[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 31 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S1214]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE CONTINUING RESOLUTION
Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, I voted in favor of the continuing
resolution to keep our government and all its essential services open
and operating for the next 2 weeks. I cast this vote because I believe
a government shutdown is in no one's interests, but I am deeply
disappointed in the political process that has put us in this position
and my patience is nearly exhausted with yet another short-term
solution and band-aid approach. A 2-week extension that merely defers
tough decisions on funding the fiscal year that started more than 5
months ago is hardly progress. A 2-week extension is preferable to a
government shutdown, but it does not provide the certainty that is
needed. The American people deserve better than a stalled process which
delays important decisions of how we can reduce our Federal budget
deficit while maintaining our important investments in infrastructure,
research, education, technology, and clean energy which will result in
new jobs and will bolster our long-term competitiveness.
The American people deserve a serious dialogue and adult conversation
within the Congress about our fiscal situation, discretionary spending,
entitlements, and revenues. We need to work towards a long-term
solution to reduce both our current budget deficit and our staggering
debt. We will need to reduce Federal spending and make appropriate
changes to our entitlement programs to meet the fiscal challenges
facing our country. To do this appropriately, everything--revenue, tax
reform, spending and entitlements--needs to be on the table.
As we make these difficult decisions, we must keep in mind that this
cannot be done by just eliminating programs which protect vulnerable
citizens or simply by increasing taxes on our wealthiest citizens.
Instead, we must find a way to share the sacrifices necessary to bring
our budget into balance over the long-term while continuing to invest
in scientific and medical research, education, infrastructure and
energy that will help create new industries and jobs in the future.
I want to be crystal clear about what is wrong with today's dialogue.
For the last months we have heard the sound bites. We have heard
elected officials say they are for small government, lower taxes, and
more freedom. But what do they really mean?
Do they want a government too limited to have invented the Internet,
now a vital part of our commerce and communications? A government too
small to give America's auto industry and all its workers a second
chance to fight for their survival? Taxes too low to invest in the
research that creates jobs and industries and fills the Treasury with
the revenue that educates our children, cures disease, and defends our
country? We have to get past slogans and sound bites, reason together,
and talk in real terms about how America can do its best.
If we are going to balance the budget and create jobs, we can't
pretend that we can do it by just eliminating earmarks and government
waste. We have to look at the plain facts of how we did it before, and
by the way, you don't have to look far. In the early 1990s, our economy
was faltering because deficits and debt were freezing capital. We had
to send a signal to the market that we were capable of being fiscally
responsible. We did just that and as a result we saw the longest
economic expansion in history, created over 22 million jobs, and
generated unprecedented wealth in America, with every income bracket
rising. But we did it by making tough choices. The Clinton economic
plan committed the country to a path of discipline that helped unleash
the productive potential of the American people. We invested in the
workforce, in research, in development. We helped new industries. Then,
working with Republicans, we came up with a budget framework that put
our nation on track to be debt free by 2012 for the first time since
Andrew Jackson's administration.
How we got off track is a story that doesn't require retelling. But
the truth of how we generated the 1990s economic boom does need to be
told. We didn't just cut our way to a balanced budget; we grew our way
there. The question now is, What are the tough decisions we are going
to make today? What are the issues we are going to wrestle with
together at a moment of enormous challenge?
This process cannot be done in two weeks, but it should have already
begun--and it needs to begin today. The American people deserve no
less.
____________________