[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 21 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Senate]
[Page S641]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FAA REAUTHORIZATION
Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I rise today to speak on behalf of
Senator Nelson's amendment preventing the establishment of an extra
advisory committee for NASA.
It is ironic that in his recent State of the Union Address, President
Obama spoke of needing a ``sputnik'' moment to push America forward
while the administration is supporting actions that complicate and
weaken NASA and outsource its core capabilities.
Why should we transfer the responsibility for deciding how to affect
aeronautics research from the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, the responsible agency? NASA provides the Nation's
fundamental aeronautics research capability and any further dilution of
its capabilities will negatively impact not only our research and
development abilities but America's future space missions.
Furthermore, the advisory committee's function would directly and
adversely affect the separate authorization of appropriations, Public
Law 109-155, for NASA, wherein the Agency's lead role in civil
aeronautics research was reaffirmed--Sec. 411.
This is why I voted in favor of Senator Nelson's amendment, which
passed by a vote of 96 to 1. It is good that the formation of this
committee has been struck by the Nelson amendment. The proposal has not
been fully considered. It is unwise and goes against what Congress has
already established.
I strongly believe it is of critical importance for the United States
to maintain our competitive edge in human space exploration and civil
aeronautics research. We should not abandon our position as an
international leader in human space exploration. Creating another
bureaucracy, blurring lines of responsibility and complicating
decisionmaking by the responsible agency, NASA, will not be a step
forward.
____________________