
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +2,749
OM,AF for C-130s.
011R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 88,822 88,822
MODERNIZATION.
011Z................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 277,985 277,985
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 3,169,643 3,173,435

042A................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 80,526 80,526
042J................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 24,353 24,353
042K................... MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 19,716 19,716
MANAGEMENT.
042L................... OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT.............. 6,071 6,071
042M................... AUDIOVISUAL.......................... 726 726
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 131,392 131,392

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -13,800
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 3,301,035 3,291,027
FORCE RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

111.................... MANEUVER UNITS....................... 807,193 807,193

[[Page S1432]]

112.................... MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES............. 166,474 166,474
113.................... ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............... 607,567 607,567
114.................... THEATER LEVEL ASSETS................. 249,930 249,930
115.................... LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT....... 35,657 35,657
116.................... AVIATION ASSETS...................... 838,895 854,895
Aircraft Maintenance Program Increase ....................... +16,000
121.................... FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT... 570,119 544,119
Distance Learning--Transfer from OCO ....................... +9,000
OM,ARNG SAG 135.
Realignment of Funding for the ....................... -35,000
Organizational Clothing and
Equipment Enterprise Environment not
Properly Accounted for in Budget
Documentation.
122.................... LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS........ 121,980 121,980
123.................... LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE........ 380,789 380,789
131.................... BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT.............. 933,514 853,514
Unjustified Growth for Information ....................... -80,000
Management Systems.
132.................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 621,843 661,843
MODERNIZATION.
Army National Guard Program Increase. ....................... +40,000
133.................... MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL 540,738 549,626
HEADQUARTERS.
Transfer from Defense Health Program ....................... +8,888
for Psychological Health--State
Directors for the National Guard.
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 5,874,699 5,833,587

421.................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 17,771 17,771
431.................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 183,781 151,463
Pay and Benefits Mismatch Between Op- ....................... -32,318
5 and Op-32.
432.................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 48,188 48,188
433.................... MANPOWER MANAGEMENT.................. 8,020 8,020
434.................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 440,245 440,245
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 698,005 665,687

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -36,650
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
FIVE PERCENT COST SAVINGS FOR ....................... -8,000
INVESTMENT IN ENERGY AND UTILITIES
PROJECTS THROUGH THE AMERICAN
RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 6,572,704 6,454,624
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD

011F................... AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS.................. 3,519,452 3,525,525
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +2,017
OM,AFR for C-130s.
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +4,056
OM,AF for C-130s.
011G................... MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS........... 762,937 762,937
011M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 598,779 605,602
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +6,823
OM,AF for C-130s.
011R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 315,210 355,210
MODERNIZATION.
Air National Guard Program Increase.. ....................... +40,000
011Z................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 668,176 668,176
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 1.......... 5,864,554 5,917,450

042A................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 41,930 41,930
042J................... RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........... 34,659 34,659
SUBTOTAL, BUDGET ACTIVITY 4.......... 76,589 76,589

UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTION DUE TO ....................... -30,200
HISTORIC UNDEREXECUTION.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 5,941,143 5,963,839
NATIONAL GUARD.

MISCELLANEOUS

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 5,000 0
TRANSFER ACCOUNT.
Unjustified Request.................. ....................... -5,000
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED 14,068 14,068
FORCES.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY...... 444,581 464,581
Program Increase..................... ....................... +20,000
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY...... 304,867 304,867
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE. 502,653 502,653
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE- 10,744 10,744
WIDE.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FUDS...... 276,546 316,546
Program Increase..................... ....................... +40,000
OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND 108,032 108,032
CIVIC AID.
COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM. 522,512 522,512
ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 217,561 217,561
FUND.
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE..... 167,878,542 165,560,124
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-1 Budget Request Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY

3...................... AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP)..... 88,483 0
Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip. ....................... -88,483
4...................... MQ-1 UAV............................. 459,310 434,310
Contract Savings..................... ....................... -25,000
5...................... RQ-11 (RAVEN)........................ 20,152 20,152
6...................... BCT UNMANNED AERIAL VEH (UAVS) INCR 1 44,206 26,568
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -17,638
8...................... HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)...... 305,272 305,272
9...................... AH-64 APACHE BLOCK III............... 332,681 332,681
10..................... AH-64 APACHE BLOCK III (AP-CY)....... 161,150 161,150
11..................... UH-60 BLACKHAWK (MYP)................ 1,250,566 1,250,566
12..................... UH-60 BLACKHAWK (MYP) (AP-CY)........ 100,532 100,532
13..................... CH-47 HELICOPTER..................... 1,101,293 1,101,293
14..................... CH-47 HELICOPTER (AP-CY)............. 57,756 57,756
15..................... HELICOPTER NEW TRAINING.............. 9,383 0
Unjustified Request.................. ....................... -9,383
17..................... MQ-1 PAYLOAD--UAS.................... 100,413 80,413
Tactical SIGINT Payload Schedule ....................... -20,000
Adjustment.
18..................... MQ-1 WEAPONIZATION--UAS.............. 14,729 14,729
19..................... GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP)................. 29,899 25,799
Airborne Precision Geolocation....... ....................... -4,100
20..................... MULTI SENSOR AIRBORNE RECON (MIP).... 16,981 16,981
21..................... AH-64 MODS........................... 393,769 393,769
23..................... CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS.......... 66,207 66,207
25..................... UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS.......... 13,716 13,716
26..................... AIRCRAFT LONG RANGE MODS............. 814 814
27..................... UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS.............. 63,085 80,085
UH-60 A to L conversions............. ....................... +17,000
28..................... KIOWA WARRIOR........................ 94,400 42,300
Cockpit and Sensor Upgrade Program ....................... -52,100
Funding Ahead of Need.
29..................... AIRBORNE AVIONICS.................... 219,425 207,425
Contract Savings..................... ....................... -12,000
30..................... GATM ROLLUP.......................... 100,862 100,862
31..................... RQ-7 UAV MODS........................ 505,015 2,515
Funding Ahead of Need for ....................... -5,000
Installation.
Transfer to Title IX................. ....................... -497,500
34..................... SPARE PARTS (AIR).................... 7,328 9,956
Transfer from OP,A line 195 at Army ....................... +2,628
request.
35..................... AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT..... 24,478 24,478
36..................... ASE INFRARED COUNTER MEASURES........ 174,222 163,722
Excess to Requirement................ ....................... -10,500

[[Page S1433]]

37..................... AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........... 4,885 4,885
38..................... COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT.............. 76,129 76,129
39..................... AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS........... 52,423 52,423
40..................... AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.................. 82,844 82,844
41..................... INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES................ 1,567 1,567
42..................... LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET................ 2,892 2,892
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY.... 5,976,867 5,254,791

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY

1...................... PATRIOT SYSTEM SUMMARY............... 480,247 613,847
PAC-3 Launchers and Missiles Army UFR ....................... +133,600
2...................... SURFACE-LAUNCHED AMRAAM SYS SUMMARY.. 116,732 102,732
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -14,000
4...................... HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY................. 31,881 31,881
5...................... JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY...... 163,929 163,929
6...................... TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY................. 30,326 24,326
Program Adjustment for Growth in ....................... -6,000
Management and Administration Costs.
7...................... TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY (AP-CY)......... 48,355 0
Excess to Requirement................ ....................... -48,355
8...................... BCT NON LINE OF SIGHT LAUNCH SYSTEM.. 350,574 0
Program Termination.................. ....................... -350,574
9...................... GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)........... 291,041 266,041
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -25,000
10..................... MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS 15,886 15,886
(RRPR).
11..................... HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM 211,517 204,517
Program Adjustment, Carriers Procured ....................... -7,000
in fiscal year 2010.
12..................... PATRIOT MODS......................... 57,170 57,170
13..................... ITAS/TOW MODS........................ 13,281 13,281
14..................... MLRS MODS............................ 8,217 8,217
15..................... HIMARS MODIFICATIONS................. 39,371 39,371
16..................... HELLFIRE MODIFICATIONS............... 10 10
17..................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 19,569 19,569
18..................... AIR DEFENSE TARGETS.................. 3,613 3,613
19..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES)..... 1,208 1,208
20..................... PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT.............. 4,510 4,510
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY..... 1,887,437 1,570,108

PROCUREMENT OF WEAPONS AND TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES, ARMY

4...................... STRYKER VEHICLE...................... 299,545 350,945
Transfer from OP,A line 9............ ....................... +61,300
Adjust Program Management Costs...... ....................... -9,900
9...................... STRYKER (MOD)........................ 146,352 85,052
Transfer to OP,A line 4.............. ....................... -61,300
10..................... FIST VEHICLE (MOD)................... 31,083 31,083
11..................... BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)................ 215,133 204,133
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -11,000
12..................... HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 105,277 5,277
(MOD).
Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip. ....................... -70,000
Transfer to RDTE,A line 116 for ....................... -30,000
Paladin PIM.
13..................... IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 69,609 69,609
HERCULES).
14..................... ARMORED BREACHER VEHICLE............. 77,930 77,930
15..................... M88 FOV MODS......................... 9,157 9,157
16..................... JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE................. 44,133 0
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -44,133
17..................... M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)................. 230,907 230,907
18..................... ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM............... 183,000 183,000
19..................... PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)... 3,145 3,145
20..................... HOWITZER, LIGHT, TOWED, 105MM, M119.. 5,575 0
Funds Excess to Requirement.......... ....................... -5,575
21..................... M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN (7.62MM)..... 28,179 20,479
Pricing Correction................... ....................... -7,700
22..................... MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL......... 79,496 0
Transfer to Title IX................. ....................... -79,496
23..................... LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN.. 18,941 18,941
25..................... MK-19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN (40MM)..... 4,465 4,465
26..................... MORTAR SYSTEMS....................... 17,082 17,082
27..................... M107, CAL. 50, SNIPER RIFLE.......... 235 235
28..................... XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM).. 16,282 16,282
29..................... M110 SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM 5,159 5,159
(SASS).
30..................... M4 CARBINE........................... 20,180 20,180
31..................... SHOTGUN, MODULAR ACCESSORY SYSTEM 7,153 7,153
(MASS).
33..................... HANDGUN.............................. 3,371 0
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -3,371
35..................... MK-19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS....... 4,286 2,986
Tactical Engagement Simulator ....................... -1,300
Terminated.
36..................... M4 CARBINE MODS...................... 14,044 14,044
38..................... M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS............ 5,922 5,922
39..................... M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS......... 15,852 15,852
40..................... M119 MODIFICATIONS................... 39,810 39,810
41..................... M16 RIFLE MODS....................... 3,855 3,855
43..................... MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV- 6,083 6,083
WTCV).
45..................... PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV).. 7,869 7,869
46..................... INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS.............. 409 409
47..................... SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH 4,042 4,042
PROG).
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY.... 1,723,561 1,461,086

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY

1...................... CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES............... 195,406 195,406
2...................... CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES............... 79,622 79,622
3...................... CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES.............. 5,377 5,377
4...................... CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES.............. 160,712 160,712
6...................... CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES................. 15,887 15,887
7...................... CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES................. 95,222 95,222
8...................... CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES................. 167,632 167,632
9...................... 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES............... 14,340 14,340
10..................... 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES............... 24,036 24,036
11..................... CTG, MORTAR, 120MM, ALL TYPES........ 96,335 67,735
APMI Unit Cost Savings............... ....................... -28,600
12..................... CTG TANK 105MM: ALL TYPES............ 7,794 7,794
13..................... CTG, TANK, 120MM, ALL TYPES.......... 114,798 114,798
14..................... CTG, ARTY, 75MM: ALL TYPES........... 7,329 7,329
15..................... CTG, ARTY, 105MM: ALL TYPES.......... 76,658 76,658
16..................... CTG, ARTY, 155MM, ALL TYPES.......... 45,752 45,752
17..................... PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE XM982...... 62,114 30,700
Exceeds Revised Requirement.......... ....................... -31,414
18..................... MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGE SYSTEM 29,309 21,909
(MACS), ALL T.
Decrease to Reduce Backlog in MACS ....................... -7,400
M232 Production.
19..................... ARTILLERY FUZES, ALL TYPES........... 25,047 15,047
Program Delay, Precision Guidance Kit ....................... -10,000
20..................... MINES, ALL TYPES..................... 817 817
21..................... MINE, CLEARING CHARGE, ALL TYPES..... 8,000 8,000

[[Page S1434]]

22..................... ANTIPERSONNEL LANDMINE ALTERNATIVES.. 53,005 8,317
FRD Slipped to fiscal year 2012...... ....................... -44,688
23..................... INTELLIGENT MUNITIONS SYSTEM (IMS), 10,246 0
ALL TYPES.
Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip. ....................... -10,246
24..................... SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL 43,873 43,873
TYPES.
25..................... ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES.......... 120,628 120,628
26..................... DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES...... 19,824 19,824
27..................... GRENADES, ALL TYPES.................. 41,803 41,803
28..................... SIGNALS, ALL TYPES................... 39,472 39,472
29..................... SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES................ 11,389 11,389
30..................... AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES........... 17,499 17,499
31..................... NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES..... 5,266 5,266
32..................... CAD/PAD ALL TYPES.................... 5,322 5,322
33..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION........... 9,768 9,768
34..................... AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT........ 12,721 12,721
35..................... FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 11,786 11,786
(AMMO).
36..................... CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES................. 100 100
37..................... PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES... 144,368 144,368
38..................... LAYAWAY OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES..... 9,504 9,504
39..................... MAINTENANCE OF INACTIVE FACILITIES... 9,025 9,025
40..................... CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 178,367 178,367
DEMILITARIZATION, ALL.
41..................... ARMS INITIATIVE...................... 3,261 3,261
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, 1,979,414 1,847,066
ARMY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY

1...................... TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS......... 25,560 0
Army Requested Program Adjustment.... ....................... -25,560
2...................... SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:............... 38,713 0
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -38,713
5...................... FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV). 918,195 693,495
Pricing Adjustment................... ....................... -224,700
6...................... FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING 21,317 21,317
EQUIPMEN.
7...................... FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 549,741 549,741
(FHTV).
8...................... PALLETIZED LOAD SYS--EXTENDED SERVICE 100,108 56,208
PGM.
Program Adjustment for Schedule Slip. ....................... -43,900
9...................... ARMORED SECURITY VEHICLES (ASV)...... 114,478 114,478
10..................... MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY....... 230,978 0
Transfer to Title IX................. ....................... -230,978
12..................... TRUCK, TRACTOR, LINE HAUL, M915/M916. 37,519 21,519
Excess to Need....................... ....................... -16,000
13..................... HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK 173,565 173,565
EXT SERV.
15..................... MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP......... 349,256 0
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -56,300
Transfer to Title IX................. ....................... -292,956
17..................... TOWING DEVICE-FIFTH WHEEL............ 234 234
18..................... AMC CRITICAL ITEMS, OPA1............. 746 746
19..................... HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN.................. 1,875 0
Slow Execution....................... ....................... -1,875
20..................... PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES.......... 3,323 1,323
Slow Execution....................... ....................... -2,000
21..................... NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER.......... 19,586 19,586
23..................... JOINT COMBAT IDENTIFICATION MARKING 11,411 11,411
SYSTEM.
24..................... WIN-T--GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK 421,798 391,798
Program Adjustment, Increment 2 Slow ....................... -20,000
Execution.
Program Adjustment, Area Common User ....................... -10,000
System Modernization Slow Execution.
25..................... JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)............ 4,690 4,690
26..................... DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM 115,744 115,744
SYSTEMS.
27..................... SHF TERM............................. 14,198 14,198
28..................... SAT TERM, EMUT (SPACE)............... 662 662
29..................... NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 32,193 32,193
(SPACE).
30..................... SMART-T (SPACE)...................... 10,285 10,285
31..................... SCAMP (SPACE)........................ 930 930
32..................... GLOBAL BRDCST SVC--GBS............... 4,586 4,586
33..................... MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)........ 1,506 1,506
34..................... MOD-IN-SERVICE PROFILER.............. 938 938
35..................... ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) 20,387 20,387
36..................... ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA 700 700
RADIO).
37..................... JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM.......... 209,568 159,468
Program Reduction in Small Form ....................... -5,000
Factor-C Radio.
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -45,100
38..................... RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)...... 5,796 5,796
39..................... SINCGARS FAMILY...................... 14,504 12,604
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -1,900
40..................... AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--OPA2............. 3,860 3,860
41..................... MULTIPURPOSE INFORMATION OPERATIONS 9,501 9,501
SYSTEMS.
42..................... COMMS-ELEC EQUIP FIELDING............ 5,965 5,965
43..................... SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT...... 26,358 6,758
Army Requested Program Adjustment.... ....................... -19,600
44..................... INTELLIGENT MUNITIONS SYSTEM REMOTE 6,603 0
CONTROL UNIT.
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -6,603
45..................... SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM AND 5,125 5,125
ELECTRONICS.
46..................... COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR (CSEL) 2,397 2,397
47..................... RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY..... 9,983 9,983
48..................... MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE 23,606 23,606
(MC4).
49..................... CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP)..... 1,465 1,465
50..................... TSEC--ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS)........ 25,959 25,959
51..................... INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-- 63,340 54,858
ISSP.
Protected Information--Biometrics-- ....................... -8,482
Transfer to OP,A line 51x.
51x.................... FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS................. 0 8,482
Non-MIP Biometrics--Transfer from ....................... +8,482
OP,A line 51.
52..................... TERRESTRIAL TRANSMISSION............. 137 137
53..................... BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS.......... 28,406 28,406
54..................... WW TECH CON IMP PROG (WWTCIP)........ 11,566 11,566
55..................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS.................. 201,081 201,081
56..................... DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS)......... 6,264 6,264
57..................... INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD 178,242 178,242
PROGRAM.
58..................... PENTAGON INFORMATION MGT AND TELECOM. 10,427 10,427
64..................... JTT/CIBS-M (MIP)..................... 3,321 3,321
65..................... PROPHET GROUND (MIP)................. 71,517 71,517
68..................... DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC SPT SYS (DTSS) 441 441
(MIP).
70..................... DCGS-A (MIP)......................... 137,424 0
Transfer to Title IX................. ....................... -137,424
71..................... JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) 9,279 9,279
72..................... TROJAN (MIP)......................... 28,345 28,345
73..................... MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) 7,602 7,602
74..................... CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND 7,416 7,416
COLL(CHARCS)(MIP).
75..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MIP).......... 18,721 18,721
76..................... LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR..... 32,980 80,080
Program Adjustment................... ....................... +47,100
77..................... WARLOCK.............................. 24,127 16,127
Excess to Need....................... ....................... -8,000
78..................... BCT UNATTENDED GROUND SENSOR......... 29,718 14,718
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -15,000

[[Page S1435]]

79..................... COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY 1,394 1,394
COUNTERMEASURE.
80..................... CI MODERNIZATION (MIP)............... 1,263 1,263
81..................... FORWARD AREA AIR DEFENSE--GROUND 91,467 91,467
BASED SENSOR.
82..................... SENTINEL MODS........................ 30,976 30,976
83..................... SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW)........ 24,939 24,939
84..................... NIGHT VISION DEVICES................. 70,528 70,528
85..................... LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT 255,641 230,641
SURVEILLANCE SYS.
Excess to Need....................... ....................... -25,000
86..................... NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT...... 248,899 248,899
87..................... SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED 8,520 8,520
MLRF.
89..................... COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR... 2,088 2,088
91..................... ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP............. 6,042 0
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -6,042
94..................... PROFILER............................. 4,408 4,408
95..................... MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER 2,843 2,843
RADARS).
96..................... FORCE XXI BATTLE CMD BRIGADE & BELOW 39,786 39,786
(FBCB2).
97..................... JOINT BATTLE COMMAND--PLATFORM (JBCP) 147 147
98..................... LIGHTWEIGHT LASER DESIGNATOR/ 65,970 65,970
RANGEFINDER.
99..................... COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32...... 815 815
100.................... MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM........... 16,475 16,475
101.................... COUNTERFIRE RADARS................... 275,867 0
Transfer to Title IX................. ....................... -275,867
102.................... ENHANCED SENSOR & MONITORING SYSTEM.. 2,062 2,062
103.................... TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTERS.......... 53,768 43,768
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -10,000
104.................... FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY............... 49,077 49,077
105.................... BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 25,866 25,866
SYSTEM.
106.................... FAAD C2.............................. 42,511 32,511
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -10,000
107.................... AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL 57,038 57,038
SYS.
108.................... KNIGHT FAMILY........................ 120,723 120,723
109.................... LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)... 1,710 1,710
110.................... AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY.. 10,858 10,858
111.................... TC AIMS II........................... 10,457 10,457
113.................... TACTICAL INTERNET MANAGER............ 1,594 1,594
114.................... NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND 18,492 18,492
SERVICE.
115.................... MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)........ 96,162 96,162
116.................... SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE 99,819 99,819
(SALE).
117.................... RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING 15,466 15,466
INSTRUMENT SET.
119.................... GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS 97,858 97,858
SYSTEM.
120.................... ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION.......... 36,158 36,158
121.................... AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT.. 203,864 203,864
122.................... CSS COMMUNICATIONS................... 39,811 39,811
123.................... RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS 39,360 39,360
(RCAS).
124.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V).......... 663 663
125.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING 6,467 6,467
EQUIPMENT).
128.................... PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)........ 542 542
129.................... BCT NETWORK.......................... 176,543 136,543
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -40,000
130.................... PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS................... 2,489 2,489
131.................... FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) 9,305 9,305
132.................... CBRN SOLDIER PROTECTION.............. 180,351 180,351
133.................... SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON 831 831
AAO ITEM).
134.................... TACTICAL BRIDGING.................... 62,817 62,817
135.................... TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON........ 105,837 105,837
136.................... HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION 43,871 43,871
SYS.
137.................... GROUND STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM 35,002 35,002
138.................... EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT 54,093 54,093
139.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M, COUNTERMINE 3,655 3,655
EQUIPMENT.
141.................... HEATERS AND ECU'S.................... 20,610 20,610
143.................... SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT.................. 5,416 5,416
146.................... PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM 7,813 7,813
(PRSS).
147.................... GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM................ 110,524 96,024
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -14,500
148.................... MOUNTED SOLDIER SYSTEM............... 38,872 38,872
149.................... FORCE PROVIDER....................... 41,539 41,539
150.................... FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT.............. 23,826 23,826
151.................... CARGO AERIAL DELIVERY AND PERSONNEL 69,496 69,496
PARACHUTE SYSTEM.
152.................... MOBILE INTEGRATED REMAINS COLLECTION 26,532 26,532
SYSTEM.
153.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENGINEER 31,420 31,420
SUPPORT).
154.................... DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM AND 175,069 164,369
WATER.
Program Adjustment................... ....................... -10,700
155.................... WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEMS........... 3,597 0
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -3,597
156.................... COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL............... 30,365 30,365
157.................... MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS. 159,285 139,985
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -19,300
158.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ)..... 3,702 3,702
159.................... GRADER, ROAD MOTORIZED, HVY, 6X4 48,379 48,379
(CCE).
160.................... SKID STEER LOADER (SSL) FAMILY OF 17,498 17,498
SYSTEM.
161.................... SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING................ 12,452 12,452
163.................... MISSION MODULES-ENGINEERING.......... 62,111 54,111
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -8,000
164.................... LOADERS.............................. 7,205 7,205
165.................... HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR.................. 8,458 8,458
166.................... TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED................ 64,032 64,032
167.................... PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING................ 10,783 10,783
168.................... HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR 64,959 60,959
(HMEE) FOS.
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -4,000
169.................... CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ESP........... 11,063 11,063
170.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONSTRUCTION 20,565 17,565
EQUIP).
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -3,000
171.................... JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV)....... 202,764 202,764
172.................... HARBORMASTER COMMAND AND CONTROL 37,683 37,683
CENTER (HCCC).
173.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)... 8,052 8,052
174.................... GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.. 113,573 113,573
175.................... ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER 29,460 29,460
(RTCH).
176.................... FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS.................. 12,936 12,936
177.................... ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM...... 17,352 17,352
178.................... COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT...... 23,400 23,400
179.................... TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM.......... 297,200 322,200
Training Range Upgrades.............. ....................... +25,000
180.................... CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER........ 64,912 64,912
181.................... AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL 26,120 26,120
TRAINER.
182.................... GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY 4,964 4,964
TRAINING.
183.................... CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT........... 38,778 38,778
184.................... INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT 104,472 104,472
(IFTE).
185.................... TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD). 19,166 18,166
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -1,000
186.................... RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT 42,229 21,229
EQUIPMENT.
Excess to Need....................... ....................... -21,000
187.................... PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)..... 56,195 56,195
188.................... BASE LEVEL COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT...... 1,873 1,873
189.................... MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA- 103,046 82,046
3).

[[Page S1436]]

Program Adjustment................... ....................... -21,000
190.................... PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)........ 2,233 2,233
192.................... SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING... 44,483 44,483
193.................... AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3.............. 13,104 13,104
194.................... MA8975............................... 3,894 3,894
195.................... BCT UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE.......... 20,046 20,046
196.................... BCT TRAINING/LOGISTICS/MANAGEMENT.... 61,581 31,581
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -30,000
197.................... INITIAL SPARES-C&E................... 38,707 36,079
Transfer to AP,A line 34 at Army ....................... -2,628
request.

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 2,560 2,560
xx..................... PROCUREMENT INNOVATION............... 0 15,000
Procurement Innovation............... ....................... +15,000
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY....... 9,765,808 8,145,665

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY

1...................... EA-18G............................... 1,028,801 971,241
Multi-year Procurement Savings....... ....................... -49,836
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -7,724
2...................... EA-18G (AP-CY)....................... 55,081 55,081
3...................... F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP)..... 1,784,894 1,684,086
Multi-year Procurement Savings....... ....................... -92,746
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -8,062
4...................... F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP) (AP- 2,295 2,295
CY).
5...................... JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER................. 1,667,093 1,653,093
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -14,000
6...................... JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER ADVANCE 219,895 219,895
PROCUREMENT (CY).
7...................... JSF STOVL............................ 2,289,816 555,716
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -42,500
Delete Two Aircraft.................. ....................... -391,600
..................... Transfer Eight Aircraft to CTOL ....................... -1,300,000
Variant.
8...................... JSF STOVL (AP-CY).................... 286,326 286,326
9...................... V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)................... 2,121,036 2,121,036
10..................... V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP-CY)........... 81,875 81,875
11..................... UH-1Y/AH-1Z.......................... 738,709 738,709
12..................... UH-1Y/AH-1Z (AP-CY).................. 69,360 58,560
Unjustified Cost Growth.............. ....................... -10,800
13..................... MH-60S (MYP)......................... 478,591 478,591
14..................... MH-60S (MYP) (AP-CY)................. 70,080 66,280
Unexecutable EOQ..................... ....................... -3,800
15..................... MH-60R............................... 897,933 897,933
16..................... MH-60R (AP-CY)....................... 162,006 129,006
Unexecutable EOQ..................... ....................... -33,000
17..................... P-8A POSEIDON........................ 1,824,437 1,820,560
Operational Flight Trainer Cost ....................... -2,155
Growth.
Weapons Tactics Trainer Cost Growth.. ....................... -1,722
18..................... P-8A POSEIDON (ADVANCED PROCUREMENT). 166,153 147,653
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -18,500
19..................... E-2C (EARLY WARNING) HAWKEYE (MYP)... 819,184 819,184
20..................... E-2C (EARLY WARNING) HAWKEYE (MYP) 118,619 118,619
(AP-CY).
21..................... C-40A................................ ....................... 74,100
Add One Aircraft..................... ....................... +74,100
22..................... JPATS................................ 266,065 26,274
Contract Delay....................... ....................... -234,849
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -4,942
26..................... MQ-8 UAV............................. 47,484 43,984
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -3,500
27..................... STUASLO UAV.......................... 23,912 0
Program Delay........................ ....................... -23,912
29..................... EA-6 SERIES.......................... 14,891 0
Unjustified Request in Avionics and ....................... -8,900
Structural Improvements OSIP.
ICAP III OSIP Unjustified Request.... ....................... -5,991
30..................... AEA SYSTEMS.......................... 33,772 29,972
Low Band Transmitter Modification Kit ....................... -1,400
Pricing.
ECO growth........................... ....................... -2,400
31..................... AV-8 SERIES.......................... 19,386 19,386
32..................... F-18 SERIES.......................... 492,821 443,806
ECP 904 Modification Kit Cost Growth. ....................... -2,310
ECP 583R2 Installation Equipment Kit ....................... -3,780
Cost Growth.
ATFLIR Installation Equipment Kit ....................... -11,745
Cost Growth.
Mission Planning/Unique Planning ....................... -2,400
Component Growth.
OSIP 002-07 Excess ECO Funding....... ....................... -9,000
ECP6279 Radar Modification Kits Ahead ....................... -7,880
of Need.
OSIP 001-10 Integrated Logistics ....................... -2,500
Support Growth.
Unjustified Cost Growth.............. ....................... -9,400
33..................... H-46 SERIES.......................... 17,685 17,685
34..................... AH-1W SERIES......................... 11,011 11,011
35..................... H-53 SERIES.......................... 25,871 25,871
36..................... SH-60 SERIES......................... 67,779 67,779
37..................... H-1 SERIES........................... 3,060 3,060
38..................... EP-3 SERIES.......................... 90,323 90,323
39..................... P-3 SERIES........................... 221,982 186,982
Unjustified Cost Growth.............. ....................... -35,000
40..................... E-2 SERIES........................... 47,046 67,046
Reliability Enhancements for E-2C.... ....................... +20,000
41..................... TRAINER A/C SERIES................... 23,999 23,999
42..................... C-2A................................. 16,020 16,020
43..................... C-130 SERIES......................... 17,839 17,839
44..................... FEWSG................................ 21,928 16,696
AN/ALQ-167 Modification Kit Cost ....................... -5,232
Growth.
45..................... CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES........... 16,092 16,092
46..................... E-6 SERIES........................... 149,164 121,194
Block 1 Upgrade Training Kit Cost ....................... -5,040
Growth.
Block 1 Upgrade OSIP Support Funding ....................... -3,000
Growth.
SLEP Installation Delay.............. ....................... -2,630
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -17,300
47..................... EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES......... 43,443 43,443
48..................... SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT............. 14,679 14,679
49..................... T-45 SERIES.......................... 61,515 46,215
Engine Surge OSIP Installation ....................... -500
Funding Ahead of Need.
Engine Surge OSIP Contract Delay..... ....................... -2,800
Required Avionics Modernization ....................... -3,900
Program Modification Kit Cost Growth.
Synthetic Aperture Radar OSIP ....................... -8,100
Contract Delay.
50..................... POWER PLANT CHANGES.................. 19,948 19,948
51..................... JPATS SERIES......................... 1,831 1,831
52..................... AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS........... 8,084 2,984
Transfer to RDTE,N line 93 for Common ....................... -5,100
Mobile Aircrew Restraint System.
53..................... COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT................. 21,947 21,947
54..................... COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES.............. 101,120 79,820
CNS/ATM Installation Equipment ....................... -12,400
Contract Savings.
CNS/ATM Installation Funding Ahead of ....................... -1,400
Need.
Tactical Moving Map Capability ....................... -7,500
Modifications Funding Ahead of Need.
56..................... ID SYSTEMS........................... 20,397 20,397

[[Page S1437]]

57..................... RQ-7 SERIES.......................... 18,121 18,121
58..................... V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY........ 21,985 21,985
59..................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 1,244,673 1,234,084
JPATS Contract Delay................. ....................... -10,589
60..................... COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT.............. 322,063 322,063
61..................... AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES....... 17,998 17,998
62..................... WAR CONSUMABLES...................... 25,248 25,248
63..................... OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES............. 7,579 7,579
64..................... SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............ 45,916 45,916
65..................... FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION..... 1,752 1,752
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY.... 18,508,613 16,170,868

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY

1...................... TRIDENT II MODS...................... 1,106,911 1,106,911
2...................... MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES........ 3,446 3,446
3...................... TOMAHAWK............................. 300,178 288,278
Production Engineering Support Growth ....................... -1,900
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -10,000
4...................... AMRAAM............................... 155,553 145,553
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -10,000
5...................... SIDEWINDER........................... 52,293 52,293
6...................... JSOW................................. 131,141 129,641
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,500
7...................... STANDARD MISSILE..................... 295,922 248,222
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -5,700
Smooth Production Ramp--SM 6......... ....................... -42,000
8...................... RAM.................................. 74,976 68,046
Contract Savings..................... ....................... -1,930
Program Rebaselined--Milestone C Slip ....................... -5,000
for Block II.
9...................... HELLFIRE............................. 43,495 41,995
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,500
10..................... AERIAL TARGETS....................... 43,988 42,888
ECM/Emitter Equipment Cost Growth.... ....................... -1,100
11..................... OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT................ 3,981 3,981
12..................... ESSM................................. 48,152 45,515
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -2,637
13..................... HARM MODS............................ 53,543 52,191
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,352
14..................... STANDARD MISSILES MODS............... 61,896 61,896
15..................... WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES........ 3,281 3,281
16..................... FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON....... 505,734 505,734
18..................... ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........... 52,152 52,152
19..................... ASW TARGETS.......................... 10,123 5,197
Contract Delay....................... ....................... -4,926
20..................... MK-46 TORPEDO MODS................... 42,144 42,144
21..................... MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS............. 43,559 29,859
Contract Delay--Funds for 15 kits and ....................... -13,700
NRE.
22..................... QUICKSTRIKE MINE..................... 6,090 6,090
23..................... TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............ 43,766 43,766
24..................... ASW RANGE SUPPORT.................... 9,557 9,557
25..................... FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION..... 3,494 3,494
26..................... SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS............... 14,316 14,316
27..................... CIWS MODS............................ 41,408 29,022
Block 1B Systems Ahead of Need....... ....................... -12,386
28..................... COAST GUARD WEAPONS.................. 20,657 13,259
CIWS Ahead of Need................... ....................... -5,698
MK160 Ahead of Need.................. ....................... -1,700
29..................... GUN MOUNT MODS....................... 43,991 40,791
Installation Funding Ahead of Need... ....................... -3,200
30..................... LCS MODULE WEAPONS................... 9,808 0
NLOS Program Termination............. ....................... -9,808
31..................... CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS........ 52,426 50,626
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,800
32..................... AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS. 23,007 23,007
35..................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 58,806 58,806
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY..... 3,359,794 3,221,957

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS

1...................... GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS................ 80,028 77,928
Direct Attack Moving Target ....................... -2,100
Capability Program Cost Growth.
3...................... AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES.......... 38,721 23,171
MK 66 Rocket Motor (Mod 4) Unit Cost ....................... -6,000
Efficiencies.
2.75'' Launcher Unit Cost ....................... -9,550
Efficiencies.
4...................... MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION............... 21,003 21,003
5...................... PRACTICE BOMBS....................... 33,666 31,666
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -2,000
6...................... CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES... 53,667 52,167
Program Execution Delays............. ....................... -1,500
7...................... AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES....... 59,626 59,626
8...................... JATOS................................ 2,869 2,869
9...................... 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION............. 34,492 33,492
Product Improvement Growth........... ....................... -1,000
10..................... INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION.. 37,234 37,234
11..................... OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION............ 36,275 36,275
12..................... SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO...... 46,192 46,192
13..................... PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION........... 11,310 10,079
MK-62 Firing Device Contract Delay... ....................... -1,231
14..................... AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION...... 4,105 4,105
15..................... SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION................ 64,839 64,839
16..................... LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES............ 15,329 15,329
17..................... 40 MM, ALL TYPES..................... 62,835 62,835
18..................... 60MM, ALL TYPES...................... 17,877 17,877
19..................... 81MM, ALL TYPES...................... 41,053 41,053
20..................... 120MM, ALL TYPES..................... 6,458 6,458
21..................... CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES.................. 2,937 2,937
22..................... GRENADES, ALL TYPES.................. 9,298 8,092
Funded Ahead of Need for Scorpion.... ....................... -1,206
23..................... ROCKETS, ALL TYPES................... 13,995 13,995
24..................... ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES................. 70,423 67,546
Decrease to Reduce Backlog in MACS ....................... -2,877
M232 Production.
25..................... DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES...... 19,464 19,464
26..................... FUZE, ALL TYPES...................... 18,032 18,032
27..................... NON LETHALS.......................... 3,009 3,009
28..................... AMMO MODERNIZATION................... 8,985 8,985
29..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION........... 4,269 4,269
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & 817,991 790,527
MARINE CORPS.

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY

1...................... CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM.......... 1,731,256 1,721,969
Consolidated Afloat Navy Enterprise ....................... -2,600
System Increment 1.
Surface Electronic Warfare ....................... -4,900
Improvement.

[[Page S1438]]

AN/UPX-29............................ ....................... -1,787
2...................... CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (AP-CY).. 908,313 908,313
3...................... VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE............. 3,441,452 3,430,343
Sonar System Hardware Cost Growth.... ....................... -5,795
Modular Mast Cost Growth............. ....................... -1,430
Propulsor Cost Growth................ ....................... -3,884
4...................... VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE (AP-CY)..... 1,691,236 1,691,236
5...................... CVN REFUELING OVERHAUL............... 1,255,799 1,248,999
SSDS Program Management Excess....... ....................... -1,800
SSDS Software Growth................. ....................... -2,000
CEC Testing and Evaluation Excess.... ....................... -3,000
6...................... CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS (AP-CY)...... 408,037 408,037
9...................... DDG 1000............................. 186,312 77,512
Volume Search Radar.................. ....................... -108,800
10..................... DDG-51............................... 2,922,190 2,868,454
MK-12 IFF Cost Growth................ ....................... -4,986
CIWS Block 1B Cost Growth............ ....................... -2,256
Exterior Communication System Cost ....................... -6,294
Growth.
Main Reduction Gear Systems ....................... -10,200
Engineering Growth.
Main Reduction Gear Contract Savings. ....................... -30,000
11..................... DDG-51 (AP-CY)....................... 47,984 47,984
12..................... LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP................. 1,230,984 1,168,984
Cost Savings......................... ....................... -62,000
13..................... LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (AP-CY)......... 278,351 190,351
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -88,000
16..................... LHA REPLACEMENT (AP-CY).............. 949,897 942,837
C4ISR Cost Growth.................... ....................... -5,174
Rolling Airframe Missile System Cost ....................... -1,886
Growth.
18..................... INTRATHEATER CONNECTOR............... 180,703 180,703
19..................... OCEANOGRAPHIC SHIPS.................. 88,561 88,561
20..................... OUTFITTING........................... 306,640 295,570
JHSV-1 Outfitting Funding Phasing.... ....................... -3,426
LPD-25 Outfitting Funding Phasing.... ....................... -2,500
DDG-1000 PostDelivery Phasing........ ....................... -1,757
LPD-23 PostDelivery Phasing.......... ....................... -3,387
21..................... SERVICE CRAFT........................ 13,770 13,770
22..................... LCAC SLEP............................ 83,035 83,035
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, 15,724,520 15,366,658
NAVY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY

1...................... LM-2500 GAS TURBINE.................. 12,137 10,525
Turbine Digital Fuel Controls Cost ....................... -1,612
Growth.
2...................... ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE............. 14,923 14,923
4...................... OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT........... 23,167 23,167
5...................... SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP....... 85,619 73,559
AN/BVS-1 Mast Tech Insertion Spares.. ....................... -1,849
ISIS Tech Insertion Kits Ahead of ....................... -2,769
Need.
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,700
Contractor Repair Funding Growth..... ....................... -5,742
6...................... DDG MOD.............................. 296,691 289,691
Multi-Mission BMD Capability Upgrade ....................... -1,000
Kits Cost Growth.
Engineering Services Unjustified Cost ....................... -6,000
Growth.
7...................... FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT............... 11,974 9,304
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus ....................... -1,570
Kits Excess to Requirements.
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,100
8...................... COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD...... 3,962 2,362
Unjustified Request.................. ....................... -1,600
9...................... POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT.......... 25,614 25,614
10..................... SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.......... 7,730 7,730
11..................... VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..... 132,039 130,039
Spare Main Propulsion Shaft Ahead of ....................... -2,000
Need.
12..................... SUBMARINE BATTERIES.................. 44,057 31,057
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,500
Excess Installation Funding.......... ....................... -11,500
13..................... STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP..... 22,811 22,811
14..................... DSSP EQUIPMENT....................... 3,869 3,869
15..................... CG-MODERNIZATION..................... 356,958 350,958
Engineering Services Unjustified Cost ....................... -6,000
Growth.
16..................... LCAC................................. 9,142 2,642
Personnel Transport Module Contract ....................... -6,500
Delay.
18..................... UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS.............. 15,908 15,908
19..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION........... 126,842 119,698
LCS Waterjets Spares Ahead of Need... ....................... -5,296
Voltage Regulators Ahead of Need..... ....................... -1,848
20..................... CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS........... 7,470 7,470
21..................... SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM........ 13,016 13,016
22..................... REACTOR POWER UNITS.................. 438,503 438,503
23..................... REACTOR COMPONENTS................... 266,469 266,469
24..................... DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT......... 10,227 10,227
25..................... STANDARD BOATS....................... 27,725 49,225
Range Support Craft.................. ....................... +21,500
26..................... OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT....... 16,094 16,094
27..................... OPERATING FORCES IPE................. 49,856 91,476
Program Increase--Shipyard Capital ....................... +41,620
Investment Program.
28..................... NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS.................. 116,829 116,829
29..................... LCS MODULES.......................... 82,951 41,369
MCM Module Production Support Growth. ....................... -6,000
Consulting Services Growth........... ....................... -3,064
Excess Remote MultiMission Vehicle ....................... -7,600
Funding.
Mission Package Computer Environment ....................... -2,268
Units Ahead of Need.
AN/AQS-20A--Ahead of Need............ ....................... -22,650
30..................... LSD MIDLIFE.......................... 106,612 102,612
60-ton Deck Crane Contract Delay..... ....................... -1,000
Boat Davit and Ballast Control System ....................... -3,000
Installations Ahead of Need.
31..................... RADAR SUPPORT........................ 12,030 7,000
Periscope Detection Radar ....................... -3,500
Installation Funding Ahead of Need.
Excess Miscellaneous Funding......... ....................... -1,530
32..................... SPQ-9B RADAR......................... 8,887 5,687
Excess Antenna Funding............... ....................... -2,200
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,000
33..................... AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM..... 87,219 85,219
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -2,000
34..................... SSN ACOUSTICS........................ 237,015 234,015
Installation Costs Unjustified Growth ....................... -3,000
35..................... UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 29,641 27,241
Common Data Link Modification ....................... -2,400
Installation Funding Ahead of Need.
36..................... SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS....... 14,056 13,056
TR-317 Module Cost Growth............ ....................... -1,000
37..................... SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM.... 20,739 18,539
Next Generation Countermeasure ....................... -2,200
Funding Ahead of Need.
38..................... SSTD................................. 2,206 0
AN/SLQ-25D Ahead of Need............. ....................... -2,206
39..................... FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM............ 57,481 57,481

[[Page S1439]]

40..................... SURTASS.............................. 8,468 8,468
41..................... TACTICAL SUPPORT CENTER.............. 18,586 18,586
42..................... AN/SLQ-32............................ 49,677 23,257
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -2,000
Block 1B3 Incremental Funding........ ....................... -7,520
Block 2 Incremental Funding.......... ....................... -16,900
43..................... SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT................. 105,624 105,624
44..................... AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) 1,299 1,299
45..................... SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG..... 71,558 70,108
ESM Capability Insertion (CI-06) Kits ....................... -1,450
Ahead of Need.
46..................... COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY.... 31,091 25,691
Planar Antenna Funding Ahead of Need. ....................... -5,400
47..................... TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS)..... 338 338
48..................... NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM 33,358 33,358
(NTCSS).
49..................... ATDLS................................ 2,273 2,273
50..................... NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 8,920 8,920
(NCCS).
51..................... MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT...... 81,441 60,710
Remote Minehunting System (RMS)...... ....................... -5,027
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -2,272
Expendable Mine Neutralization System ....................... -12,432
Funding Ahead of Need.
Assessment and Identification of Mine ....................... -1,000
Susceptibility Growth.
52..................... SHALLOW WATER MCM.................... 9,236 1,261
Cobra Block 1 Contract Delay......... ....................... -7,975
53..................... NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)........ 9,319 9,319
54..................... ARMED FORCES RADIO AND TV............ 3,328 3,328
55..................... STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP..... 4,248 4,248
56..................... OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT............. 29,061 27,761
COTS Obsolescence Growth............. ....................... -1,300
57..................... MATCALS.............................. 16,747 14,747
ASPARCS Cost Growth.................. ....................... -2,000
58..................... SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL........ 7,658 7,658
59..................... AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM..... 15,169 10,782
AN/SPN-46 Radar Modification Kits ....................... -4,387
Ahead of Need.
60..................... NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM............ 17,531 17,531
61..................... AIR STATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........ 6,851 6,851
62..................... MICROWAVE LANDING SYSTEM............. 8,551 8,551
63..................... ID SYSTEMS........................... 29,572 23,122
AN/URN-25 TACAN Upgrade Kits Ahead of ....................... -2,450
Need.
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -4,000
64..................... TAC A/C MISSION PLANNING SYS (TAMPS). 9,098 7,798
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,300
65..................... DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONT.... 8,542 8,542
66..................... TADIX-B.............................. 6,909 2,944
AN/USC-151 Upgrade Kit Ahead of Need. ....................... -3,965
67..................... GCCS-M EQUIPMENT TACTICAL/MOBILE..... 9,832 9,832
68..................... DCGS-N............................... 16,634 16,634
69..................... CANES................................ 34,398 10,264
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -24,134
70..................... RADIAC............................... 6,104 5,197
Air Particulate Detector Contract ....................... -907
Delay.
71..................... CANES-INTELL......................... 10,432 3,140
Ahead of Need........................ ....................... -7,292
72..................... GPETE................................ 5,861 5,861
73..................... INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY.... 4,445 4,445
74..................... EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION.......... 4,737 4,737
75..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION........... 51,048 29,307
SPS-73 Tech Refresh/Obsolescence ....................... -741
Growth.
SPS-48 ECO and Support Cost Growth... ....................... -3,000
SPS-48 Upgrade Kits Ahead of Need.... ....................... -13,600
Installation Funding Ahead of Need... ....................... -4,400
78..................... SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION....... 260,551 230,174
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,500
ISNS Upgrade Kits Installation ....................... -9,000
Funding Ahead of Need.
CENTRIXS Installation Funding Ahead ....................... -1,425
of Need.
SCI Network Installation Funding ....................... -2,100
Ahead of Need.
ADNS Units Ahead of Need............. ....................... -16,352
79..................... MARITIME DOMAIN AWARENESS (MDA)...... 9,250 7,650
CENTRIXS Modification Kit ....................... -1,600
Installation Funding Ahead of Need.
80..................... COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M....... 39,846 31,169
Battle Force Tactical Network Ahead ....................... -8,677
of Need.
82..................... SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT.... 59,013 55,737
Common Submarine Radio Room ....................... -1,029
Modification Kit Cost Growth.
CSSR Seawolf Ahead of Need........... ....................... -2,247
83..................... SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS..... 28,665 28,665
84..................... NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)........ 161,021 161,021
85..................... JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT......... 2,256 2,256
86..................... ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS............. 1,309 1,309
87..................... NAVAL SHORE COMMUNICATIONS........... 3,422 3,422
88..................... INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP). 120,529 114,357
SV-21 Unit Cost Growth............... ....................... -1,672
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -2,000
CND Increment 2 Ahead of Need........ ....................... -2,500
89..................... CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP..... 18,322 18,322
90..................... COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT................ 20,189 20,189
92..................... SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES................. 87,846 83,846
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -4,000
93..................... WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...... 51,742 59,700
East Coast USWTR Support Funding ....................... -3,500
Carryover.
East Coast USWTR Ahead of Need....... ....................... -8,542
Training Range Upgrades.............. ....................... +20,000
94..................... EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS.............. 8,429 8,429
95..................... AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT.......... 11,134 11,134
96..................... AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT. 37,063 28,881
Advanced Recovery Control and ....................... -1,782
Aviation Data Management and Control
Systems Cost Growth.
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -1,400
Production Engineering Unjustified ....................... -5,000
Cost Growth.
97..................... METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT............. 25,581 25,581
98..................... OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT......... 1,573 1,573
99..................... AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT................ 40,696 24,796
JHMCS Ahead of Need.................. ....................... -15,900
100.................... AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES........ 35,855 35,855
101.................... LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT..... 20,662 16,382
Units Ahead of Need.................. ....................... -4,280
102.................... PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS. 12,812 10,612
Production Support Growth............ ....................... -2,200
103.................... OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..... 12,018 12,018
104.................... NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM........... 1,086 1,086
105.................... GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT........... 8,076 8,076
106.................... NATO SEASPARROW...................... 11,121 10,161
ECP and Production Support Growth.... ....................... -960
107.................... RAM GMLS............................. 11,805 6,800
GMLS Ordalts Contract Delay.......... ....................... -5,005
108.................... SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM............. 54,290 45,902
Ship Self Defense System Modification ....................... -8,388
Kits Ahead of Need.

[[Page S1440]]

109.................... AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.............. 162,307 82,307
COTS Tech Refresh Growth............. ....................... -3,000
Ship Change Documentation Growth..... ....................... -4,500
Navy Requested Transfer to RDTE,DW ....................... -72,500
line 84 for Ballistic Missile
Defense.
110.................... TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........... 88,698 88,698
111.................... VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS.............. 5,698 5,698
112.................... STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP...... 184,034 159,034
Fire Control Tech Refresh Growth..... ....................... -5,000
Contract Delays...................... ....................... -20,000
113.................... SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS........... 88,004 77,390
TI-04 Modification Contract Savings.. ....................... -2,214
Excess TI-04 and Out Modification ....................... -8,400
Installation Funding.
114.................... SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...... 5,282 5,282
115.................... SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........ 8,323 8,323
116.................... ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.......... 7,121 7,121
117.................... EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP.... 58,288 58,288
118.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION........... 3,546 2,480
Industrial Facilities Contract Delay. ....................... -1,066
119.................... ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM....... 36,588 36,588
120.................... SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS......... 7,337 7,337
121.................... SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS....... 34,519 34,519
122.................... PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES.......... 3,719 3,719
123.................... GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS............... 584 584
124.................... CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP..... 13,935 10,435
Contract Delays...................... ....................... -3,500
125.................... FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT.............. 12,853 12,853
126.................... TACTICAL VEHICLES.................... 31,741 25,241
FMTV Contract Savings................ ....................... -2,300
Energy Initiative Unjustified ....................... -4,200
Requirement.
127.................... AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT................. 3,132 3,132
128.................... POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT.......... 5,154 5,154
129.................... ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION............... 24,770 24,770
130.................... PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES........... 1,128 1,128
131.................... MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT......... 15,504 14,030
General Purpose Forklift Cost Growth. ....................... -1,474
132.................... OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT....... 6,655 6,655
133.................... FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION..... 6,315 6,315
134.................... SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS....... 66,549 66,549
135.................... TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT........... 11,429 11,429
137.................... COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............ 47,306 37,840
BUPERS Software Cost Growth.......... ....................... -2,500
SPAWAR Hardware Items Cost Growth.... ....................... -1,080
ERP Kits Cost Growth................. ....................... -900
JFCOM National Small Unit Center..... ....................... -3,075
Future Pay and Personnel System Ahead ....................... -1,911
of Need.
138.................... EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.......... 2,067 2,067
139.................... MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT............ 7,679 5,679
Fleet Allowance List Outfitting Cost ....................... -2,000
Growth.
141.................... NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.......... 1,433 1,433
143.................... OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT... 12,754 12,754
144.................... C4ISR EQUIPMENT...................... 5,317 5,317
145.................... ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...... 20,033 20,033
146.................... PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT.......... 154,805 141,475
Shipboard Protection System ....................... -5,500
Installation Costs Excess to Need.
Shipboard Protection System Support ....................... -6,000
Cost Growth.
Biometrics Ahead of Need............. ....................... -1,830
XX..................... PROCUREMENT INNOVATION............... ....................... 15,000
Procurement Innovation............... ....................... +15,000
147.................... ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.... 377,353 159,653
Navy Requested Transfer to OM,N AGSAG ....................... -217,700
BSIT for NGEN.
149.................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 215,906 215,906
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 19,767 19,767
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY....... 6,450,208 5,804,963

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS

1...................... AAV7A1 PIP........................... 7,749 7,749
2...................... LAV PIP.............................. 41,277 41,277
4...................... EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM.... 9,723 9,723
5...................... 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER..... 10,356 10,356
6...................... HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM 22,230 22,230
7...................... WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 26,091 26,091
MILLION.
9...................... MODIFICATION KITS.................... 40,916 30,559
Unexecutable Program--M1A1 ....................... -10,357
Survivability Kits.
10..................... WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM.......... 13,115 13,115
11..................... GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE............. 5,175 3,855
Program Adjustment................... ....................... -1,320
13..................... FOLLOW ON TO SMAW.................... 21,570 21,570
14..................... ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM--HEAVY 20,315 20,315
(AAWS-H).
15..................... MODIFICATION KITS.................... 3,798 3,798
16..................... COMBAT OPERATIONS CENTER............. 10,776 10,776
17..................... REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT............ 25,636 25,636
18..................... COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM................ 32,877 32,877
20..................... ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC). 3,405 3,405
21..................... AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS............ 67,568 67,568
22..................... RADAR SYSTEMS........................ 860 860
23..................... FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM.................. 3,906 3,906
24..................... INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT....... 92,377 92,377
25..................... RQ-11 UAV............................ 32,490 16,490
Program Delay--Tier 2 UAS............ ....................... -16,000
26..................... DCGS-MC.............................. 4,582 0
DCGS-MC Program Delay................ ....................... -4,582
28..................... COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES............ 258,947 218,947
Unjustified Request--MC Intranet..... ....................... -40,000
29..................... COMMAND POST SYSTEMS................. 33,021 33,021
30..................... RADIO SYSTEMS........................ 40,551 20,051
Program Delay--JTRS handheld......... ....................... -20,500
31..................... COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS..... 32,279 22,279
Execution Delay--WNS-T............... ....................... -10,000
32..................... COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT... 15,278 15,278
33..................... COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES........ 1,157 1,157
34..................... COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES............ 12,696 12,696
35..................... 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP)............... 4,849 0
Service Requested Reduction.......... ....................... -4,849
36..................... MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS........ 5,253 5,253
37..................... MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT.. 11,721 11,721
38..................... LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT. 133,827 133,827
39..................... FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS.......... 19,156 19,156
40..................... TRAILERS............................. 8,075 8,075
41..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION........... 6,016 6,016
42..................... ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT... 5,110 5,110
43..................... BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT................ 10,743 10,743
44..................... TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS................ 29,330 29,330
45..................... POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED............. 19,419 19,419

[[Page S1441]]

46..................... AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT......... 11,718 11,718
47..................... EOD SYSTEMS.......................... 64,093 64,093
48..................... PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT.......... 16,419 16,419
49..................... GARRISON MOBILE ENGR EQUIP........... 10,976 10,976
50..................... MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP.............. 24,376 24,376
51..................... FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION..... 2,748 2,748
52..................... FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT.............. 6,722 6,722
53..................... TRAINING DEVICES..................... 5,668 5,668
54..................... CONTAINER FAMILY..................... 897 897
55..................... FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT..... 18,261 18,261
57..................... BRIDGE BOATS......................... 12,567 12,567
58..................... RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN............. 4,283 4,283
59..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION........... 7,572 7,572
60..................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 13,524 13,524
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS..... 1,344,044 1,236,436

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

1...................... F-35................................. 3,729,242 4,064,442
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +29,700
AP,AF line 43.
Production Support Carryover......... ....................... -60,000
Delete Five Aircraft................. ....................... -608,500
Transfer Eight Aircraft from STOVL ....................... 974,000
Variant.
2...................... F-35 (AP-CY)......................... 257,000 257,000
3...................... F-22A................................ 158,039 158,039
5...................... C-17A (MYP).......................... 14,283 48,683
Air Force Requested Transfer from AP, ....................... +114,400
AF line 88.
Slow Execution....................... ....................... -80,000
6...................... C-130J............................... 463,267 455,267
Updated Pricing...................... ....................... -8,000
7...................... C-130J ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)...... 48,000 40,000
Updated Pricing...................... ....................... -8,000
8...................... HC-130J.............................. 349,300 307,800
Updated Pricing...................... ....................... -41,500
9...................... HC-130J (AP-CY)...................... 10,000 10,000
10..................... MC-130J.............................. 467,465 415,465
Updated Pricing...................... ....................... -52,000
11..................... MC-130J (APCY)....................... 60,000 60,000
14..................... JOINT CARGO AIRCRAFT................. 351,200 351,200
15..................... LIGHT MOBILITY AIRCRAFT.............. 65,699 65,699
16..................... USAFA POWERED FLIGHT PROGRAM......... 4,099 4,099
18..................... COMM VERT LIFT SPT PLATFORM (UH-1N).. 6,432 0
Air Force Requested Transfer to ....................... -6,432
RDTE,AF line 113.
19..................... V-22 OSPREY.......................... 393,098 393,098
20..................... V-22 OSPREY (AP-CY).................. 13,621 13,621
24..................... CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C................. 2,424 2,424
25..................... HH-60M OPERATIONAL LOSS REPLACEMENT.. 104,447 104,447
27..................... STUASLO.............................. 3,253 3,253
28..................... TARGET DRONES........................ 85,505 85,505
29..................... C-37A................................ 52,000 52,000
30..................... RQ-4 UAV............................. 649,629 503,029
Air Force Requested Transfer to AP, ....................... -25,600
AF line 31.
Unjustified Cost Increase, Sensors... ....................... -11,000
Unjustified Request, Spares.......... ....................... -110,000
31..................... RQ-4 UAV (AP-CY)..................... 90,200 72,300
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +25,600
AP,AF line 30.
Air Force Adjustment................. ....................... -43,500
32..................... MC 130 IN BA 04...................... 9,932 0
Air Force Requested Transfer to AC- ....................... -9,932
130 Recap Program.
xx..................... AC-130 Recap......................... ....................... 9,932
Air Force Requested Transfer from MC- ....................... +9,932
130 program.
34..................... MQ-9................................. 863,595 318,131
Spares............................... ....................... -167,788
Support Equipment--Forward Funding... ....................... -42,000
Production Support--Forward Funding.. ....................... -98,376
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -21,300
Transfer 12 Aircraft to Title IX..... ....................... -216,000
35..................... B-2A................................. 63,371 63,371
37..................... B-1B................................. 200,090 200,090
38..................... B-52................................. 69,074 21,074
CONECT--Funded Ahead of Need......... ....................... -35,000
Transfer to RDTE, AF line 117 for ....................... -13,000
Internal Weapons Bay.
39..................... A-10................................. 165,361 187,361
Program Increase--Helmet Mounting ....................... +22,000
Cueing System.
40..................... F-15................................. 302,235 337,041
C/D Flight Data Recorder--Early to ....................... -11,408
Need.
Emodel Flight Data Recorder--Early to ....................... -11,786
Need.
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -4,000
AESA Radar for ANG F-15Cs............ ....................... +62,000
41..................... F-16................................. 167,188 167,188
42..................... F-22A................................ 492,199 437,739
Unjustified Request.................. ....................... -54,460
43..................... F-35 MODIFICATIONS................... 123,936 4,636
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -82,000
Air Force Requested Transfer to AP, ....................... -29,700
AF line 1.
Air Force Requested Transfer to RDTE, ....................... -7,600
AF line 81 for Auto GCAS.
44..................... C-5.................................. 740,369 37,252
Block Upgrade Ahead of Need.......... ....................... -21,260
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -5,400
Transfer C5 RERP to New AP, AF Line.. ....................... -676,457
45..................... C-5 (APCY)........................... 166,900 106,900
Funded with fiscal year 2009 and 2010 ....................... -60,000
funds.
xx..................... C-5 RERP............................. ....................... 676,457
Transfer C5 RERP from AP, AF line 44 ....................... +676,457
46..................... C-9C................................. 10 0
Program Terminated................... ....................... -10
47..................... C-17A................................ 351,614 217,547
OBIGGS Kits-Reduction of Four kits... ....................... -13,800
Extended Range Retrofits Kits- ....................... -5,267
Reduction of One Kit.
Excess to Need...................... ....................... -98,000
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -17,000
48..................... C-21................................. 339 339
49..................... C-32A................................ 12,113 12,113
50..................... C-37A................................ 12,162 12,162
51..................... GLIDER MODS.......................... 120 120
52..................... T-6.................................. 24,644 24,644
53..................... T-1.................................. 83 83
54..................... T-38................................. 28,288 26,288
Funded Ahead of Need................. ....................... -2,000
56..................... KC-10A (ATCA)........................ 13,777 11,777
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -2,000
57..................... C-12................................. 7,645 7,645
58..................... MC-12W............................... 10,826 10,826
59..................... C-20 MODS............................ 736 736

[[Page S1442]]

60..................... VC-25A MOD........................... 13,175 13,175
61..................... C-40................................. 10,697 10,697
62..................... C-130................................ 257,339 296,939
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +65,000
RDTE,AF line 220 for Avionics
Upgrades to Special Mission Aircraft.
Excess to Need...................... ....................... -25,400
63..................... C-130 MODS INTEL..................... 3,963 3,963
64..................... C-130J MODS.......................... 80,205 64,205
Contract Slip Crashworthy Seats...... ....................... -16,000
65..................... C-135................................ 44,228 37,428
Block 45 Contract Delay.............. ....................... -8,400
Low Cost Modifications............... ....................... +1,600
66..................... COMPASS CALL MODS.................... 176,558 101,558
EC-130 Program Full Funding Violation ....................... -75,000
67..................... DARP................................. 105,540 105,540
68..................... E-3.................................. 195,163 195,163
69..................... E-4.................................. 37,526 37,526
70..................... E-8.................................. 188,504 6,397
E-8 Reengining Ahead of Need......... ....................... -120,407
Engine Installs Ahead of Need........ ....................... -5,000
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -56,700
71..................... H-1.................................. 2,457 2,457
72..................... H-60................................. 11,630 41,930
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -1,700
Simulators and Low Cost Modifications ....................... +32,000
73..................... RQ-4 UAV MODS........................ 119,415 116,415
Unjustified Cost Increase ASIP ....................... -3,000
sensors.
74..................... HC/MC-130 MODIFICATIONS.............. 1,944 1,944
75..................... OTHER AIRCRAFT....................... 159,423 15,723
Transfer FABT Funds to RDTE,AF line ....................... -119,700
180.
Delete FABT Funds Early to Need..... ....................... -24,000
76..................... MQ-1 MODS............................ 208,213 20,213
Excess to Need...................... ....................... -188,000
77..................... MQ-9 MODS............................ 108,922 0
Contract Delay GCS................... ....................... -50,884
Contract Delay Reaper Retrofits...... ....................... -58,038
78..................... MQ-9 PAYLOAD UAS..................... 115,383 0
Transfer to Title IX................ ....................... -115,383
79..................... CV-22 MODS........................... 13,964 13,964
80..................... INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS.......... 622,020 698,220
Unjustified Request Joint Stars ....................... -11,700
Reengining Spares.
Program Increase F22 Engine Spares... ....................... +100,000
Excess to Need...................... ....................... -12,100
81..................... AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP... 91,701 58,301
Underexecution....................... ....................... -20,000
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -13,400
82..................... B-1.................................. 6,791 6,791
83..................... B-2A................................. 26,217 26,217
84..................... B-52................................. 3,443 1,743
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -1,700
85..................... C-5.................................. 195 195
87..................... KC-10A (ATCA)........................ 5,702 5,702
88..................... C-17A................................ 153,347 20,947
Air Force Requested Transfer to AP,AF ....................... -114,400
line 5.
Unjustified Funding for Shutdown ....................... -18,000
Activities.
89..................... C-130................................ 28,295 28,295
91..................... F-15 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT......... 21,599 17,599
Excess to Need...................... ....................... -4,000
92..................... F-16 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT......... 17,838 12,738
Excess to Need...................... ....................... -5,100
93..................... T-6.................................. 9,450 9,450
94..................... OTHER AIRCRAFT....................... 53,953 53,953
96..................... INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS.............. 24,619 24,619
97..................... WAR CONSUMABLES...................... 92,939 92,939
98..................... OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES............. 1,079,742 912,372
Funded Ahead of Need................ ....................... -6,732
Transfer to Title IX................ ....................... -160,638
99..................... OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES MQ1......... 37,500 37,500
104.................... DARP................................. 19,117 19,117
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 12,981 12,981
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR 15,366,508 13,483,739
FORCE.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

1...................... MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQBALLISTIC...... 60,647 60,647
2...................... JASSM................................ 215,825 215,825
3...................... SIDEWINDER (AIM9X)................... 64,523 64,523
4...................... AMRAAM............................... 355,358 348,358
Support Funding Carryover............ ....................... -7,000
5...................... PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE............ 44,570 44,570
6...................... SMALL DIAMETER BOMB.................. 134,884 119,884
Accounting Error..................... ....................... -15,000
7...................... INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS/POLLUTION 833 833
PREVENTION.
8...................... ADVANCED CRUISE MISSILE.............. 48 48
9...................... MM III MODIFICATIONS................. 123,378 133,178
Air Force Requested Transfer from ....................... +9,800
RDTE, AF line 175 for MEECN.
10..................... AGM-65D MAVERICK..................... 260 260
11..................... AGM-88A HARM......................... 4,079 4,079
12..................... AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE............ 10,795 10,795
13..................... INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS.......... 43,192 43,192
14..................... ADVANCED EHF......................... 38,078 38,078
15..................... ADVANCED EHF (APCY).................. 208,520 208,520
16..................... WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES........ 517,601 517,601
17..................... WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES (APCY). 58,110 58,110
18..................... GPS III SPACE SEGMENT................ 122,490 122,490
19..................... SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)............ 14,894 14,894
20..................... GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)........... 64,609 64,609
23..................... DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG (SPACE).. 88,719 88,719
24..................... EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (SPACE) 1,153,976 1,153,976
26..................... SBIR HIGH (SPACE).................... 700,704 700,704
27..................... SBIR HIGH (SPACE) (APCY)............. 270,000 270,000
28..................... NATL POLARORBITING OP ENV SATELLITE.. 26,308 0
Program Termination Early to Need.... ....................... -26,308
33..................... SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS.............. 247,584 247,584
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 893,287 893,287
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR 5,463,272 5,424,764
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE

1...................... ROCKETS.............................. 19,106 19,106
2...................... CARTRIDGES........................... 141,049 141,049
3...................... PRACTICE BOMBS....................... 34,094 23,442
BDU56A/B CDI Program Delay........... ....................... -10,652
4...................... GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS................ 183,845 183,845
5...................... JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION......... 104,642 179,361

[[Page S1443]]

Additional JDAM for War Reserve ....................... +74,719
Stockpile.
6...................... CAD/PAD.............................. 37,016 37,016
7...................... EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD).... 3,383 3,383
8...................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 1,000 1,000
9...................... MODIFICATIONS........................ 1,112 1,112
10..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000........... 5,015 5,015
11..................... FLARES............................... 72,758 72,758
12..................... FUZES................................ 57,337 57,337
13..................... SMALL ARMS........................... 7,063 7,063
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 667,420 731,487
FORCE.

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

1...................... PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLE........... 29,207 29,207
2...................... FAMILY MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE....... 45,618 37,618
Contract Savings..................... ....................... -8,000
3...................... CAP VEHICLES......................... 902 902
4...................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (CARGO).......... 31,773 31,773
5...................... SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES....... 52,867 48,867
Up-Armored HMMWV Unjustified Cost ....................... -4,000
Growth.
6...................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M.................. 18,358 18,358
7...................... FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES.. 26,924 26,924
9...................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000........... 14,501 14,501
10..................... RUNWAY SNOW REMOVAL & CLEANING EQUIP. 25,404 25,404
11..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M.................. 54,570 54,570
13..................... COMSEC EQUIPMENT..................... 216,381 180,381
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -36,000
14..................... MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)............... 1,582 0
Undefined Requirement................ ....................... -1,582
15..................... INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT...... 2,634 2,634
16..................... INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIP.............. 30,685 30,685
17..................... TRAFFIC CONTROL/LANDING.............. 6,517 6,517
18..................... NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM............. 112,056 88,940
Site Activation Ahead of Need........ ....................... -23,116
19..................... THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPRO........ 55,326 55,326
20..................... WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST......... 21,018 18,045
OS-21 Contract Delays................ ....................... -2,973
21..................... STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL........ 28,164 28,164
22..................... CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX............ 18,416 15,716
Contract Delays...................... ....................... -2,700
23..................... TAC SIGINT SPT....................... 377 377
25..................... GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY....... 74,285 74,285
26..................... AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYSTEM... 9,210 9,210
27..................... MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL......... 8,688 7,388
Contract Delays...................... ....................... -1,300
28..................... AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM... 99,281 99,281
29..................... COMBAT TRAINING RANGES............... 29,637 49,637
Training Range Enhancements.......... ....................... +20,000
30..................... C3 COUNTERMEASURES................... 11,112 11,112
31..................... GCSS-AF FOS.......................... 53,349 31,335
ECSS Ahead of Need................... ....................... -20,914
CMOS Excess to Need.................. ....................... -1,100
32..................... THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYS............ 20,525 20,525
33..................... AIR OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC).......... 58,284 38,534
Technical Refresh Unjustified Growth. ....................... -15,000
Recurring Events Unjustified Growth.. ....................... -4,750
34..................... INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS........ 101,993 56,993
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -45,000
35..................... BASE INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE...... 193,830 113,830
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -80,000
36..................... AFNET................................ 151,643 91,643
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -60,000
37..................... VOICE SYSTEMS........................ 25,399 15,399
Unjustified Growth................... ....................... -10,000
38..................... USCENTCOM............................ 36,020 36,020
39..................... SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PROG SPACE..... 24,804 24,804
40..................... NAVSTAR GPS SPACE.................... 5,279 5,279
41..................... NUDET DETECTION SYS (NDS) SPACE...... 5,926 5,926
42..................... AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE... 60,383 60,383
43..................... SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE......... 91,004 91,004
44..................... MILSATCOM SPACE...................... 221,545 190,717
FAB-T Early to Need.................. ....................... -7,538
AFWET Modernization Enterprise ....................... -23,290
Terminal Ahead of Need.
45..................... SPACE MODS SPACE..................... 18,384 18,384
46..................... COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM.................. 18,801 18,801
47..................... TACTICAL CE EQUIPMENT................ 268,140 242,995
JTC Training and Rehearsal System ....................... -25,145
Ahead of Need.
48..................... COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER....... 34,925 34,925
49..................... RADIO EQUIPMENT...................... 14,541 7,041
Contract Delays...................... ....................... -7,500
50..................... CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT........... 11,613 11,613
51..................... BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE............. 108,308 108,308
52..................... COMM ELECT MODS...................... 74,356 68,538
ILS Ahead of Need.................... ....................... -2,300
BMEWS Ahead of Need.................. ....................... -2,000
OS-21 Contract Delays................ ....................... -1,518
53..................... NIGHT VISION GOGGLES................. 20,873 14,573
Night Vision Cueing and Display ....................... -6,300
Contract Delays.
54..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 (SAFETY).. 14,292 14,292
55..................... MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING......... 12,853 12,853
56..................... BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT.............. 4,788 4,788
57..................... CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS............... 28,390 27,190
Rapid Airfield Damage Assessment ....................... -1,200
System Ahead of Need.
58..................... PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT...... 1,879 1,879
59..................... MOBILITY EQUIPMENT................... 38,558 38,558
60..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (BASE SUPPORT)... 4,989 4,989
62..................... DARP RC135........................... 23,296 23,296
63..................... DISTRIBUTED GROUND SYSTEMS........... 271,015 264,015
Program Reduction.................... ....................... -7,000
65..................... SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM............... 489,680 439,680
Classified Adjustment................ ....................... -50,000
66..................... DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAM. 32,668 32,668
XX..................... PROCUREMENT INNOVATION............... ....................... 15,000
Procurement Innovation............... ....................... +15,000
70..................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 19,046 19,046
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 14,258,508 14,396,445
Classified Adjustment................ ....................... +137,937
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE. 17,845,380 17,568,091

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSEWIDE

1...................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, BTA................. 4,000 4,000
2...................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCCA, ITEMS LESS 1,477 1,477
THAN $5M.
3...................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA................ 2,052 2,052

[[Page S1444]]

4...................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA, PERSONNEL 32,263 32,263
ADMINISTRATION.
17..................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY......... 14,625 14,625
18..................... GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS....... 5,275 5,275
19..................... GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM......... 2,803 2,803
20..................... TELEPORT PROGRAM..................... 78,227 78,227
21..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5M.................. 153,288 153,288
22..................... NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES 4,391 4,391
(NCES).
23..................... DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK.. 86,206 86,206
24..................... PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE............ 1,710 1,710
27..................... CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............ 22,493 22,493
28..................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA................. 4,846 4,846
29..................... COST................................. 10,478 10,478
..................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA,..............
30..................... AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & 1,451 1,451
LOGISTICS.
31..................... VEHICLES............................. 50 50
32..................... OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT................ 12,007 12,007
34..................... TERMINAL HIGH ALTITUDE AREA DEFENSE 858,870 586,870
FIELDING.
Production Delay Due to Investigation ....................... -272,000
of Failed Safety Component.
35..................... AEGIS FIELDING....................... 94,080 94,080
35A.................... ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS......... 0 205,000
Iron Dome Program.................... ....................... +205,000
45..................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 2,546 2,546
(ISSP).
50..................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD................. 124,050 124,050
51..................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE........ 20,138 20,138
53..................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS................. 11,526 11,526
54..................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS................. 27,179 27,179
55..................... SOF ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND 79,840 79,840
SUSTAINMENT.
55A.................... MH-47G............................... 0 100,449
SOCOM Requested Transfer from P,DW ....................... +100,449
line 56.
56..................... MH-47 SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM. 107,934 7,485
SOCOM Requested Transfer to P,DW line ....................... -100,449
55A.
57..................... MH-60 SOF MODERNIZATION PROGRAM...... 179,375 137,875
SOCOM Requested Transfer to RDTE,DW ....................... -25,100
line 268.
Quantity Reduction Due to Program ....................... -16,400
Delay.
58..................... NON-STANDARD AVIATION................ 179,949 58,681
Medium NSAV--Transfer to Title IX.... ....................... -121,268
60..................... SOF TANKER RECAPITALIZATION.......... 19,996 4,996
Contract Delays...................... ....................... -15,000
61..................... SOF U-28............................. 404 404
62..................... RQ-11 UAV............................ 2,090 2,090
63..................... CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION............... 124,035 124,035
64..................... MQ-1 UAV............................. 1,948 1,948
65..................... MQ-9 UAV............................. 1,965 1,965
66..................... STUASLO.............................. 12,148 12,148
67..................... C-130 MODIFICATIONS.................. 22,500 9,261
Low Cost Modifications--Execution.... ....................... -7,039
Aircrew Situational Awareness System. ....................... -6,200
68..................... AIRCRAFT SUPPORT..................... 489 489
69X.................... PROCUREMENT INNOVATION............... 0 15,000
Procurement Innovation............... ....................... +15,000
70..................... MK VIII MOD 1--SEAL DELIVERY VEH..... 823 823
71..................... SOF ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT........... 79,608 79,608
72..................... SOF ORDNANCE ACQUISITION............. 24,215 24,215
73..................... COMM EQUIPMENT & ELECTRONICS......... 58,390 44,390
SOF Deployable Node Delays Due to ....................... -14,000
Protests.
74..................... SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS............. 75,892 81,092
Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +5,200
Requirement.
75..................... SMALL ARMS & WEAPONS................. 30,094 30,094
76..................... DCGS-SOF............................. 5,225 5,225
77..................... MARITIME EQUIPMENT MODS.............. 206 206
79..................... SOF COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS.......... 11,706 8,306
Unvalidated Requirement--Large SFA ....................... -3,400
Craft.
80..................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS.............. 977 977
81..................... TACTICAL VEHICLES.................... 30,965 33,365
Program Increase--AFSOC Unfunded ....................... +2,400
Requirement.
82..................... MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATIONS 28,354 18,354
SYSTEMS.
MH-60M Simulator Modernization ....................... -10,000
Program.
83..................... COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS.......... 20,000 20,000
84..................... MILCON COLLATERAL EQUIPMENT.......... 102,556 102,556
88..................... SOF AUTOMATION SYSTEMS............... 52,353 52,353
89..................... SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE 9,714 9,714
ACTIVITIES.
90..................... SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 30,900 30,900
INTELLIGENCE.
91..................... SOF SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL 221 5,661
SYSTEMS.
Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +5,440
Requirement.
92..................... SOF VISUAL AUGMENTATION, LASERS AND 18,626 18,626
SENSOR SYSTEM.
93..................... SOF TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS........... 35,234 37,554
Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +2,320
Requirement.
94..................... SOF MARITIME EQUIPMENT............... 804 804
96..................... MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT.............. 7,774 7,774
97..................... SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS......... 269,182 263,182
Program Increase--HSAC Unfunded ....................... +4,000
Requirement.
Program Adjustment................... ....................... -10,000
98..................... PSYOP EQUIPMENT...................... 25,266 25,266
99..................... INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION........ 90,635 90,635
100.................... INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION................ 74,686 74,686
101.................... DECONTAMINATION...................... 21,570 21,570
102.................... JOINT BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM..... 19,389 10,389
Reduction for Anthrax Vaccine ....................... -9,000
Purchased by HHS.
103.................... COLLECTIVE PROTECTION................ 27,542 27,542
104.................... CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE.............. 136,114 136,114
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 682,643 681,643
Classified Adjustment................ ....................... -1,000
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSEWIDE..... 4,280,368 4,009,321

DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT

GALLIUM NITRIDE X-BAND MONOLITHIC 2,000 2,000
MICROWAVE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS.
GALLIUM NITRIDE RADAR AND ELECTRONIC 8,579 8,579
WARFARE MONOLITHIC MICROWAVE
INTEGRATED CIRCUITS.
GALLIUM NITRIDE ADVANCED ELECTRONIC 2,000 2,000
WARFARE MONOLITHIC MICROWAVE
INTEGRATED CIRCUITS.
BERYLLIUM SUPPLY INDUSTRIAL BASE..... 6,897 6,897
SPACE................................ 770 770
NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE INDUSTRIAL 8,500 10,900
AND SUPPLY BASE RISK MITIGATION
PROGRAM.
Program Increase..................... ....................... +2,400
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY FROM ORGANIC ....................... 3,200
SOURCES.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT........ 28,746 34,346

..................... TOTAL, PROCUREMENT................... 111,189,951 102,121,873
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R-1 Budget Request Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION, ARMY

1...................... IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT 21,780 21,780
RESEARCH.

[[Page S1445]]

2...................... DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............ 195,845 195,845
3...................... UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES...... 91,161 87,561
..................... V72-Transfer to D55.................. ....................... -3,300
..................... D55-Transfer from V72................ ....................... +3,300
..................... V72-Non-Department of Defense funding ....................... -3,600
4...................... UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH 98,087 98,087
CENTERS.
5...................... MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY................. 29,882 29,882
6...................... SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY. 48,929 48,929
7...................... TRACTOR HIP.......................... 14,624 14,624
8...................... AVIATION TECHNOLOGY.................. 43,476 43,476
9...................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY........ 17,330 17,330
10..................... MISSILE TECHNOLOGY................... 49,525 49,525
11..................... ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY.......... 18,190 18,190
12..................... ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION..... 20,582 20,582
13..................... COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE 64,740 64,740
TECHNOLOGY.
14..................... BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY................ 60,342 60,342
15..................... CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT 5,324 10,924
DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY.
..................... Emerging Chemical Agent Threat....... ....................... +5,600
16..................... JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM..... 7,893 7,893
17..................... WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY..... 42,645 42,645
18..................... ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES... 60,859 60,859
19..................... NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY.............. 40,228 40,228
20..................... COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS.................. 19,118 19,118
21..................... HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY. 21,042 21,042
.....................
22..................... ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY..... 18,364 22,364
..................... Research, Development and Engineering ....................... +4,000
Command.
23..................... COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS 25,573 25,573
TECHNOLOGY.
24..................... COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY..... 6,768 6,768
25..................... MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY...... 79,189 75,184
..................... Joint Integrated Base Defense Program ....................... -4,005
Office transfer to line 60 at
request of the Army.
26..................... MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING 22,198 22,198
TECHNOLOGY.
27..................... WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY................ 27,746 27,746
28..................... MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY................... 96,797 96,797
29..................... WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY....... 37,364 37,364
30..................... MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.......... 71,510 115,510
..................... Peer-Reviewed Neurotoxin Exposure ....................... +20,000
Treatment Parkinsons Research
Program.
..................... Neurofibromatosis Research........... ....................... +16,000
..................... Military Burn Trauma Research Program ....................... +8,000
31..................... AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY......... 57,454 57,454
32..................... WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED 64,438 64,438
TECHNOLOGY.
33..................... COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADV 89,499 125,819
TECHNOLOGY.
..................... Alternative Energy................... ....................... +36,320
34..................... COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS ADV 8,102 8,102
TECH.
35..................... MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADV 7,921 7,921
TECH.
36..................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED 50,359 50,359
TECHNOLOGY.
37..................... TRACTOR HIKE......................... 8,015 8,015
38..................... NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION 15,334 15,334
SYSTEMS.
39..................... TRACTOR ROSE......................... 12,309 12,309
41..................... MILITARY HIV RESEARCH................ 6,688 26,688
..................... HIV Research......................... ....................... +20,000
42..................... COMBATING TERRORISM, TECHNOLOGY 10,550 10,550
DEVELOPMENT.
43..................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY........ 18,350 18,350
44..................... MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED 84,553 79,053
TECHNOLOGY.
..................... P 704 excessive growth without ....................... -5,500
strategy.
45..................... TRACTOR CAGE......................... 9,986 9,986
46..................... LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED 26,953 26,953
TECH.
47..................... JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM..... 9,151 9,151
48..................... NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY..... 39,912 39,912
49..................... ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMO 15,878 15,878
50..................... MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED 27,393 24,393
TECHNOLOGY.
..................... Program reduction.................... ....................... -3,000
51..................... ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE 24,873 24,873
AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY.
53..................... ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS 11,455 11,455
INTEGRATION.
54..................... ARMY MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS 27,551 27,551
INTEGRATION (SPACE).
56..................... LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER-ADV DEV. 15,596 15,596
57..................... SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING 2,425 2,425
SYS-ADV DEV.
58..................... TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION... 42,183 37,183
..................... AKE 120mm cartridge EMD Phase II ....................... -5,000
contract award delay.
59..................... ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS). 136,302 207,702
..................... S-MOD milestone B delay.............. ....................... -57,000
..................... Stryker DVH.......................... ....................... +128,400
60..................... SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY.... 18,556 8,239
..................... Joint Integrated Base Defense Program ....................... +4,005
Office--Transfer from line 25 at
request of the Army.
..................... REF funded in Title IX............... ....................... -14,322
61..................... TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE 17,962 12,162
SYSTEM--AD.
..................... Unsustained growth................... ....................... -5,800
62..................... NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED 0 5,159
DEVELOPMENT.
..................... CSP-Transfer from line 177 at request ....................... +5,159
of the Army.
63..................... ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY..... 4,695 4,695
64..................... WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-- 190,903 190,903
TACTICAL.
65..................... NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........ 5,060 5,060
66..................... AVIATION--ADV DEV.................... 8,355 8,355
67..................... LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT--ADV 80,490 65,315
DEV.
..................... JLTV EMD contract award delay........ ....................... -15,175
68..................... COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT CONTROL SYSTEM 14,290 14,290
EVALUATION.
69..................... MEDICAL SYSTEMS--ADV DEV............. 28,132 28,132
70..................... SOLDIER SYSTEMS--ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 48,323 48,323
71..................... INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE......... 970 970
72..................... ENDURANCE UAVS....................... 93,000 93,000
73..................... AIRCRAFT AVIONICS.................... 89,210 74,210
..................... SOSCOE Apache Block III integration ....................... -15,000
change in requirements.
74..................... ARMED, DEPLOYABLE OH-58D............. 72,550 72,550
75..................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT....... 172,269 149,755
..................... CIRCM test and evaluation funds ....................... -22,514
requested ahead of need.
76..................... JOINT TACTICAL RADIO................. 784 784
77..................... ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM........... 22,574 18,074
..................... EMD contract award delay............. ....................... -4,500
78..................... TRACTOR CAGE......................... 23,194 23,194
79..................... INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS............. 80,337 70,337
..................... S62--Milestone B delay............... ....................... -10,000
80..................... MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES............. 3,710 3,710
81..................... SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING 5,335 5,335
SYS-SDD.
82..................... JAVELIN.............................. 9,999 0
..................... Lack of acquisition strategy......... ....................... -9,999
83..................... FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 3,519 3,519
84..................... AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.................. 9,892 9,892
85..................... LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES...... 1,990 1,990
86..................... NON-LINE OF SIGHT LAUNCH SYSTEM...... 81,247 0
..................... Program termination.................. ....................... -81,247
89..................... FCS SYSTEMS OF SYSTEMS ENGR & PROGRAM 568,711 498,711
MGMT.
..................... Program reduction.................... ....................... -70,000
90..................... FCS RECONNAISSANCE (UAV) PLATFORMS... 50,304 50,304
91..................... FCS UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES......... 249,948 200,000

[[Page S1446]]

..................... Program reduction.................... ....................... -49,948
92..................... FCS UNATTENDED GROUND SENSORS........ 7,515 7,515
93..................... FCS SUSTAINMENT & TRAINING R&D....... 610,389 610,389
95..................... NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS--SDD............ 52,549 52,549
96..................... COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND 2,118 2,118
EQUIPMENT.
97..................... NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES--SDD..... 27,756 27,756
98..................... AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND 34,209 34,209
INTELLIGENCE.
99..................... CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS 30,291 30,291
DEVELOPMENT.
100.................... AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT. 14,041 14,041
101.................... DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS 15,547 15,547
(DIS)--SDD.
103.................... COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) 27,670 27,670
CORE.
105.................... WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS--SDD........... 24,345 15,345
..................... PGK Increment II EMD delay........... ....................... -9,000
106.................... LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT--SDD 41,039 41,039
COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
107.................... SDD.................................. 90,736 75,736
..................... JBC-P unsustained growth............. ....................... -15,000
108.................... MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL 34,474 34,474
DEFENSE EQUIPMENT.
109.................... LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER--SDD........ 95,577 49,577
..................... Project 016--Scorpion acceleration ....................... -16,000
funded in prior approval
reprogramming.
..................... Project 415--ASTAMIDS/GSTAMIDS lack ....................... -30,000
of acquisition strategy.
110.................... ARTILLERY MUNITIONS.................. 26,371 26,371
111.................... COMBAT IDENTIFICATION................ 29,884 3,000
..................... Unexecutable request................. ....................... -26,884
112.................... ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL 60,970 60,970
HARDWARE & SOFTWARE.
113.................... GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS 13,576 13,576
SYSTEM (GFEBS).
114.................... FIREFINDER........................... 24,736 24,736
115.................... SOLDIER SYSTEMS--WARRIOR DEM/VAL..... 20,886 20,886
116.................... ARTILLERY SYSTEMS.................... 53,624 103,624
..................... Program Increase..................... ....................... +20,000
..................... Transfer from WTCV,A line 12 for ....................... +30,000
Paladin PIM.
117.................... PATRIOT/MEADS COMBINED AGGREGATE 467,139 467,139
PROGRAM.
118.................... NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL MONITORING 7,276 7,276
SENSOR NETWORK.
119.................... INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT... 23,957 23,957
120.................... ARMY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN 100,500 60,500
RESOURCES SYSTEM (A-IMH).
..................... Excessive growth without acquisition ....................... -40,000
strategy.
121.................... JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)... 130,340 130,340
122.................... SLAMRAAM............................. 23,700 23,700
123.................... PAC-2/MSE MISSILE.................... 62,500 62,500
124.................... ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE 251,124 251,124
DEFENSE (AIAMD).
125.................... MANNED GROUND VEHICLE................ 934,366 461,100
..................... Program adjustment................... ....................... -473,266
126.................... AERIAL COMMON SENSOR................. 211,500 211,500
127.................... TROJAN-RH12.......................... 3,697 3,697
128.................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT....... 21,571 13,571
..................... EW5--Unsustained growth.............. ....................... -8,000
129.................... THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT......... 26,158 26,158
130.................... TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT........... 8,614 8,614
131.................... MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT................. 42,102 42,102
132.................... RAND ARROYO CENTER................... 20,492 20,492
133.................... ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL................. 163,788 163,788
134.................... CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM..... 17,704 17,704
136.................... ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES...... 393,937 412,257
..................... Army Test Range Infrastructure ....................... +18,320
unfunded requirement.
137.................... ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION 59,040 67,760
AND TARGETS.
..................... Test and Evaluation Instrumentation ....................... +8,720
unfunded requirement.
138.................... SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS..... 41,812 43,412
..................... Test and Evaluation Instrumentation ....................... +1,600
unfunded requirement.
139.................... DOD HIGH ENERGY LASER TEST FACILITY.. 4,710 4,710
140.................... AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION............... 5,055 5,055
141.................... METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E 7,185 7,185
ACTIVITIES.
142.................... MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS............ 18,078 19,278
..................... Test and Evaluation Instrumentation ....................... +1,200
unfunded requirement.
143.................... EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS........ 5,460 5,460
144.................... SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING....... 68,191 68,191
145.................... ARMY EVALUATION CENTER............... 61,450 64,090
..................... Test and Evaluation Instrumentation ....................... +2,640
unfunded requirement.
146.................... SIMULATION & MODELING FOR ACQ, RQTS, 3,926 3,926
& TNG (SMART).
147.................... PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES............... 73,685 73,685
148.................... TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES 48,309 48,309
MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION,
EFFECTIVENESS AND.
149.................... SAFETY............................... 53,338 44,042
..................... Project 862-155mm HE projectile ....................... -9,296
underfunded new start.
150.................... ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT 3,195 3,195
SUPPORT.
151.................... MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH AND 16,154 16,154
DEVELOPMENT).
153.................... MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM..... 51,619 25,619
..................... GMLRS AW EMD contract award delay.... ....................... -26,000
154.................... AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE........ 372,493 372,493
155.................... INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO CYBER (ISC) 2,360 2,360
MIP.
156.................... ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA 24,622 24,622
SYSTEM.
157.................... COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS.. 204,481 204,481
158.................... MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM.............. 25,540 25,540
159.................... AIRCRAFT MODS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 134,999 124,856
PROGRAMS.
..................... P430--Chinook RW crashworthy seating ....................... -10,143
previously fully funded.
160.................... AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 710 710
PROG.
161.................... DIGITIZATION......................... 6,329 6,329
162.................... FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND 3,935 3,935
BELOW (FBCB2).
163.................... MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT 24,280 24,280
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
165.................... TRACTOR CARD......................... 14,870 14,870
167.................... JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM......... 12,403 12,403
168.................... JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV)....... 3,153 3,153
171.................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 54,784 11,905
..................... Protected Information--Biometrics-- ....................... -42,879
Transfer to line 171x.
171x................... FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS................. 0 42,879
..................... Protected Information--Biometrics-- ....................... +42,879
Transfer from line 171.
172.................... GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM......... 125,569 125,569
173.................... SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE).... 33,694 33,694
174.................... WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS 13,024 13,024
177.................... TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES.... 54,300 49,141
..................... CSP--Transfer of HD IR funds to line ....................... -5,159
62 at request of the Army for
execution.
178.................... DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE 103,002 103,002
SYSTEMS.
179.................... MQ-1 SKY WARRIOR A UAV............... 123,156 123,156
180.................... RQ-11 UAV............................ 1,599 1,599
181.................... RQ-7 UAV............................. 7,805 7,805
183.................... BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE...... 14,114 2,114
..................... Protected Information--Biometrics.... ....................... -12,000
185.................... END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 61,098 61,098
ACTIVITIES.
xx..................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INNOVATION.. 0 105,000
..................... Research and Development Innovation.. ....................... +105,000
..................... CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 4,447 4,447
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 10,333,392 9,710,998
EVALUATION, ARMY.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY

1...................... UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES...... 108,679 108,679
2...................... IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT 17,979 17,979
RESEARCH.

[[Page S1447]]

3...................... DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............ 429,767 429,767
4...................... POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH.... 98,150 98,150
5...................... FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH.... 107,448 147,448
..................... Alternative Energy................... ....................... +40,000
6...................... MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY 43,776 43,776
8...................... COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH...... 70,168 70,168
9...................... WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED 113,724 113,724
RESEARCH.
10..................... RF SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH.......... 83,902 83,902
11..................... OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED 49,491 49,491
RESEARCH.
12..................... JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED 6,002 6,002
RESEARCH.
13..................... UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH.... 69,186 69,186
14..................... MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE 36,833 36,833
APPLIED RESEARCH.
15..................... POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 117,908 117,908
16..................... FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 61,877 61,877
17..................... COMMON PICTURE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY... 96,720 96,720
18..................... WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT ADVANCED 98,261 98,261
TECHNOLOGY.
19..................... ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED 82,143 82,143
TECHNOLOGY.
20..................... MARINE CORPS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 115,089 115,089
DEMONSTRATION (ATD).
21..................... JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 11,131 11,131
DEVELOPMENT.
22..................... WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED 18,076 55,336
TECHNOLOGY.
..................... C.W Bill Young Bone Marrow Donor ....................... +31,500
Recruitment and Research Program.
..................... Program Increase--Tactical Athlete ....................... +5,760
Program.
23..................... UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 49,276 53,276
..................... Program Increase--ASW Research....... ....................... +4,000
24..................... NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND 53,177 53,177
DEMONSTRATIONS.
25..................... MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE 21,941 21,941
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.
XX..................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INNOVATION.. 0 105,000
..................... Research and Development Innovation.. ....................... +105,000
26..................... AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS...... 123,331 118,331
..................... JMAPS program delay.................. ....................... -5,000
27..................... AVIATION SURVIVABILITY............... 9,480 9,480
28..................... DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL. 4,275 4,275
29..................... ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.............. 8,249 8,249
30..................... TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE..... 6,452 6,452
31..................... ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY... 1,658 1,658
32..................... SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE 81,347 79,247
COUNTERMEASURES.
..................... Unmanned Surface Sweep System program ....................... -2,100
delay.
33..................... SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE......... 57,796 50,796
..................... Milestone B delay.................... ....................... -7,000
34..................... CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.......... 93,830 91,830
..................... Navy requested transfer to line 49 ....................... -2,000
for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
35..................... SHIPBOARD SYSTEM COMPONENT 51 51
DEVELOPMENT.
36..................... PILOT FISH........................... 81,784 81,784
37..................... RETRACT LARCH........................ 142,858 142,858
38..................... RETRACT JUNIPER...................... 134,497 134,497
39..................... RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL................. 1,358 1,358
40..................... SURFACE ASW.......................... 21,673 21,673
41..................... ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 608,566 559,266
..................... Execution delays..................... ....................... -49,300
42..................... SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS... 5,590 5,590
43..................... SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN......... 17,883 17,883
44..................... SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY 1,796 1,796
STUDIES.
45..................... ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS....... 366,509 366,509
46..................... ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS... 5,459 5,459
47..................... CHALK EAGLE.......................... 447,804 447,804
48..................... LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)........... 226,288 189,588
..................... LCS-2 post shakedown availability ....................... -15,800
delay.
..................... LCS-1 post shakedown availability ....................... -500
planning funding excess.
..................... NLOS missile termination............. ....................... -15,400
..................... Program Increase--Mine Warfare ....................... +4,000
Testing Disruption.
..................... Navy requested transfer to line 49 ....................... -2,000
for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
..................... Program Increase--Small Business ....................... +8,000
Technology Insertion (Mine Warfare
Modules).
..................... Savings from accelerated DT.......... ....................... -15,000
49..................... COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION............ 24,344 34,344
..................... Navy requested transfer from lines ....................... +10,000
34, 48, 107, 122 and 136 for
Automatic Test and Re-Test.
50..................... CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS............... 5,388 5,388
51..................... MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES........ 242,765 222,765
..................... Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle....... ....................... -165,000
..................... Termination Liability, or SDD if ....................... +145,000
certified by the Secretary.
52..................... MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT 40,505 28,505
SYSTEM.
..................... JLTV EMD contract award delay........ ....................... 12,000
53..................... JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 25,873 25,873
DEVELOPMENT.
54..................... COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT............... 52,282 52,282
55..................... OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY 13,560 13,560
DEVELOPMENT.
56..................... ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION............. 20,207 20,207
57..................... NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM.................. 30,403 34,403
..................... Program Increase--Alternative Energy ....................... +4,000
from Organic Sources.
58..................... FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT............... 3,746 3,746
59..................... CHALK CORAL.......................... 71,920 71,920
60..................... NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY........... 4,139 4,139
61..................... RETRACT MAPLE........................ 219,463 219,463
62..................... LINK PLUMERIA........................ 58,030 58,030
63..................... RETRACT ELM.......................... 183,187 183,187
64..................... SHIP SELF DEFENSE.................... 4,385 4,385
65..................... LINK EVERGREEN....................... 41,433 41,433
66..................... SPECIAL PROCESSES.................... 36,457 36,457
67..................... NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........ 9,196 9,196
68..................... LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY............... 905 905
69..................... NONLETHAL WEAPONS.................... 43,272 43,272
70..................... JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING 159,151 159,151
SYSTEMS.
73..................... DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON ....................... 8,000
SYSTEMS.
..................... Directed Energy Development and Test. ....................... +8,000
74..................... TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED 51,693 51,693
COUNTERMEASURES.
75..................... JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED 56,542 50,242
ELECTRONIC WARFARE.
..................... Program delay........................ ....................... -6,300
76..................... PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT 25,121 25,121
PROGRAM.
77..................... SPACE & ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) 34,793 34,793
ARCHITECTURE/ENGINE.
78..................... ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT--MIP......... 2,161 2,161
79..................... SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS-- 4,253 4,253
MIP.
80..................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT--MIP.. 663 663
81..................... OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT............... 44,329 44,329
82..................... AV-8B AIRCRAFT--ENG DEV.............. 22,867 22,867
83..................... STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT................ 45,667 45,667
84..................... MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE 55,792 55,792
DEVELOPMENT.
85..................... AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING...... 5,735 5,735
86..................... P-3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM............ 3,574 3,574
87..................... WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM............... 3,733 3,733
88..................... TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM.............. 89,955 87,955
..................... Systems engineering growth........... ....................... -2,000
89..................... ADVANCED HAWKEYE..................... 171,132 171,132
90..................... H-1 UPGRADES......................... 60,498 60,498
91..................... ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS.............. 64,834 64,834
92..................... V-22A................................ 46,070 44,425
..................... Fuel forward funded in fiscal year ....................... -1,645
2010 supplemental.

[[Page S1448]]

93..................... AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT......... 8,689 11,189
..................... Transfer from AP,N line 52 for Common ....................... +2,500
Mobile Aircrew Restraint System.
94..................... EA-18................................ 22,042 21,773
..................... Fuel forward funded in fiscal year ....................... -269
2010 supplemental.
95..................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT....... 80,819 80,819
96..................... VH-71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT.... 159,785 159,785
97..................... NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ)......... 120,602 90,602
..................... Technology development contract delay ....................... -30,000
98..................... JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM--NAVY 687,723 627,723
(JTRS-NAVY).
..................... Airborne Maritime Fixed unjustified ....................... -60,000
increase.
100.................... SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM 193,933 193,933
ENGINEERING.
101.................... LPD-17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION..... 1,373 1,373
102.................... SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)............ 44,091 24,091
..................... Program delay........................ ....................... -20,000
103.................... STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS........ 96,186 96,186
104.................... AIRBORNE MCM......................... 45,885 45,885
105.................... NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL-COUNTER 21,517 21,517
AIR SYSTEMS ENG.
106.................... ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS......... 274,371 274,371
107.................... SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION.... 118,897 112,197
..................... Navy requested transfer to line 49 ....................... -2,000
for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
..................... Communications at Speed and Depth.... ....................... -4,700
108.................... AIR CONTROL.......................... 5,665 5,665
109.................... SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS........... 70,117 70,117
110.................... COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION. 5,044 5,044
111.................... NEW DESIGN SSN....................... 155,489 171,489
..................... Program Increase--Small Business ....................... +16,000
Technology Insertion.
112.................... SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM.... 50,537 50,537
113.................... SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/LIVE FIRE T&E... 153,686 166,686
..................... Full Ship Shock Trial Alternative ....................... +13,000
transfer from line 136.
114.................... NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES..... 4,443 4,443
115.................... MINE DEVELOPMENT..................... 5,455 5,455
116.................... LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT...... 25,282 25,282
117.................... JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 10,489 10,489
DEVELOPMENT.
118.................... PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND 10,759 10,759
HUMAN FACTORS.
119.................... JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS........ 12,567 12,567
120.................... SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL). 45,930 45,930
121.................... SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 5,860 5,860
122.................... SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/ 84,525 82,525
EW).
..................... Navy requested transfer to line 49 ....................... -2,000
for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
123.................... INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING............. 6,820 6,820
124.................... MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT.................. 12,337 29,137
..................... Wound Care Research.................. ....................... +10,400
..................... Military Dental Research............. ....................... +6,400
125.................... NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM................. 66,636 66,636
126.................... JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)-EMD....... 667,916 613,864
..................... Block IV capabilities funding ahead ....................... -29,052
of need.
..................... Underexecution of test program....... ....................... -25,000
127.................... JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)........... 707,791 676,806
..................... Block IV capabilities funding ahead ....................... -29,000
of need.
..................... Fuel forward funded in fiscal year ....................... -1,985
2010 supplemental.
128.................... INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT... 22,783 22,783
129.................... INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT... 28,280 28,280
130.................... NAVY INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN 27,444 15,444
RESOURCES SYSTEM.
..................... Reduction to pre-development ....................... -12,000
activities.
131.................... CH-53K............................... 577,435 577,435
133.................... JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)... 100,846 100,846
134.................... MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) 929,240 941,240
..................... Program Increase--Small Business ....................... +12,000
Technology Insertion.
136.................... DDG-1000............................. 549,241 534,241
..................... Navy requested transfer to line 49 ....................... -2,000
for Automatic Test and Re-Test.
..................... Full Ship Shock Trial Alternative ....................... -13,000
transfer to line 113.
137.................... TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM--MIP......... 1,318 1,318
138.................... SSN-688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION-- 1,415 1,415
MIP.
139.................... TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS......... 17,019 12,387
..................... Execution delays..................... ....................... -4,632
140.................... THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT......... 18,755 18,755
141.................... TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT........... 66,066 66,066
142.................... MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT................. 37,522 37,522
143.................... STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT--NAVY... 8,149 8,149
144.................... CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES............ 49,165 49,165
146.................... TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES....... 662 662
147.................... MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL 58,329 58,329
SUPPORT.
148.................... STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT.......... 3,451 3,451
149.................... RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 72,094 72,094
MANAGEMENT.
150.................... RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT...... 95,332 93,871
..................... Fuel forward funded in fiscal year ....................... -1,461
2010 supplemental.
151.................... TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.......... 376,418 376,418
152.................... OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION 15,746 15,746
CAPABILITY.
153.................... NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 4,013 4,013
(SEW) SUPPORT.
154.................... SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE 19,700 19,700
SUPPORT.
155.................... MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT.... 17,721 17,721
156.................... TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES...... 1,859 1,859
157.................... SERVICE SUPPORT TO JFCOM, JNTC....... 4,260 4,260
161.................... UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) 266,368 266,368
ADVANCED COMPONENT.
162.................... STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM 81,184 71,184
SUPPORT.
..................... Conventional Trident Modification.... ....................... -10,000
163.................... SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM..... 34,997 34,997
164.................... SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE 6,815 6,815
DEVELOPMENT.
165.................... NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS........ 10,331 10,331
166.................... RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT).... 35,120 35,120
167.................... F/A-18 SQUADRONS..................... 148,438 148,438
168.................... E-2 SQUADRONS........................ 19,011 19,011
169.................... FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL).. 26,894 26,894
170.................... TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION 10,587 10,587
PLANNING CENTER (TMPC).
171.................... INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM....... 23,464 23,464
172.................... AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS.... 4,357 4,357
173.................... CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS 50,750 50,750
DEVELOPMENT.
174.................... CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT........... 1,519 1,519
175.................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS 39,398 39,398
SUPPORT.
176.................... HARM IMPROVEMENT..................... 14,207 12,207
..................... Systems engineering growth........... ....................... -2,000
177.................... TACTICAL DATA LINKS.................. 28,854 28,854
178.................... SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 32,877 36,877
..................... Program Increase--Small Business ....................... +4,000
Technology Insertion.
179.................... MK-48 ADCAP.......................... 26,234 34,234
..................... Program Increase--Small Business ....................... +8,000
Technology Insertion.
180.................... AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS................ 133,611 100,890
..................... F-135 engine ahead of need........... ....................... -27,000
..................... Multi-purpose bomb rack program delay ....................... -5,721
181.................... NAVY SCIENCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM...... 3,535 3,535
182.................... OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS.... 74,229 74,229
183.................... MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.. 245,298 232,898
..................... Joint Cooperative Target ....................... -12,400
Identification--Ground.
184.................... MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING 100,424 76,424
ARMS SYSTEMS.

[[Page S1449]]

..................... Marine personnel carrier program ....................... -20,000
delay.
..................... LAV-AT contract delay................ ....................... -4,000
185.................... MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT. 19,466 19,466
186.................... USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE 20,316 20,316
SYSTEMS.
187.................... TACTICAL AIM MISSILES................ 912 912
188.................... ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR 2,633 2,633
MISSILE (AMRAAM).
189.................... JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV)....... 3,586 3,586
194.................... SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE)..... 422,268 422,268
195.................... CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK 63,563 44,563
ENTERPRISE SERVICES.
..................... Increment 1 transition contract delay ....................... -19,000
196.................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 25,934 25,934
199.................... CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK 8,375 8,375
ENTERPRISE SERVICES--MIP.
201.................... COBRA JUDY........................... 36,527 36,527
202.................... NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS- 63,878 63,878
SPACE (METOC).
203.................... JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS. 4,435 4,435
204.................... TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES.... 35,212 18,912
..................... Marinized UAS........................ ....................... -16,300
206.................... AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS...... ....................... 50,200
..................... Program increase..................... ....................... +5,200
..................... EP-3/SPA systems development......... ....................... +45,000
207.................... MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS........ 19,263 19,263
208.................... DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/ 8,377 8,377
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
209.................... DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEMS/ 16,665 16,665
SURFACE SYSTEMS.
210.................... RQ-4 UAV............................. 529,250 529,250
211.................... MQ-8 UAV............................. 10,665 10,665
212.................... RQ-11 UAV............................ 512 512
213.................... RQ-7 UAV............................. 934 934
214.................... SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS 26,209 26,209
(STUASL0).
215.................... SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS 18,098 12,710
(STUASL0).
..................... STUAS Lite termination............... ....................... -5,388
218.................... MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT...... 8,158 8,158
219.................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)........... 18,649 18,649
220.................... AVIONICS COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 3,250 3,250
PROGRAM.
221.................... INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS.............. 46,173 46,173
..................... CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 1,284,901 1,499,901
..................... Classified adjustment................ ....................... +215,000
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 17,693,496 17,736,303
EVALUATION, NAVY.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, AIR FORCE

1...................... DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............ 350,978 350,978
2...................... UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES...... 136,297 136,297
3...................... HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH 13,198 13,198
INITIATIVES.
4...................... MATERIALS............................ 137,273 137,273
5...................... AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES....... 144,699 144,699
6...................... HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH. 87,452 87,452
7...................... AEROSPACE PROPULSION................. 207,049 204,049
..................... Unjustified program growth........... ....................... -3,000
8...................... AEROSPACE SENSORS.................... 157,497 159,897
..................... Program Increase--Materials for ....................... +2,400
Structures, Propulsion, and
Subsystems.
9...................... SPACE TECHNOLOGY..................... 111,857 111,857
10..................... CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS............... 61,330 61,330
11..................... DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY........... 103,596 122,396
..................... Re-alignment of funding for ground ....................... +18,800
optical imaging research and
technology.
13..................... DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND 117,283 115,783
METHODS.
..................... Transfer to line 11.................. ....................... -1,500
14..................... HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH........... 53,384 53,384
15..................... ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 33,414 40,414
..................... Transfer to line 11.................. ....................... -1,000
..................... Metals Affordability Initiative...... ....................... +8,000
16..................... SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2,935 2,935
(S&T).
17..................... ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS........... 44,677 44,677
18..................... AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO........ 53,588 52,588
..................... Transfer to line 11.................. ....................... -1,000
19..................... AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER 136,135 134,135
TECHNOLOGY.
..................... Transfer to line 11.................. ....................... -2,000
21..................... ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY......... 16,992 16,992
22..................... ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY....... 83,705 80,115
..................... Transfer to line 11.................. ....................... -3,590
23..................... MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) 5,899 5,899
24..................... HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED 24,814 24,814
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
25..................... CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY...... 15,755 15,755
26..................... ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY.......... 17,461 17,461
27..................... MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM..... 39,701 47,701
..................... Program Increase--Best Industrial ....................... +8,000
Process for Department of Defense
Depots.
28..................... BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT & 32,382 32,382
DEMONSTRATION.
30..................... HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 1,847 1,847
PROGRAM.
XX..................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INNOVATION.. 0 105,000
..................... Research and Development Innovation.. ....................... +105,000
31..................... INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.... 5,019 5,019
32..................... PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT.......... 3,576 1,000
..................... Unjustified program request.......... ....................... -2,576
33..................... GPS III--OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT. 0 356,867
..................... 212.................................. ....................... +356,867
34..................... ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE)....... 351,817 394,817
..................... Program Increase--Capabilities ....................... +43,000
Insertion Program.
35..................... POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE).............. 164,232 164,232
36..................... SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY............. 45,012 45,012
37..................... COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY..... 26,172 36,172
..................... Program Increase--Automatic Dependent ....................... +10,000
Surveillance--Broadcast.
38..................... NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........ 4,372 4,372
39..................... INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D.. 635 635
40..................... SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP)....... 8,349 8,349
42..................... INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE......... 20,580 20,580
43..................... INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE... 66,745 66,745
44..................... WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SYSTEM RDT&E 36,123 79,123
(SPACE).
..................... Program Increase--Capabilities ....................... +43,000
Insertion Program.
45..................... POLLUTION PREVENTION (DEM/VAL)....... 2,534 2,534
46..................... JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING 13,952 13,952
SYSTEMS.
47..................... NEXT GENERATION BOMBER............... 198,957 198,957
48..................... BATTLE MGMT COM & CTRL SENSOR 0 12,000
DEVELOPMENT.
..................... Program Increase--GMTI Radar ....................... +12,000
Development.
49..................... HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT 22,389 22,389
SYSTEM.
50..................... JOINT DUAL ROLE AIR DOMINANCE MISSILE 9,799 9,799
51..................... REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION. 34,339 34,339
52..................... NEXT-GENERATION MILSATCOM TECHNOLOGY 0 20,000
DEVELOPMENT.
..................... Program Increase--Acquisition ....................... +20,000
Planning and Studies.
53..................... GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE 32,513 22,513
DEVELOPMENT.
..................... Program delay........................ ....................... -10,000
54..................... ALTERNATIVE FUELS.................... 24,064 24,064
55..................... AUTOMATED AIR-TO-AIR REFUELING....... 85 85
56..................... OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE....... 93,978 125,978
..................... Program Increase--Responsive Launch ....................... +32,000
Capabilities.
57..................... TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM.............. 12,260 12,260

[[Page S1450]]

58..................... NATIONAL POLAR-ORBITING OPERATIONAL 325,505 100,000
ENVIRONMENTAL SAT.
..................... Program Reduction.................... ....................... -225,505
58A.................... DEFENSE WEATHER SATELLITE SYSTEM ....................... 75,000
(DWSS).
..................... DWSS-only for defense sensor ....................... +75,000
development.
59..................... GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS)....... 18,171 18,171
60..................... NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT.............. 60,545 60,545
62..................... SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT 8,066 8,066
TRAINING.
64..................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT....... 89,966 89,966
65..................... JOINT TACTICAL RADIO................. 631 631
66..................... TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE.... 102,941 102,941
67..................... PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT.......... 50 50
68..................... SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)............ 153,505 100,505
..................... SDB II--Contract Award Delay......... ....................... -53,000
69..................... COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS................. 40,276 40,276
70..................... SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS.... 426,525 350,425
..................... SBSS Follow On....................... ....................... -45,100
..................... Space Fence.......................... ....................... -35,000
..................... Integration of Missile Defense Agency ....................... +4,000
radar systems into Space
Surveillance Network.
71..................... AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK........... 25,937 25,937
72..................... SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) 530,047 530,047
HIGH EMD.
74..................... ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT........ 6,693 6,693
75..................... SUBMUNITIONS......................... 1,622 1,622
76..................... AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT................. 37,987 37,987
77..................... LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS................. 10,650 10,650
78..................... COMBAT TRAINING RANGES............... 36,905 36,905
79..................... INTEGRATED COMMAND & CONTROL 10 10
APPLICATIONS (IC2A).
80..................... INTELLIGENCE EQUIPMENT............... 1,364 1,364
81..................... JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)........... 883,773 1,051,210
..................... Air Force requested transfer from ....................... +159,837
line 135.
..................... Air Force requested transfer for Auto ....................... +7,600
GCAS from AP, AF line 43.
82..................... INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE... 71,843 71,843
83..................... EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE 30,245 55,245
PROGRAM (SPACE).
..................... Program Increase--EELV Common Upper ....................... +25,000
Stage.
85..................... NEXT GENERATION AERIAL REFUELING 863,875 0
AIRCRAFT.
..................... Transfer to Tanker Transfer Fund..... ....................... -863,875
86..................... CSAR HH-60 RECAPITALIZATION.......... 12,584 0
..................... Program Termination.................. ....................... -12,584
86A.................... HH-60 RDT&E.......................... 0 1,934
..................... Terrain and Traffic Avoidance ....................... +1,934
Systems--Transfer from line 86.
88..................... HC/MC-130 RECAP RDT&E................ 15,536 15,536
91..................... SINGLE INTEGRATED AIR PICTURE (SIAP). 1,832 0
..................... Program termination.................. ....................... -1,832
92..................... FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING......... 57,393 57,393
94..................... JOINT CARGO AIRCRAFT (JCA)........... 26,407 26,407
95..................... CV-22................................ 18,270 18,270
96..................... AIRBORNE SENIOR LEADER C3 (SLC3S).... 15,826 7,826
..................... Contract award delay for SLC3S-A ....................... -8,000
Communications Program (SCP).
97..................... THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT......... 21,245 21,245
98..................... MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT................. 61,587 61,587
99..................... RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE............... 26,752 26,752
101.................... INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION 20,665 20,665
102.................... TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.......... 759,868 759,868
103.................... ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) 23,551 23,551
104.................... SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP)............. 47,623 47,623
105.................... FACILITIES RESTORATION & 46,327 46,327
MODERNIZATION--TEST & EVAL.
106.................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT--TEST AND 27,579 27,579
EVALUATION SUPPORT.
107.................... MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 18,901 18,901
INITIATIVE.
108.................... ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT... 24,968 24,968
109.................... GENERAL SKILL TRAINING............... 1,544 1,544
111.................... INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES............. 3,764 3,764
113.................... COMMON VERTICAL LIFT SUPPORT PLATFORM 0 4,000
..................... Air Force requested transfer from AP, ....................... +4,000
AF line 18.
114.................... AIR FORCE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN 43,300 23,300
RESOURCES SYSTEM.
..................... Funding ahead of need................ ....................... -20,000
115.................... ANTITAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE 42,255 42,255
AGENCY.
117.................... B-52 SQUADRONS....................... 146,096 140,896
..................... EHF Request--early to need........... ....................... -24,700
..................... Program Increase to continue advanced ....................... +6,500
targeting pod integration.
..................... Air Force requested transfer from AP, ....................... +13,000
AF line 38 for Internal Weapons Bay.
118.................... AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)... 3,631 3,631
119.................... B-1B SQUADRONS....................... 33,234 33,234
120.................... B-2 SQUADRONS........................ 260,466 276,466
..................... Program Increase--Mixed Loads and ....................... +16,000
Other Capabilities.
121.................... STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM--USSTRATCOM 28,441 28,441
122.................... NIGHT FIST--USSTRATCOM............... 5,359 5,359
125.................... REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL 23,732 23,732
CENTER MODERNIZATION.
126.................... STRATEGIC AEROSPACE INTELLIGENCE 15 15
SYSTEM ACTIVITIES.
127.................... WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS 10,580 10,580
(WRAP) RAPID TRAN.
128.................... MQ-9 UAV............................. 125,427 125,427
129.................... MULTI-PLATFORM ELECTRONIC WARFARE 15,574 15,574
EQUIPMENT.
130.................... A-10 SQUADRONS....................... 5,661 5,661
131.................... F-16 SQUADRONS....................... 129,103 129,103
132.................... F-15E SQUADRONS...................... 222,677 207,677
..................... Contract award delays................ ....................... -15,000
133.................... MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION....... 12,937 12,937
134.................... F-22 SQUADRONS....................... 576,330 511,330
..................... Modernization program................ ....................... -100,000
..................... MADL--Transfer from line 155......... ....................... +35,000
135.................... F-35 SQUADRONS....................... 217,561 0
..................... Block 4 Development.................. ....................... -57,724
..................... Air Force requested transfer to line ....................... -159,837
81.
136.................... TACTICAL AIM MISSILES................ 6,040 6,040
137.................... ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR 62,922 62,922
MISSILE (AMRAAM).
138.................... JOINT HELMET MOUNTED CUEING SYSTEM 2,407 2,407
(JHMCS).
139.................... COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY........... 944 944
140.................... COMBAT RESCUE--PARARESCUE............ 2,921 2,921
141.................... AF TENCAP............................ 11,648 11,648
142.................... PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT. 3,017 3,017
143.................... COMPASS CALL......................... 20,652 20,652
144.................... AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 147,396 120,626
PROGRAM.
..................... F-135 Component Improvement Program-- ....................... -26,770
premature request.
146.................... JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 20,000 20,000
(JASSM).
147.................... AIR AND SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 93,102 93,102
148.................... CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)... 58,313 58,313
149.................... AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM 239,755 229,755
(AWACS).
..................... Contract award and schedule delays ....................... -10,000
for Block 40/45 EMD and DRAGON.
151.................... ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS...... 67,532 67,532
153.................... COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM 3,310 3,310
ACTIVITIES.
154.................... THEATER BATTLE MANAGEMENT (TBM) C4I.. 15,170 15,170
155.................... FIGHTER TACTICAL DATA LINK........... 85,492 23,992
..................... MADL--Transfer to line 134........... ....................... -61,500
157.................... C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK............. 1,584 1,584
158.................... COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) 24,229 24,229
CONSTELLATION.
159.................... JOINT SURVEILLANCE AND TARGET ATTACK 168,917 168,917
RADAR SYSTEM.

[[Page S1451]]

160.................... SEEK EAGLE........................... 19,263 19,263
161.................... USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION......... 21,638 21,638
162.................... WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS..... 6,020 6,020
163.................... DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES... 2,863 2,863
164.................... MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS............. 79,112 79,112
165.................... INFORMATION WARFARE SUPPORT.......... 2,294 2,294
166.................... CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES............. 1,117 1,117
173.................... SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE....... 10,006 10,006
174.................... E-4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS 12,532 12,532
CENTER (NAOC).
175.................... MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY 78,784 68,984
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK.
..................... MMPU Production--Air Force requested ....................... -9,800
transfer to MP,AF line 9.
176.................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 140,017 140,017
177.................... GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM......... 3,393 3,393
178.................... GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.... 3,055 5,212
..................... Air Force requested transfer from ....................... +2,157
line 179.
179.................... JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL PROGRAM 2,157 0
(JC2).
..................... Air Force requested transfer to line ....................... -2,157
178.
180.................... MILSATCOM TERMINALS.................. 186,582 306,282
..................... FAB-T--Air Force requested transfer ....................... +119,700
from AP,AF line 75.
182.................... AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE........... 149,268 144,268
..................... Program execution.................... ....................... -5,000
185.................... GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM). 5,708 5,708
186.................... CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............ 2,030 2,030
187.................... DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER............... 279 279
188.................... SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE).... 21,667 21,667
189.................... WEATHER SERVICE...................... 32,373 32,373
190.................... AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, & 33,268 33,268
LANDING SYSTEM (ATC).
191.................... AERIAL TARGETS....................... 63,573 58,573
..................... Program execution.................... ....................... -5,000
194.................... SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 469 469
196.................... DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE 40 40
ACTIVITIES.
198.................... NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 165,936 165,936
(USER EQUIPMENT).
199.................... NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 34,471 34,471
(SPACE AND CONTROL).
201.................... SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION 4,572 4,572
CENTER.
202.................... SPACE WARFARE CENTER................. 2,929 2,929
203.................... SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE)....... 9,933 9,933
204.................... INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION 1,254 1,254
OPERATIONS.
206.................... AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS...... 168,963 90,263
..................... Wide Area Airborne Surveillance ....................... -78,700
Program of Record--ahead of need.
207.................... MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS........ 15,337 15,337
208.................... DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE 93,398 85,898
SYSTEMS.
..................... Program Reduction.................... ....................... -7,500
209.................... PREDATOR UAV (JMIP).................. 28,913 23,913
..................... Program execution.................... ....................... -5,000
210.................... RQ4 UAV.............................. 251,318 220,318
..................... Execution adjustment................. ....................... -31,000
211.................... NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGET 7,267 7,267
(TIARA).
212.................... GPS III SPACE SEGMENT................ 828,171 446,304
..................... Operational Control Segment (OCX)-- ....................... -381,867
Transfer to line 33.
213.................... JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM................. 132,706 109,506
..................... JSPOC Mission System................. ....................... -28,000
..................... Karnac............................... ....................... +4,800
214.................... INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION 5,512 5,512
WARFARE.
215.................... NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE)....... 72,199 72,199
216.................... NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE OFFICE....... 10,630 0
..................... Program termination--Funding ....................... -10,630
transferred to Executive Agent for
Space, OM,AF.
217.................... SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS. 43,838 43,838
218.................... INFORMATION OPS TECHNOLOGY 21,912 21,912
INTEGRATION & TOOL DEVELOP.
219.................... SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)........... 2,952 2,952
220.................... C-130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON............... 113,107 43,472
..................... Air Force requested transfer to AP,AF ....................... -69,635
line 61.
221.................... C-5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS................ 58,990 58,990
222.................... C-17 AIRCRAFT........................ 177,212 162,212
..................... Contract award delays................ ....................... -15,000
223.................... C-130J PROGRAM....................... 26,770 26,770
224.................... LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES 17,227 17,227
(LAIRCM).
225.................... KC-135S.............................. 20,453 20,453
226.................... KC-10S............................... 56,669 41,669
..................... Milestone B slip..................... ....................... -15,000
227.................... OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT.......... 4,988 4,988
228.................... C-STOL AIRCRAFT...................... 1,283 1,283
230.................... SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL..... 7,345 7,345
231.................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)........... 1,514 1,514
234.................... LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 227,614 227,614
(LOGIT).
235.................... SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.......... 6,141 38,141
..................... Alternative energy research and ....................... +32,000
integration.
235A................... AIR FORCE RECRUITING INFORMATION 0 5,100
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
..................... Air Force Recruiting Information ....................... +5,100
Support System--Air Force requested
transfer from OM,AF.
236.................... OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING................ 667 667
237.................... JOINT NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER....... 9 9
239.................... OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES........... 116 116
240.................... JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY...... 6,107 6,107
242.................... CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM........ 7,811 7,811
243.................... PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION............. 11,179 11,179
244.................... FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 49,816 49,816
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.
..................... CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 12,406,781 12,915,571
..................... Classified Adjustment................ ....................... +508,790
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 27,247,302 26,517,405
EVALUATION, AIR FORCE.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE

1...................... DTRA UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP 47,412 47,412
BASIC RESEARCH.
2...................... DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES............ 328,195 295,695
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -32,500
5...................... NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM... 109,911 94,311
..................... Unexecutable growth.................. ....................... -15,600
6...................... CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 49,508 49,508
PROGRAM.
7...................... INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS--EXPLORATORY 22,448 20,448
DEVELOPMENT.
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -2,000
8...................... HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES & UNIV 15,067 23,067
(HBCU) SCIENCE.
..................... Program Increase..................... ....................... +8,000
9...................... LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM.. 32,830 32,830
10..................... INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS 281,262 253,262
TECHNOLOGY.
..................... DISCOVER contract award delays....... ....................... -10,000
..................... Extreme Computing contract award ....................... -18,000
delays.
11..................... COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS.......... 90,143 90,143
12..................... MACHINE INTELLIGENCE................. 44,682 44,682
13..................... BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE........... 32,692 32,692
14..................... CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 169,287 174,287
PROGRAM.
..................... TMTI BA 5 unexecutable funding ....................... +5,000
transferred back to S&T at request
of the Department.
15..................... JOINT DATA MANAGEMENT ADVANCED 3,261 0
DEVELOPMENT.
..................... Duplicate effort..................... ....................... -3,261
16..................... CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH.............. 10,000 5,000
..................... Lack of authorization................ ....................... -5,000

[[Page S1452]]

17..................... HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR 9,499 7,999
MODELING (HSCB) APP.
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -1,500
18..................... TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY.................. 224,378 224,378
19..................... MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY.. 312,586 307,586
..................... Unsustained growth................... ....................... -5,000
20..................... ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY............... 286,936 266,936
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -20,000
21..................... WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT 212,742 212,742
TECHNOLOGIES.
22..................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY 26,545 36,745
DEVELOPMENT.
..................... Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +15,200
Requirement.
..................... Unexecutable growth.................. ....................... -5,000
24..................... JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECH 20,556 15,556
INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS AD.
..................... Unjustified growth................... ....................... -5,000
25..................... SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.......... 44,423 44,423
26..................... COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY 85,299 85,299
SUPPORT.
27..................... COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES-- 295,163 295,163
PROLIF PREV & DEFEAT.
28..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY. 132,220 92,220
..................... SM-3 Block IIB Development transfer ....................... -40,000
to line 84, AEGIS BMD.
29..................... JOINT ADVANCED CONCEPTS.............. 6,808 6,808
30..................... JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 22,700 22,700
DEVELOPMENT.
31..................... AGILE TRANSPO FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 750 750
(AT21)--THEATER CA.
32..................... ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS........... 303,078 241,378
..................... ArcLight............................. ....................... -5,000
..................... ISIS lack of transition partner...... ....................... -21,700
..................... MoTr program delays.................. ....................... -15,000
..................... Vulture program descope and delays... ....................... -20,000
33..................... SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY........ 98,130 98,130
34..................... CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 177,113 222,713
PROGRAM--ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.
..................... TMTI BA 5 unexecutable funding ....................... +45,600
transferred back to S&T at request
of the Department.
35..................... JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. 8,386 8,386
36..................... JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY 206,917 191,917
DEMONSTRATIONS.
..................... Unjustified growth................... ....................... -15,000
37..................... NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES 30,035 25,035
..................... Unjustified growth................... ....................... -5,000
38..................... JOINT DATA MANAGEMENT RESEARCH....... 6,289 4,289
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -2,000
39..................... BIOMETRICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.... 11,416 11,416
40..................... CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH..... 10,000 5,000
..................... Lack of authorization................ ....................... -5,000
41..................... HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR 11,510 10,510
MODELING (HSCB) ADV.
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -1,000
42..................... DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE 18,916 42,916
AND TECHNOLOGY PROG.
..................... Industrial Base Innovation Fund...... ....................... +24,000
43..................... JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM/AUTONOMOUS 9,943 9,943
SYSTEMS.
44..................... GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY 20,542 20,542
DEMONSTRATIONS.
45..................... DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION 29,109 29,109
ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY.
46..................... STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 68,021 64,021
PROGRAM.
..................... Unexecutable growth.................. ....................... -4,000
47..................... MICROELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY 26,878 26,878
DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT.
48..................... JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM............ 10,966 10,966
49..................... ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES.... 197,098 197,098
52..................... HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING 200,986 240,986
MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.
..................... Program adjustment................... ....................... +40,000
53..................... COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS 219,809 219,809
SYSTEMS.
54..................... CLASSIFIED DARPA PROGRAMS............ 167,008 150,308
..................... Poor justification materials......... ....................... -16,700
55..................... NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY... 234,985 227,985
..................... Unsustained growth................... ....................... -7,000
56..................... SENSOR TECHNOLOGY.................... 205,032 205,032
58..................... DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED 13,986 13,986
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
59..................... SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE....... 30,910 30,910
61..................... QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS...... 78,244 58,244
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -13,000
..................... P826--Excess to Quick Reaction Fund ....................... -7,000
requirements.
62..................... JOINT EXPERIMENTATION................ 111,946 91,946
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... -20,000
63..................... MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT 38,140 33,140
OFFICE.
..................... Unexecutable growth.................. ....................... -5,000
64..................... DIRECTED ENERGY RESEARCH............. 98,688 123,688
..................... Program Increase..................... ....................... +25,000
65..................... TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & 97,642 97,642
TECHNOLOGY.
66..................... TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.................. 23,310 17,310
..................... Unjustified growth................... ....................... 6,000
67..................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED 30,806 38,806
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
..................... SOF ACTD Programs.................... ....................... +8,000
68..................... AVIATION ENGINEERING ANALYSIS........ 4,234 4,234
69..................... SOF INFORMATION & BROADCAST SYSTEMS 4,942 4,942
ADVANCED TECHNOLOG.
69X.................... INNOVATIVE RESEARCH.................. 0 124,200
..................... Program adjustment................... ....................... +124,200
70..................... NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL 32,132 32,132
SECURITY EQUIPMENT.
71..................... RETRACT LARCH........................ 21,592 21,592
72..................... JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM............... 9,878 9,878
73..................... ADVANCE SENSOR APPLICATIONS PROGRAM.. 18,060 18,060
74..................... ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL 30,419 30,419
CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.
75..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL 436,482 431,482
DEFENSE SEGMENT.
..................... Funding no longer required for ....................... -5,000
transition to Reagan Test Site.
76..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE 1,346,181 1,311,181
DEFENSE SEGMENT.
..................... Excess Award Fee and Test and ....................... -35,000
Integration Delays.
78..................... CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 277,062 271,062
PROGRAM.
..................... Improved Nerve Agent Treatment ....................... -5,000
System--slow obligation rate in
fiscal year 2010.
..................... Lightweight Chemical/Biological ....................... -1,000
Ensemble execution delays.
79..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS.... 454,859 392,159
..................... Transfer to line 88 for Concurrent ....................... -35,900
Test, Training and Operations.
..................... Transfer to line 88 for TPY-2 C2BMC ....................... -13,000
Fielding.
..................... Transfer to line 88 for BMDS Radars ....................... -13,800
Communications Sustainment (TPY-2).
81..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST & 1,113,425 1,008,525
TARGETS.
..................... Transfer to lines 82 and 88.......... ....................... -94,900
..................... Funding no longer required for move ....................... -5,000
to Reagan Test Site.
..................... Program Growth in Program Operations ....................... -5,000
Systems Engineering and Systems
Management.
82..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ENABLING 402,769 406,269
PROGRAMS.
..................... Transfer from line 81................ ....................... +43,500
..................... Excessive contractor support, ....................... -40,000
advisory services and program growth.
83..................... SPECIAL PROGRAMS--MDA................ 270,189 245,189
..................... Transfer to higher priority near-term ....................... -25,000
MDA procurement programs.
84..................... AEGIS BMD............................ 1,467,278 1,569,278
..................... Program growth....................... ....................... -12,000
..................... Navy requested transfer from OP,N ....................... +72,500
line 109.
..................... Aegis BMD Ships--Navy requested ....................... +1,500
transfer from OM,N line 1B5B.
..................... SM-3 Block IIB Development--transfer ....................... +40,000
from line 28.
85..................... SPACE SURVEILLANCE & TRACKING SYSTEM. 112,678 112,678
87..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM 10,942 10,942
SPACE PROGRAMS.
88..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE C2BMC...... 342,625 456,725
..................... Transfer from line 81 for Concurrent ....................... +51,400
Test, Training and Operations.
..................... Transfer from line 79 for Concurrent ....................... +35,900
Test, Training and Operations.

[[Page S1453]]

..................... Transfer from line 79 for TPY-2 C2BMC ....................... +13,000
Fielding.
..................... Transfer from line 79 for BMDS Radar ....................... +13,800
Communications Sustainment (TPY-2).
90..................... BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT 68,726 58,726
WARFIGHTER SUPPORT.
..................... Duplication of effort with MDA core ....................... -10,000
programs.
91..................... CENTER (MDIOC)....................... 86,198 86,198
92..................... REGARDING TRENCH..................... 7,529 7,529
93..................... SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX)......... 153,056 153,056
98..................... ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS......... 121,735 209,935
..................... David's Sling Weapons Program........ ....................... +38,000
..................... Arrow System Improvement Program ....................... +42,000
(ASIP).
..................... Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor ....................... +8,200
Program.
99..................... HUMANITARIAN DEMINING................ 14,735 14,735
100.................... COALITION WARFARE.................... 13,786 13,786
101.................... DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION 4,802 39,502
PROGRAM.
..................... Department of Defense Corrosion ....................... +34,700
Prevention and Control Program.
102.................... DOD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) 49,292 49,292
COMMON DEVELOPMENT.
104.................... HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL BEHAVIOR 7,459 7,459
MODELING (HSCB) RES.
105.................... JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION COMMAND 19,413 19,413
(JSIC).
106.................... JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION & 16,637 16,637
INTEROPERABILITY TEAM.
107.................... LAND-BASED SM-3 (LBSM3).............. 281,378 281,378
108.................... AEGIS SM-3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT.. 318,800 318,800
109.................... PRECISION TRACKING SPACE SYSTEM RDT&E 66,969 36,969
..................... Transfer to higher priority near-term ....................... -30,000
MDA procurement programs.
110.................... AIRBORNE INFRARED (ABIR)............. 111,671 76,671
..................... Transfer to higher priority near-term ....................... -35,000
MDA procurement programs.
111.................... REDUCTION OF TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST.... 20,310 20,310
112.................... JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY 4,027 4,027
(JET) PROGRAM.
113.................... DEFENSE ACQUISITION CHALLENGE PROGRAM 24,344 24,344
(DACP).
114.................... NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL 7,973 7,973
SECURITY EQUIPMENT.
115.................... PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY 239,861 239,861
DEVELOPMENT.
116.................... CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 407,162 300,562
PROGRAM.
..................... Plague Vaccine--slow obligation rate ....................... -5,000
in fiscal year 2010.
..................... TMTI BA 5 unexecutable funding ....................... -65,600
transferred back to S&T at request
of the Department.
..................... Bioscavenger Increment II schedule ....................... -12,000
delays.
..................... Decontamination Family of Systems ....................... -9,000
schedule delays.
..................... Next Generation Chemical Standoff ....................... -9,000
Detection schedule delays.
..................... SSI NBCRS growth without acquisition ....................... -6,000
strategy.
117.................... JOINT ROBOTICS PROGRAM............... 4,155 4,155
118.................... ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM 49,364 23,695
OFFICE (AITSJPO).
..................... Technology Initiatives Investment ....................... -25,669
Fund.
119.................... JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION 20,954 20,954
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS).
120.................... WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT 7,307 7,307
CAPABILITIES.
121.................... INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT... 11,937 11,937
122.................... DEFENSE INTEGRATED MILITARY HUMAN 11,800 11,800
RESOURCES SYSTEM.
123.................... BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION AGENCY R&D 184,131 181,166
ACTIVITIES.
..................... VIPS Increment II contract award in ....................... -2,965
fiscal year 2012.
124.................... HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY 391 391
INITIATIVE.
125.................... OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES... 5,000 5,000
126.................... TRUSTED FOUNDRY...................... 35,512 35,512
128.................... GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM......... 17,842 17,842
130.................... WOUNDED ILL AND INJURED SENIOR 1,590 1,590
OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.
132.................... DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM 5,113 5,113
(DRRS).
133.................... JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE 8,052 8,052
DEVELOPMENT.
134.................... CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION 162,286 162,286
INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT.
135.................... ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS.......... 2,500 2,500
136.................... THERMAL VICAR........................ 8,851 8,851
137.................... JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST 10,287 10,287
CAPABILITY (JMETC).
138.................... TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND 49,282 49,282
ANALYSIS.
139.................... USD(A&T)--CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 4,743 4,743
140.................... FOREIGN MATERIAL ACQUISITION AND 95,520 95,520
EXPLOITATION.
141.................... JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 94,577 94,577
ORGANIZATION.
142.................... CLASSIFIED PROGRAM USD(P)............ 0 106,000
..................... Classified Program USD(P)............ ....................... +106,000
143.................... FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING.......... 32,755 27,755
..................... Unjustified growth................... ....................... -5,000
144.................... SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.................. 29,824 37,024
..................... Sustainment of fiscal year 2010 level ....................... +7,200
145.................... NUCLEAR MATTERS--PHYSICAL SECURITY... 6,264 6,264
146.................... SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION 15,091 15,091
INTEGRATION.
147.................... GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) 6,227 6,227
147X................... DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT.. 0 12,000
..................... Program Increase--contract management ....................... +12,000
services program.
148.................... CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 120,995 120,995
PROGRAM.
155.................... SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH/ 2,189 2,189
CHALLENGE ADMINISTR.
156.................... DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS.......... 13,858 11,158
..................... P796--Technical Grand Challenge ....................... -2,700
Program.
157.................... FORCE TRANSFORMATION DIRECTORATE..... 19,701 19,701
158.................... DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 61,054 58,554
(DTIC).
..................... Excessive growth..................... ....................... 2,500
159.................... R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, 64,737 64,737
TESTING & EVALUATION.
160.................... DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION...... 18,688 25,888
..................... Sustainment of fiscal year 2010 level ....................... +7,200
161.................... DARPA AGENCY RELOCATION.............. 11,000 11,000
162.................... MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (RESEARCH & 56,257 56,257
DEVELOPMENT).
163.................... BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS....... 6,099 6,099
164.................... AVIATION SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES......... 10,900 10,900
165.................... JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT....... 23,081 8,081
..................... Growth without acquisition strategy.. ....................... -15,000
168.................... SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS 31,500 31,500
(IO) CAPABILITIES.
169.................... INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RAPID 5,135 5,135
ACQUISITION.
170.................... CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............ 10,000 10,000
171.................... INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION 21,272 21,272
OPERATIONS (IO).
173.................... WARFIGHTING AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED 845 845
SUPPORT.
174.................... COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND 92,253 48,688
TRAINING TRANSFORMATION.
..................... P 754--Initiatives funded by Services ....................... -33,315
..................... P 764--NPSUE funding without program. ....................... -10,250
175.................... PENTAGON RESERVATION................. 20,482 20,482
176.................... MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS--MDA......... 29,754 29,754
177.................... IT SOFTWARE DEV INITIATIVES.......... 278 278
..................... CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 61,577 61,577
178.................... DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR 5,522 1,000
SECURITY (DISS).
..................... Unjustified program.................. ....................... -4,522
179.................... REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH & 2,139 2,139
PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE.
180.................... OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE 290 290
SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM.
181.................... CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE 6,634 6,634
(OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT).
183.................... JOINT INTEGRATION AND 44,139 44,139
INTEROPERABILITY.
185.................... CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 2,288 2,288
186.................... C4I INTEROPERABILITY................. 74,023 74,023
188.................... JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION 9,379 9,379
SHARING.
195.................... NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE 467 467
SUPPORT.
196.................... DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE 16,629 36,629
ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION.
..................... Cyber Security Pilot Programs........ ....................... +20,000
197.................... LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS (DCS)....... 9,130 9,130
198.................... MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY 9,529 9,529
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK.

[[Page S1454]]

199.................... PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)...... 8,881 8,881
200.................... KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI).. 45,941 45,941
201.................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 14,077 14,077
202.................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM. 388,827 388,827
205.................... C4I FOR THE WARRIOR.................. 2,261 2,261
206.................... GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.... 26,247 25,047
..................... Fiscal year 2012 testing............. ....................... -1,200
207.................... JOINT SPECTRUM CENTER................ 20,991 20,991
208.................... NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES 3,366 3,366
(NCES).
209.................... JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE.. 1,161 1,161
210.................... TELEPORT PROGRAM..................... 6,880 6,880
211.................... SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR 16,272 16,272
CONTINGENCIES.
214.................... CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............ 501 501
216.................... CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............ 2,251 2,251
217.................... CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE............ 10,486 10,486
221.................... POLICY R&D PROGRAMS.................. 9,136 9,136
223.................... NET CENTRICITY....................... 29,831 14,831
..................... Unjustified growth................... ....................... -15,000
227.................... DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE 1,290 1,290
SYSTEMS.
230.................... DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE 3,513 3,513
SYSTEMS.
232.................... MQ-1 PREDATOR A UAV.................. 98 98
234.................... HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 2,988 2,988
PROGRAM.
235.................... INT'L INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY 1,416 1,416
ASSESSMENT, ADVANCEMENT.
245.................... INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS.............. 21,798 21,798
246.................... LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES......... 2,813 2,813
247.................... MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (JCS)........ 2,807 2,807
249.................... NATO AGS............................. 93,885 93,885
250.................... MQ-9 UAV............................. 98 98
252.................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS AVIATION SYSTEMS 68,691 68,691
ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.
253.................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS TACTICAL SYSTEMS 1,582 1,582
DEVELOPMENT.
254.................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE 23,879 25,479
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.
..................... Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +1,600
Requirement.
255.................... SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS......... 62,592 63,692
..................... Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +4,000
Requirement.
..................... Program termination.................. ....................... -2,900
256.................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS CV-22 DEVELOPMENT. 14,406 14,406
257.................... JOINT MULTI-MISSION SUBMERSIBLE...... 14,924 0
..................... SOCOM requested transfer to line 269. ....................... -14,924
259.................... MISSION TRAINING AND PREPARATION 2,915 2,915
SYSTEMS (MTPS).
261.................... MC130J SOF TANKER RECAPITALIZATION... 7,624 7,624
262.................... SOF COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND 1,922 922
ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS.
..................... Execution delays..................... ....................... -1,000
263.................... SOF TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS........... 2,347 2,347
264.................... SOF WEAPONS SYSTEMS.................. 479 479
265.................... SOF SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL 593 593
SYSTEMS.
267.................... SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES................ 1,994 994
..................... Change in requirements............... ....................... -1,000
268.................... SOF ROTARY WING AVIATION............. 14,473 33,715
..................... SOCOM requested transfer from P,DW ....................... +19,242
line 57.
269.................... SOF UNDERWATER SYSTEMS............... 13,986 28,910
..................... SOCOM requested transfer from line ....................... +14,924
257.
270.................... SOF SURFACE CRAFT.................... 2,933 18,933
..................... Program Increase--CCM Unfunded ....................... +16,000
Requirement.
271.................... SOF PSYOP............................ 4,193 4,193
272.................... SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE 5,135 5,135
ACTIVITIES.
273.................... SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 9,167 9,167
INTELLIGENCE.
..................... CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.................. 3,832,019 4,011,571
..................... Classified adjustment................ ....................... +179,552
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 20,661,600 20,797,412
EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE.

OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION, DEFENSE

1...................... OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION...... 59,430 59,430
2...................... LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION........ 12,899 12,899
3...................... OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND 122,581 122,581
ANALYSES.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION, 194,910 194,910
DEFENSE.
=================================================
..................... TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 76,130,700 74,957,028
EVALUATION.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

..................... STRATEGIC SHIP ACQUISITION........... 411,202 911,202
..................... Additional Mobile Landing Platform... ....................... 500,000
..................... DoD MOBILIZATION ASSETS.............. 158,647 158,647
..................... STRATEGIC SEALIFT SUPPORT............ 4,875 4,875
..................... SEALIFT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT..... 28,012 28,012
..................... READY RESERVE FORCE OPERATIONS AND 332,130 332,130
MAINTENANCE.
..................... MARITIME ADMINISTRATION SHIP ....................... 40,000
FINANCING GUARANTEE PROGRAM.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND. 934,866 1,474,866

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............ 29,915,277 29,671,764
IN-HOUSE CARE........................ 7,781,877 7,791,077
131.................................. 2,800 -2,800
Pain Management Task Force........... ....................... +12,000
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE.................. 16,034,745 15,673,745
TRICARE Underexecution............... ....................... -236,000
Global Deployment of the Force ....................... 125,000
medical research funding--DOD
requested transfer to maintain full
funding for the program.
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CARE............. 2,122,483 2,085,770
131.................................. 27,825 -27,825
Psychological Health--State Directors ....................... -8,888
for the National Guard--Transfer to
OM,ARNG line 133.
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT/IT............ 1,452,330 1,452,330
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS.............. 293,698 288,698
MHS Strategic Communications ....................... -5,000
efficiencies.
EDUCATION AND TRAINING............... 632,534 632,534
BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS... 1,597,610 1,747,610
Medical Facilities Sustainment, ....................... +150,000
Restoration and Modernization.
PROCUREMENT.......................... 519,921 534,921
Procurement of Medical Equipment and ....................... +15,000
IO&T Navy.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT............. 499,913 1,175,513
ALS.................................. ....................... +8,000
Armed Forces Institute of ....................... +4,800
Regenerative Medicine.
Autism Research...................... ....................... +6,400
Bone Marrow Failure Disease Research ....................... +4,000
Program.
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.......... ....................... +4,000
Global HIV/AIDS Prevention........... ....................... +10,000
Traumatic Brain Injury and ....................... +100,000
Psychological Health.
Global Deployment of the Force ....................... +125,000
medical research funding--Department
of Defense requested transfer to
maintain full funding for the
program.
Gulf War Illness Peer-Reviewed ....................... +8,000
Research Program.
Multiple Sclerosis................... ....................... +4,800

[[Page S1455]]

Peer-Reviewed Alzheimer Research..... ....................... +15,000
Peer-Reviewed Breast Cancer Research ....................... +150,000
Program.
Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Program ....................... +16,000
Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research ....................... +12,800
Program.
Peer-Reviewed Orthopedic Research ....................... +24,000
Program.
Peer-Reviewed Ovarian Cancer Research ....................... +20,000
Program.
Peer Reviewed Vision research in ....................... +4,000
conjunction with the DoD Vision
Center of Excellence.
Peer-Reviewed Prostate Cancer ....................... +80,000
Research Program.
Peer-Reviewed Spinal Cord Research ....................... +12,000
Program.
Research in Alcohol and Substance Use ....................... +5,200
Disorders.
SBIR to the core funded RDT&E........ ....................... +1,200
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)..... ....................... +6,400
Pain Management Task Force Research.. ....................... +4,000
Peer Reviewed Medical Research ....................... +50,000
Program.
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM........ 30,935,111 31,382,198

CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............ 1,067,364 1,067,364
PROCUREMENT.......................... 7,132 7,132
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND 392,811 392,811
EVALUATION.
TOTAL, CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS 1,467,307 1,467,307
DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE.
DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTERDRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE

PC129..................
3...................... Supplies and Materials (non-fund)-- ....................... -1,000
NSA.
PC132..................
9...................... Other Intra-Governmental Purchases-- ....................... -2,500
Navy.
PC650..................
1...................... Other Intra-Governmental Purchases-- ....................... -2,000
OSD.
PC920..................
6...................... Other Intra-Governmental Purchases-- ....................... -4,000
OSD.
PC9205................. EUCOM Counternarcotics Operations ....................... -3,000
Support excessive growth.
PC1293................. International crime and narcotics ....................... -1,000
analytic tools excessive growth.
PC2360................. EUCOM Tactical Analysis Team Support ....................... -1,500
unauthorized new Start.
FFRDC cost growth and CN indicated no ....................... -11,394
need.
National Guard Counter-Drug Program- ....................... +50,000
State Plans.
Young Marines-Drug Demand Reduction.. ....................... +2,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION AND 1,131,351 1,156,957
COUNTERDRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE.

JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND

4...................... STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE............. 215,868 0
Transfer to Title IX................. ....................... -215,868
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE 215,868 0
DEVICE DEFEAT FUND.

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............ 282,354 305,794
Program Increase..................... ....................... +23,440
PROCUREMENT.......................... 1,000 1,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR 283,354 306,794
GENERAL.
=================================================
TOTAL, OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 34,032,991 34,313,256
PROGRAMS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE IX--OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

For the Department of Defense overseas contingency
operations budget, funds are to be available for fiscal year
2011, as follows:

MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS. ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 1,237,779 1,237,779
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 313,278 313,278
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 349,839 349,839
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 44,752 44,752
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 2,835 2,835
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 159,261 159,261
ALLOWANCES........................... 56,632 56,632
SEPARATION PAY....................... 1,303 1,303
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 94,650 94,650
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 2,260,329 2,260,329

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 2,708,271 2,708,271
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 693,325 693,325
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 1,113,877 1,113,877
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 6,714 6,714
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 574,120 574,120
ALLOWANCES........................... 241,921 241,921
SEPARATION PAY....................... 26,276 26,276
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 207,174 207,174
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 5,571,678 5,571,678

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 329,046 329,046
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND.................. 1,871,805 1,871,805
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 2,200,851 2,200,851

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION ....................... .......................
TRAVEL.
ACCESSION TRAVEL..................... 45,512 45,512
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL................... 107,025 107,025
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL.................... 45,514 45,514
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 198,051 198,051

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
INTEREST ON UNIFORMED SERVICES 16,102 16,102
SAVINGS.
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 66,220 66,220
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 192,223 192,223
RESERVE INCOME REPLACEMENT PROGRAM... 1,895 1,895
SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS........... 171,060 171,060
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 447,500 447,500

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. ....................... 789,624
Undistributed Transfer from Title I.. ....................... +789,624
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, ARMY...... 10,678,409 11,468,033

[[Page S1456]]

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS. ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 213,340 213,340
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 59,067 59,067
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 67,023 67,023
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 7,315 7,315
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 1,543 1,543
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 16,667 16,667
ALLOWANCES........................... 16,754 16,754
SEPARATION PAY....................... 14 14
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 16,320 16,320
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 398,043 398,043

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 262,656 262,656
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 74,338 74,338
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 121,913 121,913
INCENTIVE PAYS....................... 325 325
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 80,007 80,007
ALLOWANCES........................... 27,692 27,692
SEPARATION PAY....................... 3,535 3,535
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 20,093 20,093
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 590,559 590,559

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 28,639 28,639
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND.................. 14,546 14,546
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 43,185 43,185

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION ....................... .......................
TRAVEL.
ACCESSION TRAVEL..................... 5,214 5,214
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL................... 23,903 23,903
ROTATIONAL TRAVEL.................... 30,110 30,110
SEPARATION TRAVEL.................... 3,132 3,132
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 62,359 62,359

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 3,800 3,800
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 29,662 29,662
SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS........... 51,111 51,111
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 84,573 84,573

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. ....................... 130,000
Higher than Budgeted Mobilization ....................... +110,000
Levels.
Increased Deployment Levels.......... ....................... +20,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY...... 1,178,719 1,308,719

MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS

BA-1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS. ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 40,079 40,079
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 13,308 13,308
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 18,565 18,565
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 1,760 1,760
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 10,747 10,747
ALLOWANCES........................... 4,805 4,805
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 4,176 4,176
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 93,440 93,440

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 190,013 190,013
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 43,090 43,090
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 45,977 45,977
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 95,395 95,395
ALLOWANCES........................... 40,431 40,431
SEPARATION PAY....................... 3,017 3,017
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 13,435 13,435
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 431,358 431,358

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 21,420 21,420
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 21,420 21,420

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION ....................... .......................
TRAVEL.
ACCESSION TRAVEL..................... 3,270 3,270
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 3,270 3,270

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 27,000 27,000
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 19,942 19,942
SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS........... 48,345 48,345
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 95,287 95,287

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. ....................... 88,145
Over Budgeted End Strength........... ....................... +88,145
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, MARINE 644,775 732,920
CORPS.

MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE

BA--1: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF OFFICERS ....................... .......................
BASIC PAY............................ 188,334 188,334
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 45,953 45,953
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 58,889 58,889
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 7,320 7,320
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 13,613 13,613
ALLOWANCES........................... 5,760 5,760
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 14,408 14,408
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 334,277 334,277

BA-2: PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC PAY............................ 472,896 472,896
RETIRED PAY ACCRUAL.................. 115,387 115,387
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.......... 177,545 177,545
SPECIAL PAYS......................... 49,964 49,964
ALLOWANCES........................... 16,254 16,254
SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.................. 36,177 36,177
TOTAL, BA-2.......................... 868,223 868,223

BA-4: SUBSISTENCE OF ENLISTED ....................... .......................
PERSONNEL.
BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR SUBSISTENCE...... 39,090 39,090
SUBSISTENCE-IN-KIND.................. 61,805 61,805
TOTAL, BA-4.......................... 100,895 100,895

BA-5: PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION ....................... .......................
TRAVEL.
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL................... 5,957 5,957
TOTAL, BA-5.......................... 5,957 5,957

[[Page S1457]]

BA-6: OTHER MILITARY PERSONNEL COSTS. ....................... .......................
DEATH GRATUITIES..................... 2,000 2,000
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS................ 27,978 27,978
SGLI EXTRA HAZARD PAYMENTS........... 67,057 67,057
TOTAL, BA-6.......................... 97,035 97,035

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. ....................... 654,055
Higher than Budgeted Mobilization ....................... +378,000
Levels.
Over Budgeted End Strength........... ....................... +276,055
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE. 1,406,387 2,060,442

RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY

BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING... ....................... .......................
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 104,230 104,230
DRILLS 24/48).
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 9,886 9,886
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 153,915 153,915
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 268,031 268,031
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, ARMY....... 268,031 268,031

RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY

BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING... ....................... .......................
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 7,019 7,019
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 38,683 38,683
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 3,210 3,210
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 48,912 48,912
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, NAVY....... 48,912 48,912

RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS

BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING... ....................... .......................
SCHOOL TRAINING...................... 5,467 5,467
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 24,797 24,797
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 373 373
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 30,637 30,637

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. ....................... 14,800
Over Budgeted End Strength........... ....................... +14,800
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE 30,637 45,437
CORPS.

RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE

BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING... ....................... .......................
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 27,002 27,002
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 27,002 27,002
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESERVE PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE.. 27,002 27,002

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY

BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING... ....................... .......................
PAY GROUP A TRAINING (15 DAYS and 231,547 231,547
DRILLS 24/48).
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 550,090 550,090
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT........... 46,485 46,485
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 828,122 828,122

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. ....................... 24,900
Support to Southwest Border.......... ....................... +24,900
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, ARMY 828,122 853,022

NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE

BA-1: UNIT AND INDIVIDUAL TRAINING... ....................... .......................
SPECIAL TRAINING..................... 21,060 11,060
Excess to Need....................... ....................... -10,000
TOTAL, BA-1.......................... 21,060 11,060

UNDISTRIBUTED ADJUSTMENT............. ....................... 5,800
Support to Southwest Border.......... ....................... +5,800
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR 21,060 16,860
FORCE.
=================================================
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL............ 15,132,054 16,829,378
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0-1 Budget Request Recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY

131.................... BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT.............. 0 1,000,000
..................... Increased Peacetime Base Operations ....................... +1,000,000
Support Costs to Redeployment of
Soldiers from Iraq.
135.................... ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES................ 47,638,208 44,608,615
..................... Reduced Deployment Level............. ....................... -2,500,000
..................... Transfer to SAG 421 for Subsistence ....................... -1,013,000
Transportation Costs.
..................... Transfer from Overseas Contingency ....................... +80,000
Operations Transfer Fund for
Detainee Operations.
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Synchronization ....................... +3,200
and Integration WTI Cell.
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Thermal Station ....................... +13,000
(National IED Exploitation Facility
(NIEF)).
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Beachcomber.... ....................... +3,000
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Counter Bomber. ....................... +1,500
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--CREW-SSM ....................... +3,000
Universal Test Set.
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Subtle Magnetic ....................... +1,000
Anomaly Detection Network Systems.
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Technical ....................... +16,400
Collection Training Program.
..................... Transfer from Title II--Chemical ....................... +8,579
Defense Equipment Sustainment.
..................... Transfer from Title II--MRAP Vehicle ....................... +6,420
Sustainment at Combat Training
Centers.
..................... Transfer from Title II--Body Armor ....................... +71,660
Sustainment.
..................... Transfer from Title II--Rapid ....................... +9,294
Equipping Force Readiness.
..................... Transfer from Title II--Fixed Wing ....................... +21,171
Life Cycle Contract Support.
..................... Transfer from Title II--Overseas ....................... +200,000
Security Guards.
..................... Transfer from Title II--Senior Leader ....................... +30,000
Initiative--Comprehensive Soldier
Fitness Program.
..................... Transfer from Title II--Survivability ....................... +15,183
and Maneuverability Training.
136.................... COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 1,300,000 500,000
..................... Program reduction.................... ....................... -400,000
..................... Transfer to Afghanistan ....................... -400,000
Infrastructure Fund.
137.................... RESET................................ 7,840,211 6,261,568
..................... Army-Identified Excess Reset ....................... -1,578,643
Requirement.
411.................... SECURITY PROGRAMS.................... 2,358,865 2,364,265
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Air Vigilance.. ....................... +5,400
421.................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 3,465,334 4,478,334
..................... Transfer from SAG 135 for Subsistence ....................... +1,013,000
Transportation Costs.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 62,602,618 59,212,782
ARMY.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY

1A1A................... MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS.. 1,839,918 1,839,918
1A2A................... FLEET AIR TRAINING................... 3,453 3,453

[[Page S1458]]

1A3A................... AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING 1,400 1,400
SVCS.
1A4A................... AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT.... 26,837 26,837
1A4N................... AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT.................. 44,567 44,567
1A5A................... AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........... 233,114 281,114
..................... Aircraft Depot Maintenance Increase.. ....................... +48,000
1B1B................... MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.... 1,151,465 1,151,465
1B2B................... SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING... 27,472 27,472
1B4B................... SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............... 1,266,556 1,290,556
..................... Ship Depot Maintenance Increase...... ....................... +24,000
1C1C................... COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................ 38,468 38,468
1C4C................... WARFARE TACTICS...................... 82,801 32,801
..................... Navy Identified Excess to Requirement ....................... -50,000
for CENTCOM Operations.
1C5C................... OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND 24,855 24,855
OCEANOGRAPHY.
1C6C................... COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................ 2,737,727 2,930,528
..................... Transfer from Title II--Naval ....................... +192,801
Expeditionary Combat Command
Increases.
1C7C................... EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................ 3,677 3,677
1CCH................... COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS. 7,000 7,000
1CCM................... COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 7,455 7,455
SUPPORT.
1D3D................... INSERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT.... 99,118 100,118
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--CREW-SSM ....................... +1,000
Universal Test Set.
1D4D................... WEAPONS MAINTENANCE.................. 82,519 82,519
1D7D................... OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT......... 16,938 16,938
BSIT................... ENTERPRISE INFORMATION............... 10,350 0
..................... ONE-NET Baseline Budget Requirement.. ....................... -10,350
BSM1................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 28,250 49,250
MODERNIZATION.
..................... Continuing Operations at Guantanamo ....................... +21,000
Bay--Transfer from Overseas
Contingency Operations Transfer Fund.
BSS1................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 381,749 436,249
..................... Continuing Operations at Guantanamo ....................... +4,000
Bay--Transfer from Overseas
Contingency Operations Transfer Fund.
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Counter Bomber. ....................... +500
..................... Transfer from Title II--Regional/ ....................... +50,000
Emergency Operations Center.
2A1F................... SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE........ 27,300 27,300
2C1H................... FLEET HOSPITAL PROGRAM............... 4,400 4,400
2C3H................... COAST GUARD SUPPORT.................. 254,461 0
..................... Transfer to Department of Homeland ....................... -254,461
Security.
3B1K................... SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........... 81,454 84,454
..................... Transfer from Title II--NAVSEA VSSS/ ....................... +3,000
EOD Training.
3B4K................... TRAINING SUPPORT..................... 5,400 0
..................... Training Support Baseline Budget ....................... -5,400
Requirement.
4A1M................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 4,265 4,265
4A2M................... EXTERNAL RELATIONS................... 467 467
4A3M................... CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 450 450
MANAGEMENT.
4A4M................... MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 11,214 11,214
MANAGEMENT.
4A5M................... OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT.............. 2,706 2,706
4A6M................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 28,671 28,671
4B1N................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 300,868 300,868
4B3N................... ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT... 6,091 6,091
4B7N................... SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS. 2,153 2,153
4C1P................... NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE.......... 78,464 78,464
9999................... OTHER PROGRAMS....................... 22,581 22,581
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 8,946,634 8,970,724
NAVY.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS

1A1A................... OPERATIONAL FORCES................... 2,448,572 2,317,572
..................... Excess to Requirement for Cargo UAS.. ....................... -90,400
..................... Transfer to RDTE,N for Cargo UAS..... ....................... -36,000
..................... Transfer to OP,N for AM-2 Matting.... ....................... -4,600
1A2A................... FIELD LOGISTICS...................... 514,748 517,248
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Counter Bomber. ....................... +1,000
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--CREW-SSM ....................... +1,000
Universal Test Set.
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Subtle Magnetic ....................... +500
Anomaly Detection Network Systems.
1A3A................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 523,250 523,250
1B1B................... MARITIME PREPOSITIONING.............. 7,808 7,808
BSS1................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 55,301 55,301
3B4D................... TRAINING SUPPORT..................... 223,071 223,071
4A3G................... SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........... 360,000 360,000
4A4G................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 3,772 3,772
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 4,136,522 4,008,022
MARINE CORPS.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE

011A................... PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES................ 1,896,647 1,896,647
011C................... COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES............ 1,954,759 1,954,759
011D................... AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING.............. 113,948 113,948
011M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 297,623 399,983
..................... Weapons System Sustainment........... ....................... +102,360
011R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 704,463 504,463
MODERNIZATION.
..................... Unjustified Growth from fiscal year ....................... -200,000
2010 Baseline.
011Z................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 1,780,052 1,780,052
012A................... GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING......... 128,632 128,632
012C................... OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS........ 397,894 397,894
013A................... LAUNCH FACILITIES.................... 28,975 28,975
013C................... SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS................ 34,091 34,091
015A................... COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 127,861 127,861
SUPPORT.
021A................... AIRLIFT OPERATIONS................... 4,403,800 4,403,800
021D................... MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS............ 240,394 240,394
021M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 217,023 217,023
021R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 20,360 20,360
MODERNIZATION.
021Z................... BASE SUPPORT......................... 57,362 57,362
031R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 1,948 1,948
MODERNIZATION.
031Z................... BASE SUPPORT......................... 6,088 6,088
032A................... SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........... 45,893 45,893
032B................... FLIGHT TRAINING...................... 20,277 20,277
032C................... PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION... 1,500 1,500
032D................... TRAINING SUPPORT..................... 1,820 1,820
041A................... LOGISTICS OPERATIONS................. 292,030 292,030
041R................... FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 10,500 10,500
MODERNIZATION.
041Z................... BASE SUPPORT......................... 31,985 31,985
042A................... ADMINISTRATION....................... 5,438 5,438
042B................... SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........... 247,149 247,149
042G................... OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES......... 113,082 113,082
043A................... SECURITY PROGRAMS.................... 305,689 305,689
..................... REDUCED DEPLOYMENT LEVELS............ ....................... -400,000
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 13,487,283 12,989,643
FORCE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENCE, DEFENSE-WIDE

1PL1................... JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF................ 20,500 20,500
1PL2................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND........... 3,012,026 2,903,126
..................... Information Operations............... ....................... -49,400
..................... Leased Aircraft--Unjustified Request. ....................... -65,500
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Wolfhound II... ....................... +6,000
ES18................... DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY............... 14,799 14,799
4GT6................... DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY........ 27,000 27,000

[[Page S1459]]

4GT9................... DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY... 136,316 144,316
..................... Increase Afghanistan FOB Fiber ....................... +8,000
Connectivity.
4GTJ................... DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY... 74,862 74,862
4GTA................... DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY........ 120,469 116,969
..................... Overstatement of Habeas Corpus ....................... -3,500
Civilian Personnel Pricing.
4GTJ................... DEFENSE DEPENDENTS EDUCATION......... 485,769 501,769
..................... Additional Funding for Outreach and ....................... +16,000
Reintegration Services Under the
Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program.
4GTD................... DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY.. 2,000,000 2,000,000
4GTI................... DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY...... 1,218 1,218
4GTN................... OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE... 188,099 173,099
..................... Knowledge Management................. ....................... -15,000
9999................... OTHER PROGRAMS....................... 3,345,300 3,299,332
..................... Classified Adjustments............... ....................... -49,168
..................... Transfer from JIEDDO--Synchronization ....................... +3,200
and Integration WTI Cell.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 9,426,358 9,276,990
DEFENSE-WIDE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY RESERVE

135.................... ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES................ 286,950 206,784
..................... Army Reserve Identified Excess to ....................... -80,166
Requirement.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 286,950 206,784
ARMY RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY RESERVE

1A1A................... MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS.. 49,089 49,089
1A3A................... INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE............. 400 400
1A5A................... AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........... 17,760 17,760
1B1B................... MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS.... 9,395 9,395
1B4B................... SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............... 497 497
1C1C................... COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS................ 3,185 3,185
1C6C................... COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES................ 12,169 12,169
4A4M................... MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 1,064 1,064
MANAGEMENT.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 93,559 93,559
NAVY RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS RESERVE

1A1A................... OPERATING FORCES..................... 23,571 23,571
BSS1................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 6,114 6,114
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 29,685 29,685
MARINE CORPS RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE RESERVE
011M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 116,924 191,124
..................... Weapons System Sustainment........... ....................... +74,200
011Z................... BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............... 12,683 12,683
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 129,607 203,807
FORCE RESERVE.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

135.................... ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES................ 544,349 497,849
..................... Distance Learning Transfer to ....................... -9,000
Baseline OM,ARNG SAG 121.
..................... Air OPTEMPO Duplicate Request........ ....................... -44,000
..................... Support to Southwest Border.......... ....................... +6,500
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, 544,349 497,849
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD

011F................... AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS.................. 152,896 152,896
011G................... MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS........... 57,800 59,400
..................... Support to Southwest Border.......... ....................... +1,600
011M................... DEPOT MAINTENANCE.................... 140,127 205,687
..................... Weapons System Sustainment........... ....................... +65,560
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, AIR 350,823 417,983
NATIONAL GUARD.

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND

..................... OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 1,551,781 0
TRANSFER FUND.
..................... Transfer to OM,A SAG 135............. ....................... -80,000
..................... Transfer to OM,N SAGs BSS1 and BSM1.. ....................... -25,000
..................... Unjustified Program Change........... ....................... -1,446,781
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 1,551,781 0
OPERATIONS TRANSFER ACCOUNT.

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND

..................... Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund-- ....................... +400,000
Transfer from CERP.
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN INFRASTUCTURE FUND 0 400,000

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND

..................... Afghan National Army................. 7,467,014 7,467,014
..................... Infrastructure....................... 1,790,933 1,790,933
..................... Equipment and Transportation......... 1,846,623 1,846,623
..................... Training and Operations.............. 836,842 836,842
..................... Sustainment.......................... 2,992,616 2,992,616
..................... Afghan National Police............... 4,085,437 4,085,437
..................... Infrastructure....................... 1,078,413 1,078,413
..................... Equipment and Transportation......... 917,966 917,966
..................... Training and Operations.............. 990,213 990,213
..................... Sustainment.......................... 1,098,845 1,098,845
..................... Related Activities................... 66,832 66,832
..................... Detainee Operations--Sustainment..... 6,037 6,037
..................... Detainee Operations--Training and 1,530 1,530
Operations.
..................... Detainee Operations--Infrastructure.. 58,265 58,265
..................... COIN Activities...................... 1,000 1,000
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES 11,619,283 11,619,283
FUND.

IRAQ SECURITY FORCES FUND
..................... Defense Security Forces.............. 1,656,906 1,656,906
..................... Equipment and Transportation......... 1,067,706 1,067,706
..................... Training............................. 248,075 248,075
..................... Sustainment.......................... 341,125 341,125
..................... Interior Security Forces............. 268,094 268,094
..................... Equipment and Transportation......... 220,469 220,469
..................... Sustainment.......................... 47,625 47,625
..................... Related Activities................... 75,000 75,000
..................... Authorization Reduction.............. ....................... -500,000
-------------------------------------------------
..................... TOTAL, IRAQ SECURITY FORCES FUND..... 2,000,000 1,500,000

..................... TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE..... 115,205,452 109,427,111
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page S1460]]

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY

2...................... C-12 CARGO AIRPLANE (OCO)............ 78,060 78,060
4...................... MQ-1 UAV (OCO)....................... 47,000 24,000
Reduction to Projected Battle ....................... -23,000
Losses.
5...................... RQ-11 (RAVEN) (OCO).................. 17,430 17,430
9...................... AH-64 APACHE BLOCK III............... ....................... 34,600
War Replacement Aircraft........... ....................... +34,600
11..................... UH-60 BLACKHAWK (OCO)................ 40,500 373,400
Program Increase for Army National ....................... +80,000
Guard.
Three Combat Loss UH-60............ ....................... +52,500
Accelerate 12 Aircraft............. ....................... +200,400
13..................... CH-47 HELICOPTER (OCO)............... 70,600 258,400
Accelerate Six Aircraft............ ....................... +187,800
16..................... C12 AIRCRAFT MODS (OCO).............. 122,340 122,340
17..................... MQ-1 PAYLOAD UAS (OCO)............... 3,600 3,600
19..................... GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) (OCO)........... 30,200 6,000
Authorization Adjustment........... ....................... -24,200
20..................... MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) (OCO)... 86,200 86,200
21..................... AH-64 MODS (OCO)..................... 199,200 654,200
AH-64A to AH-64D Conversion for the ....................... +455,000
Texas and Mississippi National Guard.
23..................... CH-47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (OCO).... 82,900 66,900
Cargo On/Off Loading System (COOLS) ....................... -16,000
ahead of need.
27..................... UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS (OCO)........ 14,530 14,530
28..................... KIOWA WARRIOR (OCO).................. 187,288 160,378
Fielded Fleet Upgrades............. ....................... +20,000
Limit Ramp Rate on Replacement ....................... 46,910
Aircraft.
29..................... AIRBORNE AVIONICS (OCO).............. 24,983 24,983
31..................... RQ-7 UAV MODS (OCO).................. 97,800 546,500
Funding Ahead of Need.............. ....................... -1,000
Transfer from Title III............ ....................... +497,500
Ahead of Need...................... ....................... -47,800
36..................... ASE INFRARED CM (OCO)................ 197,990 182,990
Excess to Need..................... ....................... -15,000
38..................... COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT (OCO)........ 65,627 65,627
40..................... AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (OCO)............ 7,555 0
Unjustified Request................ ....................... -7,555
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY.... 1,373,803 2,720,138

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY

4...................... HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY (OCO)........... 190,459 190,459
6...................... TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY (OCO)........... 112,769 112,769
13..................... ITAS/TOW MODS (OCO).................. 40,600 40,600
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY..... 343,828 343,828

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY

4...................... STRYKER VEHICLE (OCO)................ ....................... 545,000
Transfer from Stryker ....................... +445,000
Modifications, line 9.
Increase for Stryker Double V Hull. ....................... +100,000
9...................... STRYKER VEHICLE MODS (OCO)........... 445,000 0
Transfer to Stryker Vehicle, line 4 ....................... -445,000
22..................... MACHINE GUN, CAL .50, M2 ROLL........ ....................... 79,496
Transfer from Title III............ ....................... +79,496
26..................... MORTAR SYSTEMS (OCO)................. 8,600 8,600
28..................... XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (OCO) 22,500 22,500
COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS
STATION.
32..................... (OCO)............................... 100,000 100,000
34..................... HOWITZER LT WT 155MM (T) (OCO)....... 62,000 62,000
36..................... M4 CARBINE MODS (OCO)................ 12,900 42,900
Program Increase................... ....................... +30,000
37..................... M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS (OCO)..... 15,000 15,000
40..................... M119 MODIFICATIONS (OCO)............. 21,500 21,500
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY.... 687,500 896,996

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY

2...................... CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)......... 32,604 13,000
Per Army Request................... ....................... -19,604
4...................... CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES (OCO)........ 128,876 47,000
Per Army Request................... ....................... -81,876
5...................... CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)........... 20,056 10,500
Per Army Request................... ....................... -9,556
7...................... CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)........... 23,826 9,500
Per Army Request................... ....................... -14,326
8...................... CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)........... 62,700 25,000
Per Army Request................... ....................... -37,700
11..................... 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES (OCO)........ 120,160 26,900
APMI Unit Cost Savings............. ....................... -50,100
Per Army Request................... ....................... -43,160
15..................... CTG, ARTY, 105MM: ALL TYPES (OCO).... 37,620 15,000
Per Army Request................... ....................... -22,620
16..................... CTG, ARTY, 155MM: ALL TYPES (OCO).... 37,620 15,000
Per Army Request................... ....................... -22,620
18..................... MODULAR ARTILLERY CHARGE SYS, ALL 15,048 6,000
TYPES (OCO).
Per Army Request................... ....................... -9,048
19..................... ARTILLERY FUZES, ALL TYPES (OCO)..... 12,540 5,000
Per Army Request................... ....................... -7,540
24..................... SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL 17,556 0
TYPES (OCO).
Per Army Request................... ....................... -17,556
25..................... ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES (OCO).... 139,285 139,285
26..................... DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES (OCO) ....................... 20,000
Per Army Request................... ....................... +20,000
27..................... GRENADES, ALL TYPES (OCO)............ 2,000 0
Per Army Request................... ....................... -2,000
31..................... NONLETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES (OCO) 15,000 0
Per Army Request................... ....................... -15,000
40..................... CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 37,700 37,700
DEMILITARIZATION, ALL TYPES (OCO).
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, 702,591 369,885
ARMY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY

5...................... FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) 516,350 398,925
(OCO).
Battle Loss Replacement............ ....................... +8,875
Contract Savings................... ....................... -126,300
7...................... FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 188,677 199,809
(OCO).
Battle Loss Replacement............ ....................... +11,132
9...................... ARMORED SECURITY VEHICLES (ASV) (OCO) 52,780 52,780
10..................... MINE PROTECTION VEHICLE FAMILY (OCO). 136,700 367,678
Transfer from Title III............ ....................... +230,978
14..................... HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM (OCO). 989,067 989,067
15..................... MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP (OCO)... 20,000 312,956
Transfer from Title III............ ....................... +292,956
24..................... WIN-T-GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK 8,163 8,163
(OCO).

[[Page S1461]]

27..................... SHF TERM (OCO)....................... 62,415 62,415
29..................... NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 13,500 63,500
(OCO).
Additional DAGRs................... ....................... +50,000
40..................... AMC CRITICAL ITEMS--OPA2 (OCO)....... 3,946 3,946
47..................... RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY 78,253 78,253
(OCO).
48..................... MEDICAL COMM FOR CBT CASUALTY CARE 15,000 15,000
(OCO).
51x.................... FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS................. ....................... 38,172
Non-MIP Biometrics--Transfer from ....................... +38,172
RDTE,A line 171.
53..................... BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS (OCO).... 70,000 47,500
Excess to Need..................... ....................... -22,500
55..................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS (OCO)............ ....................... 55,000
Program Adjustment for Tactical ....................... +55,000
Local Area Network (TACLAN).
57..................... INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD 413,200 413,200
(OCO).
65..................... PROPHET GROUND (OCO)................. 18,900 18,900
70..................... DCGS-A (MIP) (OCO)................... 197,092 334,516
Transfer from Title III........... ....................... +137,424
74..................... CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL 52,277 47,377
(OCO).
Excess to Need..................... ....................... -4,900
75..................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MIP) (OCO).... 5,400 5,400
76..................... LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR 25,000 10,000
(OCO).
Program Decrease................... ....................... -15,000
77..................... WARLOCK (OCO)........................ 225,682 225,682
79..................... COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY 455,639 455,639
COUNTERMEASURES (OCO).
81..................... FAAD GBS (OCO)....................... 167,460 167,460
84..................... NIGHT VISION DEVICES (OCO)........... 5,019 5,019
89..................... COUNTER-ROCKET, ARTILLERY & MORTAR (C- 291,400 251,200
RAM) (OCO).
Funded Ahead of Need.............. ....................... -40,200
90..................... BASE EXPEDITIONARY TARGETING & SURV 486,050 408,050
SYS (OCO).
Program Decrease................... ....................... -78,000
95..................... MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER 69,800 69,800
RADARS) (OCO).
96..................... FORCE XXI BATTLE CMD BRIGADE & BELOW 135,500 135,500
(OCO).
98..................... LIGHTWEIGHT LASER DESIGNATOR/ 22,371 22,371
RANGEFINDER.
99..................... COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 (OCO) 1,800 1,800
101.................... COUNTERFIRE RADARS (OCO)............. 20,000 285,867
Transfer from Title III............ ....................... +275,867
Funded Ahead of Need............... ....................... -10,000
103.................... TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTERS (OCO).... 43,800 43,800
104.................... FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY (OCO)......... 566 13,566
Advanced Field Artillery Tactical ....................... +13,000
Data System.
105.................... BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 420 420
SYS.
108.................... KNIGHT FAMILY (OCO).................. 49,744 49,744
110.................... AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY 2,222 2,222
(OCO).
114.................... NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION & 5,000 5,000
SERVICE (OCO).
115.................... MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (OCO)........ 60,111 60,111
121.................... AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP (OCO) 10,500 10,500
130.................... PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS (OCO)............. 5,690 5,690
135.................... TACTICAL BRIDGING, FLOAT RIBBON (OCO) 3,220 3,220
136.................... HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION 0 28,000
SYSTEM.
Transfer from JIEDDO for Proper ....................... +28,000
Execution.
137.................... GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTION SYSTEM 191,000 191,000
(OCO).
141.................... HEATERS AND ECU'S (OCO).............. 8,708 8,708
149.................... FORCE PROVIDER (OCO)................. 261,599 52,499
Excess to Need..................... ....................... -209,100
150.................... FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT (OCO)........ 29,903 29,903
154.................... DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & 55,105 55,105
WATER (OCO).
155.................... WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEMS (OCO)..... 12,086 0
Funded Ahead of Need............... ....................... -12,086
156.................... COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL (OCO)......... 8,680 8,680
157.................... MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 41,398 41,398
(OCO).
159.................... GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) 3,390 3,390
(OCO).
161.................... SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING (OCO).......... 3,195 3,195
164.................... LOADERS (OCO)........................ 1,157 1,157
168.................... HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR FOS 3,750 3,750
(OCO).
170.................... ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) 4,140 4,140
(OCO).
174.................... GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP (OCO) 37,480 37,480
175.................... ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (OCO) 4,562 4,562
177.................... ALL TERRAIN LIFTING ARMY SYSTEM (OCO) 56,609 58,049
Battle Loss Replacement............ ....................... +1,440
179.................... TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM (OCO).... 28,624 28,624
180.................... CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER (OCO).. 8,200 0
Funded Ahead of Need............... ....................... -8,200
184.................... INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT 622 622
(OCO).
186.................... RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPT 58,590 38,590
EQUIPMENT (OCO).
Excess to Need..................... ....................... -20,000
187.................... PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) 77,000 77,000
(OCO).
192.................... SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING 1,987 1,987
(OCO).
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS (OCO).......... 775 775
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY..... 5,827,274 6,423,832

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY

3...................... F/A-18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET (MYP)..... ....................... 495,000
Strike Fighter Shortfall ....................... +495,000
Mitigation--Nine Aircraft.
11..................... UH-1Y/AH1Z (OCO)..................... 88,500 88,500
19..................... E-2C (EARLY WARNING) HAWKEYE (MYP)... ....................... 175,000
Program Increase--Combat Loss ....................... +175,000
Replacement.
29..................... EA-6 SERIES (OCO).................... 15,000 12,700
Install Equipment Program ....................... -2,300
Adjustment.
31..................... AV-8 SERIES (OCO).................... 72,100 65,371
Pod Upgrade Kits Cost Growth....... ....................... -1,529
GEN4 Pod Cost Growth............... ....................... -5,200
32..................... F-18 SERIES (OCO).................... 43,250 43,250
34..................... AH-1W SERIES (OCO)................... 35,510 35,510
35..................... H-53 SERIES (OCO).................... 36,248 27,148
Funded Ahead of Need............... ....................... -9,100
36..................... SH-60 SERIES (OCO)................... 6,430 6,430
39..................... P-3 SERIES (OCO)..................... 6,000 6,000
48..................... SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT (OCO)....... 6,100 6,100
53..................... COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT (OCO)........... 38,700 31,020
Directed Infrared Countermeasures ....................... -7,680
Installation Kit Cost Growth.
54..................... COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES (OCO)........ 14,100 14,100
55..................... COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM (OCO). 10,500 10,500
57..................... RQ-7 SERIES (OCO).................... 8,000 8,000
58..................... V-22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY (OCO).. 36,420 36,420
59..................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (OCO)........ 3,500 208,500
Aviation Spares.................... ....................... +205,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY.. 420,358 1,269,549

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY

5...................... SIDEWINDER (OCO)..................... 2,923 0
Non-combat Expenditures............ ....................... -2,923
9...................... HELLFIRE (OCO)....................... 85,504 85,504
26..................... SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS (OCO)......... 4,998 4,998
-------------------------------------------------

[[Page S1462]]

TOTAL, WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY... 93,425 90,502

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MARINE CORPS

1...................... GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS (OCO).......... 6,060 0
Contract Delay..................... ....................... -6,060
3...................... AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES (OCO).... 76,043 76,043
4...................... MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION (OCO)......... 69,660 68,660
20mm Linked TP, PGU-27 Cost Growth. ....................... -1,000
7...................... AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES (OCO). 33,632 33,632
11..................... OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION (OCO)...... 455 455
12..................... SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO (OCO) 7,757 7,757
13..................... PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION (OCO)..... 1,209 1,209
15..................... SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION (OCO).......... 19,498 19,498
16..................... LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES (OCO)...... 4,677 4,677
17..................... 40 MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)............... 11,307 11,307
18..................... 60MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)................ 17,150 17,150
19..................... 81MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)................ 27,738 27,738
20..................... 120MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)............... 96,895 96,895
21..................... CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES (OCO)............ 990 990
22..................... GRENADES, ALL TYPES (OCO)............ 6,137 6,137
23..................... ROCKETS, ALL TYPES (OCO)............. 13,543 13,543
24..................... ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES (OCO)........... 137,118 137,118
25..................... DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES (OCO) 9,296 9,296
26..................... FUZE, ALL TYPES (OCO)................ 25,888 25,888
27..................... NON LETHALS (OCO).................... 31 31
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & 565,084 558,024
MARINE CORPS.

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY

25..................... STANDARD BOATS (OCO)................. 30,706 23,706
Riverine Patrol Boats--Unjustified ....................... -7,000
Request.
57..................... MATCALS (OCO)........................ 27,080 25,080
ASPARCS--Unjustified Cost Growth... ....................... -2,000
74..................... EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION (OCO).... 1,800 1,800
94..................... EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS (OCO)........ 0 4,600
AM-2 Matting Expeditionary ....................... +4,600
Airfield--Requested Transfer from
OM,MC.
99..................... AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT (OCO).......... 26,024 10,024
CSEL Excess to Need................ ....................... -16,000
117.................... EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP 132,386 10,386
(OCO).
JCREW--Funding No Longer Required.. ....................... -122,000
122.................... PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES (OCO).... 1,234 1,234
123.................... GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS (OCO)......... 420 420
124.................... CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP 55,474 41,474
(OCO).
Contract Delays.................... ....................... -14,000
126.................... TACTICAL VEHICLES (OCO).............. 91,802 91,802
129.................... ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (OCO)......... 26,016 26,016
131.................... MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT (OCO)... 33,659 33,659
137.................... COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (OCO)...... 2,775 2,775
146.................... PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT (OCO).... 46,417 38,917
ATFP Afloat--Ahead of Need......... ....................... -7,500
149.................... SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (OCO)........ 4,942 4,942
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY..... 480,735 316,835

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS

2...................... LAV PIP (OCO)........................ 152,333 37,573
Baseline Budget Requirement........ ....................... -114,760
5...................... 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER 103,600 103,600
(OCO).
6...................... HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM 145,533 145,533
(OCO).
7...................... WEAPONS & COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 M 7,329 7,329
(OCO).
9...................... MODIFICATION KITS (OCO).............. 12,000 12,000
10..................... WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (OCO).... 18,571 18,571
16..................... UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER (OCO)......... 112,424 112,424
17..................... REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT (OCO)...... 15,962 38,762
OCO Shortfall--ETMS and ....................... +22,800
Obsolescence Upgrades.
19..................... MODIFICATION KITS (OCO).............. 18,545 3,345
Unexecutable Funding--CESAS........ ....................... -15,200
20..................... ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) 11,549 11,549
(OCO).
21..................... AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS (OCO)...... 41,031 41,031
22..................... RADAR SYSTEMS (OCO).................. 5,493 10,993
OCO Shortfall--TPS-59.............. ....................... +5,500
23..................... FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM (OCO)............ 4,710 4,710
24..................... INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (OCO). 82,897 82,897
26..................... DCGS-MC (OCO)........................ 21,789 21,789
28..................... COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES (OCO)...... 29,412 29,412
29..................... COMMAND POST SYSTEMS (OCO)........... 36,256 36,256
30..................... RADIO SYSTEMS (OCO).................. 155,545 110,545
E-LMR--Not an OCO Requirement...... ....................... -45,000
31..................... COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS 63,280 28,280
(OCO).
Previously Funded UUNS............. ....................... -35,000
35..................... 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) (OCO)......... 12,994 0
Service Requested Reduction........ ....................... -12,994
37..................... MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 80,559 80,559
(OCO).
38..................... LOGISTICS VEHICLE SYSTEM REP (OCO)... 109,100 109,100
39..................... FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS (OCO).... 22,130 22,130
42..................... ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT 17,799 27,399
(OCO).
OCO Shortfall--ECU and SFRS........ ....................... +9,600
43..................... BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT (OCO).......... 1,628 16,758
OCO Shortfall--Tank and Pump ....................... +15,130
Modules.
44..................... TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS (OCO).......... 83,698 89,498
OCO Shortfall--Liquid Fuel Storage. ....................... +5,800
45..................... POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED (OCO)....... 41,536 41,536
47..................... EOD SYSTEMS (OCO).................... 213,985 188,985
Excess to Requirement.............. ....................... -25,000
48..................... PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT (OCO).... 5,200 5,200
50..................... MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP (OCO)........ 58,264 58,264
53..................... TRAINING DEVICES (OCO)............... 55,864 55,864
54..................... CONTAINER FAMILY (OCO)............... 8,826 8,826
56..................... FAMILY OF INTERNALLY TRANSPORTABLE 28,401 28,401
VEHICLE (OCO).
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS... 1,778,243 1,589,119

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

1...................... F-35 (OCO)........................... 204,900 0
Unjustified Request................ ....................... -204,900
19..................... CV-22 (OCO).......................... ....................... 70,000
Program Increase--Provides for One ....................... +70,000
Additional Combat Loss Aircraft.
25..................... HH-60M OPERATIONAL LOSS REPLACEMENT 114,000 417,400
(OCO).
Program Increase (Adds 10 Aircraft, ....................... +303,400
Not Less Than Four for the Air
National Guard).
26..................... RQ-11 (OCO).......................... 9,380 9,380
34..................... MQ-9 (OCO)........................... 216,000 376,814
Spares............................. ....................... -55,186
Transfer 12 Aircraft from Title III ....................... +216,000
37..................... B-1B (OCO)........................... 8,500 8,500

[[Page S1463]]

39..................... A-10 (OCO)........................... 16,500 16,500
44..................... C-5 (OCO)............................ 73,400 73,400
47..................... C-17A (OCO).......................... 224,450 176,450
Program Decrease................... ....................... -48,000
56..................... KC-10A (ATCA) (OCO).................. 3,540 3,540
62..................... C-130 (OCO).......................... 166,720 166,720
63..................... C-130 MODS INTEL (OCO)............... 10,900 10,900
66..................... COMPASS CALL MODS.................... 10,000 10,000
72..................... H-60 (OCO)........................... 81,000 153,200
Excess to Need for Radars.......... ....................... -61,000
Program Increase--Transportable ....................... +92,800
Blackhawk Operation Simulators.
Program Increase--Control Display ....................... +12,500
Unit Mission Processors.
Program Increase--GPS/Inertial ....................... +27,900
Navigation Units.
75..................... OTHER AIRCRAFT (OCO)................. 61,600 61,600
78..................... MQ-9 PAYLOAD--UAS.................... 45,000 160,383
Transfer from Title III............ ....................... +115,383
79..................... CV-22 MODS (OCO)..................... 830 830
80..................... INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS.......... 10,900 10,900
98..................... OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES (OCO)....... 57,500 218,138
Transfer from Title III............ ....................... +160,638
104.................... DARP (OCO)........................... 47,300 47,300
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR 1,362,420 1,991,955
FORCE.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

5...................... PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE (OCO)...... 41,621 41,621
10..................... AGM-65D MAVERICK (OCO)............... 15,000 15,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR 56,621 56,621
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE

2...................... CARTRIDGES (OCO)..................... 30,801 30,801
4...................... GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS (OCO).......... 53,192 53,192
5...................... JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION (OCO)... 147,991 147,991
11..................... FLARES (OCO)......................... 20,486 20,486
12..................... FUZES (OCO).......................... 24,982 24,982
13..................... SMALL ARMS (OCO)..................... 15,507 15,507
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, 292,959 292,959
AIR FORCE.

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE

2...................... MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE (OCO)........ 7,350 5,350
Contract Savings................... ....................... -2,000
5...................... SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES (OCO). 15,540 13,540
Uparmored HMMWV--Unjustified Cost ....................... -2,000
Growth.
11..................... ITEMS LESS THAN 690 690
$5,000,000(VEHICLES)(OCO).
16..................... INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT (OCO).... 1,400 1,400
19..................... THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMEN... 4,354 4,354
20..................... WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST (OCO)... 9,825 0
OS-21 Contract Delays.............. ....................... -9,825
28..................... AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM 6,100 6,100
(OCO).
38..................... USCENTCOM (OCO)...................... 28,784 28,784
44..................... MILSATCOM SPACE (OCO)................ 4,300 4,300
46..................... COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM (OCO)............ 8,200 8,200
47..................... TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT (OCO)......... 2,552 2,552
52..................... COMM ELECT MODS (OCO)................ 470 470
53..................... NIGHT VISION GOGGLES (OCO)........... 8,833 4,433
NVCD-NSL Contract Delays........... ....................... -4,400
57..................... CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)......... 131,559 16,759
JCREW Ahead of Need................ ....................... -114,800
56..................... BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT (OCO)........ 9,070 9,070
59..................... MOBILITY EQUIPMENT (OCO)............. 16,588 16,588
66..................... DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG 9,700 9,700
(OCO).
OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO)............... 2,822,166 2,736,303
Classified Adjustment.............. ....................... -85,863
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 3,087,481 2,868,593

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE

5...................... DIA SUPT TO CENTCOM INTELLIGENCE ACT 27,702 27,702
(OCO).
18..................... GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYS (OCO). 1,000 1,000
20..................... TELEPORT PROGRAM (OCO)............... 6,191 6,191
23..................... DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK 520 520
(OCO).
35..................... AEGIS FIELDING....................... 0 189,720
SM-3 Block IA--Additional 20 ....................... +189,720
Interceptors.
50..................... MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD (OCO)........... 5,700 5,700
52..................... UNDISTRIBUTED, INTELLIGENCE.......... 15,000 15,000
XX..................... OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO)................. 323,486 333,675
Classified Adjustment.............. ....................... +10,189
55..................... ROTARY WING UPGRADES & SUSTAINMENT 5,600 5,600
(OCO).
55A.................... MH-47G............................... 0 28,500
Combat Loss Replacement Aircraft... ....................... +28,500
56..................... MH-47 SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PROG 4,222 15,222
(OCO).
Modifications for Combat Loss ....................... +11,000
Replacement Aircraft.
57..................... MH-60 SOF MODERNIZATION (OCO)........ 0 7,800
Modifications for Combat Loss ....................... +7,800
Replacement Aircraft.
58..................... NON-STANDARD AVIATION................ 0 121,268
Medium NSAV--Transfer from Title ....................... +121,268
III.
63..................... CV-22 SOF MODIFICATION............... 0 15,000
Modifications for Combat Loss ....................... +15,000
Replacement Aircraft.
64..................... MQ1 UAS(OCO)......................... 8,202 8,202
65..................... MQ-9 UAV (OCO)....................... 4,368 4,368
71..................... SOF ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT (OCO)..... 75,878 65,878
Execution Delays................... ....................... -10,000
72..................... SOF ORDNANCE ACQUISITION (OCO)....... 49,776 49,776
73..................... COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT & 9,417 31,817
ELECTRONICS (OCO).
Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... 22,400
Requirement.
74..................... SOF INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (OCO)....... 149,406 81,306
Leased Aircraft--Unjustified ....................... -42,800
Request.
HF-TTL Baseline Budget Requirement. ....................... -25,300
81..................... TACTICAL VEHICLES (OCO).............. 36,262 91,262
Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +55,000
Requirement.
83..................... COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS (OCO).... 30,000 0
OCO Program Growth................. ....................... -30,000
88..................... SOF AUTOMATION SYSTEMS (OCO)......... 1,291 1,291
90..................... SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 25,000 25,000
INTELLIGENCE (OCO).
92..................... SOF VISUAL AUGMENTATION, LASERS & 3,200 22,700
SENSORS (OCO).
Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +19,500
Requirement.
93..................... SOF TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEMS (OCO)..... 3,985 3,985
96..................... MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT (OCO)........ 5,530 5,530
97..................... SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS (OCO)... 79,869 95,545
Program Increase--Unfunded ....................... +51,376
Requirement.
Requirement Addressed by ....................... -35,700
Reprogramming.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS................ 2,941 2,941
-------------------------------------------------

[[Page S1464]]

TOTAL, PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE... 874,546 1,262,499

NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT

NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE 0 850,000
EQUIPMENT.
Program Increase--Army Reserve..... ....................... +140,000
Program Increase--Navy Reserve..... ....................... +70,000
Program Increase--Marine Corps ....................... +70,000
Reserve.
Program Increase--Air Force Reserve ....................... +70,000
Program Increase--Army National ....................... +250,000
Guard.
Program Increase--Air National ....................... +250,000
Guard.

MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTECTED VEHICLE FUND

MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTECTED 3,415,000 3,415,000
VEHICLE FUND.
=================================================
TOTAL, PROCUREMENT................. 21,361,868 25,316,335
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, ARMY

48..................... NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 0 23,100
(OCO).
Program increase--Aviation night and ....................... +23,100
limited visibility sensor
demonstration.
60..................... SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 57,900 14,900
(OCO).
HFDS--Transfer to line 75 for ....................... -48,000
execution at request of the Army.
REF--Transfer from Title IV for OCO ....................... +5,000
requirement.
61..................... TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE 0 7,800
SYSTEM--ADV DEV.
Transfer from JIEDDO--Air Vigilance.. ....................... +7,800
75..................... ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT (OCO). 5,400 48,000
HFDS Transfer from line 60 for ....................... +48,000
execution at request of the Army.
Long-term development effort......... ....................... -5,400
77..................... ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM (OCO)..... 8,100 8,100
171.................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 63,306 0
(OCO).
Protected Information--Biometrics-- ....................... -25,134
Transfer to line 171x.
Transfer to OP,A line 51 at request ....................... -38,172
of the Army.
171x................... FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS................. 0 25,134
Non-MIP Biometrics--Transfer from ....................... +25,134
line 171.
178.................... DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE 16,200 16,200
SYSTEMS (OCO).
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 150,906 143,234
EVALUATION, ARMY.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY

19..................... ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED 14,100 10,680
TECHNOLOGY (OCO).
Unjustified request.................. ....................... -3,420
53..................... JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 1,000 1,000
DEVELOPMENT (OCO).
75..................... JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED 0 11,800
ELECTRONIC WARFARE (OCO).
Network Enabled EW--Transfer from ....................... +11,800
JIEDDO.
124.................... MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT (OCO)............ 300 300
153.................... NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 5,200 5,200
(SEW) SUPPORT (OCO).
204.................... TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES.... 0 36,000
Transfer from OM,MC for Qualitative ....................... +36,000
Risk Assessment.
213.................... RQ-7 UAV (OCO)....................... 6,900 6,900
999.................... OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO)................. 32,901 32,901
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 60,401 104,781
EVALUATION, NAVY.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, AIR FORCE

17..................... ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS........... 0 56,000
Blue Devil Block 2--Transfer from ....................... +56,000
JIEDDO.
36..................... SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (OCO)....... 16,000 16,000
66..................... TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE 30,000 30,000
(OCO).
128.................... MQ9 UAV (OCO)........................ 0 88,500
VADER/DDR on MQ-9--Transfer from ....................... +88,500
JIEDDO.
145.................... CSAF INNOVATION PROGRAM (OR ISR 0 112,000
INNOVATIONS).
ISR Sensor Pilot Program............. ....................... +112,000
164.................... MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS (OCO)....... 4,443 4,443
211.................... NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE 6,100 6,100
TARGETING (OCO).
230.................... SPECIAL TACTICS/COMBAT CONTROL (OCO). 10,325 10,325
999.................... OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO)................. 199,373 161,014
Classified Adjustment................ ....................... -38,359
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 266,241 484,382
EVALUATION, AIR FORCE.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE

56..................... DARPA SENSOR TECHNOLOGY.............. 0 40,000
Transfer from JIEDDO--Wide Area ....................... +40,000
Surveillance Development Roadmap.
197.................... LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS DCS (OCO)... 23,125 23,125
202.................... INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 750 750
(OCO).
254.................... SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE 9,440 9,440
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT (OCO).
255.................... SOF Operational Enhancements......... 0 14,500
Transfer from JIEDDO--EW Family of ....................... +14,500
Systems.
999.................... OTHER PROGRAMS (OCO)................. 123,925 134,801
Classified Adjustment................ ....................... +3,376
Transfer from JIEDDO--Wallaby........ ....................... +7,500
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 157,240 222,616
EVALUATION, DEFENSE-WIDE.
=================================================
TOTAL, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 634,788 955,013
EVALUATION.

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............ 1,398,092 1,398,092
IN-HOUSE CARE........................ 709,004 709,004
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE.................. 538,376 538,376
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CARE............. 128,412 128,412
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT/IT............ 2,286 2,286
MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS.............. 518 518
EDUCATION AND TRAINING............... 18,061 18,061
BASE OPERATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS... 1,435 1,435
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT............. 0 24,000
Blast Recovery Monitors--Transfer ....................... +8,000
from JIEDDO.
Body Blood Flow Monitor--Transfer ....................... +9,000
from JIEDDO.
EMF Blast Pulse Effects--Transfer ....................... +7,000
from JIEDDO.
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM........ 1,398,092 1,422,092

DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE

AFGHANISTAN AIR MOBILITY............. 141,634 141,634
AFGHANISTAN BORDER FACILITIES........ 5,000 5,000
AFGHANISTAN BORDER POLICE EQUIP...... 19,500 19,500
AFGHANISTAN BORDER TRAINING.......... 20,000 20,000
CENTCOM SUPPORT--AFGHANISTAN COUNTER 3,000 3,000
NARCOTICS POLICE AFGHANISTAN.
FACILITIES........................... 25,295 25,295
TRAINING COUNTER NARCOTICS POLICE 50,250 50,250
AFGHANISTAN (CNP-A).

[[Page S1465]]

EQUIPMENT............................ 1,241 1,241
INTELLIGENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.......... 61,500 -56,900
Program Adjustment................... ....................... -4,600
PAKISTAN............................. 49,590 49,590
KAZAKHSTAN........................... 7,850 7,850
KYRGYZSTAN........................... 27,900 27,900
TAJIKISTAN........................... 8,500 8,500
TURKMENISTAN......................... 10,350 10,350
UZBEKISTAN........................... 8,500 8,500
YEMEN................................ 17,000 17,000
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT................... ....................... -12,000
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER- 457,110 440,510
DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE.

JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND

1...................... ATTACK THE NETWORK................... 1,434,400 765,200
Transfer to Staff and Infrastructure ....................... -238,800
for proper execution.
Air Vigilance--outside JIEDDO ....................... -13,200
mission--Transfer to RDTE,A line 61
and OM,A line 411 for proper
execution.
Blue Devil Block 2--Transfer to ....................... -56,000
RDTE,AF line 17 for proper execution.
Copperhead--program terminated....... ....................... -125,000
Electronic Warfare Family of Systems ....................... -14,500
(EW FoS)--Transfer to SOCOM, RDTE,DW
for proper execution.
JUON Reserve......................... ....................... +100,000
Solar ISE--outside JIEDDO mission.... ....................... -7,000
Synchronization and Integration WTI ....................... -6,400
Cell--Transfer to OM,A SAG 135 and
OM,DW for proper execution.
Thermal Station (National IED ....................... -13,000
Exploitation Facility (NIEF))--
Transfer to OM,A SAG 135 for proper
execution.
VADER development--Transfer $88.5 ....................... -241,800
million to RDTE,AF line 128.
Wallaby--Transfer to RDTE,DW for ....................... -7,500
proper execution.
Wide Area Surveillance Development ....................... -40,000
Roadmap (WASDP)--Transfer to DARPA
for proper execution.
Wolfhound II--Transfer to OM,DW for ....................... -6,000
proper execution.
2...................... DEFEAT THE DEVICE.................... 1,529,390 1,223,090
ACES HY Roadmap--Program terminated.. ....................... -28,000
Transfer to Staff and Infrastructure ....................... -105,000
for proper execution.
Beachcomber--Transfer to OM,A SAG 135 ....................... -3,000
for proper execution.
Counter Bomber--Transfer to OM,A SAG ....................... -3,000
135, OM,N, OM,MC and OM,AF for
proper execution.
CREW--SSM--Universal Test Set ....................... -5,000
Transfer to OM,A SAG 135, OM,N and
OM,MC for proper execution.
JUON Reserve......................... ....................... -105,000
Networked Enabled EW--Transfer to ....................... -11,800
RDTE,N line 75 for proper execution.
Personnel Borne IED/Vehicle Borne IED ....................... -28,000
(PBIED/VBIED)--Transfer to OP,A line
136 for proper execution.
Starlite Development Program--Program ....................... -16,000
terminated.
Transfer to OM,A SAG 135 and OM,MC ....................... -1,500
for proper execution.
3...................... TRAIN THE FORCE...................... 286,210 170,410
Transfer to Staff and Infrastructure ....................... -75,400
for proper execution.
Blast Recovery Monitors--Transfer to ....................... -8,000
DHP RDTE for proper execution.
Body Blood Flow Monitor--Transfer to ....................... -9,000
DHP RDTE for proper execution.
EMF Blast Pulse Effects--Transfer to ....................... -7,000
DHP RDTE for proper execution.
Technical Collection Training ....................... -16,400
Program--Transfer to OM,A SAG 135
for proper execution.
4...................... STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE............. 0 635,068
Transfer from Title VI............... ....................... +215,868
Transfer from Attack the Network for ....................... +238,800
proper execution.
Transfer from Defeat the Device for ....................... +105,000
proper execution.
Transfer from Train the Force for ....................... +75,400
proper execution.
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE 3,250,000 2,793,768
DEVICE DEFEAT FUND.

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL...... 10,529 10,529
-------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL...... 10,529 10,529
-------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 5,115,731 4,666,899
PROGRAMS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Nevada.
Mr. ENSIGN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that speakers on
the Republican side be limited to 10 minutes each, with Senator Coburn
controlling up to 25 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. ENSIGN. Mr. President, I rise to speak on the two proposals, the
Democratic proposal and the Republican proposal from the House known as
H.R. 1. I am going to reluctantly support H.R. 1. It reduces government
spending by about $61 billion below last year's levels. The reason I am
reluctantly supporting it is because I don't think it goes far enough.
We have heard the other side rail that the cuts are too large, but
let me bring to the attention of my colleagues a few quotes.
This is from ADM Mike Mullen, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff:

I believe that our debt is the greatest threat to our
national security.

We know our national debt is over $14 trillion. This year, we are
spending, in excess of what we take in, almost $1.6 trillion. All we
are talking about in the House bill is reducing that amount by $61
billion--a paltry amount.
A few other quotes.
This is from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on February 17:

It is an excessively high interest burden. It's
unsustainable. With the President's plan, even if Congress
were to enact it, and even if Congress were to hold to it and
reduce those deficits as a percentage of GDP over the next 5
years, we would still be left with a very large interest
burden and unsustainable obligations over time.

He also said:

Our deficits are too high. They are unsustainable.

I think everybody agrees.

They are unsustainable and, if left unaddressed, these
deficits will hurt economic growth and make us weaker as a
nation.

One of the bills before the Senate starts to address it. The other
bill virtually ignores the deficit.
This is from the President:

What my budget does is to put forward some tough choices,
some significant spending cuts so that by the middle of this
decade our annual spending will match our annual revenues. We
will not be adding more to the national debt.

It is absolutely incredible that the President could make such a
comment when looking at his budget. His budget takes us from $14
trillion in debt to $27 trillion in debt over the next decade, almost
doubling the national debt. He says we are going to be living within
our means?
Here is a graph. In 2010, we are at about $13.5 trillion. We see that
over the decade we go up further, further, and down here in 2021, it is
$26.3 trillion. This is virtually a doubling of the national debt.
That is why when Timothy Geithner says it is unsustainable--the
Secretary of the Treasury appointed by President Obama--we all agree.
So when are we going to get spending under control? We literally have
to quit spending money we do not have because we are bankrupting the
very future of America.
I wish to quote a few Senators from the other side of the aisle.
Senator Joe Manchin said:

The most powerful person in these negotiations, our
President, has failed to lead this debate or offer a serious
proposal for spending cuts.

He also said:

[The Democratic bill] utterly ignores our fiscal reality,
that our Nation is badly in debt and spending at absolutely
unsustainable and out-of-control levels. We must turn our
financial ship around. But the Senate proposal continues to
sail forward as if there is no storm on the horizon.

That is from one of our Democratic colleagues from West Virginia.

[[Page S1466]]

The bill proposed by the Democratic majority fails to understand that
there is a fiscal crisis in this country. It is a problem of spending.
Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri said:

I feel strongly that the cuts are not large enough.

Senator Mark Warner said:

At some point we need to send some kind of a shock wave
across the Federal Government that this time we really mean
it.

He was talking about spending cuts. He was talking about getting
serious about deficit reduction.
The House bill doesn't do enough, but at least it is headed more in
the right direction for getting spending under control. While I might
not agree with every one of the spending cuts in it, it is going in the
right direction, and shows what we need to do as a Congress. The bill
the majority has put before us shows a lack of understanding as to how
serious the deficit and the debt are as an issue for the country.
I wish to put this deficit reduction into some sort of context. This
year, the Congressional Budget Office says we will spend $1.5 trillion
more than we take in. That is what the deficit is this year. According
to the President, it is over $1.6 trillion. Those are their estimates.
The bottom line is that we are spending about 40 cents more per dollar
than what we take in.
This graph shows the spending proposals before us. This is how much
the deficit is. The House bill will reduce that deficit by this tiny
slice of the pie. The Democratic majority bill will reduce it by this
little tiny slice of the pie right here. So the House bill is a small
slice, but at least it is a larger slice than what the Democratic
majority has offered. The bottom line is that this is pathetic and will
do nothing to actually put us on a sustainable fiscal path where we can
start living within our means and quit spending money we do not have.
The House bill itself is actually a 4-percent reduction in the amount
of money we are borrowing. If we think about it, this year, since we
are borrowing 40 cents out of every dollar we spend, to put that in
terms that maybe a family would understand, it would be as if a family
making $60,000 a year were going to spend $100,000. Any family would
understand that is unsustainable. They could not continue along that
path. If that same family were to decrease their spending habits by the
same amount the Democrats have proposed, out of that $100,000, they
would reduce their spending habits by $168. That is all. That is how
pathetic this spending reduction is offered by the other side.
We have to get serious. Recently, Senator Coburn requested a General
Accountability Office report that came back and identified over $100
billion in duplicative and wasteful spending programs. This GAO report
underscores the negligence of the Federal Government when it comes to
managing hard-earned taxpayer dollars.
Let me give a couple of facts from that report. It said that the
government spends $18 billion on 47 different job-training programs.
Yet the President requested another $400 million for a new program that
will replicate proven strategies to develop even more job-training
programs. Out of the 47 programs, zero are measured for effectiveness.
Yet we are going to create more instead of eliminating a lot of the
programs and doing the proper oversight this Congress should be doing.
There are 80 programs providing transportation to disadvantaged
persons in 8 different departments. The GAO found $2 billion in costs
for just 29 of these programs but, with the extent of fragmentation in
this area, was unable to identify total costs for the other 51
programs. In other words, they couldn't even identify what the total
costs were for these other programs. That is how messed up it is.
The U.S. Government also spends about $63 billion on 18 different
domestic food and nutrition programs and about $3 billion on 20
homelessness programs. The report notes:

This can create unnecessary work for both providers and
applicants and may result in the use of more administrative
resources than needed.

Let me translate. That means we have too much bureaucracy and too
much wasteful spending, so the money doesn't actually get to the people
it is intended to help. It gets spent in the bureaucracy.
We also have another almost $60 billion spent on over 100 duplicated
and fragmented surface transportation programs.
While I am troubled that the $61 billion from the House isn't enough
to tackle the problem, I am astounded by what the other side of the
aisle has done. It also continues many of the wasteful programs we have
talked about.

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting has come under fire.
Obviously, this morning their CEO resigned. We have seen the
controversies there.
Their bill also spends tens of millions of dollars to help unions
organize--overseas, not even in America. Helping unions organize
overseas--is that what we want to be doing with American taxpayer
dollars?
Today's votes are a choice between modest progress and making the
problem worse.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has used 10 minutes.
Mr. ENSIGN. I ask unanimous consent for 1 additional minute.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. ENSIGN. The House bill needs to be the floor for what we
accomplish out of this process. The House bill isn't nearly enough, and
we cannot allow this process to capture a modest improvement in the
name of compromise by watering it down to a complete abdication of
leadership. The stakes are too high.
Today, I will be reluctantly supporting H.R. 1, the House bill, which
cuts $61 billion from last year's spending. It is a modest step in the
right direction. The other side has put forward a proposal that should
be rejected out of hand because it is completely inadequate. It keeps
us spending money we do not have.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New York.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for up
to 2 minutes and for Senator Leahy to be recognized following my
remarks for 10 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I wouldn't mind the chart from my friend
from Nevada staying up because it makes my point.
In a few hours, the Senate will hold an up-or-down vote on H.R. 1,
the House Republicans' scorched earth spending proposal that counts
among its casualties such critical priorities as border security,
cancer research, and food safety inspectors. The House GOP proposal is
a Trojan horse, and we will not be fooled by it. It speaks in the name
of deficit reduction, but the dirty little secret about the Republican
spending plan is that once the dust is settled, it would only decrease
the deficit by $5 billion in fiscal year 2011. When we look at the CBO
score of the continuing resolution we are operating under and compare
that to the House spending bill, the difference by CBO in budget
outlays only amounts to $5 billion in fiscal year 2011. We are talking
about a difference of $1.36 trillion in budget outlays under the
current CR versus $1.355 trillion in budget outlays under the
Republican proposal, much as the chart of my colleague from Nevada has
shown. In other words, all of the cuts the Republicans are currently
proposing will shave a grand total of .3 percent from the deficit.
Some might say it is a start, but in relation to the damage these
cuts will do, it is a meaningless start. Their cuts to domestic
discretionary spending will do nothing to create jobs or spur short-
term economic growth. In fact, the reverse is true. As numerous
independent economists point out, we will see a reduction in economic
growth almost immediately if H.R. 1 is enacted, and these cuts will
harm our ability to prepare for the future because they gut the very
priorities we need to invest in to help our economy grow: education,
energy investment, technology, and infrastructure.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator's time has expired.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent I be given 2
additional minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. SCHUMER. So if all these cuts will not improve the economy in the
near term and will not help economic

[[Page S1467]]

growth in the longer term and will not cut the deficit, then exactly
what will they do? They will satisfy a very small but vocal segment of
the Republican Party. That is all.
So it is time for a reset. This morning I called for a reset of this
budget debate. I think it is important that after today's votes both
sides in the debate take a deep collective breath. We should all take
stock of how the discussion up to now has become distorted and seek to
reset the terms of the debate. It may not happen tomorrow, but in the
coming weeks, as the negotiations led by the White House reconvene, we
should approach the talks with fresh eyes and a new mindset.
Rather than continuing the fixation on domestic discretionary cuts,
which at the same time do huge damage and cut the deficit very little
just because of the way they are spent, the next offer and counteroffer
should include mandatory cuts and revenue raisers such as oil royalties
into the mix.
We will only put a dent in the deficit through shared sacrifice.
Focusing simply on domestic discretionary and even leaving out the
military will not achieve our goal of deficit reduction. Including
mandatory cuts and revenue raisers such as oil royalties will.
The bottom line is this: The blame for the current breakdown in
budget negotiations rests with our failure to think big. A bipartisan
compromise simply will not be found in discretionary spending cuts
alone. We must broaden the playing field. The solution will only come
from putting other kinds of cuts, as well as revenue enhancements, on
the table. Doing this will also set the table for the larger budget
discussions still to come.
I see my colleague from Vermont, so I am ready to yield the floor to
him.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I appreciate that. But I think what we are
going to do is try to go back and forth.
Mr. SCHUMER. Well, I yield the floor in any case, Mr. President.
Mr. LEAHY. So Senator Sessions will go next. But I appreciate the
courtesy of the Senator from New York. I yield with the consent that I
then be recognized at the end of the speech of the Senator from
Alabama.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The Senator from Alabama.
Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I thank the distinguished chairman of
the Judiciary Committee and congratulate him on a very successful
patent bill that passed with an overwhelming vote. I was pleased to
work with him on that as a partner for 2 years when I was ranking
member of that committee. I think it was a good day.
Mr. President, we will soon be moving toward a vote on the continuing
resolution. Apparently, there are going to be two options given to us.
The question I would pose to our colleagues and to the American people
is, Do we have to do something or can we do nothing? Is nothing an
option? That is what the Democratic proposal is--nothing, zero, nada.
So we had in the Budget Committee, which I am the ranking member now,
the testimony yesterday of Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles. Senator
Simpson is a Republican from Wyoming, and Mr. Bowles was President
Clinton's Chief of Staff and a well-known business and Democratic
leader.
This is what they told us yesterday in their written statement. Both
of them put this in to us:

We believe that if we do not take decisive action our
nation faces the most predictable economic crisis in its
history.

They have spent months wrestling with these numbers. A majority of
the members voted for the reforms they proposed, and they gave a lot of
time and effort to it. I did not think they went far enough in some of
the areas. But I would say they made a real significant attempt to deal
with the crisis we face.
In their testimony yesterday they went even further. What do we mean,
a ``crisis''? We had a crisis in 2007. That put us in the deepest
recession we have had in decades. Greece has had a crisis. That is the
kind of thing they are talking about. Forty percent of every dollar we
spend is borrowed.
Senator Conrad, our chairman, our distinguished Democratic leader,
asked them:

What happens, in your judgment, to the U.S., if we fail to
get an agreement in the range of what the commission
concluded is necessary?

The commission proposes a $4 trillion reduction in our deficit
spending over the next 10 years. It should be more. That is what they
proposed. President Obama's budget says it reduces it by $1 trillion.
But when the CBO scores it, they are going to find it is filled with
gimmicks and there will not be any reduction, I predict, in the deficit
in the Obama budget, which is disappointing. It is a do-nothing-about-
the-debt-problem budget.
So what is going to happen?
Mr. Bowles:

This problem is going to happen, it is a problem, we're
going to have to face up to, in maybe 2 years, maybe a little
less, maybe a little more.

Senator Simpson commented:

I think it will come before 2 years.

We are talking about a crisis.

I'm just saying at some point, I think within a year, at
the end of the year, if they [people who hold our debt] just
thought you're playing with fluff--5, 6, 7 percent of this
hole--they're going to say, ``I want some money for my
paper.'' And if there's anything money guys love, it's money.
And money guys, when they start losing money, panic. And let
me tell you they will. It won't matter what the government
does, they'll say I want my money, I've got a better place
for it. . . . Just saying for me, it won't be a year [before
we have a crisis].

Well, this is a serious matter. It is not a do-nothing circumstance.
So we have a simple choice to make today: Do we take a step, even a
small step, that sends a signal to the world that we intend to take
action to prevent the crisis, not act after a disaster hits? Or we
could do nothing, as the Democratic proposal does.
The Republican proposal will immediately lower spending by $61
billion for the rest of the year. That is a reduction of about 6
percent of the discretionary spending budget. Most States, cities, and
counties in America have had bigger deductions than that, and they are
still here. They have not ceased to exist, and we are not going to
cease to exist if we reduce spending 6 percent. But it will make a
difference. That amounts to 4 percent of the total debt. As I will show
in a moment, it means a lot more than that.
The Democratic proposal proposes $6 billion, but it is clearly only a
$4 billion reduction. That is less than a one-half-of-1-percent
reduction in the discretionary spending budget--less than one-half of 1
percent.
Now, this $61 billion is not going to break us. The GAO recently
found that the government spends $8 billion on 47 different job
training programs--47 different job training programs. We don't have
any ability to save money and do more with less in this country? No
business would run the way we run the U.S. Government, and this is just
one of the typical kinds of duplication and waste that goes on in our
government.
We are living in a fantasy world if we think we cannot find $61
billion to reduce out of more than $1 trillion in a discretionary
budget. Under President Obama, the discretionary spending increased 24
percent in the last 2 years. It has already gone up 24 percent.

What do you mean we cannot take a 6-percent reduction? We are facing
a crisis, a debt crisis. Families across the country are trimming their
budgets. They are doing so every day. Washington just keeps on growing
and spending and growing.
We had the Education Secretary in the Budget Committee last week.
They propose an 11-percent increase in education spending this year.
Energy was in--a 9.5-percent increase this next year for energy, they
say. And, hold your hat, the Secretary of Transportation was in and
proposes a 62-percent transportation budget increase.
So this is where we were, as shown on this chart: over $2 trillion,
and we have jumped now to $3.7 trillion. So that is a 24-percent
increase. I am not making up these numbers.
Well, what about the deficit numbers? This year, we spend $3.7
trillion, maybe $3.8 trillion. Do you want to know how much our revenue
is this year? Mr. President, $2.2 trillion. I know this is
unbelievable. The American people probably cannot imagine that we are
spending $3.8 trillion and taking in $2.2 trillion, but it is true.
Forty cents of every dollar we spend is borrowed. This is why Mr.
Bowles and Mr. Simpson and every economist who has ever testified has
said we are on an unsustainable path, a path that cannot be continued.

[[Page S1468]]

We need to take action now. This is not enough. But it is a step. I
think it sends a word to the world's financial markets, the bond
vigilantes, that maybe the United States is, in fact, on the road to
doing something about the spending we are in.
Our debt will soon be larger than the economy. It will exceed 100
percent of GDP by the end of this fiscal year, amazingly surging our
debt load for the whole country. We cannot keep spending what we do not
have, borrowing what we cannot pay back. We cannot do this.
Our crushing debt burden is like an anchor dragging on our economy.
It slows growth. As the Rogoff and Reinhart study showed, as Secretary
of Treasury Geithner acknowledged in the committee, it is already
slowing our growth. He also added it is worse than that because it puts
us at risk, as Mr. Bowles and Mr. Simpson say, for some sort of debt
crisis. It is unpredictable when and how it might occur. That is
President Obama's Secretary of the Treasury.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Member's time has expired.
Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to have 2
additional minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. SESSIONS. So we cannot keep delaying. We cannot keep promising to
do something tomorrow. We have to have a vote. We will have a vote
today. We need to act today. A vote for the Democratic proposal is a
vote to do nothing. It is a vote to stay in denial. It is a vote that
says deficits do not matter, we can just keep on. But deficits do
matter. They have always mattered. They always will matter.
Some say you cannot make any savings from reducing discretionary
spending. Let me show this chart because a $61 billion reduction is a
reduction of the baseline. When you reduce the baseline, you save that
amount every year, even if you have growth in the future years. And it
adds up. It is kind of a geometrical reduction in spending and debt
that we have to have, and it has been working the other way. We have
been increasing dramatically. You know from your business accounting
that a 7-percent return on your money doubles your money in 10 years.
We had 24 percent the last 2 years. That is why the government is
doubling and quadrupling in size. But this would show, according to our
budget staff and the calculators, if you reduce the baseline $61
billion in discretionary spending alone, it would save $862 billion in
deficit reduction over 10 years. If we were to freeze that baseline in
for just 5 years, not only would we save $860 billion, but $1.65
trillion--enough money to make a real difference in one little act of
$61 billion in the reduction of discretionary spending. We have to take
that step.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The time of the Senator has expired.
Mr. SESSIONS. I thank the Presiding Officer.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Vermont.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I appreciate the help of the Senator from
Alabama on the patent bill which passed last night. It will help us
increase jobs without adding anything to the deficit.
We made what I think was a terrible mistake when the Congress voted
to support going to war in Iraq--I was one of the 22 who voted against
that war--and then voted to cut taxes and borrow the money to pay for
the war in Iraq. We borrowed $1 trillion to pay for a war that has not
made us safer. It has caused thousands of deaths of Americans and tens
of thousands of others, and has degraded our military which will cost
billions to rebuild.
We also went into Afghanistan with the intent to catch Osama bin
Laden, and when, according to accounts, he was surrounded, our
personnel were yanked out of Afghanistan and sent to Iraq, and he
escaped into Pakistan, and $1 trillion later, we are still there.
Again, borrowed money for those two wars, one that went way beyond
whatever it was supposed to and the other one that should never have
happened in the first place. We also cut taxes on oil companies and
millionaires and everybody else. And now we have a skyrocketing
deficit, thanks to those mistakes.
Later today we will vote on H.R. 1, the House Continuing Resolution,
and then the Senate substitute. I want to speak briefly about how the
Senate CR compares to H.R. 1, particularly funding for the Department
of State and Foreign Operations.
First, Senators should know what is in the House CR or, perhaps more
importantly, what is not in it.
It is notable that the House defines diplomacy and international
development as non-security spending, in spite of, of course, the
integral part they both play protecting our security around the globe.
It ignores the views of Secretary of State Clinton, Secretary of
Defense Gates, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mullen, former
Chairman General Powell, General Petraeus, President Obama, former
Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, and every former
National Security Adviser. They have all made clear that these
investments do directly protect U.S. security interests, not only on
the front line States of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, but around
the world.
President Reagan and former Homeland Security Secretary Ridge also
recognized the connection between international assistance and our
security. President Reagan said:

Security assistance programs, an essential complement to
our defense effort, directly enhances the security of the
United States.

Secretary Ridge said:

The programs supported by the International Affairs Budget
are as essential to our national security as defense
programs.

Secretary Gates said:

I never miss an opportunity to call for more funding for
and emphasis on diplomacy and development.

There are a whole lot of other examples, from both Republican and
Democratic leaders, which seem to have fallen on deaf ears in the
House.
Our Republican friends in the House should know that we cannot
counter the influence of al-Qaida and other violent extremists through
military force alone. They should know that helping countries such as
Southern Sudan rebuild after conflict, building stable democratic
institutions in countries such as Egypt, preventing the trafficking of
nuclear material and other weapons in the former Soviet Union,
educating and providing jobs for youth who would otherwise be fodder
for terrorist recruiters in the Middle East, combating the corrosive
influence of organized crime in Central America, preventing the spread
of deadly viruses in Africa and Asia--viruses that are only one
airplane ride away from the United States--or supporting NATO, the
International Atomic Energy Agency, or U.N. peacekeeping--these are all
parts of our national security. It is the diplomats here and abroad,
and the funds they administer, that help make U.S. leadership possible
around the world.
While the House press releases claim to adequately fund operations
and programs in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, that is empty
rhetoric. Secretary Clinton has said the House CR will unacceptably
harm U.S. interests in those countries.
That is only the beginning. The House CR slashes funding for refugees
and other victims of disaster by 40 percent, at the same time Members
on the other side of the aisle are rightly urging that we help the tens
of thousands of Libyans, Tunisians and Egyptians who have fled their
homes.
The House CR provides no funding for the Global Food Security Fund
which prevents hunger and famine in Africa and Asia and improves
America's standing.
It eliminates funding for the Clean Technology Fund which supports
exports of solar, wind, and other renewable energy. And by doing so it
opens the door wider to China's exports. How shortsighted can we be? It
is like owning a business and you have a competitor on the other side
of town and you say, Well, we are not going to advertise. We are not
going to stock our shelves. We are only going to be open a couple of
days a week. Gosh, I hope that competitor doesn't drive us out of
business.
It drastically reduces funding to operate our embassies and
consulates, which every American traveling, working, or studying
overseas depends on. Every one of us as Members of Congress knows when
an American constituent has a problem somewhere we turn to our
embassies or our consulates to help them. H.R. 1 would slash their
funding.

[[Page S1469]]

H.R. 1 would also sharply cut funding for global health programs:
HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and other deadly diseases--denying
life-saving drugs and other services to hundreds of thousands of
people, condemning women and children in other parts of the world to
death.
It would renege on our treaty obligations to the U.N. and to the
international financial institutions, threatening our voting shares
which our competitors--including China--are eager to purchase.
At a time when China is rapidly expanding its influence globally, the
House would have us pull back and say, you take over. You can be the
power that other countries turn to, not the United States. Even Great
Britain's conservative government, slashing spending left and right, is
exempting, and even increasing, international aid, because unlike our
Republican friends in the House, they recognize it is a matter of
national security.
The impact of H.R. 1 is equally devastating to our domestic programs.
From the social safety net to programs that maintain and expand our
country's infrastructure, these programs would be slashed.
Numerous economists, from Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke to Mark
Zandi, recognize that the impact of H.R. 1 will be the loss of hundreds
of thousands of jobs, at a time when our economy is beginning to
recover. I hear this daily from fellow Vermonters. Take, for example,
the mother who came into my Montpelier office a few months ago and
explained how the Head Start Program changed her life. Not only did
Head Start provide a reliable, safe, educational environment for her
children, it made it possible for her to pursue a college education and
be a strong tax-paying part of our society. But H.R. 1 would deny more
than 300 of Vermont's children and families these same opportunities.
For those unmoved by cuts to Head Start, H.R. 1 would also devastate
one of our best economic development tools: the community development
block grant program.
CDBG has a proven track record of putting people to work through
housing construction, public service improvement projects and downtown
revitalization efforts. The 62-percent cut to CDBG in H.R. 1 would
greatly hamper Vermont's ability to move these types of projects
forward at a time when they are needed more than ever.
In the past 3 weeks I have heard from hundreds of Vermonters who rely
on the community services block grant program, which would also be
slashed in H.R. 1. This is a program that serves 55,000 Vermonters
whose incomes are at or below the poverty line--some of my State's most
vulnerable people. The impact of this cut would shutter as many as six
of our largest food shelves, and eliminate assistance for the thousands
of Vermonters looking for housing and heating assistance each year.
These are only three of the domestic programs that would be decimated
by H.R. 1, part of a veritable laundry list of cuts that target the
very programs that give Americans a hand up. Very simply we are talking
about cutting, food, shelter, and heat, the basic necessities of life.
Turning again to national security, a frequently asked question is
how does the Senate CR compare to the fiscal year 2010 level for the
Department of State and foreign operations? The answer depends on who
you ask.
In fiscal year 2010, the Department of State and foreign operations
received close to $48.8 billion in regular appropriations and $4.1
billion in emergency supplemental funds for these purposes in
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and Mexico. In addition, the fiscal year
2009 emergency supplemental provided about $2 billion for fiscal year
2010 costs related to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, Israel,
Jordan, and Mexico. In other words, these programs received $54.9
billion for fiscal year 2010.
While the Senate CR funding level is $1.38 billion or 2.8 percent
above the fiscal year 2010 regular appropriation for the Department of
State and foreign operations, it is $4.75 billion or 8.7 percent below
the fiscal year 2010 level of $54.9 billion which supports operations
and programs that must be continued in fiscal year 2011, a critical
fact wholly ignored by the House.
Although even the Senate CR cuts funding for the Department of State
and foreign operations by billions of dollars, rather than the slash-
and-burn approach of the House, it does so in a manner that seeks to
limit the damage to our national security. Here are a few of the ways
the Senate CR does that.
Although the Senate CR cuts the State Department's operations budget
by $606 million below the request, it provides $552 million above the
amount in H.R. 1. These funds support U.S. embassies and consulates, as
well as the State Department's diplomatic personnel and operations in
Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.
The Senate CR provides $1.5 billion for worldwide security
protection. Although $25 million below the request, this is $44.4
million above the amount provided in H.R. 1. This funds diplomatic
security agents, armored vehicles, and training to protect U.S.
personnel working in dangerous places overseas. It also, incidentally,
protects Members of Congress who travel abroad.
The Senate CR provides $625 million for educational and cultural
exchange programs, which is $8.2 million below the request and $123.6
million above the amount provided in H.R. 1. These funds, which have
traditionally been strongly supported by Republicans and Democrats
particularly since 9/11, support exchanges between Americans and
citizens of other countries, including the Fulbright, International
Visitor Leadership, and Citizen Exchange programs. The House CR would
result in the elimination of over 2,500 American exchanges and 8,600
foreign citizen exchanges.
The Senate CR provides $2 billion for U.S. contributions to
international peacekeeping, which is $87.3 million below the request
and $196.5 million above the amount provided in H.R. 1. These funds pay
for peacekeepers in the Sinai, Lebanon, Haiti, Congo, and many other
countries that might otherwise descend into chaos and potentially
require the deployment of U.S. troops at far greater risk and expense.
The Senate CR provides $1.5 billion for U.S. contributions to
international organizations, which is $50 million below the request and
$28.5 million above the amount provided in H.R. 1. This funds U.S.
membership in the United Nations, NATO, the International Atomic Energy
Agency, World Health Organization, and other international
organizations that directly protect our security.
The Senate CR provides $39.5 million for the U.S. Institute for
Peace, which is $7 million below the request. H.R. 1 does not include
any funding for USIP. This funds conflict resolution and peace
building, including in Iraq, and has been supported by Republicans and
Democrats since Congress first established it. I ask unanimous consent
that an Op-ed by GEN Anthony Zinni about USIP in the March 8 New York
Times, entitled ``Peace-building that Pays Off,'' be printed in the
Record after my remarks.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. (See
Exhibit 1.)
Mr. LEAHY. The Senate CR provides $7.8 billion for global health
programs, which is $633 million below the request and $884 million
above the amount provided in H.R. 1. These funds support programs to
prevent and treat HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, polio and neglected
tropical diseases, and to support voluntary family planning and
reproductive health.
The total to combat HIV/AIDS is $5.35 billion through the Department
of State, which is $145 million below the request and $509 million
above the amount provided in H.R. 1. H.R. 1 would deny life-saving HIV/
AIDS drugs to some 400,000 people. I wonder how many House Members even
know that.
The Senate CR provides $750 million for the Global HIV/AIDS fund,
which is equal to fiscal year 2010 and $150 million above the amount
provided in H.R. 1. At the House level, approximately 3.7 million
people would not be tested for HIV, more than 10 million mosquito nets
for malaria would not be provided, and 372,000 testing and treatments
for tuberculosis would be halted. Malaria, which is preventable and
curable, is a leading killer of African children.
The Senate CR provides $879 million for international disaster
assistance, which is $449 million above the amount provided in H.R. 1.
These funds support aid to people displaced by war, famine

[[Page S1470]]

and natural disasters, such as the earthquake in Haiti and floods in
Pakistan. The House would decimate our ability to respond to those
catastrophes. That is not the America I know.
Likewise, the Senate CR provides $1.68 billion for refugee
assistance, which is equal to fiscal year 2010 and $662 million above
the amount provided in H.R. 1. At a time when the number of refugees
and other displaced persons in the Middle East, North Africa, and
Pakistan is skyrocketing, and protracted refugee crises exist from
Burma to Iraq, the House would turn its back on these people.
There are many other examples. The point should be lost on no one.
The House CR would cause lasting, unprecedented damage to our global
leadership and our security, and cost thousands of American jobs, at
the same time that it would have no appreciable impact on the deficit.
The amounts in the House CR or the Senate CR represent only 1 percent
of the Federal budget, but it is a critical investment in our security
that the House treats as a luxury we can do without. I challenge them
to find a single current or former President, Secretary of Defense,
Secretary of State, National Security Advisor, or, frankly, anyone with
expertise in this area--Republican or Democrat--who would agree with
that shortsighted, dangerous view.

Exhibit 1

[From the New York Times, Mar. 7, 2011]

Peace-Building That Pays Off

(By Anthony C. Zinni)

Williamsburg, Va.--In voting last month to eliminate
financing for the United States Institute of Peace, members
of the House of Representatives did not do their research.
You will find the institute's competent work behind
practically every American success in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It has undertaken missions from the Balkans and Sudan to the
Philippines and Somalia, where I supported the institute's
efforts to mediate conflicts, promote the rule of law and
encourage democracy.
This week, as the Senate considers alternatives to the
House budget bill, we should remember that the stakes for
national security and peace-building are high. The institute
was created in 1984, when the cold war was still at its
height. Congressional leaders guided by Senator Spark M.
Matsunaga, a Hawaii Democrat, saw the need for an institution
that would strengthen the nation's ability to limit
international violence and manage global conflict. President
Ronald Reagan signed the act creating the institute. A
bipartisan majority of Congress has supported it since--until
now.
The Institute of Peace is like the Marine Corps or special
forces for foreign affairs and peace building. When others
are fleeing conflict around the world, you'll usually find
institute staff members going in. They were working in
Afghanistan before 9/11 and were among the first nonmilitary
personnel on the ground after the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
The institute's headquarters in Baghdad has twice been
damaged by rocket and mortar attacks. At the height of the
Iraq insurgency, when virtually every other American and
international group pulled out their personnel, the State and
Defense Departments requested that the institute stay. Under
fire regularly, it was the only United States organization
outside of those departments that did not flee Baghdad.
But the institute's value goes beyond the bravery and
commitment of its staff. In 2007, when the Army's loth
Mountain Division arrived in Mahmudiya, a city of half a
million in the ``triangle of death'' dominated by Al Qaeda
south of Baghdad, officers asked the institute to mediate
between Shiite civil authorities and the Sunni sheiks who
controlled the area. Institute-trained negotiators convened
warring Iraqis to consolidate security, restore services,
develop the local economy, enhance local governance and
improve the rule of law. Gen. David H. Petraeus called it a
turning point in the war.
In the six months before the institute's intervention,
there had been 93 attacks on American forces in the area with
homemade bombs; in the six months after, just one. Mahmudiya
became a cornerstone of peace in the district, allowing the
Army to reduce its strength from a brigade combat team of
3,500 soldiers to a battalion of 650, with corresponding
savings and reductions in casualties.
In Afghanistan, the institute conducts mediations on issues
from refugees to property and water disputes. In the last
year, these operations have resolved 18 tribal disputes
throughout the country, mostly involving the abuse of women,
and included 30 training programs for government officials,
lawyers, mullahs, tribal councils and community leaders. The
network is even supporting dialogue along the Afghanistan-
Pakistan border, the earth's most dangerous frontier--home to
Taliban and Qaeda attacks and a wellspring of religious and
political extremism.
Congress would be hard-pressed to find an agency that does
more with less. The institute's entire budget would not pay
for the Afghan war for three hours, is less than the cost of
a fighter plane, and wouldn't sustain even 40 American troops
in Afghanistan for a year. Within the budget, peace-building
is financed as part of national security programs, and is
recognized as an important adjunct to conventional defense
spending and diplomacy. The institute's share of the proposed
international affairs budget, $43 million, is minuscule: less
than one-tenth of 1 percent of the State Department's budget,
and one-hundredth of 1 percent of the Pentagon's.
The idea that eliminating the United States Institute of
Peace would benefit taxpayers is extremely shortsighted and
ill informed. America deserves better from Congress than
eliminating something that saves American lives and taxpayer
dollars.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Mexico.
Mr. BINGAMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for up
to 10 minutes as in morning business.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. BINGAMAN. Mr. President, I rise today to talk about the damage
that would be done if H.R. 1 were to become law, and specifically to
talk about a few areas I have been paying particular attention to:
science and technology, for one, particularly related to energy policy;
second, border security and law enforcement; as well as education.
To me, this is not a question of whether there should be cuts in our
Federal budget. Clearly, there should be cuts. But the real issue here
is whether we should be smart about where we make those cuts. To me, it
is clear that H.R. 1 does not represent smart policy about where to
make those cuts. It represents a plan to mindlessly cut funding during
the remaining 5 months of the current fiscal year in order to send some
kind of message to the world that we are serious about deficit
reduction. In my view, H.R. 1 sends a message, but it is not the right
message. The message it sends is that we, in fact, are not willing to
look at serious deficit reduction at this point.
The first area of cuts I wish to talk about contained in H.R. 1 that
will severely impact our Nation for years to come and have an effect on
how many jobs we can actually create is the area of science and energy
innovation. Last December, this Congress passed a reauthorization of
what we call the America COMPETES Act. I was very privileged to work,
particularly with my colleague from Tennessee, Senator Alexander, on
helping to get that legislation enacted. Its purpose was to authorize
funding for the Department of Energy's Office of Science, for the
National Science Foundation, and for the National Institutes of
Standards and Technology for the next 3 years so that by fiscal year
2016, we would have completed a 10-year doubling of the funding for
those agencies. I wish to note that this effort was first started
during the Bush administration. It has been carried forward during this
current administration under President Obama. The effort has enjoyed
strong bipartisan support and garnered endorsements from leading
industry groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business
Roundtable, and the Council on Competitiveness. These organizations
recognize that the future of our Nation depends on the strong
scientific backbone we need for our workforce in order to out-innovate
our competitors around the world. So it comes as a surprise to me to
see large cuts being proposed by the House of Representatives in their
fiscal year 2011 funding bill to the very programs that all of us
seemed to agree are needed to keep us competitive in the years ahead.
What cuts am I talking about? Let me give one example. The Office of
Science is the Nation's largest supporter of the physical sciences, and
these are the very areas by which we intend to supply a new stream of
scientists and engineers to companies such as Intel, Ford Motor
Company, and others. The House bill proposes to cut the Office of
Science budget by $1.1 billion or 22 percent. The result is an
estimated reduction of 4,500 full-time scientists and engineers working
on basic endeavors in the area of energy science. It will terminate the
Early Career Research Program for young faculty and ongoing graduate
programs in the energy sciences. National user facilities that the
Office of Science runs for upward of 27,000 researchers from industry
and academia will be shuttered or put into a standby status. This

[[Page S1471]]

includes the four nanoscience centers across the United States, which
have had breakthrough discoveries to propel our industries forward in
the areas of solid-state lighting, new drugs, and microelectronics.
Let me talk about some of the other programs impacted in the
Department of Energy. The Office of Nuclear Energy, which is leading
the way to a new generation of smaller, less costly reactors at places
such as Oak Ridge and Idaho National Laboratories, will suffer. The
ability to move this bipartisan program forward will cease.
In the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy--EER&E, as it
is referred to in the Department--the House bill will result in over
31,000 homes that will not be weatherized, and by July 1, it is
estimated that something like 8,000 people who are expected to perform
this work will be out of jobs. The program to mix coal with biomass,
which shows great promise, will be eliminated, as will programs to fund
offshore wind.
Let me cite some other examples of the damage that the House bill
will have on other agencies in the COMPETES Act.
The National Science Foundation will have reductions leading to a
loss of 10,000 university researchers and graduate students. Being so
late in the year--and I indicated we have about 5 months left in this
fiscal year--it will reduce the program to train teachers in math and
science by 53 percent, at a time when it is widely recognized that
other nations are outperforming us in student test scores in these
subjects.
I ask unanimous consent that two letters be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:

Task Force on

American Innovation,

Washington, DC, March 3, 2011.
Hon. Harry M. Reid,
Majority Leader, U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Mitch McConnell,
Minority Leader, U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC.
Dear Leaders Reid and McConnell: Most of the undersigned
organizations signed a November 5, 2010 letter to you in
support of the reauthorization of the America COMPETES Act.
We applaud the Senate for engaging in the hard work that was
necessary to achieve a bipartisan majority to enact that
legislation in the previous Congress.
Today, we write to urge you to continue to support the
goals of the COMPETES legislation. As the Senate considers
legislation to complete Fiscal Year 2011 appropriations, we
ask that you and your colleagues reject the cuts adopted by
the House that would significantly reduce funding for the key
research agencies, including the National Science Foundation
(NSF), the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, and
the National Institute of Standards and Technology, as well
as science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)
education programs contained in that law.
While we recognize that Congress faces a major challenge to
reduce federal budget deficits and bring the national debt
under control, it is critical that these cuts be implemented
strategically, with an eye toward the future economic health
of the U.S. As many of us wrote to you last year, continued
strong funding of basic scientific research and STEM
education programs would help ensure the economic growth
needed to restore long-term fiscal strength and national
prosperity. The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility
and Reform, headed by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, said
it well:
Cut and invest to promote economic growth and keep America
competitive. We should cut red tape and unproductive
government spending that hinders job creation and growth. At
the same time, we must invest in education, infrastructure,
and high-value research and development to help our economy
grow, keep us globally competitive, and make it easier for
businesses to create jobs.
Despite this recommendation, the House has passed a
continuing resolution for FY2011 (H.R. 1) that takes the
opposite approach to research and STEM education. It would
make deep cuts to the NSF, DOE Office of Science, NIST core
programs, and other science agencies which would have a
devastating impact, magnified by being crowded into the less
than seven months remaining in the fiscal year.
For example, reducing funding for the DOE Office of Science
by $886 million, or 18 percent below fiscal year 2010, during
the last seven months of the fiscal year--an effective 31-
percent reduction over the seven-month period--would
adversely impact world-class scientific facilities, basic
research of national importance, and some of the nation's
best scientific and engineering talent. Virtually all DOE
national laboratory user facilities--which the federal
government built at tremendous expense--would cease
operations, affecting some 26,000 scientists and engineers
from universities, industry, and government who rely on these
unique, complex facilities to conduct their research. The DOE
national laboratories would also be forced to furlough or
layoff thousands of workers, including highly-skilled
research staff and blue-collar workers. Finally, the H.R. 1
reduction would slow or bring to a halt the ongoing
construction of a number of advanced research facilities
aimed at keeping the United States at the technological
forefront and American industry from moving research and
development activities abroad, leading to the layoff of
thousands of construction workers and ultimately increasing
construction costs.
At NSF, the 5.2-percent overall cut (an effective 8.9
percent over the last 7 months) would mean that 10,000 fewer
university researchers would receive support for critical
research and education. The 16.4 percent cut to vital STEM
education programs embedded in the 5.2 percent overall NSF
cut would in reality amount to a 28.1 percent reduction
during the last 7 months of the fiscal year. A reduction of
53.3% in funding for major construction projects focused on
developing advanced sensor networks of ocean and terrestrial
observatories would likely lead to schedule delays and cost
increases in future years, and severely jeopardize the jobs
of roughly 200-300 scientists, engineers, and technical
personnel. At a time when our nation desperately needs to
enhance its technological workforce, these reductions are
seriously counterproductive.
The proposed cut to NIST would require the agency to cut
support for contractors by 25% since savings from layoffs
could not be achieved in the current year. Contractors at
NIST play a critical role in many areas, including
cybersecurity research efforts, development of standards for
the Smart Grid, and the upgrade, maintenance, and
construction of NIST facilities. The cut to the Technology
Innovation Program would mean no new awards in the current
fiscal year; these would be concentrated in areas of national
need such as advanced solutions to repairing, inspecting, and
monitoring the nation's infrastructure system and efforts to
remove critical bottlenecks in current manufacturing
processes that impede U.S. competitiveness.
Congress took a very important step for our nation's future
by reauthorizing the America COMPETES Act in 2010,
reaffirming its commitment to the science and
innovation essential to long-term economic growth. We urge
you now to continue implementation funding and to reject
the cuts to research and STEM education adopted by the
House in H.R. 1.
Sincerely,
The Task Force on American Innovation; Acoustical Society
of America; American Anthropological Association; American
Association for the Advancement of Science; American
Association of Physics Teachers; American Astronomical
Society; American Chemical Society; American Geological
Institute; American Geophysical Union; American Institute for
Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE); American
Institute of Physics; American Mathematical Society; American
Physiological Society; American Psychological Association;
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology;
American Society for Engineering Education; American Society
of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE); American
Society of Agronomy; American Society of Civil Engineers;
American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
American Society of Plant Biologists; American Statistical
Association; American Vacuum Society; Applied Materials,
Inc.; Arizona State University; Associated Universities, Inc.
(AUI); Association for Computing Machinery U.S. Public Policy
Council; Association for Women in Mathematics; Association
for Women in Science (AWIS); Association of American
Universities; Association of American Medical Colleges;
Association of Independent Research Institutes; Association
of Public and Land-grant Universities; ASTRA, The Alliance
for Science & Technology Research in America; Battelle;
Binghamton University, State University of New York; Brown
University; California Institute of Technology; Carnegie
Mellon University; Case Western Reserve University; Center
for Innovation in Engineering & Science Education at Stevens
Institute of Technology.
Center for Inquiry; Clemson University; Columbia
University; Computing Research Association; Cornell
University; Council for Chemical Research; Council of Energy
Research and Education Leaders; Council of Environmental
Deans and Directors; Council of Graduate Schools; Cray Inc.;
Crop Science Society of America; CSTEM Teacher and Student
Services, Inc.; Duke University; Ecological Society of
America; Emory University; Federation of American Societies
for Experimental Biology; Geological Society of America
(GSA); Georgia Institute of Technology; Hands On Science
Partnership; Harvard University.
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; IEEE-USA;
Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology; Indiana
University; Intel Corporation; Jefferson Science Associates,
LLC; Johns Hopkins University Center for Educational
Outreach; KDSL--Know.Do.Serve.Learn; Krell Institute;
Maryland Academy of Sciences at the Maryland Science Center;
Maryland MESA; Massachusetts Institute of Technology;
Michigan State University; Michigan Technological University;
Muses3, LLC; National Center for Women and Information
Technology (NCWIT); National Council for Science and the
Environment; National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON),
Inc.; National

[[Page S1472]]

Girls Collaborative Project; National Postdoctoral
Association.
National Science Center; National Science Education
Leadership Association (NSELA); National Science Teachers
Association; National Society of Professional Engineers; New
Mexico State University; New York University; North Carolina
State University; Northeastern University; Oregon State
University; PBS; Princeton University; Purdue University;
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Research!America; Rutgers,
The State University of New Jersey; SACNAS; School Science
and Mathematics Association; Semiconductor Industry
Association; Semiconductor Research Corporation; Sigma Xi,
The Scientific Research Society.
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; Soil
Science Society of America; Southeastern Universities
Research Association; Southern Illinois University System;
SPIE, the International Society for Optics & Photonics;
Stanford University; STEM Education Center University of
Minnesota; Stony Brook University, State University of New
York; Syracuse University; TechAmerica; Texas A&M University;
Texas Tech University; The Association of American Medical
Colleges; The Business-Higher Education Forum; The Campaign
for Environmental Literacy; The Florida State University; The
Johns Hopkins University; The Materials Research Society; The
National Center for Manufacturing Sciences; The Ohio State
University.
The Optical Society; The Science Coalition; The University
of Arizona; The University of Georgia; The University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill; The University of North
Carolina at Greensboro; Tulane University; U.S. Chamber of
Commerce; Universities, Research Association, Inc.;
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR);
University of California System; University of California
Berkeley; University of California Davis; University of
California Irvine; University of California Los Angeles;
University of California Riverside; University of California
San Diego; University of California San Francisco; University
of California Santa Barbara; University of California Santa
Cruz.
University of California Merced; University of Central
Florida; University of Chicago; University of Cincinnati;
University of Hawaii System; University of Illinois;
University of Kansas; University of Maryland; University of
Massachusetts System; University of Michigan; University of
Minnesota; University of Nebraska; University of New
Hampshire; University of New Mexico; University of Oregon;
University of Pennsylvania; University of Pittsburgh;
University of Rochester; University of Tennessee; University
of the District of Columbia; University of Virginia.
University of Washington; University of Wisconsin-Madison;
Vanderbilt University; Vernier Software & Technology;
Washington University in St. Louis; Wayne State University;
West Virginia University; Yale University.
____

Council on Competitiveness,

Washington, DC, February 28, 2011.
Hon. Harry Reid,
Majority Leader, U.S. Senate, Hart Senate Office Bldg.,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Mitch McConnell,
Minority Leader, U.S. Senate, Russell Senate Office Bldg.,
Washington, DC.
Dear Senator Reid and Senator McConnell: As the Senate
begins consideration of a continuing resolution to fund the
federal government through the remainder of the current
fiscal year, we want to express our concern with severe cuts
being proposed to small but critical portions of the federal
research budget that drive economic growth. Robust growth
generates jobs, replacing benefit payments to struggling
families with receipts that accrue from prospering families.
A growing economy will reduce the severity of spending cuts
or tax increases necessary to bring our national finances
back to a sustainable trajectory.
The Council's 2005 Innovate America report urged that
America reverse a precipitous decline in physical science
research funding as a share of our economy. The report also
advocated improving the number and performance of students in
science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)
disciplines. Scientific research and skilled workers are the
basis for new ideas, new technologies, new products and
services, new companies, even entirely new industries. The
American economy cannot compete and grow if we neglect our
capacity to innovate.
Federal investments in these areas are necessary and
affordable, yet current proposals being considered by
Congress would reduce the budgets of the National Science
Foundation, the Department of Energy Office of Science, and
the core accounts of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology. The cuts would be severe to each agency, but
merely symbolic in the context of the larger fiscal
challenge. The combined cuts would save 0.039 percent from
the FY 2011 budget proposed by the President, but would set
back important research, shut down key facilities, and
exacerbate the supply and development of skilled STEM
professionals.
Cuts to the Office of Science could endanger America's
leadership in areas like High Performance Computing, which
hold the potential for groundbreaking discoveries and game
changing industries. How to make greater use of this
comparative advantage we hold in the global economy should be
our focus.
While no program (including entitlement programs),
department or agency should be off the table in the debate as
to how to bring our nation's fiscal house in order, we urge
you to consider the negative implications of cuts to research
at a time when competing nations are investing heavily in
their innovation future.
Sincerely,
Samuel R. Allen,
Chairman and CEO, Deere & Company.
Michael R. Splinter,
Chairman and CEO, Applied Materials, Inc.
William P. Hite,
General President, United Association of Plumbers and
Pipefitters.
Charles O. Holliday, Jr.,
Chairman Bank of America.
Deborah L. Wince-Smith,
President and CEO, Council on Competitiveness.

Mr. BINGAMAN. The first letter is by the Council on Competitiveness,
signed by Sam Allen, chairman and CEO of the Deere Company; Mike
Splinter, chairman and CEO of Applied Materials; Chad Holliday,
chairman of the Bank of America; William Hite, general president of the
United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters; Deborah Wince-Smith,
president and CEO of the Council. That letter succinctly states that:

Scientific research and skilled workers are the basis for
new ideas, new technologies, new products and services, new
companies, even entirely new industries. The American economy
cannot compete and grow if we neglect our capacity to
innovate.

The other letter, from 175 universities, industries, and
laboratories, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, supports the
goals outlined in the America COMPETES Act and asks this Chamber to
reject the cuts adopted by the House funding bill. This letter states
that:

Congress took a very important step for our Nation's future
by reauthorizing the America COMPETES Act in 2010,
reaffirming its commitment to the science and innovation
essential to long-term economic growth. We urge you to
continue implementation funding and to reject the cuts to
research and STEM education adopted by the House in H.R. 1.

I will move to the issue of homeland security. Over the last several
years, we have heard a lot of speeches in the Senate about the need to
bolster border security, particularly along the southern border, and
enhance homeland security capabilities. Unfortunately, the budget the
House has presented falls short in this respect.
The continuing resolution would severely impact the capabilities of
the Department of Homeland Security and reduce essential assistance
that is provided to organizations at the State and local level. This
legislation would be a step back in terms of the progress we are making
in securing our border and ensuring that communities and law
enforcement agencies along the border have the necessary resources to
handle crime and to respond to disasters.
With regard to border security, the House continuing resolution would
reduce planned technological, fencing, and security improvements along
the southwest border. The legislation would reduce interoperable
communication capabilities, and it would cut tactical communications
modernization efforts by 50 percent, making it more difficult for law
enforcement to respond to emergencies in a timely way.
The House bill would also provide funding for 20,500 Border Patrol
agents, rather than the 21,370 the Senate is proposing to fund. This
cutback in Border Patrol agents, I think, is shortsighted.
The measure would also severely impact aviation security initiatives.
The number of advanced imaging technology screening machines, canine
teams, and explosive detection machines would also be slashed by over
50 percent.
FEMA grants that help State and local governments respond to and
prepare for disasters would be reduced by about 20 percent.
The House bill would drastically cut back on DHS's cyber security
plans--cyber security coverage of the Federal civilian networks would
be reduced from about 30 percent to 12 percent.
And with respect to the DHS science and technology directorate, the
CR would reduce funding for research and

[[Page S1473]]

development by about $600 million--which would mean the elimination of
entire research areas, such as border security and cyber security, and
the significant reduction in nuclear and explosives research and
funding for projects at DOE national laboratories--including a
potential reduction of $60 to $80 million for New Mexico's labs. It is
critical that we make the investments in research and development now
to ensure we stay ahead of emerging security threats.
The House CR also drastically cuts DOJ State and local law
enforcement assistance programs that are critical in keeping our
communities safe and preventing crime.
State and locals law enforcement grants are cut by 37 percent and
juvenile justice programs are reduced by 45 percent. The bill also
eliminates funding for the Weed and Seed Program and reduces the COPS
Program by 25 percent--the Republican plan originally called for
completely eliminating the COPS hiring program, which has been
instrumental in keeping police officers in communities across New
Mexico, but Democratic efforts in the House to restore the funding were
successful. The proposed cuts to the Byrne law enforcement grant
program would also result in a $1 million drop in assistance coming to
New Mexico.
With respect to education, H.R. 1 contains draconian cuts that would
limit opportunities for millions of Americans of all ages and
educational levels. It would cut Federal education spending by $11.55
billion, or 16.1 percent. This would be, if approved, the largest
education cut in history.
H.R. 1 would cut Head Start by $1.1 billion--15 percent--resulting
about 2,000 fewer children in New Mexico receiving early childhood
education services that prepare them for success in school.
It would cut title I, which provides academic support to
disadvantaged students in public schools, by $693 million. It would
also cut the Pell grant maximum award by $845, or 15.2 percent. Mr.
President, 57,402 New Mexican students received Pell grants in the
2009-10 academic year, and more are expected to be eligible in coming
years. Many low- and moderate-income students in New Mexico would find
college less affordable and less accessible under H.R. 1.
These House-passed education cuts would devastate New Mexico's public
education system, which is already facing severe State budget cuts. And
they would limit our country's future economic competitiveness and
security.
In contrast, the proposed Senate Democratic year-long continuing
resolution proposal provides stability in Federal education
investments. It maintains the Pell grant maximum award while providing
modest increases for title I grants, Head Start, and other critical
Federal education programs. In today's fiscal climate, H.R. 1's drastic
cuts to education investments are irresponsible and would have dire
consequences for New Mexico and the country.
It is not a question of whether there should be cuts--but whether we
should be smart about where we make the cuts.
To me it is clear that H.R. 1 does not represent smart policy about
where to make these cuts. It represents a plan to mindlessly cut
funding in the remaining 5 months of the current fiscal year in order
to send a ``message'' to the world that we are serious.
In my view H.R. 1 sends a message but not the right one.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of a letter from
a coalition of corporations and businesses be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:

Tapping America's Potential,

Washington, DC, March 9, 2011.
Hon. Harry M. Reid,
Majority Leader, U.S. Senate, Hart Senate Office Building,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Mitch McConnell,
Republican Leader, U.S. Senate, Russell Senate Office
Building, Washington, DC.
Dear Leaders Reid and McConnell: We write to you as
companies and business organizations that understand the
challenge Congress faces to reduce federal budget deficits
and bring the national debt under control.
We are well aware that every constituency will plead its
case to be spared as you make difficult decisions. However,
we believe that leaders set priorities that are in the
national interest and determine where the federal
government's support is essential for U.S. competitiveness,
economic expansion and job growth. The private sector is
doing its part to ensure that the U.S. remains the world's
scientific and technological leader. Even in the midst of
recessions, when revenues are in decline, U.S. businesses
invest in research and development (R&D) because those
activities support future sales and market leadership.
American business largely preserved its R&D intensity
throughout the deep economic downturn of 2008-2009.
The private sector cannot replace, however, the federal
support for basic science and engineering research and math
and science education that undergirds America's national
economic competitiveness. Because these investments are the
key to future productivity growth, they must remain a top
national priority, even while deficit spending is reduced.
The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and
Reform, headed by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, said it
well:
``Cut and invest to promote economic growth and keep
America competitive. We should cut red tape and unproductive
government spending that hinders job creation and growth. At
the same time, we must invest in education, infrastructure,
and high-value research and development to help our economy
grow, keep us globally competitive, and make it easier for
businesses to create jobs.''
That is why we supported passage of the America COMPETES
Act in 2007 and its reauthorization in 2010. COMPETES
addressed a serious national problem and began to reverse
nearly twenty years of flat funding, as a fraction of
national output, for federal innovation investments. We
applaud the Senate for engaging in the hard work that was
necessary to achieve a bipartisan majority to enact that
legislation in the previous Congress.
Even in the context of reducing overall government
spending, you have an opportunity to reaffirm that commitment
and continue to support the goals of the COMPETES
legislation. As the Senate completes Fiscal Year 2011
appropriations, we ask that you put a priority on funding for
the key agencies that support basic scientific research in
the physical sciences and engineering, including the National
Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy (DOE)
Office of Science, and the National Institute of Standards
and Technology, as well as science, technology, engineering,
and math (STEM) education programs contained in the law.
As Congress determines the budget for world-class
scientific facilities in the U.S., basic research of national
importance, and some of the nation's best scientific and
engineering brainpower, our greatest concern is the message
that is communicated about America's commitment to sustaining
its leadership position in science and innovation. Recent
trends indicate that without sustained investment in basic
scientific research and developing U.S. STEM talent, America
is on a path to ceding our premiere position to international
competitors.
In this resource constrained environment, we urge the
Senate to prioritize and support strong funding of basic
scientific research and STEM education programs. They are
essential to U.S. innovation, which in turn produces the
economic growth needed to restore long-term fiscal strength
and national prosperity.
Sincerely,
Accenture; Advanced Micro Devices; Aerospace Industries
Association; Altera Corporation; American Council on
International Personnel; A Plus Education Partnership
(Alabama); ArvinMeritor; Avery Dennison; Battelle;
Bechtel Corporation; The Boeing Company; Business
Coalition for Educational Excellence at the New Jersey
Chamber of Commerce; The Business Council of New York
State; The Business-Higher Education Forum; Business
Roundtable; California Business for Education
Excellence; CEO Council for Growth (Greater
Philadelphia); CH2M Hill; Cognizant Technology
Solutions; Colorado Succeeds; Connecticut Business &
Industry Association, Education Foundation; Corporate
Voices for Working Families; The Dow Chemical Company;
DuPont Company; Eastman Chemical Company; Eaton
Corporation; Florida Council of 100, Inc.; Freescale
Semiconductor Inc.; GLOBALFOUNDRIES; Harris
Corporation; Illinois Business Roundtable; Iowa
Business Council; Johnson City/Jonesborough/Washington
County TN Chamber of Commerce; JPMorgan Chase & Co.;
Macy's, Inc.; Mass Insight Education and Research
Institute; Massachusetts Business Roundtable; The
McGraw-Hill Companies; Medtronic; Micron Technology;
Microsoft; Minority Business Roundtable; Motorola
Solutions, Inc.; National Gypsum Company; NDIA; Nevada
Manufacturers Association; New Mexico Business
Roundtable; Nucor Corporation; Ohio Business
Roundtable; ON Semiconductor Corporation; Oracle; Owens
Corning; Partnership for Learning (Washington);
Partnership for New York City; Pennsylvania Business
Council; The Procter & Gamble Company; Qualcomm;
Rockwell Automation; RR Donnelley; SAP America, Inc.;
Semiconductor Equipment and

[[Page S1474]]

Materials International; Semiconductor Industry
Association; Semiconductor Research Corporation;
Siemens Corporation; Software & Information Industry
Association; State Farm; Technology CEO Council;
Tennessee Business Roundtable; Texas Instruments
Incorporated; Time Warner Cable; Washington Roundtable.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Utah is recognized.
Mr. HATCH. Mr. President in a few hours, this body will vote.
This is a solemn responsibility, one not to be taken lightly.
At Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln reminded Americans that those who died
on that battlefield fought for government of the people, by the people,
and for the people.
We are only here because the people, our constituents, sent us here.
And every time we vote, we represent them. We represent their
aspirations. We represent the dreams of growing families and
entrepreneurs. We represent the interests of taxpayers.
Of course, not all votes are created equal. Some are more important
than others. And in my view, the votes that we are taking today are
transcendent. They are quite literally about the future of this
country.
Are we going to be a country with a constitutionally limited
government; are we going to be a country that limits the burden of
taxation on individuals and families and businesses; or are we going to
become Europe?
Are we going to move toward a full-blown cradle-to-grave nanny
government with the majority of Americans on the public dole and a
small group of individuals bankrolling an ever expanding leviathan
state?
In short, are we going to remain America--a beacon of freedom to the
world or do we aspire to become a second European Union with high
taxes, high spending, and measly economic growth?
Again, I remind you that we represent the aspirations of our
constituents.
I represent the people of Utah. And I can tell you that they do not
wake up in the morning and say--You know what--America would be much
better if we were more like France.
This is no exaggeration.
Right now government spending is at 25 percent of gross domestic
product. And if we do nothing, that number is just going to grow,
pushing past 25 and cruising toward 28 percent of GDP. The last time we
did that was during World War II.
Republicans and Democrats have very different ideas about how to
address this spike in spending.
Either we can step off the pedal, hit the brakes, and bring spending
back in line with historical levels--levels that respect our
Constitution of limited government and respect taxpaying citizens or we
can keep the car on cruise control and drive the car off the cliff.
Republicans want to hit the brakes.
Democrats want to pull a Thelma and Louise with our economy.
I, for one, am not going to sit back and let them do this. Let's be
clear about what the Democrats and Republicans are proposing.
H.R. 1, the bill that passed the House, appropriates $1.026 trillion
in nonemergency discretionary spending.
The alternative offered up by my Democratic colleagues would
appropriate, $1.079 trillion in total nonemergency discretionary
spending.
H.R. 1, the bill passed by the new Republican majority in the House--
a majority that most closely represents the views of millions of
Americans who are genuinely scared about our Nation's fiscal
trajectory--would reduce spending by $57 billion over the current
continuing resolution.
The Democratic alternative would reduce spending by just $4.7
billion.
You will hear Democrats complain about the draconian cuts in the
House-passed H.R. 1.
This is nonsense.
The fact is, when you look at Federal nonemergency discretionary
spending as a whole--which has exploded under Democrats' control of
Congress and with President Obama's acquiescence in their big spending
ways--H.R. 1 provides modest cuts.
The people of Utah, and the people of this country, understand this.
So now that Republicans are winning the game on spending cuts,
Democrats are seeking to move the goal posts.
It is now being suggested that we can bridge the gap between these
two bills by going after entitlements and tax expenditures.
Don't get me wrong, we need to address both. But I can tell the
Members on the other side now that we are not going to let you shift
the debate.
This is a debate about discretionary spending. This is a debate about
low-hanging fruit.
Last week, the Government Accountability Office issued a report
detailing possibly hundreds of billions of dollars in government waste
and bloat.
There is plenty of fat to be cut in the discretionary budget, and
doing so would give our constituents and Members of Congress the
courage to go after bigger fish.
Yet, Democrats can't find it in themselves to cut an additional $50
billion when nonemergency discretionary spending is well over $1
trillion.
Some are now proposing that we get into tax expenditures. Tax
expenditures are a debate for another time.
Nondefense discretionary spending has grown by 24 percent over the
last couple of years. We can cut that back significantly. We need to do
so, and Americans understand that going back to 2008 spending levels is
not the end of the world.
I also want to correct the record with respect to H.R. 1 and Medicare
Advantage.
Yesterday, Secretary Sebelius sent a letter to my colleague, the
chairman of the Finance Committee, Senator Baucus, suggesting that H.R.
1 would have a detrimental impact on Medicare Advantage.
This assertion is Orwellian. The Secretary knows full well that
ObamaCare cuts more than $200 billion from an MA program that currently
serves nearly 12 million seniors. According to the administration's own
Chief Actuary, these devastating cuts will reduce enrollment in this
popular program by 50 percent. Furthermore, the CBO has also found that
these cuts would reduce important benefits by 50 percent for seniors
enrolled in the program.
H.R. 1 is intended to halt the harmful cuts to seniors in the MA
program.
Suggesting otherwise, as the Secretary did, is both inaccurate and
risks confusing millions of seniors.
H.R. 1 is a good bill. It is solid and responsible. And I will be
supporting it. But it is only a starting point.
The fact is, we are going to need many more cuts in discretionary
spending.
The American people--the people who sent us here--have not signed on
to the Democrats' project of Europeanizing the United States economy.
Citizens in every State want to roll back spending, reduce the tax
burden on families and businesses, and--restore America's promise of
opportunity and economic growth.
My colleagues on the other side of the aisle need to get with the
program. We will be cutting spending. And we need to cut a lot of it.
It may not all happen in the next 2 years.
The American people might need to speak again and send people to
Washington in 2012 who will accurately represent their interests.
This is a big vote today. And when we look back, I think Americans
will say: It was just a beginning.
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Udall of New Mexico). The clerk will call
the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. CARPER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. CARPER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for up to
5 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. CARPER. Mr. President, I used to be a Governor. I sometimes say I
used to be somebody. As Governor, you had to propose budgets, you had
to balance budgets, and you had to work with the legislature. I
followed Mike Castle, and he followed Pete DuPont. We focused very hard
on fiscal responsibility. During the 8 years I was Governor, we had
eight balanced budgets in a row. For 7 years, we cut taxes. A couple of
years, we actually paid down some debt. We ended up with a triple-A
credit rating for the first time in the history of the State of
Delaware. So I

[[Page S1475]]

feel as though I know something about this issue. So do a number of my
colleagues.
We are having a lot of debate, as we should, over what our spending
plans are going to be in this continuing resolution to fund the
government for another 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months. That is well and
good and important. We need to get started and demonstrate that we are
able to reduce this deficit and reduce our debt. We need to keep in
mind that while what we do in the next 6 months is important, what is
really important is what we do in the next 6 years and beyond that.
We had a commission put together that a bunch of us supported. We
created the deficit reduction commission, chaired by Erskine Bowles and
Alan Simpson. They gave us a pretty good roadmap of how to get to a
more fiscally responsible place in the next few years, cutting some $4
trillion out of the budget deficit. What they said is that pretty much
everything needs to be on the table--domestic spending, defense
spending, entitlement programs, tax expenditures, tax credits, tax
deductions, tax rates. They have suggested a proposal that cuts the
deficit by $4 trillion over 10 years, about two-thirds of that on the
spending side and maybe one-third or so on the revenue side. I think it
is a pretty good approach, and I commend the 18 members of the
commission who endorsed that approach.
One of my core values is, everything I do, I know I can do better. I
think the same is true of all my colleagues. Frankly, the same is true
of Federal programs. What we need to do is to replace what a lot of
people think we have in Washington--a culture of spendthrift--and we
need to replace it with a culture of thrift. We need to look in every
nook and cranny of the Federal Government and all programs and say: Can
we get better results for less money or can we get a better result by
at least not spending more money? Partnering with the General
Accountability Office, GAO, OMB, with all the inspectors general, with
nonprofit groups such as Citizens Against Government Waste, what can we
do to get better results for less money? That is part of what we need
to do long term. We still will have tough decisions, but at the end of
the day, we need to save some money, carve out some money. If we have
to spend an extra dollar or two, where should we invest that money?
There is a guy named John Chambers, whom the Presiding Officer knows,
and some of us met with him earlier today. He is CEO of Cisco, a big
technology company. He likes to say that there are two things we need
to do if we are to be successful as a nation, with a 21st-century
economy: No. 1, invest in people so we have the most productive
workforce, smart workers, whether postdocs or people with high school
degrees--productive workforce; No. 2, invest in our infrastructure.
Last year, the transportation infrastructure in this country got a D
as in ``delta''--not good--a D as in ``dumb.'' That is where our
infrastructure is in this country. We need to invest in our
infrastructure, not just roads, highways, bridges, rails, and ports,
but broadband, water, wastewater--broadly defined infrastructure.
The third thing we need to do is invest in research and development
so we can continue to be an innovation economy. The President said that
if we are going to be successful in the 21st century, we need to
outeducate, outinnovate, outcompete the rest of the world.
We need to invest in our workforce, our very young kids and folks who
are off to college and postsecondary training.
We also need to invest in our infrastructure, not just roads,
highways, bridges, and rails, but infrastructure described broadly.
Finally, we need to invest in R&D so we can invest and outcompete the
best of the world.
At the end of the day, we have to create what I call a nurturing
environment for job creation, for job preservation. We need a nurturing
environment. Part of that is our obligation working with the private
sector and others, States and local governments across the country.
Right now, our debt as a percentage of GDP has climbed to 65 percent,
I am told. Sixty-five percent--our debt as a percentage of GDP. The
last time it was that high was at the end of World War II. It is the
only time it has been that high--65 percent. Other countries getting
into that kind of territory are Greece and Ireland. That is not smart.
They found out the hard way. We need to learn from them, and this is
the time to do it. It requires all of us to stand and do what we know
we need to do, to share in the sacrifice, with everything on the table.
Let's use the deficit commission as a good role model. Let's ask the
executive branch to provide the leadership they need to provide.
I think my time has expired, Mr. President. I note the presence of
the Senator from Kentucky so he can take the floor as my time has
expired.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Kentucky is recognized.
Mr. PAUL. Mr. President, we are discussing and debating two different
alternatives--one from the other side of the aisle and one from our
side--about what we should do about the budget deficit. We have a
projected $1.65 trillion deficit in the next year. I think both
alternatives are inadequate and do not significantly alter or change
our course.
On the Democrats' side, we have a proposal to cut about $5 billion to
$6 billion for the rest of the year. To put that in perspective, we
borrow $4 billion a day. So the other side is offering up cuts equal to
one day's borrowing. I think it is insignificant, and it will not alter
the coming and looming debt crisis we face. On our side of the aisle,
we have done more. The cuts are more significant, but they also pale in
comparison to the problem. If we were to adopt the President's
approach, we would have a $1.65 trillion deficit in 1 year. If we adopt
our approach, we are going to have a $1.55 trillion deficit in 1 year.
Both approaches do not significantly alter or delay the crisis that is
coming.
It is interesting, when we talk about cuts, everybody seems to be
giddy around here, saying this is the first time we have talked about
cuts. It is better and it sounds good, but, guess what. We are not even
really cutting spending. What we are talking about is cutting the rate
of increase of spending. The baseline of spending is going to go up at
7.3 percent, according to the CBO. We are talking about reducing that
increase to a 6.7-percent increase. We are talking about cutting the
rate of increase of government. The problem is, it is not enough. Our
deficit is growing by leaps and bounds. Our national debt is $14
trillion. Our national debt is now equal to our entire economy. Our
gross domestic product equals our national debt.
I think the President is tone-deaf on this issue. We had an election,
and in the election the people said: We are concerned about out-of-
control spending. We are concerned about massive deficits. We are
concerned about passing this debt on to our kids and our grandkids.
The President recently proposed a 10-year budget, a 10-year plan for
spending. He proposes that we spend $46 trillion. That means they are
not getting it. Official Washington is not getting what the people are
saying, and they are not getting how profound the problems are.
Spending $46 trillion?
The President's plan will add $13 trillion to the debt. The
Republicans say: Oh, ours is a lot better. Theirs will add $12 trillion
to the debt. It is out of control, and neither plan will do anything to
significantly alter things.
We are spending $10 billion a day. In order to reform things, in
order to change things around, we will have to come to grips with the
idea of what government should be doing. What are the constitutional
functions of government? What were the enumerated powers of the
Constitution? What powers did the Constitution give to the Federal
Government? And then we examine what we are actually doing, what we are
spending money on that is not constitutional or should not be done here
or should be left to the States and the people respectively.

Once upon a time, our side believed education was a function of the
States and localities. It is not mentioned in the Constitution that the
Federal Government should have anything to do with education. Does it
mean we are opposed to education? No. We just think it should be done
at the State and local level.

[[Page S1476]]

Ronald Reagan was a champion of eliminating the Department of
Education. It was part of the party platform for many years. Then we
were in charge after 2000, and we doubled the size of the Department of
Education.
If you are serious about balancing the budget, if you are serious
about the debt, you have to look at taking departments, such as the
Department of Education, and sending them back to the States and the
localities. You have to look at programs that are growing by leaps and
bounds, such as Medicaid and food stamps, cap them, block grant them,
and send them back to the States. The States can manage these issues
better. The closer they are to the people, the better managed they will
be.
The other compromise that needs to occur--and this is something our
side needs to compromise on--our side has blindly said that the
military should get anything it wants and it is a blank check: What do
you want? Here it is.
We have increased military spending by 120 percent since 2001. We
have doubled military spending. I am for a strong national defense. I
believe it is a constitutional function of the Federal Government to
provide for our national defense. I think it is the preeminent
enumerated power, the thing we should be doing. But that being said, we
cannot every 8 years double the Defense Department, double the military
spending.
It is also ultimately the compromise. Within the space of a few
years, everyone here will come to an agreement, not because we want to
but because we are forced to by the events and by the drama of the debt
crisis. It will come. It has come to other nations. When it comes to
us, the compromise that both sides of the aisle will have to work out,
the other side of the aisle will have to admit that we cannot have
enormous domestic spending, and our side of the aisle will have to
admit that we cannot give a blank check to the military.
We will also have to look at entitlements. Everyone is afraid to say
how we reform entitlements. But there are two inescapable facts with
entitlements: We are living longer, and a lot of people born after
World War II are getting ready to retire. These are inescapable
demographic facts. We have to address them. If we simply do nothing, if
we do not address the entitlements, within a decade, entitlements will
account for the entire budget and interest. There will be no money left
for anything.
Right now, the argument is about all these other programs. There will
be no money left for any of these programs if we do nothing. It is
going to take both sides of the aisle grappling with this issue and
admitting the rules and eligibility will have to change for Social
Security and likely for Medicare. If we do it now, we can do it
gradually. If we start now, we can gradually let the age rise for
Medicare and Social Security for those 55 and under. Young people have
already acknowledged this is going to happen. Ask young people anywhere
across America: Do you think you are going to have Social Security when
you retire? Do you think you are going to get it at 67? Most young
people acknowledge it is broken. It is broken so badly that the only
way to fix it and continue is we have to look at eligibility. But so
many people have said: Oh, we cannot talk about entitlements. You will
be unelected. You will be unelectable if you talk about entitlement
reform.
The President still makes this mistake. He will not lead us. He will
not talk and give a leadership role to entitlement reform. Someone must
do it. We must stand up and be bold because the longer these problems
fester, the longer we allow them to accumulate, the bigger the problems
become and the more dramatic the answers must be.
If we look at Greece and these other nations that have faced a debt
crisis, their problem came to a head all of a sudden, and they changed
the age on social security like that. If we want to do it gradually and
let people plan for their future, we need to start now before we enter
into a crisis.
My problem with the discussion and the debate at this point is that I
do not think either side recognizes the enormity of the problem or the
immensity of the problem. Even people who would be considered to be
those of the mainstream--former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan
said there is a 50-percent chance there will be some kinds of monetary
problems, significant monetary problems, even to the point of crisis,
in the next few years. Many people have said Japan is locked in crisis.
That crisis is coming because of the debt they have accumulated. When
that comes to America, do we want to have government by crisis? Already
we can't even pass a budget. We can't pass appropriations bills. Our
bills do not even go to the committees anymore. They come to the floor
and we put a patchwork quilt on them. There is a chance this winds up
being 2 more weeks. We have government by 2-week edict. It is not the
way to run government.

If you want to have a significant plan for changing things, send
bills through the committee. If you want a realistic way of running
government, have appropriations bills. If you want to be someone who
believes in good, responsible government, for goodness' sake, pass a
budget. We didn't pass a budget last year.
This chart shows how big the problem is. I wish I had a magnifying
glass because that is the only way you could see the other side's
proposal--$6 billion in cuts. It is 1 day's borrowing. It is not even 1
day's spending they are talking about. It is insignificant, it is
inconsequential, and it will do nothing to delay or alter the looming
debt crisis.
Look at the other proposal from our side. It is bigger. You can
actually see it without a magnifying glass. But look how it is dwarfed
by 1 year's problem. I recently proposed $500 billion in cuts. When I
went home and spoke to the people of my State, spoke to the tea party
people, they said $500 billion is not enough. They are right--$500
billion is one-third of 1 year's problem. Up here, that is way too
bold, but it is not even enough.
We have to counterbalance and understand the alternatives.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has used 10 minutes of time.
Mr. PAUL. If we do nothing, all the programs people are so fond of
extolling and saying we need money for will be gone.
So I implore the American public and those here to look at the
problem and to say to Congress: You are not doing enough. You must cut
more.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I come to the floor today as a Senator
from California to speak about how damaging I believe the House
continuing resolution would be for the people and economy of my State.
I would first like to begin by expressing my approval that Congress
is finally talking about controlling the deficit. I have been on the
record for many years about our need to rein in spending, and we are
finally moving in the right direction.
I believe that government--in some ways--must adopt some of the
discipline of a business. Businesses face tough choices about how to
allocate resources. Businesses thrive when there is consistency and a
commitment to planning for the future. These are things that have been
lacking in our budget process of late. And that needs to change.
The 2-week continuing resolution under which we are currently
operating would not work for any business in California, and it does
not work for the Federal Government.
That being said, I must add this warning: we cannot balance the
budget on the backs of California's families and businesses.
And that, unfortunately, is precisely what the House-passed
continuing resolution does.
In short, H.R. 1 is budget-cutting by ideology. If our friends on the
other side of the Capitol did not like a program, they cut it.
Unfortunately, cutting by this sort of political bias left us with a
bill that will slash hundreds of thousands of jobs--700,000 jobs by
some economic estimates--and many of those in the private sector.
Even worse for my home State of California, the programs that House
Republicans chose to cut form the backbone of our job-creation strategy
and the heart of many programs on which our working families rely.
Public health and education programs will be especially hard hit.
The budget for community health centers is cut by more than half. In
California, these clinics serve 2.8 million patients every year--and
for

[[Page S1477]]

many, they are the only health care option available. These cuts would
force clinics to fire 28,000 doctors and staff.
Funding for Head Start is slashed by 14 percent, depriving 24,000
low-income children in California access to early childhood services.
Thousands of teachers and staff will lose their jobs and parents will
lose a reliable child care option.
And the title X Family Planning Program is completely eliminated. For
California, that means 1.2 million individuals lose health care,
counseling and education services. And this ends the program that has
been credited with preventing more than 400,000 abortions in 2008 more
than 80,000 of those in California.
H.R. 1 would also sacrifice tens of thousands of California jobs. We
have the second-highest unemployment rate in the Nation, and this bill
will send us in the wrong direction.
Two key priorities for California are in the crosshairs: our clean
energy sector and the modernization of our aging infrastructure. And
both of these are proven job-creators.
A vital Energy Department loan program will be lost, cutting $40
billion worth of investment. By ending this one program, California
developers will be forced to halt 24 projects, killing 76,000 jobs.
Funding for energy research and development will be slashed by $1.9
billion, meaning a loss of more than $200 million for California's
laboratories and universities. That means a direct loss of 9,400 jobs
and enduring damage to our leadership as a global innovator.
Funding for a high-speed rail initiative will be eliminated, and $1
billion already sent to California will be rescinded. This would likely
end California's hopes for a high-speed rail line, and in the process
eliminate 20,000 future jobs.
The bill also rescinds funding for nationally significant
transportation infrastructure investments. For California, this ends
six projects totaling $59 million, including a Los Angeles metro line
and a rail project at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.
As the economy continues its fragile recovery, we simply cannot
afford to make dramatic spending cuts driven purely by political
ideology. Unfortunately, this is the approach employed by House
Republicans.
I support a different course in the Senate. I believe we must pair
responsible, targeted spending cuts with smart investments that will
support California and the Nation's economic recovery, preserve jobs
and protect families.
The Senate bill, introduced last week, takes a more pragmatic
approach. Like the Republican plan, the Senate bill imposes significant
spending cuts, but it does so through prudent action that will not
jeopardize our Nation's economic recovery.
The Senate bill cuts $51 billion from the President's fiscal year
2011 budget request, eliminates earmarks and advances additional
spending cuts proposed by the President for fiscal year 2012. However,
in contrast to the House bill, this legislation continues support for
critical health, infrastructure, education, and energy investments, and
provides necessary funding for essential services the American people
depend upon every day.
Yes, Mr. President, we need to rein in spending. But we can't do that
if we use a political litmus test to pick and choose which programs to
cut.
I encourage my colleagues to join with me in opposition to these
short-sighted and damaging budget cuts.
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, today we are faced with two alternative
versions of a fiscal year 2011 funding bill. The version that came over
from the other body contains an endless list of problems. It slashes
fundamental programs that are important to the health and well-being of
every America, unleashes attacks on our bedrock environmental laws that
protect clear and safe water as well as healthy air, and undermine our
efforts to reassert America's leading role in education, research and
innovation. Casting a vote against this bill will be easy.
The alternative bill offered by the Senate Appropriations Committee
is dramatically better. It is a good faith effort at tackling the
deficit while maintaining critical investments in America's future.
This bill, however, is not without its problems.
The Senate version of the fiscal year 2011 spending bill restores a
substantial portion of the cuts to the nation's water infrastructure
contained in H.R. 1. I applaud the committee's effort to protect this
critical investment, but it doesn't go far enough. As a nation, we see
650 water main breaks per day. That is the rate of one every 2 minutes
and results in the loss of $2.6 billion in water annually. The story on
wastewater systems is equally dismal, resulting in sewage overflows and
broken pipes on a daily basis. Our drinking water and wastewater
infrastructure has been given a grade of D- from the American Society
of Civil Engineers.
These system failures aren't just expensive, they are also dangerous.
Raw sewage flows into our rivers and streams, forcing local health
authorities to warn local residents to avoid contact with rivers,
beaches and lakes. Drinking water systems are forced to issue boil-
water advisories to compensate for broken systems. We must do better.
The investments in water infrastructure in the Senate bill are a step
in the right direction, but we should be doing more.
There are other examples as well. The cuts to the conservation
programs in the Senate version are disproportionately large. The
Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations Program at USDA, for example,
is eliminated entirely.
We need to make hard choices about our funding priorities. But we
shouldn't be doing so without also having a frank discussion about tax
loopholes that cost us billions of dollars annually.
And finally, the Senate bill is a dramatic improvement over H.R. 1 in
terms of environmental policy. The other body approved legislative
riders that would stop EPA from being able to protect the air Americans
breathe every day and it would stop dead in its tracks the Chesapeake
Bay restoration effort. The Senate bill, to its credit, eliminates
these terrible policy directives. The Senate bill, however, does
include a provision that would legislatively de-list the gray wolf from
the endangered species list.
I continue to oppose legislative efforts to delist endangered
species. We have a regulatory process that is based on scientific data,
and we should use it. All that is needed is for the States in the
Northern Rockies to submit appropriate management plans to the
Department of Interior so that the law can work the way Congress
intended.
I have no problem today in voting against the draconian cuts and
terrible public policy riders in H.R. 1. My support for the Senate
alternative, which is dramatically better, is tempered by my concerns.
My vote for the Senate substitute is a reluctant aye. As we move
forward to enact a fiscal 2011 spending bill, I hope we will be able to
address the issue I have outlined here to make sure that the American
people are getting the kinds of investments and savings that they
deserve.
Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, I rise today to express my dismay at
some of the irresponsible cuts in H.R. 1, particularly the elimination
of a program of personal importance, The Corporation for National and
Community Service which is home to the AmeriCorps and Volunteers in
Service to America--VISTA--programs. I stand by a commitment to reduce
the deficit, but we cannot be irresponsible in cuts to such essential
programs that help the people of West Virginia and the rest of the
United States.
As you may know, I came to West Virginia in 1964 as a VISTA worker
which is now a part of the Corporation along with other public service
organizations. My decision to join VISTA was one of the most important
decisions of my life. While my goal was to help the people of Emmons,
WV, that community came to help me much, much more. It gave me a new
focus of public service which has led me into a fulfilling and
meaningful career. Sargent Shriver was the shining light and soul of
VISTA and many other public service initiatives. Through these
programs, he inspired me to find my true home in West Virginia, and I
have no doubt that he profoundly impacted the lives of many other
volunteers. VISTA, AmeriCorps and all the public service programs under
the Corporation provide opportunity for everyone from young people to
seniors. As a young man, it changed the direction of my

[[Page S1478]]

life. It provides service opportunities which can provide educational
vouchers and jobs skills.
There were over a thousand applicants in 2010 to the West Virginia
branch of AmeriCorps. I cannot support the continuing resolution from
the House which eliminates this program and says ``no thanks'' to them.
Since 1994, over 9,300 West Virginians have served over 14 million
hours in efforts to better communities across the state. Over 7,600
disadvantaged children and youth in West Virginia will be left without
a tutor or mentor, directly impeding their ability to achieve the
academic gains needed to succeed. This not only damages communities
today but also damages our future workforce; we cannot rob young people
of a better future.
By eliminating AmeriCorps and VISTA, we are missing an opportunity to
develop lifelong public servants and leaders--the public servants and
leaders our country needs now more than ever before. Nationally,
through the elimination of AmeriCorps and VISTA, we would lose the
volunteer service of nearly 75,000 people. Across the country,
elimination of AmeriCorps and VISTA would have a devastating impact.
I was told of the story of Elvin Campbell, an AmeriCorps member and
military veteran, serving in Charleston, WV. Elvin works with homeless
individuals, providing them with life skills, helping them prepare a
resume, search for a job and successfully budget their finances.
Last year, Elvin helped 127 people go from being unemployed to self-
sufficient, contributing members of society. Without Elvin, there are
127 people who would otherwise be unemployed, an investment in
AmeriCorps is an investment in jobs across this country. Elvin is one
of 10 veterans doing work like this throughout the Charleston area.
Through AmeriCorps, these military heroes help grow our economy and
move my State, and our Nation forward.
We talk quite a bit about jobs around here. Elvin's example shows us
that dedicated public servants can give our citizens the necessary
skills to attain jobs throughout West Virginia. H.R. 1 eliminates
AmeriCorps which was organized under President Clinton and expanded
more than 50 percent by President Bush. Democratic and Republican
administrations alike have realized it is a great investment, leading
to over 60 million volunteer hours last year. In West Virginia alone,
AmeriCorps volunteers have served over a million hours last year,
improving West Virginia communities across the State.
Without AmeriCorps, West Virginia would lose 800 AmeriCorps
servicemembers and 115 year-long VISTA slots, translating into over
691,000 service hours, combined. The loss of the VISTA slots is
estimated to result in the loss of 18,720 volunteers providing over
397,000 hours of service to West Virginia communities. Each state would
face similar cuts and be faced with the consequences.
I urge my colleagues not to support these cuts in H.R. 1. Of course,
this program is just one of many the continuing resolution approved by
the House proposes for elimination. I am willing to work together with
my colleagues to identify real savings, but I cannot support H.R. 1 or
the reckless cuts it proposes.
I thank the Chair.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Missouri.
Mrs. McCASKILL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for
up to 5 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mrs. McCASKILL. Mr. President, we need to make serious and
substantial cuts and we also need to compromise. Cuts and compromise
need to be the dialog occurring across the aisle and with each other. I
have great respect for some of my colleagues on the other side who say
we have a structural debt problem and we have to get to it. Certainly
we do.
But it is completely wrong that we would do massive cuts all in one
fell swoop right now with our economy in the position that it is. That
would cause as big a crisis as our failure to deal with our long-term
structural debt. So that is where the compromise part comes in. We have
to do significant cuts now, we have to put everything on the table and
look at our long-term debt structure and we need to figure out how we
do that in a bipartisan way, because we are going to fail our country
if no one is willing to compromise.
The House resolution, frankly, was not smart in the way they did the
cuts. No one in any business would take all the cuts out of one small
sliver of their business. They would look at their entire business to
try to find cost savings. It was not smart that all the pain was in one
place, and they are killing off the very part of our budget that has
the best chance of increasing economic activity in this country--the
building of roads and bridges, the educating of our kids, the research
and the science and development. So while their cuts were more
substantial than the Democrats' plan in the Senate, they were not smart
cuts. They did not spread the pain around.
On the other hand, the Senate has not gone far enough. It is,
frankly, disappointing to me. I still think there are way too many
people in denial around here about the nature of the problem and how
serious it is, and I don't think we are demonstrating to the American
people we understand the nature of the problem when we present an
alternative proposal with such a small number of cuts. The sweet spot
is somewhere in between these two approaches. Pain needs to be spread
more broadly throughout the budget so the pain is not so acute in one
area of the budget, and we need to look at all the programs, put it all
on the table, and we need to be able to compromise.
Let me point out where I think some of the compromises could come
easy. The Senate version, which I will not be able to support--the
Senate Democratic version--increases the President's budget in 15
different programs. Think about that. We are trying to cut, and our
appropriators have come up with a plan to increase 15 of the
President's budget requests by a total of $2.6 billion. We are going
the wrong direction. We should be, at a minimum, cutting what the
President has recommended cutting. Frankly, I think we need to go even
further.
The Pentagon. Let me give one example that came up in a hearing
yesterday so people understand there are real savings. We have a
Pentagon that we can't audit, and we haven't been able to audit for
decades. It is frustrating that we don't have business systems in place
that allow transparency and that allow wise choices in terms of the
expenditure of dollars. In a hearing yesterday in the Armed Services
Committee, I talked with the head of the Navy and the Marines about a
system they are putting in place to track equipment. Good idea; right?
We want to track equipment. The Army is also putting in a system to
track equipment. Here is the rub. They share equipment. You might think
these two systems will be able to talk to each other. Oh, no, they have
been done separately. They do not talk to each other. It is different
software. We are going to have to spend more money for a mechanism so
the two systems' tracking equipment--sometimes the equipment they are
sharing--can see what is going on. By the way, each of these systems is
billions of dollars. We could save billions of dollars by saying to the
Army and to the Marines: Use the same software. Use the same program.
That is the kind of savings we can find in the Pentagon if we just
look at the GAO high-risk list. The Air Force has been trying for years
to put resource management software in place. They are saying they
can't even get there until 2017. Are you kidding?
We have to be more efficient with the dollars we spend at the
Pentagon, and we will not be if we always say yes and we never say no.
There will be no incentive to find savings or to find more jointness
among our different military branches in terms of administrative costs
if we always say yes and never say no. So the pain has to be felt at
the Pentagon too. We cannot do this without pain being felt at the
Pentagon.
It has to be across the board, it has to be more substantial than
$6.5 billion, and we all have to be willing to compromise.
I will be voting no on both proposals for that reason, but I am
anxious to sit down, I am anxious to sit down at the table and find
those compromises.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has used 5 minutes.

[[Page S1479]]

Mrs. McCASKILL. I wish to make real cuts and move forward in a
responsible way to show the American people we get it.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Nebraska is recognized.
Mr. NELSON of Nebraska. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to
speak for up to 8 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. NELSON of Nebraska. Mr. President, I rise to speak about the two
budget bills we will be voting on shortly that purport to cut spending
in Washington. I appreciate the comments of my good friend from
Missouri, Senator McCaskill, in pointing out many of the shortcomings
of the two pieces of legislation.
I am here to deliver a eulogy. Both bills are dead, and they deserve
to be dead. One bill cuts too little; the other bill has too much hate.
Neither one is serious. Most important, neither will pass, and they
shouldn't pass because they are unfair. They are not in the best
interests of Nebraskans and taxpayers across our country. About the
only thing they are serious about is guaranteeing shutting down the
government.
Nebraskans want serious spending cuts, but these bills are loaded
with tricks, treats, gimmicks, and games. On one side, we see a bill
that simply cuts too little. It purports to cut spending by $50
billion, but when you push through the thicket of gimmicks, it actually
only cuts about $6 billion. In a budget of more than $1 trillion, a cut
of about one-half percent isn't enough. It will not get runaway
government spending under control, nor will it begin to bring down that
unsustainable national debt that endangers America's future. To win my
support, there needs to be more cuts in spending and they need to be
real and reasonable.
That brings me to the other bill. The other bill is H.R. 1. It is
chock-full of provisions pushing a political agenda snuck into the bill
in the middle of the night. One provision is an attack on America's
farmers. It aims to block allowing the use of more American-made
ethanol in our cars and trucks. Today, cars and trucks can use gas with
10 percent ethanol. The government has just approved a 15-percent
ethanol blend. There is no cost, but that didn't stop some from
sneaking in an unfair ban.
Cutting back on ethanol at a time when gas prices are above $3.50 a
gallon nationwide, and rising fast, is the wrong thing to do. Worse, it
is a gift to foreign oil. Looking at all the violence and turmoil we
are seeing on TV in a key oil-producing region of the world, it seems
the worst possible gift at the worst possible time.
Another political agenda item in H.R. 1 will eliminate public
television in Nebraska--an educational resource for our citizens and an
informational lifeline in many parts of Nebraska.
This bill makes other sneaky attempts to push a political agenda. It
eliminates poison control centers, blocks a consumer database people
might use to determine a product's safety, and keeps high-speed
Internet service out of rural areas.
H.R. 1 also limits urban homeland security funds and sets the limit
arbitrarily at 25 cities. That will likely bar any future funding to
the largest city in my State. While some might not think of Omaha as a
terror target, let me tell you it is the home to the U.S. Strategic
Command, a major national telecommunications hub, and is a key rail and
highway crossroads for freight and transportation.
On the spending side, the House bill makes unfair cuts to the States,
including mine, that will cost Nebraskans hundreds of jobs and, indeed,
unnecessary hardship. For example, more than 1,200 Nebraska children
would lose access to Head Start, which has proven to help students
complete high school. The bill cuts Pell tuition grants that 43,000
Nebraskans need to afford college.
In addition, the $75 million cut for homeless veterans' housing
vouchers seems absurd. To quote the Director of the Omaha Veterans
Hospital: ``This is a very big deal for those veterans and the
community.'' This could impact 10,000 homeless veterans nationwide. In
Omaha alone, 240 veterans have used these vouchers, and there are
likely 600 more who need this help to find permanent housing.
After all is said and done, the bottom line is Washington hasn't
gotten serious. I will not be held accountable for the failings of the
House and the Senate.
I can, however, be held accountable for 1 of the 12 spending bills
that fund the government. As chairman of the Senate Appropriations
Legislative Branch Subcommittee, I have the responsibility to oversee
the spending bill for Congress. We cut spending last year, we are
cutting spending by 5 percent this year, and we will be back for more
cuts next year.
Last year, Senator Murkowski and I did this before all the campaign-
style speeches about cutting began. It was clear she didn't bring a
political agenda to the table, and I hope she knows I didn't either.
This year, in working with Senator Hoeven--also a former Governor, as I
am--who is now ranking member on the subcommittee, I have every reason
to believe he also will be serious and fair as we reduce spending in
next year's budget.
Cutting the spending for Congress--for our offices, committees and
staff, our buildings, our police--and our efforts on this Hill is an
effort to lead by example. Our committee's bipartisan example could
serve as a model for how the other 11 spending bills are handled. Our
message, to paraphrase Harry Truman, is: The buck shrinks here.
Soon, we will vote on the two spending bills. One has done nothing to
attract Republicans; the other has done nothing to attract
Democrats. In the end, we have bills that will divide. They do not
unite Congress. For the reasons I have given, I will vote against both.

Then what is next? Washington needs to put aside all the games and
gimmicks, the treats and tricks, and come together and do what is right
for the American people by passing the budget. They deserve it, they
are owed it, and it is now time.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon is recognized.
Mr. MERKLEY. Mr. President, this debate today is all about jobs. The
House Republican budget which we will soon be voting on in this body
will destroy 700,000 American jobs. That is the estimate put forward by
Mark Zandi, who advised John McCain's Presidential campaign and now
works for the nonpartisan Moody's Group.
That sort of estimate is not just a voice in the wilderness, it is
repeated by major group after major group. Ben Bernanke, Chairman of
the Fed, said last week the plan would cost ``a couple hundred thousand
jobs.'' Goldman Sachs analyst Alec Phillips put forth an estimate that
said ``this House job-killing plan will reduce, in the second and third
quarters of the next year, the economy of the United States by 1.5 to 2
percentage points.''
What is 2 percent of a $15 trillion economy? It is $300 billion.
Whether you view it in terms of the gross domestic product or you
view it in terms of the number of jobs of Americans taken away by the
job-killing Republican plan, this bill, H.R. 1, that we will be voting
on later today, is a disaster.
I want us to focus on this number because I can tell you, folks back
home in Oregon want to create jobs. They want us to put America back to
work. They don't want to have a plan put forward that continues to pay
enormous bonuses to the billionaires of Wall Street and creates
enormous special tax bonuses for the billionaires who are making their
tax returns while taking out this huge economic meltdown on working
people.
Let's review how this all came to pass. You will recall that during
the second Bush administration there was a plan to launch two foreign
wars and not pay for them, and then proceed to create Medicare Part D
and not pay for it, and then to give bonus tax breaks to millionaires
and billionaires and not pay for it, and reverse an enormous annual
surplus and turn it into an enormous annual deficit and, in the
process, produce a very tiny, modest expansion, in which working people
actually lost ground. That expansion all went to the very top.
That was just the beginning, before my colleagues across the aisle
decided they are going to deregulate retail mortgages in order to ramp
up predatory mortgages, produce a huge balloon

[[Page S1480]]

in the real estate market, deregulate Wall Street so they could proceed
to securitize those mortgages and have those blow up in financial
institutions across America and have the economy melt down in 2008-
2009. That is how we got where we are right now.
Rather than take on a plan that creates jobs in America, the plan is
to eliminate 700,000 jobs across this country.
Let's be clear. There is a tremendous amount we can do to reduce the
deficit. A plan was put forward a few weeks ago in which we get rid of
those bonus breaks for those who are in the top 2 percent of this
country. It saves about $250 billion a year in real hard cash. The plan
has been put forward to get rid of the tax breaks for the oil and gas
industry which was doing very well and is doing even better now with
the oil market speculators driving it up to over $100 a barrel. These
things actually close the deficit. They do not destroy the economy.
They actually create the sort of plan that can create jobs across this
Nation and put people back to work and invest in the future of our
Nation rather than saying--after we blew up the economy--let's make
working people do even worse.
I am going to summarize by saying embedded in H.R. 1 is attack after
attack. For example, taking on preventive health care, preventive
health care for women across this country by taking out title X.
How about the attack on homeless veterans? I go throughout my State
and folks say: A lot of our sons and daughters are coming home from
Iraq and Afghanistan and we need to support them in the transition back
home. It is very difficult, there is a lot of post-traumatic stress.
Instead of supporting them, my colleagues across the aisle have
produced a plan that says let's take away that support for housing for
the homeless, housing for veterans.
I could go on because the list is so long and the attacks are so
many. But that option, while it does only a modest amount in the short
term to affect the deficit, proceeds to have devastating results on the
economy. And what will happen when the economy will collapse again, a
double-dip recession courtesy of H.R. 1? Then the debt goes back up, so
it is a loss on both fronts. We need a responsible plan to reduce the
deficit, not a plan to bomb the economy on the heads of our working
Americans.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oklahoma is recognized.
Mr. COBURN. Mr. President, will you kindly advise me when I have 10
minutes left, please.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Chair will do so.
Mr. COBURN. Mr. President, I come to the floor today to talk about
where we find ourselves. Nobody has spent more time in the last 6\1/2\
years on this floor talking about the problem in front of us. Hopefully
I can do that in a way that would never impugn the motives of my fellow
Senators.
I enjoyed the speech of the Senator from Nebraska, because one of the
things he stated is we have to come together. You are not going to get
coming together when we have the speech we just heard, when you have a
speech that impugns the motives of the people in the other body trying
to solve some of our problems.
The first point I wish to make is we are at a place where we are
going to vote on two bills with no amendments. Since when did the
Senate give up its ability to try to amend bills going forward? The
reason we are not is because, had we not agreed to it, the tree would
have been filled and we would have either voted for cloture or not to
have cloture, but the fact is in this body we ought to be about
amending what we do not like in the bills.
If the Senator from Oregon does not like what is in the bills, he
ought to have a chance to try to change it. Yet we find ourselves with
a very short period of time to debate what is the No. 1 risk for us as
a nation today.
I have read all the economic studies that have been put out on H.R.
1. I have also read what the economists on the other side say in terms
of the false assumptions that have been made in it. I don't know which
ones are right, but the fact is we are not going to have an actual
debate on advancing amendments.
Let me describe where we are today, so everybody knows. We are adding
$4.507 billion to the deficit every day. We are borrowing in the
international market $3 billion a day. By the time I finish this talk,
we will have added $98 million to the deficit. Adding something to the
deficit, what does that mean? That is the same thing as saying we are
taking the opportunity away from the children and the generation that
follows us by putting them in debtors prison. That is exactly what we
have done.

I don't care where the blame lies. What we have to start doing is not
spending money we do not have. We cannot continue to spend money we do
not have. It is very interesting that a week ago this morning, this
past Monday, the GAO issued a report. It covers one-third of the
Federal Government and lists the duplications they found. We asked them
to do that with the last debt limit extension in the Federal
Government.
According to my calculations, there is at least $100 billion that is
not touched by either of these bills that could be eliminated tomorrow
and saved against our children's future. We do not have an opportunity
to offer amendments to do that on this bill. Here is real data compiled
by the Government Accountability Office where multitudes of Members
from this body have called me and said how do we help you do that?
The first way you help me do that is make sure we have an open
process on the floor where we can offer an amendment to do it. Let me
highlight for a minute some of the things that were in this wonderful
report put forward by the GAO.
We have 47 job training programs across 9 different agencies that we
are spending $18 billion a year on. Not one of them has a metric on
whether it is successful or actually is accomplishing what it is
supposed to do. Why do we need so many different job training programs?
Why do we need any job training program if we cannot show it is
working? Why are we spending money on a job training program that is
not working?
We have five departments, eight agencies, two dozen Presidential
appointees who oversee our work on bioterrorism. We don't have one
agency responsible for it, one group of people. We are spending $6.5
billion a year on bioterrorism and the right hand doesn't know what the
left hand is doing.
We have 20 agencies and 56 programs dedicated to teaching America
financial literacy. We have no moral authority to teach anybody
financial literacy when we have a deficit that is going to be $1.65
trillion this year and we are $14.2 trillion in debt.
We have 80 economic development programs across 4 different agencies
where we spend $6.5 billion a year. We don't know if they are working.
Maybe they are but we ought to know it before we spend money we don't
have on things when we do not know if they are working.
We have 15 different agencies covering 30 food safety laws--15
different agencies.
We have 18 nutrition programs, separate nutrition programs. We spend
$62.5 billion a year, $30 billion of it is borrowed, and we do not know
the results. Why shouldn't we have one? And why shouldn't we put a
metric on it to know whether it is working?
We have 20 homeless programs. We heard mentioned the homeless
programs. We are going to spend $2.9 billion at seven different
agencies, and if you add up the money over the last 10 years that we
spent on homeless programs we can buy every homeless person in this
country a $200,000 home. Yet we continue to spend money. We don't know
if the programs are working. They certainly would be better off if they
had $200,000 for their care for the future rather than continue the
programs we have no metrics on.
We have 82 teacher training quality programs--82 of them. They are
across 10 different Federal Government agencies and we spend $4 billion
a year on them and we have no idea whether they are successful. As a
matter of fact, we do know if they are successful--we are not
successful in our country today. Are we getting value for what we are
spending? Remember, 40 cents of every dollar we spend on these programs
we are borrowing from the Chinese.
We have 52 programs for entrepreneurial efforts. Since when is that a

[[Page S1481]]

role of the Federal Government? We have 35 programs to oversee
infrastructure; 27 different programs for commercial buildings; 28
programs to oversee new markets outside of this country--28 programs;
20 programs for business incubators, and 17 different grant programs
for disaster preparedness. We have 17 different grant programs for
disaster preparedness; 34 areas where Federal agencies, offices, or
programs have redundant objectives or are fragmented across several
departments; 2,100 data centers for 24 agencies. Consolidating them
could save $200 billion over a decade. We cannot even offer that
amendment on this debate. That is $20 billion a year. That is a third
of what the House wants to save.
We have the ability--there is the waste, there is the incompetency in
what Congress has done through its duplication of efforts and its lack
of oversight--to solve a great portion of our fiscal problems.
We can do it. But we cannot do it when the process does not allow for
debate and votes on those specific issues. I want to talk for a minute
about what is ahead of us as a nation because I think it is important.
I am very sorry my friend, President Obama, has not led on this issue.
Let me tell you what is in front of us. What is in front of us is
rising interest rates. What is in front of us is rising competition for
capital to fund our deficits. The historic rate for us on our debt as a
nation over the last 35 years has been greater than 6 percent. Last
year we paid less than 2 percent for what we have on the books, less
than 2 percent average.
Our historical timeframe on when that money is due is usually about
10-plus years. We are now financing that at 59 months. What is going to
happen in the world next year? Well, the difference in terms of
sovereign financing--that is, other countries that also need to borrow
money, including us--and what is available to finance that next year is
$7 trillion. In other words, there is a $7 trillion shortfall in terms
of what is going to be available to finance.
If we are going to borrow $7 trillion in the world more than what is
available, what do we think is going to happen to interest rates? What
is going to happen? Well, they are going to rise. So we are going to be
faced with one of the following two dilemmas unless Congress gets its
act together. Here are the two dilemmas: The first is, our average
interest cost goes back to its historical cost. If that happens,
immediately we are going to see $640 billion more a year in interest
costs--$640 billion. We only have less than $200 billion this year. We
are going to see a $640 billion increase. That does not help any person
who has a need. All that does is that is paid out to our debtors. That
is a very real risk for us right now.
That goes to say that we do not have a lot of time because what we
know is interest rates are going to rise. So it is mandatory that
Congress do what the American people have known for a while we need to
do; that is, live within our means.
Now, let me describe the second problem or second solution; that is,
what the Federal Reserve will do. The Federal Reserve will just print
more money. Well, if we print more money and we do not have any base
for doing that, that creates what is called inflation. It is called
debasing our currency.
What happens in America if we decide that the way we are going to get
out of our problem is to debase our currency and print more money, like
the Fed is doing right now, what is called quantitative easing 2?
They are printing $600 billion worth of money between now and June.
Well, what happens is the value of everything we own in real terms
declines, in nominal dollars goes up, but the purchasing power of the
average middle-class family in this country declines tragically, and
the safety net this country has been known for, for those who are far
less fortunate than the average American, will be absolutely
unaffordable, totally unaffordable. So we are talking about the
destruction of the best of America, our middle class. We are talking
about taking opportunities away.
So what is the answer? The answer is not to have more partisan
statements by Senator Merkley impugning the motives of people who are
trying to do what is right even though it is different from his
opinion. The answer is for Congress to get together and recognize the
threat to our future and give up long-held positions to solve the
greater good. That means we have to move. That means we have to
recognize that we cannot have it all our way.
How do we actually do that? Well, the one failure of Congress, in my
time in Congress, both in the House in the mid-1990s and now in the
Senate since 2004, is we do not do oversight. How did we end up with
this report that shows $100 billion in duplications? The only way it
could happen is we were not watching. We were not doing the oversight.
So one of the things that needs to happen is the chairman of every
committee ought to spend 90 percent of their time in oversight on
things we are already doing rather than working on creating new bills
and new programs.
Second, what ought to happen is we ought to have a vigorous debate
with amendments on the floor of the Senate to solve some of the very
real problems. It is not all that hard to solve these problems. But
what happens is in partisan bodies, people talk past one another.
Nobody would decline the fact that we ought to get rid of unused
property. We can save $8 billion a year if we get rid of unused Federal
property. Does anybody disagree with that? But we have not done it.
There is $8 billion. We are going to get out of this $1.6 trillion hole
a couple billion dollars at a time. We ought to do that. We ought to
get rid of the wasteful printing at the Government Printing Office,
save several hundred million dollars over the next 10 years.
We ought to quit paying bonuses to contractors who do not do their
job--and we have documented that multiple agencies are doing that--
performance bonuses when they do not meet the performance requirements.
We ought to collect the unpaid taxes from Federal employees; it is $3
billion. Those are the settled claims; these are not the unsettled
claims.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cardin.) The Chair notifies the Senator he
has 10 minutes remaining.
Mr. COBURN. I thank the Chair. Here is a list of ideas that comes to
$380 billion, of things that we would, as normal Americans sitting at
our family table, say: You are in trouble. Forty percent of your budget
you are spending you do not have the money for. Your credit cards are
maxed out. You cannot do it. What can we spend? Here it is.

There were 72 amendments last year. Two of them passed the
Senate. I heard the Senator from Nebraska talking about some
pain that might occur in his district. I want to tell you,
there has to be shared pain all across the country if we are
going to get out of the problem we are in. We can no longer
kick the can down the road without spilling the soup all over
our kids. The time for action is now. The time for leadership
is now.

If we look at history, what we find is the average age of a republic
is 207 years. All republics before us have failed. How have they
failed? What is it that caused them to lose their economy and their
freedom? Was it an invading army? Was it some natural disaster? None of
those things. If we go back in history, every one that has failed has
failed over fiscal issues, the very issues that confront us today.
I think it is time America cheats history. I think it is time we come
together and solve these big problems. It is going to be painful for
everyone.
It means some Senators are going to lose their seats if they do the
best, right thing for America. There cannot be a greater calling than
that, to do the best, right thing for our country. It means following a
pattern of leadership that says personal sacrifice by me in a
leadership position has to come first, demonstrating my ability to
understand the problem.
So we are going to have a limited debate on two bills, both
imperfect. But certainly one of them goes more toward the problem that
we have than the other. We are going to spend $3.8 trillion this year
through September 30. The deficit is going to be $1.6 trillion.
The savings from the House cut is this little, bitty green line down
here. It is only $57 billion. The savings from Inouye is $4.7. You
cannot even see a line. It does not begin to address the duplication,
the waste, the fraud and abuse, the incompetence of what we have
created in the Federal Government. It will not solve our problems.

[[Page S1482]]

It will be a nice starting point for partisan debate, but it takes us
away from what we need to do. Here is the cut. Here is the deficit.
This is a pie chart. It is showing--it is nothing--$57 billion is
nothing. What we have to do to be able to compete in a world financial
market is send a signal that we get what the problem is, that we are
willing to make the difficult and tough sacrifices and choices to
become viable and reliable and have people loan us money in the future.
We have to extend the term and period of our debt where we buy the time
to make these things possible so the least amount of pain--although
very real--comes about.
For goodness' sake, we have to stop spending money we do not have on
things we do not absolutely need.
I yield the remainder of my time to the Senator from Louisiana.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Louisiana is recognized.
Mr. VITTER. Mr. President, I thank my colleague. As Congress tries to
get serious about cutting wasteful and reckless spending, I believe
taxpayer subsidy of abortion providers should be among the first things
to go. I personally believe it is morally wrong to end an innocent
human life through abortion. I also believe it is morally reprehensible
to take the dollars of millions of pro-life Americans in order to fund
organizations that do that. That is a view held by the great majority
of Americans. Americans should not be forced to subsidize abortion,
much less fund our Nation's largest abortion provider, Planned
Parenthood.
When the House passed its continuing resolution before us today, it
adopted a provision that cuts funding to this abortion giant, and it
did it with significant bipartisan support. Unfortunately, that
language was stripped by Senate leadership behind closed doors. But I
believe Senators should have a chance to vote directly on that measure
following a full and open debate.
Again, I do not personally believe abortion is a right guaranteed by
the Constitution. I believe that it is morally wrong. But this issue is
even beyond that. This is not about abortion on demand in this country.
This debate is about whether taxpayer dollars, including those billions
of taxpayer dollars from pro-life Americans, should be sent to
organizations such as Planned Parenthood, which performs millions of
abortions in this country.
According to their latest annual report, Planned Parenthood boasted
more than $363 million in taxpayer funding, $363 million. By the way,
that is the same year it performed an unprecedented 324,008 abortions.
Every year since 2000 the government has increased taxpayer funding of
Planned Parenthood, on average over a $22 million-a-year increase. And
guess what. The number of abortions Planned Parenthood has performed
has also steadily increased, even though the overall abortion rate in
the United States has declined since 2008.
Planned Parenthood's abortion rate massively outpaces its adoption
referrals. In 2008, a woman entering a Planned Parenthood clinic was
134 times more likely to have an abortion than to be referred for an
adoption.
Planned Parenthood has also made a profit every year since 1987,
including over a $63 million return profit in 2009. There is no
justification for subsidizing Planned Parenthood's profit-making
venture with taxpayer dollars.
There has been a recent onslaught of ads that claim Planned
Parenthood is simply a leading provider of women's health services. But
abortions, not other health services, not true health services--
abortions account for roughly one-third of the $1 billion income
generated by its affiliated clinics.
Let me be clear. This provision would not cut all title X funding for
health services such as breast cancer screenings, HIV testing,
counseling, valuable family planning services. It would simply block
funds, taxpayer dollars, from subsidizing America's largest abortion
provider. That has the support of the American people, even well beyond
America's prolife numbers. I believe the sanctity of human life is a
principle that Congress should proclaim at every opportunity. Again,
this goes even beyond that.

The time has come to respect the wishes of the great majority of
Americans, pro-life and many pro-choice, who say using taxpayer dollars
to fund huge abortion providers--Planned Parenthood is the biggest--
simply is not right. We have to cut. We have to get responsible. This
is certainly a key place to start.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland is recognized.
Ms. MIKULSKI. I ask unanimous consent to speak for up to 10 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I rise to address the Senate on the
consequences of where we are in the debate on appropriations and the
harsh and punitive consequences of H.R. 1. However, I cannot let the
comments made during the last half hour go unchallenged.
First, I wish to comment on the remarks of the Senator from Oklahoma
on duplication in government. I so respect the Senator from Oklahoma.
We have worked on many fiscal reform issues. But he went over a list,
program by program by program, of where he says we have duplication. I
don't challenge his facts, but I do challenge his inertia. If these
programs have been in existence and have been duplicative and denied
value to the taxpayer, where has he been? The Republicans were in
charge for 10 years, from 2000 to 2008. They were in charge of all
three branches of the government. So if he didn't like duplication,
they had the Presidency, the House, and they had the Senate. Why didn't
they change it? Now all of a sudden they have religion. I don't know
what faith that is, but they now have the desire to talk about it. If
they were serious about ending duplication, it should have started a
long time ago.
Second, bring the ideas forth, look for cosponsors from other reform-
minded people such as the Presiding Officer and myself. Let's end the
duplication. But let's end the duplicity and in the way we talk about
duplication. I am tired of blaming Barack Obama, who has been President
for 2 years, for everything that is perceived as wrong with the United
States. Where were they?
I must credit the Senator from Oklahoma. He has often brought fiscal
folly to the attention of the Senate. I was with him when we fought
lavish meatballs at $4 and $7 apiece that he found. When he showed it
to me, I joined with him in the reform package. I loved it, and I look
forward to working with him. But don't act holier than thou now about
duplication.
Now let's go to the abortion topic. I will not change this
conversation into the ``A'' word. However, the Senator talked about
Planned Parenthood being profit making. It cannot be. It is a
nonprofit. I am not even going to argue additional revenue. He doesn't
want to give money to Planned Parenthood because they make a profit. I
won't debate him on that. But the next time he supports an oil subsidy,
I am going to oppose it because the oil companies make a profit. I am
going to fight tooth and nail to end the lavish subsidies we give on
oil and gas. If we are not going to give it to Planned Parenthood
because they make money, then I will not support giving it to oil
companies because they make money. So there. I have said it, and I am
proud of it.
This is no laughing matter, what we are dealing with on
appropriations. H.R. 1 will have a Draconian effect on the middle class
and a Draconian effect on jobs. Our economy is very fragile. We are
barely making a recovery. If we pass H.R. 1, we will place our Nation
at risk because of the impact of the cuts on those who really do
protect America.
It will further pummel the middle class. I am not going to stand for
further pummeling of the middle class.
I am not just a Senator from Maryland. Like the Presiding Officer, I
am a Senator for Maryland. If we take a look at what H.R. 1 does, it
really whacks at Maryland's middle-class families. It cuts job
training, education and access to higher education, much-needed
childcare and afterschool programs. Right this very minute, if H.R. 1
passed, we would have people lose their Pell grants. A tremendous
number of Marylanders would lose their Pell grants, not only
numerically but their grant would be cut by over $500. For a lot of
people, that is the money that helps buy textbooks, pays the lab fees
so they can go on to be a lab tech or a cyber tech in the new economy.

[[Page S1483]]

Let's take a look at the children. They talked about the right to
life. I am for a right to life after one is born. I think after one is
born, they ought to have a shot. I respect their position. They have to
respect ours. Under their Draconian cuts, 2,471 Maryland children would
lose Head Start opportunities. Head Start is what gets them learning
ready so they can take advantage of our public schools and move on in
life. Let's have it for these little children.
Then there are those who say we need to compete. I want to compete
too in the global marketplace. So what does that mean? It means we have
to fund NIH. Under H.R. 1, NIH will be cut $1 billion. In cancer
screening alone, 36,000 Marylanders will lose that opportunity, and 5
million will lose it nationwide. If we look at program after program
and how it affects women and children and access to education, we are
the net losers. If we are going to out-educate and out-innovate, we
cannot pass H.R. 1, which takes me to why it is bad for Maryland jobs.
We have the great honor of representing iconic Federal institutions:
the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Standards,
Goddard Space Agency, Goddard and Hopkins Space Telescope Institute,
home to the great Hubbell telescope which serves the world in what it
does. The fact is, it takes people to work there. If we do these
Draconian cuts, it will have a tremendous impact. But I am not talking
about only government jobs. I am talking about private sector jobs.
If H.R. 1 passes, we will lose a tremendous amount in Community
Development Block Grant money. We will lose $11 million in Community
Development Block Grant money. So whether one is in Baltimore City,
making its comeback under Mayor Stephanie Rawlings, or in a small rural
county, it could result in 1,000 jobs being lost in construction where
we could be creating new housing and new opportunities for economic
development. The Speaker of the House says if it is going to cost jobs,
so be it. Well, so be it is not OK with me.
If we look at transportation alone, the cuts in transportation will
cause Maryland to lose close to $100 million to fix highways, byways,
beltways, the kinds of things we need to do that deal with congestion
and will save lives because we will have safer roads, and create jobs
in construction. That is over 3,157 Maryland jobs. Those are private
sector construction jobs.
The Presiding Officer and I have visited our great Maryland biotech
companies. They have NIH doing the basic research. They value add it,
and then they go to FDA. FDA makes sure our prescription drugs are
safe. When they have the FDA brand of approval, we can sell them
anywhere in the world. But under these cuts, we are going to eliminate
5,000 jobs. What that means is, we are going to further set back the
backlog in order to get a biotech, a pharmaceutical or a medical device
approved. So it is going to cost us jobs in government in Maryland at
FDA, but it is also going to cost jobs in the private sector in the
biotech field, the medical device field, and the pharmaceutical field.
Right now the Social Security Administration--the people who
calculate and make sure the checks go out on time to the right person--
is facing possible layoffs and furloughs. We are facing nationwide an
immediate possibility of furloughs of 3,500 people. What does that
mean? The checks will go out, yes. But that means if one is applying
for a benefit, they are going to wait a long time. If they have any
kind of disability, the backlog could increase to as much as 3 to 4
years. They can't apply for Social Security disability. If they are
applying for disability, it means they are too sick to work. So we are
going to lay off the very people who make sure our checks are developed
in a timely way.
I have more to say, and I will say it as the debate continues. But if
we pass H.R. 1, it is a job-killing, middle-class pummeling bill that I
am going to vote no on and urge my colleagues to do the same.
I also wish to discuss the Commerce, Justice, Science and Related
Agencies, CJS, in the Senate Continuing Resolution, CR.
CJS in the Inouye CR totals $53.6 billion, which is $6.9 billion or
11 percent below the President's request for FY 2011. This is in
contrast to the House Republican CR, which is $900 million lower. I
support the Inouye CR and oppose the House Republican CR because it
would undermine our ability to outeducation, outinnovate, and outbuild
the rest of the world.
Make no mistake, the Inouye CR makes painful cuts, and further cuts
will hurt even more. I would like my colleagues to know I will go no
more. I am finished cutting.
Under the Inouye CR, CJS cuts $420 million from state and local law
enforcement grants, a 7 percent cut to every grant program, including
COPS hiring grants, Byrne grants, grants for bulletproof vests for
police officers who walk the thin blue line, and grants to reduce the
backlog of DNA evidence.
The CR terminates the Weed and Seed program, which helps local
communities fight gangs and crime. State and local law enforcement
agencies will lose Federal funding they need during a time of austerity
in their own budgets.
Federal law enforcement is funded at substantially below the
President's request in this CR. Specifically, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, FBI, is $500 million below President's request, and the
Drug Enforcement Agency, DEA, is $110 million below President's
request. The hiring freeze will continue. Vacant positions won't be
filled--not just in headquarters--but in our local communities where
agents are partners in fighting drugs and crime, and tracking down
sexual predators who prey on our children.
The CR provides $6.3 billion for Bureau of Prisons salaries and
expenses, which is $245.5 million below the President's FY 2011 budget
request. Prisons will continue to have serious and dangerous
overcrowding, putting the safety of our prison guards at risk.
The Justice Department's core capabilities will also be degraded. The
CR cuts $216 million from internal technology upgrades that are
supposed to give the Department better financial management and
accountability, and better communications with State and local law
enforcement.
This CR cuts the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
NOAA, by $943 million. This cut will jeopardize efforts to fix ongoing
problems with the development of NOAA's polar satellites by not
providing new funding for the Joint Polar Satellite System. This could
lead to a gap in weather forecasting data that the military and our
private sector rely upon.
The cuts in this CR will already halt plans to pump funds into
scientific research and discovery that leads to innovation and economic
growth, and education programs that build the next generation of
scientists and innovators. Specifically, it cuts the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration by $461 million, the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, by $165 million and the
National Science Foundation, NSF, by $573 million. NASA will continue
to follow the authorizing bill with new path forward for human
spaceflight, but the Agency won't be able to initiate new space
technology programs. NIST will not have funding for new Technology
Innovation Partnership, TIP, grants or for competitive science building
construction. NSF will be halted on its path to doubling.
While the CR gives the Patent and Trademark Office full access to
fees paid by inventors, it cuts the International Trade Administration,
ITA, $93 million less than the fiscal year 2011 requested level. This
will delay efforts to boost the economy and create jobs by helping more
U.S. farmers, manufacturers, and service providers sell their products
overseas.
We made many responsible cuts in the CR. It eliminates the $48
million Emergency Steel Loan Guarantee program, which has not made a
loan since 2003, and cuts $44 million from the Census, eliminating
duplicative and overlapping analysis performed by other agencies or
issued in other ways by Census. The Inouye CR also eliminates one time
construction projects at the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and
Firearms, and the U.S. Marshals Service.
Even with all that, we are being asked to do more. How much more is
it responsible to cut? I want my colleagues to know, I am done cutting.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Montana.

[[Page S1484]]

Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. President, I was concerned over what the effect of
H.R. 1 would be on Medicare beneficiaries. I wrote a letter to HHS
Secretary Sebelius asking that question, what effect passage of H.R. 1
would have on Medicare beneficiaries. I got the answer a couple days
ago. Frankly, it spent a couple days going through the White House,
OMB, and so forth, but I received the letter last night. What does that
letter say?
I ask unanimous consent that this letter be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:

Dept. of Health & Human Svcs.,

Office of the Secretary,

Washington, DC, March 8, 2011.
Hon. Max Baucus,
Chairman, Senate Finance Committee,
Washington, DC.
Dear Mr. Chairman: In a recent letter, you asked
specifically how Medicare and Medicaid would be affected if
the House-passed version of H.R. 1 were enacted. Sections
4016 and 4018 of H.R. 1 would preclude use of Continuing
Resolution (CR) funds for implementing or carrying out
provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
The Affordable Care Act modifies and improves almost every
Medicare payment system--including the inpatient hospital
prospective payment system, the outpatient hospital
prospective payment system, the physician fee schedule,
Medicare Advantage plan payments, and prescription drug plan
payments. If H.R.1 were enacted, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) would not be able to use CR funds to
administer payments based on any rate calculated on the basis
of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act--which is to say
virtually all rates.
Where the Affordable Care Act effectively repealed prior
payment methodologies and replaced them with new ones, H.R. 1
would seem to preclude any payments for the items or services
at issue. For example, the Affordable Care Act replaced the
old statutory provisions governing payments to Medicare
Advantage (MA) organizations with new provisions, including a
freeze in payment levels in 2011. Using CR funds to make
payments to MA organizations under the new Affordable Care
Act provisions would be prohibited by H.R. 1. Moreover, there
would not appear to be legal authority to pay MA
organizations under the prior payment methodology, given that
this methodology was repealed in the Affordable Care Act.
This would seem to mean that payments to MA organizations
would have to be suspended, risking a significant disruption
in services to beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage.
In the event that any prior payment methodologies that have
not been fully repealed by the Affordable Care Act could be
decoupled from all of the additions to the Medicare statute
made by the Affordable Care Act, CMS would have to perform
extensive analyses to determine whether it could permissibly
make payments of some sort. But, even if CMS could do so, it
would be required to undertake rulemaking to establish new
rates under each payment system, as the existing rates are
all in some way dependent on Affordable Care Act authorities.
The promulgation of each new rule could take several months
to complete. While the new rates were implemented, CMS
would be prohibited from paying providers and suppliers at
the Affordable Care Act rates.
In a system where millions of claims are paid each week,
millions of claims would accumulate, which CMS and its
contractors would be prohibited from paying at the Affordable
Care Act rates. At the point at which claims could begin to
be paid at the new rates, it would take many months and
significant resources to process the backlog--resources that
H.R. 1 would not provide. As a result, providers and
suppliers, many of which are small businesses--and,
ultimately, beneficiaries--would experience significant
disruption.
In addition to changes in Medicare payment methodologies,
beginning this year, the Affordable Care Act authorizes
Medicare to cover annual ``wellness visits'' for
beneficiaries and waives coinsurance and deductibles for
critical preventive services. Claims could no longer be paid
for any of these benefits using CR funds, as payments for
these benefits are authorized only by the Affordable Care
Act.
Many of the provisions in the Affordable Care Act are aimed
at slowing the growth rate of spending increases and
improving health care for beneficiaries through innovative
health service delivery reforms and value-based purchasing.
None of these reforms--such as hospital value-based
purchasing; payment incentives for reductions of hospital-
acquired conditions; and the care transitions program for
high-risk Medicare beneficiaries--could be implemented using
CR funds.
H.R. 1 would adversely affect health care in rural areas as
well. As an example, as a means to encourage physicians to
provide services in rural areas, the Affordable Care Act
established a new 10 percent bonus payment for primary care
services furnished by primary care practitioners and for
major surgical procedures furnished by general surgeons in
shortage areas. Without available CR funding, CMS would no
longer be able to provide the bonus to primary care and
general surgery physicians for eligible services.
The Affordable Care Act also gives CMS new tools to fight
fraud and helps us move from a pay-and-chase system to a
comprehensive prevention-focused strategy. By precluding the
use of CR funds for such efforts, H.R. 1 would substantially
impede CMS's proven and successful efforts to reduce fraud
and waste in the health care system, resulting in increased
erroneous payments. H.R. 1 would effectively require CMS to
cease enforcing new screening and enrollment standards,
diminish CMS's ability to suspend payments when credible
allegations of fraud are uncovered, and reduce resources that
have been made available for investments in anti-fraud work.
The Affordable Care Act also provided States with a number
of opportunities to compete for federal grants and expand
eligibility and services for Medicaid beneficiaries at little
or no cost to States. Among these are: funding for States to
provide incentives to prevent chronic diseases in Medicaid
beneficiaries, increased federal funding to provide
preventive services for eligible adults in Medicaid, and
enhanced funding to assist in providing health homes to
Medicaid beneficiaries. Under H.R. 1, CR funds could not be
used in furtherance of any of these provisions.
The Affordable Care Act also includes numerous other
policies to make health care more affordable, accessible, and
accountable for seniors, individuals with disabilities,
children, and all other Americans, as well as businesses
large and small. Its improvements are already woven into the
fabric of our health care system. A broad prohibition on the
use of CR funds would work to seriously impair or even halt
the operation of the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program; the
Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan; and the health
insurance rate review, consumer assistance, and Exchange
grant programs.
I hope this information is helpful. We would be happy to
answer any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Sebelius,

Mr. BAUCUS. According to the Secretary of HHS, the consequences for
Medicare beneficiaries of H.R. 1 are dire, to say the least. I don't
have the calculations for the number of Medicare beneficiaries who
would be affected nationwide, but I can give my colleagues the effect
it would have on Montana, and that way they can extrapolate that into
what the effect would be nationwide.
Essentially, according to the Secretary's letter, she says that
because the health care reform bill repealed certain provisions in
Medicare and then replaced them with other provisions to address
quality and help provide better health care especially for seniors,
that H.R. 1, because it repeals the provisions in the health care law
put in place to provide benefits for seniors, would have the effect of
cutting health care to seniors.
For example, essentially the House amendment would eliminate private
Medicare coverage under Medicare Advantage. That is the effect of H.R.
1. If one is a Medicare recipient under a Medicare Advantage plan,
under H.R. 1 they would no longer be allowed to receive benefits.
In my State of Montana, Medicare Advantage covers about 26,000
seniors. That is only the State of Montana. But nationwide, of course,
it would be hundreds of thousands, probably close to in the millions of
seniors who would no longer be able to benefit under Medicare
Advantage. They would be thrown off. That is what the HHS Secretary
says.
I will read the significant sentence. I am reading one sentence from
the letter, dated March 8:

This would seem to mean that payments to MA organizations
would have to be suspended, risking a significant disruption
in services to beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage.

They would be suspended, according to the interpretation of the HHS
Secretary of the effect of H.R. 1 on Medicare beneficiaries.
Second, it would have virtually the same effect with respect to the
part D prescription drug benefits; that is, health care reform began to
close the doughnut hole. Earlier, seniors received $250 in assistance
for prescription drugs. Under the health care reform bill, they would
be eligible for a 50-percent discount for brand-name drugs. That, too,
would be suspended. That is the effect of H.R. 1--to suspend. Let me
see if I can find the operable sentence in the letter. I do not see it
at the moment. In a few minutes, I will find it and I will give it to
you.
Add to that the payments for preventive benefits. They, too, would be
suspended--wellness programs, such as for colonoscopies, mammographies,
et cetera. She says ``[c]laims could no

[[Page S1485]]

longer be paid for any of these benefits'' as a consequence of H.R. 1.
Add to that rural health care.

Without available CR funding, CMS would no longer be able
to provide the bonus to primary care and general surgery
physicians for eligible services.

There are other areas. In the nature of fraud prevention, those
efforts would be suspended. Of course, some of the proponents who want
to kill health care reform do not mind some additional provisions I
might mention--namely, moving more toward delivery system reform and
toward improving the quality of health care and also reducing costs.
I do not think the authors of H.R. 1 knew what they were doing. I
think they were a little quick in writing their legislation. I do not
think they realized the effect of H.R. 1 would be to deny Medicare
beneficiaries these payments. Especially, I point out that the Medicare
beneficiaries, under Medicare Advantage--according to the HHS
Secretary, those payments to those persons under Medicare Advantage
would have to be suspended.
I have a hunch that if we were to look more deeply into the actual
provisions of H.R. 1, we would find other similar consequences. Maybe
it would be in the Medicare Program. It might be in some other health
care program. But I just asked the Secretary to focus in on the effects
to Medicare, and that is the response she gave.
I urge all Senators, please let's not cut Medicare Advantage
payments. That is just not the right thing to do. Innocent seniors are
getting caught in this crossfire here. I am sure we have to begin to
cut Federal spending. There is no question about that. But let's not be
so foolhardy and unintelligently cut Medicare beneficiaries the way
H.R. 1 does.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who yields time?
The Senator from Louisiana.
Ms. LANDRIEU. Thank you, Mr. President.
I wish to follow up on the comments of the Senators from Montana and
Maryland who spoke so eloquently and clearly about the consequences of
adopting the House resolution which sets spending levels for the next
year.
In my view, a vote for H.R. 1 would be, indeed, a reckless vote
because the consequences of such severe cuts in some areas, as outlined
particularly by the Senator from Maryland and the Senator from Montana,
would be, in fact, reckless, and also, as it relates to my
subcommittee, which I want to speak about for a moment, the
Subcommittee on Homeland Security--not an inconsequential area of our
responsibility: protecting the 350-plus million Americans who live in
the United States and trust that we are doing our jobs well enough to
keep them safe every day from rising threat levels from a variety of
different sources. That is what our job is on the Homeland Security
Appropriations Subcommittee, and I am going to be voting against H.R. 1
because, in my view, it goes too far, and it puts our homeland in
jeopardy.
Let me be clear. In the State of the Union, the President stated that
al-Qaida and its affiliates continue to plan attacks against our
Nation. He stressed that extremists are trying to inspire acts of
violence by those within our borders. According to the Attorney
General, in the last 2 years, 126 individuals have been indicted for
terrorist-related activities, including 50 of our own citizens.
The Homeland Security Secretary appeared before my subcommittee last
week and said that the threat of terrorist attacks is as high as it has
been since 9/11. And what do the Republican leaders, just newly minted
and elected, come to Washington to do? Slash the homeland security
budget. I am not going to do that, and I urge my colleagues not to do
that.
In view of these threats, we cannot reduce the homeland security
budget to levels that preceded the Christmas Day bombing attempt, the
Times Square bombing attempt, the air cargo bombing attempt, and the
Fort Hood shooting and before the escalation of violence and drugs
along the Mexican border. We had one of our agents gunned down just 3
weeks ago. What does this budget do that they are recommending? Slash
border security. We literally spilled blood on this floor, almost,
building that fence along the border and adding border security. Now
they want to dismantle it? I do not think so.
The bill makes deep cuts in State and local grants to train and equip
first responders. Do they think it is going to be the FBI agents who
are walking around Times Square every day looking for a smoking car?
No. It is going to likely be a local New York firefighter or police
officer or a citizen walking by noticing something and calling the
police. We have very small--really, relatively small--training grants
available. They cut that by over 50 percent. Is that smart? I do not
think so.
The House bill cuts border security infrastructure programs when
violence in Mexico is at an unprecedented level.
The House bill will cut Coast Guard acquisitions despite a need to
recapitalize its aging fleet and when the Coast Guard mission continues
to expand, as was so clear not even a year ago, on April 20, when the
Deep Horizon exploded. Whom did you call when you went to 911 and said
there is a rig on fire? Whom did we call? The Coast Guard. How did they
get to the rig? On cutters and boats that we built. What did they do
with the Coast Guard budget? They cut it almost below maintenance
levels for situations such as this.
The House bill cuts port security and transit security when the
Mumbai, London, and Madrid terrorist attacks proved that those sectors
are vulnerable. How many more terrorists have to attack trains before
we realize there is a level you cannot go beneath without putting our
citizens at risk? And we are perilously close to that level.
The House bill reduces Transportation Security Administration
procurement for its explosive-detection technologies that TSA needs to
respond, as we have developed since the attempted bombing at
Christmastime.
Cyber security--I have not even spoken about this. It is very
difficult, and some of this is classified information, and it is not
something people can really grasp as well as they can understand
explosives on trains and airplanes, which is, I guess, easier to
visualize.
These attacks through our Internet and through the new
interconnecting technologies now that our electric grid and all of our
companies depend on need to be countered as well.
Amendment No. 149 addresses these cuts while making responsible cuts
in lower priority programs.
The House bill cuts port security grants by 66 percent despite the
fact that our ports produce over $3 trillion of economic activity and
jobs for 13 million American workers and the Mumbai attacks proved the
vulnerability of ports. The Senate bill would maintain the fiscal year
2010 level of $300 million.
H.R. 1 would cut transit security grants by 66 percent, despite the
fact that there have been over 1,300 attacks, killing or injuring over
18,000 people worldwide on trains and subways over the last 7 years.
The Senate amendment would maintain the fiscal year 2010 level of $300
million.
I say to all of my friends who get on a plane and expect it to be
safe that H.R. 1 would cut $562 million from the President's request
for the Transportation Security Administration to provide our airports
with scanners, screeners, and K-9 teams. Under H.R. 1, funding for the
Transportation Security Administration would be below the operating
level on December 25, 2009, when a Nigerian terrorist tried to blow up
Northwest flight 253 over the United States. As a result, TSA would
only be able to purchase 250 additional advanced imaging technology
body scanners, instead of the 500 requested, and 415 additional
portable explosives trace detection units, instead of the 800 units
requested. The Senate Democratic alternative restores these cuts.
H.R. 1 would cut the precise agencies--FEMA, the Coast Guard, and
State and local first responders--that are supposed to help us prevent
or respond to future disasters. The Senate version restores these cuts.
Under H.R. 1, the Coast Guard would not be able to award production
of the fifth National Security Cutter, NSC, delaying the project by a
year and driving up costs by $45 to $60 million. The Senate amendment
fully funds the $692 million necessary to complete NSC, No. 5. National
Security Cutters are replacing the Coast Guard's 40-year-old

[[Page S1486]]

fleet of high endurance cutters, which are increasingly unavailable due
to equipment breakdowns. The Senate amendment also includes funds to
hire 55 additional Coast Guard personnel to improve their capacity to
respond to oilspills.
The Senate amendment provides $189 million more than the House bill
for the border security agencies--Customs and Border Protection and
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Within that amount, the Senate
bill provides $150 million more than the House bill for border security
infrastructure and technology, providing our Border Patrol agents with
the assets they need to help secure the northern and southern borders.
Cuts to border technology made by the House bill would postpone for at
least 1 year the procurement, construction, and deployment of new
remote video surveillance systems in Arizona and reduce by 50 percent
funds available for tactical communications modernization along the
Southwest border.

H.R. 1 provides no funding to continue construction of the DHS
Headquarters at the St. Elizabeths campus in Washington, DC. Congress
has appropriated $1.1 billion for the project, but the House action
would leave a half-built building, sitting in the mud. This decision
will delay completion of the Coast Guard headquarters by at least 1
year and increase costs by $69 million. The Senate amendment provides
$91.4 million to complete the Coast Guard headquarters.
The House bill cuts emergency management performance grants by 12
percent. The events surrounding Hurricanes Katrina and Rita highlighted
the critical importance of effective catastrophic all-hazards planning.
The Senate amendment maintains the $340 million fiscal year 2010 level.
H.R. 1 would reduce science and technology research and development
funding by 69 percent, forgoing critical investments in the next
generation of explosives detection systems, chemical and biological
weapons detection systems, radiological and nuclear detection systems,
as well as sensors and other technologies to help secure the borders.
The Senate version reduces funding by only 19 percent, a difficult but
responsible reduction.
The House bill makes deep cuts to cyber security, which is
unconscionable, since the President has said, ``the cyber threat is one
of the most serious economic and national security challenges we
face''. The House cuts would delay deployment of the Einstein program--
our network intrusion detection and protection program--reducing
protection coverage of Federal agency networks by 12 percent, reduce
cyber attack response efforts by 25 percent, reduce international
collaboration, and reduce our development of advanced tools needed to
keep pace with new and evolving cyber threats.
In order to make these restorations, the Senate amendment rescinds
over $545 million of low priority unobligated balances and reduces
lower priority programs by over $900 million below fiscal year 2010
levels.
My goal is to produce a fiscally responsible Homeland Security bill
that provides the Department with the resources it needs to prepare
for, respond to, and recover from all threats, both manmade and
natural. It is essential that we provide the Department with the
resources that it needs to be nimble in preparing for and responding to
an evolving threat.
I urge Members to support amendment No. 149 to H.R. 1.
As I said, the House bill, H.R. 1, cuts port security grants by 66
percent, transportation security grants by 66 percent. It cuts FEMA,
and it cuts the Coast Guard below levels that are safe.
Homeland Security is the newest agency. I realize we have to make
cuts and bring our budget into balance. If this were a plan to get us
to a balanced budget, I would support it. But it is not. It is just a
plan that jeopardizes our homeland security and does not do very much
at all to close that deficit gap. When a real plan is present, I will
vote for it. Until then, I am voting no.
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, the badly misguided budget cuts contained
in the legislation the House has sent to us threaten to strangle our
fragile economic recovery before it can truly begin. The House bill
would weaken the social safety net that helps keep our communities
together; it would end education opportunities that give Americans a
chance to succeed; it would weaken investments in science and new
technologies that we need to make our Nation competitive globally; and
it would make our Nation less secure.
Our colleagues in the House have diagnosed a patient with heart
disease--and prescribed amputation. Their proposed cure would do little
to heal the disease of budget deficits, and in the meantime, do a lot
of damage to the patient. They propose to solve our budget woes by
slashing nondefense discretionary spending--which makes up a mere 15
percent or so of the Federal budget. In fact, the Congressional Budget
Office told us just this week that if we eliminated all nondefense
discretionary spending--every last dime of it--we would still run
budget deficits by 2016. We cannot solve the budget problem this way,
no matter how hard our Republican friends try to convince Americans
that we can.
Republicans say we should interpret their drastic, unbalanced and
extreme legislation as sending a message on their seriousness about the
deficit. But the only message it sends is that they are serious about
eroding important programs from Head Start to job training to Pell
grants to food inspections to border security.
This legislation would cut $61 million from the Presidential budget
request for food inspections, sending the message that we don't need to
worry about food safety, despite the thousands of Americans every year
who suffer from food-borne illness. It would cut over $1 billion from
the Women, Infants and Children Program, sending the message that we
should do less to help poor families put food on the table.
Our Republican colleagues are serious about cutting more than $180
million from the Securities and Exchange Commission budget and more
than $100 million from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission budget,
sending the message that we don't need to put cops on the beat to
police financial markets that all too recently devastated our economy.
They are serious about cutting nearly $290 million from Veterans
Administration efforts to provide better service to our veterans.
Their bill would cut $1 billion in funding for community health
centers, sending the message that health care for citizens who would
lose it under this proposal is a secondary concern. They would remove
$17 million from the research on immunization and respiratory disease,
a message that we can cut back on efforts to fight childhood illness.
Their bill would cut $550 million from the National Science
Foundation research budget, and another $1.1 billion from Department of
Energy research. It would cut about $900 million from our support of
renewable energy sources and energy conservation--sending a message
that we need not worry about high gas prices and dependence on imported
oil.
Their bill would cut $2 billion from clean water programs, putting
public health at risk, and cut $250 million from Great Lakes
restoration efforts, putting at greater risk our unique Great Lakes, on
which hundreds of thousands of jobs depend.
The Republican bill would cut more than $1 billion from Head Start.
Their message seems to be that 200,000 American children don't really
need an early childhood education boost so they can grow up to compete
in a global economy. Their bill would also cut or eliminate Pell grants
for hundreds of thousands of college students. The Republican message:
American families don't need help to meet the rising cost of college.
Speaker Boehner's Web site proclaims that ``[s]ecuring our borders
and stopping the flood of illegal immigration into the United States
must be the first priority of this Congress.'' So what does the House
bill do? It cuts more than $120 million from the President's request
and more than $350 million from the fiscal 2010 level from border
security efforts.
Now, the supporters of the House bill tell us that they regret the
need for these cuts, that these would be worthy programs in happier
times, but that the fiscal straits in which we find ourselves make
their cuts necessary. They say we have no choice.
That is false. We do have a choice. We can end the excessive tax cuts
for

[[Page S1487]]

upper income taxpayers that President Bush put in place, and close tax
loopholes that not only drain the treasury but send American jobs
abroad to boot.
The cost to the government of those upper income tax cuts is an
increase in the deficit of about $30 billion a year. Ending that $30
billion tax cut for the wealthy--for the roughly 2 percent of Americans
at the very top--could allow us to avoid the drastic cuts in important
programs that I have mentioned, and much more besides.
It is very difficult in my book to treat proposals adding $30 billion
a year to the deficit by protecting tax cuts for upper income earners
as serious deficit reduction.
There are also other revenues we can look to if we are truly serious
about deficit reduction. There are a number of tax loopholes that we
can close. For example, we should not continue to give corporations a
tax deduction when they send American jobs overseas. We should not
allow corporations and wealthy individuals to avoid U.S. taxes by
hiding assets and income in offshore tax havens. And we should not
allow hedge fund managers to earn enormous incomes and yet pay a lower
tax rate than their secretaries and janitors pay.
When we are willing to tackle those issues, when we recognize that
the solution to our deficits must be comprehensive, when we acknowledge
that it must include revenues, when we acknowledge the need to close
those tax loopholes, then the American people will know we are serious
about deficit reduction. Then, and only then, will we be able to tackle
the deficit without threatening the education of our children, or
making it harder to afford college, or cutting food programs for
children, or damaging our support for science and technology, or making
our border less secure, or reducing efforts to find new sources of
energy, or setting back so many other investments in our future well-
being.
I commend Senator Inouye for his attempts to craft an alternative
package that would avoid the draconian cuts that Republicans have
proposed. But I cannot support that legislation. It deals only with
cuts in nondefense discretionary spending, and as a result it gives
support to a pattern of debating only spending cuts as the solution to
our deficits, when it fact the solution to this problem must include
additional revenue as well.
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I would like to share my perspectives
about the funding for agencies and programs under the jurisdiction of
the Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General
Government. It has been my privilege to chair this subcommittee for
over 4 years.
Overall, the Senate CR includes $23.25 billion for financial services
accounts. This represents a cut of $2.268 billion, or 9 percent, below
the President's fiscal year 2011 budget request of $25.518 billion.
Compared to the fiscal year 2010 enacted level of $24.355 billion--
the amount presently available under the continuing resolution--the
funding in the Senate CR is a reduction of over $1.1 billion. This is a
cut of over 4 percent below a freeze.
In comparison, the House funding of $20.513 billion for financial
services is a cut of $3.84 billion, or 16 percent, below a freeze. This
is extreme. It is harmful. It is unacceptable.
The Senate approach, while making significant and difficult cuts,
restores $2.737 billion of irresponsible cuts made in H.R. 1. The
Senate CR preserves reasonable funding to minimize erosions in critical
government programs and prevent harmful setbacks in the delivery of
important public services.
Let me take this opportunity to illustrate some of the harsh,
detrimental reductions included in H.R. 1, and why the funding
recommended in the Senate CR offers a prudent alternative.
For the Treasury's Community Development Financial Institutions Fund,
or CDFI, the Senate CR provides $247 million, a freeze to the fiscal
year 2010 level. CDFI funds provide seed financing in our nation's most
challenged communities for projects such as affordable housing
developments, retail developments, small business lending, and
community facilities such as day care centers and charter schools.
Each dollar of Federal spending provides confidence for private
investors. For example, last year, the Community Investment
Corporation, a CDFI in Illinois, leveraged a $1 million Federal grant
into $400 million of total financing from 33 banks for affordable
housing. CDFI funds offer a lifeline for small businesses and
communities that would otherwise have no option to find financing
during these tough economic times. CDFI funds are truly the ``last
mile'' of financing in struggling communities.
By contrast, H.R. 1 reduces funding for the CDFI Fund to a mere $50
million, a drastic 80-percent reduction below the Senate CR level. If
enacted, H.R. 1's cuts to the CDFI Fund would result in the loss of an
estimated $1.6 billion in private sector leveraging for investment in
America's most challenged communities.
This huge reduction in financing would cause the loss of 19,200 new
jobs that would otherwise be created, the loss of 14,100 affordable
housing units that would otherwise be built, and the loss of 3,200
small business loans that would otherwise be made. It would be a
mistake to enact H.R. 1's cuts to CDFI. The Senate CR level is a
responsible way to maintain investment in our Nation's most challenged
communities during these tough economic times.
For the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, $286 million is
provided in the Senate CR. On the other hand, H.R. 1 decimates the
resources for this agency by slashing funding down to a meager $112
million. This is a cut of $57 million, or 33 percent, below a freeze at
the current level of $168.8 million. The Senate level supports
necessary staffing increases and key information technology investments
to help the CFTC better protect the average investor and increase
safeguards against excessive speculation.
The House level would prevent the CFTC from meeting its mission to
monitor the markets. It would jeopardize CFTC's work to ensure that the
ever evolving world of commodity futures--diversified products from
grains to gold, from currencies to carbon credits--are free from
manipulation, fraud, and abusive trading and sales practices. Futures
prices--and CFTC's oversight role--impact what we pay for the basic
necessities of everyday life: our food, our clothing, fuel in our
vehicles, and heat in our homes. The House sledgehammer cut to the CFTC
is irresponsible and irrational.
For the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Senate CR provides
$1.3 billion, consistent with the authorized level for fiscal year
2011. These funds support increased legal and investigative staffing
for oversight and enforcement responsibilities as well as substantial
investments in IT upgrades. By contrast, H.R. 1 cuts resources for the
SEC to $1.069 billion. This is a reduction of $41 million, or 4
percent, below a freeze. It is a decrease of $231 million, or 18
percent, below the authorized level.
Among a long list of expected setbacks, the decreased funding in H.R.
1 will severely limit SEC's ability to police the markets and enforce
Federal securities laws to protect investors from deceptive financial
schemes. It will limit SEC's pursuit of quality complaints, tips, and
referrals and will stall investigations.
Less funding will diminish the SEC's ability to conduct public
company oversight, review public filings of large financial
institutions, and decrease the frequency of reviews of smaller and mid-
sized companies to less than once every 3 years. Is this really what we
want in the wake of the Wall Street fiasco?
H.R. 1 cuts mean that outmoded technology will languish without
critical modernization, leaving the SEC to lag far behind the
industries it regulates. SEC will be hampered in its ability to collect
the tremendous amounts of market data needed to better identify,
address, and prevent activities and events that can disrupt markets and
harm investors, such as those that occurred on May 6, 2010--the ``flash
crash''. Why supporters of H.R. 1 want to undercut this watchdog agency
is hard to comprehend.
For the Small Business Administration, the Senate CR provides $762
million, in essence a freeze at the fiscal year 2010 level due to
available carryover balances. In contrast, H.R. 1 reduces SBA's
operating budget by $25 million compared to the Senate CR. This cut
would reduce staff across the entire SBA. Reducing staff would cause a
backlog in loan approvals under SBA's loan programs that support over

[[Page S1488]]

$20 billion a year in financing for new and expanding small businesses.
A loan approval backlog would impose delays and uncertainty in
financing for small businesses during a critical time in the Nation's
economic recovery.
The cut to SBA would also scale back the ability of SBA's field staff
to serve small businesses seeking credit and business counseling
resources. This will deprive small businesses of critical
``matchmaking'' connections to banks participating in SBA's loan
programs and to counseling programs for starting and growing small
businesses. The Senate CR funding for SBA is a responsible alternative
to H.R. 1's reckless cut. The Senate CR will keep SBA operational to
support American small businesses working towards economic recovery.
For tax law enforcement, the Senate CR provides $5.59 billion to the
Internal Revenue Service. It is a modest but rational increase of $87
million, or 1.6 percent, above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level of
$5.5 billion. The funding includes critical resources for targeting
offshore tax evasion.
In contrast, H.R. 1 cuts tax law enforcement to $5.219 billion, which
is $285 million, or 5 percent, below a freeze. Cutting IRS resources is
counterintuitive to the goal of reducing the Federal deficit. Under
H.R. 1, lost enforcement revenue could surpass well over $4 billion.
Reductions under H.R. 1 would necessitate furloughing all enforcement
employees for up to 19 business days and/or significant RIFs.
Among other consequences, the H.R. 1 cut means 164,000 fewer
individual and business audits, directly affecting the performance of
IRS's enforcement revenue efforts and reducing overall compliance. It
will mean 8,400 fewer taxpayer appeals case closures, as fewer
taxpayers are able to turn to the appeals process to resolve disputed
tax controversies.
Moreover, 310 fewer criminal cases will be completed, 216 fewer
convictions will be realized, and an estimated $67 million in asset
forfeiture revenue will be sacrificed. It also means the discontinuance
of fraud cases related to the Return Preparer Program, drug trafficking
tax cases, and interagency efforts in coordination with the Justice
Department and Drug Enforcement Administration.
For the General Services Administration, the Senate CR would provide
$591 million for construction of Federal buildings, providing
continuation funding for multiyear, consolidation projects and nearly
$398 million for repair of Federal buildings and courthouses. In
contrast, H.R. 1 eliminates all funding for Federal building
construction and all major repairs for Federal buildings. Overall, the
Senate CR reduces GSA programs below fiscal year 2010 levels and by a
total of approximately $1 billion below fiscal year 2011 requested
levels.
The House approach is irresponsible because it defers Federal
construction projects, making them more expensive; results in more
Federal leasing, which is more expensive over the long-term than
federally owned space; and prevents Federal agencies from operating as
efficiently as possible due to delays in moving into new space
necessary to meet mission requirements.
In addition, eliminating the construction and repair projects could
cost as many as 16,000 private sector jobs in the construction and
related industries. It would also delay other benefits associated with
Federal capital projects, including economic development and
``multiplier effects'' of infusions of Federal spending into local
economies.
Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Mr. President, it is likely that neither the House
nor Senate version of the fiscal year 2011 continuing resolution will
pass this body.
I would like to highlight one feature of both of the bills we are
considering that I believe is truly misguided. Neither bill provides
funding to continue the alternate engine program for the F-35 airplane.
In the past, Congress has supported this engine in a bipartisan,
bicameral way as a lower cost, higher performance alternate that will
save billions in tax dollars and give the F35 engine program
competition it badly needs.
There has been significant misinformation circulated about the
alternate engine program, which, based on previous experience with
engine competition programs, should actually reduce the Federal deficit
by more than $20 billion.
During the 1980s, the Air Force and Navy jointly qualified second
sources for the Sidewinder, Sparrow, Amraam, Maverick, Standard,
Tomahawk, and Ham missile programs. In every case, buying from both
sources brought costs down dramatically. That same strategy brought
costs down and under budget for the FFG-7 frigates, DDG-51 destroyers,
Aegis Cruisers, and attack submarines.
Absent the F35 alternative engine program, a company that is
currently $3.5 billion over budget will be the monopoly provider of the
engine for the F35 airplane. This is not the way taxpayers want
Washington to do business.
The alternate engine program supports 2,500 jobs in the United
States, 800 of those in Ohio. My State's unemployment rates is already
9.3 percent, and it would be a tragedy if we eliminate jobs that are
actually serving to reduce federal spending and protect against faulty
or delayed access to engines needed by our military.
I am disappointed no funds are contained in either bill. I don't
believe you walk quietly away from a $100 billion program that has
billions of tax dollars invested in it without a vigorous debate. In
deleting the alternate engine, both bills eliminated a line item today
at the expense of significant savings downstream.
We are not going to end the budget deficit by haphazardly taking
dollars out of investments justified not only by their public policy
purpose--in this case, equipping our military in the most responsible,
efficient means possible--but by their potential to produce major
downstream savings.
It is unclear how the negotiations on getting a budget deal will
proceed and it is equally clear that they will be hard. But the future
of this engine must be on the agenda.
Our safety and security as a nation and the seriousness of the budget
choices that face us are simply too important to let expediency get the
better of common sense. Exploring what is best for our military and our
budget goals must be part of the continuing resolution negotiations.
Mr. INOUYE. Mr. President, over the past few weeks, I have listened
to several of my colleagues say that the Defense budget should be
further reduced. Other Members are concerned that this bill cuts too
much funding out of the Department of Defense.
I believe the Defense bill before you today strikes a fair balance
between responsible reductions and protection of our military forces.
The defense portion of this bill provides a total of $671.5 billion
in base and overseas contingency operation funding for fiscal year
2011.
The base budget is $513.6 billion, which is $17.3 billion less than
the President's budget request. This bill cuts an additional $2.13
billion more than H.R. 1 for defense. I believe that these reductions
are prudent, and reflect the reality of today's challenging fiscal
environment where all programs are subject to reductions.
But let me be clear--this bill continues to fully support our men and
women in uniform and protects funding for four important national
security priorities.
First, the bill takes care of our military personnel. It fully funds
the 1.4 percent authorized pay raise and provides $887 million above
the budget request to cover shortfalls in the military personnel
accounts that were identified by the services.
Second, the bill fully funds health care for the military and their
families. The bill provides $32.8 billion for the Defense Health
Program, continues advancements in medical research, modernizes and
maintains medical infrastructure, and develops the next generation of
electronic medical records.
In addition, the bill adds $100 million for peer-reviewed research in
psychological health and traumatic brain injury.
Third, the bill fully funds key readiness programs critical to
prepare forces for combat operations and other peace time missions,
including flying hours and steaming days, depot maintenance, training,
spare parts, and base operations.
Additional funding is included to provide for shortfalls identified
by the

[[Page S1489]]

Army for base operations, for the Navy and Air Force for depot
maintenance, and tuition assistance for military spouses.
Fourth, the bill provides additional funding to protect our forces,
including new equipment and upgrades to existing programs to ensure
that our military has the hardware needed to conduct operations and
train during a time of war. High-priority programs are increased, such
as:
The replacement of helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft lost in
battle, and increased production of Army and Air Force helicopters
urgently needed to support combat operations in Afghanistan;
Support for critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance,
ISR, initiatives, including procurement of 48 Reaper unmanned aerial
vehicles and more than $2.5 billion of ISR programs identified by the
Secretary of Defense as high priority for troops overseas;
Better protection of deployed military personnel, such as $3.4
billion to fully fund Mine Resistant Ambush Protected-All Terrain
Vehicles and an additional $225 million to test and procure the Stryker
Double V Hull for additional protection from IEDs;
An additional $850 million for the National Guard and Reserve to
ensure that our Reserve components have the equipment needed to conduct
their growing missions.
Furthermore, the bill continues our goal to transfer responsibility
to our partners in Afghanistan and Iraq so that our forces can safely
and responsibly withdrawal.
The bill provides $11.6 billion for the Afghanistan security forces
fund, $1.5 billion for the Iraq security forces fund, $500 million for
the Commander's emergency response program, and $400 million for the
Afghanistan infrastructure fund.
However, the Department of Defense is not immune from budget
reductions. I believe this bill judiciously cuts defense spending,
while improving fiscal accountability. Nearly 760 defense programs are
reduced in the package before you today.
These funding cuts are made as a result of program terminations or
delays, changes to policy or programs since submission of the budget
over a year ago, inadequate justification, authorization adjustments,
or corrections to poor fiscal discipline.
For instance, the bill cuts nearly $2 billion out of the Joint Strike
Fighter program due to production and testing delays. Over $450 million
is deleted from the bill due to the termination of the non-line of
sight launch system.
The bill rescinds $1.2 billion from prior year funding in 45
different programs due to poor execution, delays or terminations. The
list goes on and on.
This is a fair bill for the Department of Defense. It is a bipartisan
compromise between responsibly reducing defense spending while at the
same time providing for our men and women in uniform that are fighting
a war in Afghanistan, winding down operations in Iraq, and operating
around the globe to protect this Nation's security.
I strongly urge my colleagues to support this measure.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority's time has expired.
The Senator from South Dakota.
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I want us to remember why we are here. The
reason we are here right now debating this issue is because last year
the Democratic majority failed to pass a budget. They did not pass a
budget and did not pass a single appropriations bill. This is a $3.7
trillion enterprise called the Federal Government. Last year, we did
not pass a budget. We did not pass a single appropriations bill. So
this is cleaning up the unfinished business of last year.
It was always said that we could not do this before the election. So
when the election was over with, instead of dealing with these
important budget issues, we did a START treaty, which, of course, was
important to debate; don't ask, don't tell; the DREAM Act; all kinds of
other things but never the budget. We did not deal with the budget. So
here we are dealing with last year's unfinished business.
So when my colleagues come in here and make all these arguments about
how terrible it is that we are having to do this and the House
Republicans have sent us this budget that shaves $60 billion from last
year's spending levels, the reason we are having to go through this
exercise in the first place is because last year the Democratic
majority did not even pass a budget.
Where does that leave us today? Well, we all know we have a $14
trillion debt--$14 trillion. I think that has sunk in with the American
people. To put that into perspective, historically, this last month--
the month of February--our debt was $223 billion. Our deficit, in other
words--what we added to the debt--was $223 billion in 1 month--the
largest single monthly total ever. We added more to the debt last month
than we did from the founding of our country until 1945--in just 1
month.
The projected deficit for this entire year is $1.65 trillion--the
largest ever in nominal terms. And OMB predicts it to be the largest as
a share of our economy since World War II. That is as much debt as we
ran up from the founding of our country until 1985. This is the
dimension of the problem we are dealing with.
There is an old saying that if you are in a hole, stop digging. Well,
we continue to dig the hole deeper and deeper and deeper. So we are
going to have votes today on a couple of alternatives.
One is the alternative that was sent over from the House of
Representatives which shaves $60 billion off of last year's spending
level. So there are lots of people coming down here, and there is all
kinds of gnashing of teeth and statements of how Draconian these
various cuts are going to be. Mr. President, $60 billion, remember, in
a $3.7 trillion budget is less than 2 percent. Now, to the average
American, if they were like we are at the Federal level and out of
every dollar they spent, they were borrowing over 40 cents and running
$1.5 trillion and $1.6 trillion deficits year over year over year, I
think they would figure out a way to tighten their belts a little bit
and be able to absorb a 1.5-percent cut over last year's spending
level.
Now, couple that with the fact that since 2008 spending has increased
by 22 percent. Nondefense discretionary spending, which is what we are
talking about here, has gone up 22 percent--10 times the rate of
inflation. All we are talking about here is going back to 2008 levels.
This is not Draconian. I think the American people think this is
reasonable.
So what does the other side put forward? The other side said: Well,
we think this is Draconian, and so we are going to put forward a
proposal that cuts $4.7 billion--$4.7 billion compared to $60 billion.
Mr. President, $4.7 billion is what the other side puts on the table in
terms of spending reduction in trying to do something about our runaway
Federal debt. Well, if you look at the clock today, it is 2:45 p.m. By
this time tomorrow--2:45 p.m. tomorrow--we will have added over $4
billion to the debt--almost as much as they are proposing to save for
the balance of this entire year. So they are laying forward savings of
$4.7 billion for the rest of the fiscal year, when between now and this
time tomorrow we will add over $4 billion to the Federal debt. That is
the dimension of what we are talking about.

It is so bad that former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said recently
that he views the probability or the possibility of a debt crisis
occurring in the next 2 to 3 years to be 50 percent--debt crisis. If
that is not enough, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the
highest ranking military official in this country, ADM Mike Mullen,
said a few months back that the greatest threat to America's national
security is our national debt. How much more do we have to hear? It is
not just a threat to our future and to future generations; it is a
threat to our national security, and it is a threat to our economy.
We have all kinds of evidence out there that this level of spending
and this amount of debt costs jobs in our economy. Everybody says the
most important thing we want to focus on is the economy and job
creation. I agree with that. One of the best ways to do that is to
start getting spending and debt under control. There is a great variety
of research out there that studied the last eight centuries of
governments and concluded that when your gross debt reaches the 90-
percent level of your total economy--in other words, gross debt to GDP
equals 90 percent--that it costs you about 1 percentage point of
economic growth every year. According to Christina Romer, the

[[Page S1490]]

former economic adviser to the President, every time you lose 1
percentage point of economic growth, you lose 1 million jobs. So if we
continue to sustain this level of debt, it is costing us economic
growth, which is costing us literally jobs every single day.
A couple of weeks ago the Government Accountability Office issued a
report and in it they looked at the government and the various agencies
of government and how much it costs and looked for duplication and
redundancy and inefficiency. What did they conclude? They concluded
that there are 82 programs in this country across 10 different agencies
and departments of government that are designed to improve teacher
quality; granted, a very noble goal, but does it take 82 Federal
programs and 10 agencies or departments to administer programs
improving teacher quality? There are 56 Federal programs out there
which teach people how to manage their finances. When you are running a
$14 trillion debt, arguably this is probably the last place that ought
to be advising people about managing their finances. But 56 Federal
programs? The American people have to be looking at this, and it is
incomprehensible to them, I think, to see what their Federal Government
wastes money on.
What we are talking about here is a fairly reasonable reduction in
nondefense, nonnational security discretionary spending. I hope today
we will take a step forward and demonstrate we are serious. What the
Democrats put forward, $4.7 billion, isn't serious. It completely
ignores and appears to be in denial of the dimensions of this problem,
which I think are wholly grasped by the American people. In fact, we
had testimony yesterday in front of the Senate Budget Committee from
Erskine Bowles and Senator Al Simpson who headed the debt commission
and said this is the most predictable crisis we have ever had. We see
it coming. We know it is coming. We can do something about it, and we
are trying to today.
It is about jobs. People have gotten up on the other side and said,
Well, it is going to cut this or cut that. The majority leader said
yesterday we can't do this because it would cut funding at the Cowboy
Poetry Festival. When you are out of every dollar you are spending,
borrowing more than 40 cents; when you are running a $14 trillion
debt--there are priorities, arguably, that are important in terms of
Federal priorities. I don't think that probably counts as one of them
and I don't think the American people would think so either.
The Senator from Montana said this is going to cut people from
Medicare Advantage. What about the health care reform bill last year?
That cut $2 billion in Medicare Advantage and would leave literally a
quarter of those people who get benefits under Medicare Advantage
without that coverage today. That wasn't a big talking point for the
other side when we were doing health care reform last year. Yet, today,
again, we hear typical rhetorical scare tactics. But what I want to
remind my colleagues of and remind the American people of is that over
the last 2 years, nondefense discretionary spending has increased 22
percent.
All we are talking about is going back to 2008 levels. Since that
time, it has increased 10 times the rate of inflation. We need to start
living within our means. We cannot continue to spend money we don't
have.
I hope my colleagues will support H.R. 1 and let the American people
know we are serious about getting our fiscal house in order.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Tennessee.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, how much time remains?
The PRESIDING OFFICER. There is 11 minutes 25 seconds remaining.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Will the Chair let me know when 2 minutes remains?
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator will be so notified.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I thank the Senator from South Dakota
for his eloquent remarks. He phrased exactly the question before this
body on which we are going to be casting two votes within a few
minutes, and that is this: Will we or will we not stop spending money
we don't have? I repeat, the question is: Will we or will we not stop
spending money we don't have? Do we have the courage and the common
sense and the sense of responsibility to make difficult decisions for
the future of our country when it comes to spending and debt?
Let's look at the facts. The Federal Government this year is
collecting $2.2 trillion--that is what is coming in--and spending $3.7
trillion. We are collecting $2.2 trillion in revenue, and we are
spending $3.7 trillion in revenue. That is a fact.
Here is another fact: Forty cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends is borrowed, much of it from China.
Here is another fact: We are piling up new debt at the rate of $4
billion a day--$4 billion a day of new debt. Here is another fact: Last
month was the shortest month of the year--February. The deficit--that
is this year's deficit in just that month--was the largest in history:
$223 billion. And our friends on the other side are suggesting we solve
a problem of this dimension by reducing spending by $4.7 billion. As
Senator Thune said, by tomorrow, at about this time, we will have piled
up as much more debt as they propose to save. That is not urgent; that
is not responsible; that is not dealing with difficult decisions in the
way people expect us to do.
The Republicans in the House of Representatives have stepped up and
have made difficult decisions. We might not agree with every single
detail of the decision, and the Senate will have its own priorities
when we pass a bill, but I, for one--and I think many others on this
side of the aisle--are going to vote for H.R. 1, the House-passed $57
billion cut, because it is a sure step toward reducing spending and
stopping our country from spending money we don't have. Senate
Democrats say, Sorry, we can only find $4.7 billion to save.
The purpose of the vote I will cast today is to say we have an urgent
need that needs to be addressed. We have a sense of responsibility
toward that decision. We can't solve much of it today, but we can solve
some of it today, and the time to start addressing this urgent need is
now.
When I became Governor of Tennessee about 30 years ago, a friend gave
me a book written by George Reedy, Lyndon Johnson's press secretary. It
was called ``The Twilight of the Presidency.'' In that book, I found a
definition I used as Governor because it was such a good definition of
what an executive in public life is to do. George Reedy said that the
job of the President is, No. 1, to see an urgent need; No. 2, to
develop a strategy to meet the need; and No. 3, to persuade at least
half the people that he is right. See an urgent need, develop a
strategy to meet the need, and persuade at least half the people he is
right.
This is an urgent need facing our country. Forty cents out of every
dollar we spend is borrowed; $2.2 trillion coming in; $3.7 trillion
going out; 47 top economists over 2 weekends ago saying it was the most
urgent need facing our country. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff is saying it is our biggest national security threat--the debt.
As Senator Thune said, debt costs jobs. Economists tell us that debt at
this level costs us about 1 million jobs a year.
Let me read what the President's own debt commission had to say about
this. This debt commission had six Members of the U.S. Senate as
members--three Republicans, three Democrats. Five of the six voted for
this report of the debt commission. They said, as members of this
commission:

We spent the past 8 months studying the same hard, cold
facts--

Not opinions, facts.

Together we have reached these unavoidable conclusions. The
problem is real. The solution will be painful. There is no
easy way out. Everything must be on the table, and Washington
must lead.

That is President Obama's debt commission. After all the talk about
debt and deficits, they go on to say:

It is long past time for America's leaders to put up or
shut up.

That is the President's debt commission talking.

The era of debt denial is over. There can be no turning
back. We sign our names to this plan because we love our
children, our grandchildren, and our country too much not to
act while we still have the chance to secure a better future
for all of our citizens.

That report included five Members of this body, two Democrats, three
Republicans. That was what the debt commission had to say.

[[Page S1491]]

Here is what the President had to say. In 2009 he said:

What we have done is kicked this can down the road. We are
now at the end of the road. We are not in a position to kick
it any further.

We can only find $4 billion to save?
President Obama said last year:

I hope some of the folks who are hollering about deficits
and debt step up, because I am calling their bluff.

We can only save $4 billion?

My administration is going to seek to work with Congress to
execute serious entitlement reform.

And then as Senator the President said:

Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically, weakens
us internationally. Leadership means the buck stops here.
Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices
today on to the backs of our children and grandchildren.
America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership.

I ask, where is the President of the United States in this debate?
Where is the President of the United States? His debt commission came
out months ago and recommended $4 trillion in savings. No support from
the President. The President made an eloquent State of the Union
Address. I sat on the front row and applauded many times. No sense of
urgency about the Federal debt. The President offered his budget a few
weeks ago. No plan for reducing the Federal debt.
Now we are taking step No. 1, which is to work on the discretionary
part of the budget--only about 12 percent of the budget. The House is
willing to take difficult steps; the Senate Democratic majority says we
can only find an amount that equals the debt we are piling up in one
24-hour period; and the President is missing in action.
I respectfully say that is not leadership. We need the President of
the United States to join us in an effort to stop our country from
spending money we don't have, in making difficult decisions about
spending, so we can assure the strength and future of our country.
The question before us is will we or will we not stop spending money
we don't have? Will we or will we not make the difficult decisions it
takes to reduce spending so that our country will be strong for the
future?
The other side says they can find $4.7 billion to save. We say we can
start with $57 billion. I will vote for the $57 billion and against the
$4.7 billion because that is a sure step toward a bright path for
America's future.
I thank the Chair. I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Does the Senator yield back the remaining
time? There is 2 minutes remaining.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I yield back the remainder of our time.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. All time is yielded back.
Under the previous order, the question is on the passage of H.R. 1.
Under that order, 60 votes are required for passage.
Mr. ALEXANDER. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
The result was announced--yeas 44, nays 56, as follows:

[Rollcall Vote No. 36 Leg.]

YEAS--44

Alexander
Ayotte
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Brown (MA)
Burr
Chambliss
Coats
Coburn
Cochran
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Crapo
Ensign
Enzi
Graham
Grassley
Hatch
Hoeven
Hutchison
Inhofe
Isakson
Johanns
Johnson (WI)
Kirk
Kyl
Lugar
McCain
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rubio
Sessions
Shelby
Snowe
Thune
Toomey
Vitter
Wicker

NAYS--56

Akaka
Baucus
Begich
Bennet
Bingaman
Blumenthal
Boxer
Brown (OH)
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Conrad
Coons
DeMint
Durbin
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Hagan
Harkin
Inouye
Johnson (SD)
Kerry
Klobuchar
Kohl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Lee
Levin
Lieberman
Manchin
McCaskill
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Murray
Nelson (NE)
Nelson (FL)
Paul
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Rockefeller
Sanders
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Warner
Webb
Whitehouse
Wyden
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 44, the nays 56.
Under the previous order requiring 60 votes for passage of this bill,
the bill is rejected.
The majority leader.

Amendment No. 149

Mr. REID. Mr. President, on behalf of Senator Inouye, I send to the
desk amendment No. 149.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
The legislative clerk read as follows:

The Senator from Nevada [Mr. Reid], for Mr. Inouye,
proposes an amendment numbered 149.

Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the reading of
the amendment be dispensed with.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
(The amendment is printed in the Record of Friday, March 4, 2011.)
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The question is on agreeing to amendment No. 149.
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
The result was announced--yeas 42, nays 58, as follows:

[Rollcall Vote No. 37 Leg.]

YEAS--42

Akaka
Baucus
Begich
Bingaman
Blumenthal
Boxer
Brown (OH)
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Conrad
Coons
Durbin
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Harkin
Inouye
Johnson (SD)
Kerry
Klobuchar
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Lieberman
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Murray
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Rockefeller
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Udall (NM)
Warner
Whitehouse
Wyden

NAYS--58

Alexander
Ayotte
Barrasso
Bennet
Blunt
Boozman
Brown (MA)
Burr
Chambliss
Coats
Coburn
Cochran
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Crapo
DeMint
Ensign
Enzi
Graham
Grassley
Hagan
Hatch
Hoeven
Hutchison
Inhofe
Isakson
Johanns
Johnson (WI)
Kirk
Kohl
Kyl
Lee
Levin
Lugar
Manchin
McCain
McCaskill
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Nelson (NE)
Nelson (FL)
Paul
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rubio
Sanders
Sessions
Shelby
Snowe
Thune
Toomey
Udall (CO)
Vitter
Webb
Wicker
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, there are 42 yeas, 58 nays.
Under the previous order requiring 60 votes for adoption of this
amendment, the amendment is rejected.
Under the previous order, the measure will be returned to the
calendar.
The Senator from Minnesota.

____________________