[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 30 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1084-S1085]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                               GAO REPORT

  Mr. COBURN. Madam President, I thank the majority leader and the 
minority leader both for their comments on this report. It is important 
for the American people to know that this is the first of three reports 
we are going to receive. This report just covers what the GAO has 
looked at in the last 4 to 5 years. It truly only covers about one-
third of the Federal Government, and I am talking discretionary 
programs, not mandatory programs such as Social Security and Medicare 
and Medicaid.
  The GAO report shows at least $100 billion in savings if we could do 
our job. We are going to have a large debate over the next 2 weeks 
focused on funding the government for the next 6 months of this fiscal 
year and what the funding is going to be like in the next year. If I 
were sitting at home as a regular American looking at Congress, having 
read this report, the question I would ask is, Why will there be any 
debate at all? The GAO has given us a roadmap. They have said: Here is 
where $100 billion--those are my numbers, not theirs--of savings can 
come on an annualized basis on the first third of the discretionary 
side of the Federal Government. The discretionary programs of this 
government are 24 percent greater now than they were 2 years ago.
  The challenge we face before us as a nation is a far greater 
challenge than anything we have ever faced. That sounds like a gigantic 
overstatement, but when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who 
is head of all of our military, reporting to our civilian officials, 
says the greatest threat to this country is our debt, we ought to wake 
up and pay attention to it. The average American--75 percent of 
Americans--across this land wants the size of the Federal Government 
and its spending reduced, and that includes Democrats, Republicans, and 
Independents. What is lacking today is the leadership to define the 
problem for the American people so that we can come together as a 
nation and solve this greatest of all challenges before us.
  Let me spend a minute talking about what is going to happen if we 
don't solve it. We heard the minority leader, the Senator from 
Kentucky, talk about the $1.65 trillion deficit this year. Today, the 
United States is borrowing money, on average, for everything we have 
borrowed, for about 2 percent. The historical average at which we 
borrow money is around 6 percent. Over the next 2 years, we are going 
to add, if we don't change things drastically--and I am talking 
drastically--another $3.5 trillion to the debt, to bring us to almost 
$18 trillion worth of debt. If we apply our historical interest rate to 
the debt--which we will be at in 2 or 3 years, there is no question 
about that--of 6 percent to $18 trillion, what we get is $1.08 trillion 
a year in interest costs. Think about that. We spent $127 billion this 
last year on interest, and we are going to take $1 trillion.
  What happens if that happens? What that means is there is no 
discretionary budget. That means there is no money for the military; 
there is no money for education; there is no money for any or all of 
the programs other than Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. That 
is the only thing that is left. And if that happens, our ability to 
borrow money in the international market will markedly decline, and the 
likelihood is that interest rates will go even higher than our 
historical average of 6 percent.
  So the time to call us together, the time for shared sacrifice--not 
for sacrifice's sake but so we can restore the hope of prosperity for 
our Nation--is now. It is not tomorrow, it is now.
  We are going to have a small bill on the floor that over the next 2 
weeks will eliminate $4 billion by advancing terminations of programs 
both President Bush and President Obama want to terminate and eliminate 
$2.7 billion worth of earmarks that are inappropriate. So that is $4 
billion over 2 weeks. Our interest cost today and what we are borrowing 
is $3 billion. That is what we are borrowing a day that we don't have. 
Every day, we go into the markets and borrow $3 billion. So over these 
2 weeks, 14 days--14 days--we are going to borrow $42 billion, and we 
are only going to save $4 billion. Do my colleagues see the magnitude 
of the problem? We cannot continue to go in this direction.
  The bill the House sent us is a step in the right direction but far 
less than what is needed based on the reality of what is in front of 
us. Every dollar this government spends, we borrow 40 cents of it--40 
cents. What do we think a 20-year-old individual out there is going to 
see 20 years from now as a consequence of us going down the drain in

[[Page S1085]]

terms of the interest costs and the debt?
  Necessity is the mother of invention. We have a need now as a 
nation--not as Republicans and Democrats but as a Nation--to come 
together and make the decisions that will put us on a course that 
guarantees the future for our kids and grandkids. The easiest way I 
know right now to take some of the sting out of the parochialism and 
partisanship is for every Member of this body and those in the House to 
become acutely aware of what this report says.
  The minority leader listed a few of the programs. Let me go through 
these. Sitting at home or sitting in your office, think about if any of 
this makes sense.
  There are 82 separate teacher training programs run by the Federal 
Government--82 separate sets of bureaucracies and sets of Federal 
employees. None of these teacher training programs, by the way, have a 
metric on them to evaluate whether they are successful. So when we are 
not successful--and I question whether it is even the role of the 
Federal Government to be involved in teacher training. I couldn't find 
it in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson couldn't find it in the 
Constitution. Roosevelt couldn't find it in the Constitution. Johnson 
couldn't find it in the Constitution. They all said so. We have quotes 
on that. Yet we have 82 programs, none of which do we know whether they 
are working.
  We have 47 job training programs, 44 of which overlap one another--
some to the degree of 100 percent, some 60 percent. We spend $18 
billion a year on it, and not one of them has a measurement of whether 
it is effective. We have a great need in our country today to retrain 
people to available jobs. Yet we don't have any idea whether these will 
work. If you are trying to figure out how to get through these 
programs, you need another government program to help you figure out 
how to get through them.
  We have 20 offices with programs for homeless people--20 different 
programs--at the Federal level. Again, if you read the Constitution and 
the enumerated powers, you find a real difficulty in saying whether 
that is a Federal responsibility versus a State responsibility. Yet we 
have 20 separate programs for homeless people. How about one that 
works--if, in fact, it is a responsibility of the Federal Government.
  We run 80 separate economic development programs--80 of them. That is 
in four different Cabinet agencies. We spend $6.5 billion a year, and 
what the GAO says is you cannot say whether there is any economic 
development that has come out of this $6.5 billion.
  The Department of Transportation spends $58 billion on 100 separate 
programs run by 5 different agencies with 6,000 employees, with no idea 
whether that is the most efficient or effective way to do it because 
nobody has ever put a metric on it.
  We have 30 separate programs on food safety, run by 15 different 
Federal agencies. We just added a whole bunch more with the last food 
safety bill--none of which had a metric on it, none of which perfected 
the food safety in terms of interstate transport, which is undoubtedly 
a Federal responsibility. How about an efficient and effective way to 
do that. How about 1 agency being responsible for food safety instead 
of 15.
  We have 18 domestic food and nutrition programs--we spend $62.5 
billion--11 of which we have no idea whether they are performing 
effectively.
  The first question you might ask is, How in the world did we get all 
these programs? We got all these programs because somebody saw a need 
and thought that would solve that need. They did so without the benefit 
of one of the No. 1 obligations of Congress, which is the oversight of 
the bureaucracy. We have all these complaints by those who favor the 
earmarking process that if we don't earmark it, then the Federal 
agencies will spend the money where they are. They forget one little 
clue in terms of the Congress. We have absolute power to oversee every 
branch of the Federal Government in terms of their effectiveness and 
their efficiency.
  Yet we have not done it. The Congress has that. Whether it is run by 
Republicans or Democrats, it is not done. It is not a partisan issue. 
It is laziness on our part. It is far easier to write a new bill that 
solves the same problem and not oversee the others. Consequently, we 
answer the humanitarian, compassionate call to fix something we have 
done by treating symptoms rather than the disease.
  We have a real disease in our country today. The disease is a cancer 
that will take away our freedom. If you look back in history, all 
republics have fallen. The average age of a republic is 206 years. How 
did they fail? What caused them to fail? If you read the history books 
and look at all of them, you will find that even though they might have 
been overrun by an enemy, the key factor that caused them to fail was 
fiscal every time. They lived beyond their means. Look at what is 
happening to us in the world today. The scope of our power militarily 
is being limited by our economic power because we are extremely far in 
debt. When you go to the lead economists, such as Ken Rogoff and Carmen 
Reinhart--the book they have written is ``This Time is Different.'' The 
economists tell us our debt right now--not what is coming this next 
year but right now--with the interest costs we have today, is costing 1 
percent of GDP. We are only going to grow about 3.5 percent this year. 
If we didn't have the debt, it would be 4.5 percent. That means 1 
million more people would have great-paying jobs this year if we didn't 
have this debt. So there is a clarion call out there coming from 
America--not inside Washington--to fix the real problems.
  As a physician, what I know is this: If I treat the symptoms of a 
disease and do not treat the real disease, I ultimately make the 
disease much worse. I cover up the signs and symptoms of the disease. 
The disease we have is a disease of not recognizing the very critical 
nature that you cannot--never--you can never live above and beyond your 
means without ultimately paying a greater price. The difference between 
the Federal Government, most of the State governments, and every family 
is when you have maxed out the credit card, it is maxed. You are not 
going to get another credit card company to give you more. You will 
either have to start paying or you will default on it.
  The question comes, Will we honor our true commitments? Will we make 
the hard decisions that are required to put us on a path for renewed 
prosperity? Will we take real information--and I have offered 70 
amendments on this over the past 6 years, which have been voted down--
and will we start paying attention now because, ultimately, if we don't 
make decisions today that will control and set us on a path of 
prosperity, we are going to be in a position where our debtholders will 
make our decisions for us. That is when liberty declines. That is when 
American exceptionalism dies. That is when our destiny is taken from 
our hands. It should not be that way.
  I, again, call on the President to lead this Nation to define the 
problem, the real threat to our freedom, and come forward and pull us 
together and let's solve this problem, with everyone recognizing that 
everyone is going to sacrifice, but the sacrifice will create a future 
benefit that will be rewarded in the lives of our children and 
grandchildren.
  I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. KIRK. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________