[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 26, 2011)]
[House]
[Pages H501-H502]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE ``RIDE PAST THE WRECKAGE'' IN AFGHANISTAN
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, President Obama gave a stirring speech last
night, most of which I agreed with, especially the calls for defense
cuts; the investments in innovation, education, and infrastructure; and
the elimination of oil company subsidies.
But given the sacrifice endured by the American people, I thought
Afghanistan got short shrift--a mere two paragraphs.
The American Prospect magazine described the State of the Union as a
``ride past the wreckage.'' I think that was because it applies to the
State of the Union's treatment of Afghanistan.
The fact is that the training of Afghan security forces has been slow
and ineffective. The inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction
said as much this very week. The Taliban remains a vital force in many
pockets of Afghanistan, and the head of the Afghan NGO safety office
reports a very precarious security situation.
The President was correct when he said that Afghanistan will need to
provide better governance, but it's hard to see that happening with
President Karzai regularly lashing out at us and, at one point, saying
he would choose the Taliban over the United States and the
international community.
Mr. Speaker, the American people are tired of being talked down to
about this war, tired of being told everything is fine and under
control, tired of being urged to stay the course, tired of talk about
progress that seems to be little more than an illusion.
The President reiterated last night that we will begin to bring our
troops home in July, but there's plenty of evidence to suggest we're
ramping up this war instead of winding it down.
Earlier this month, for example, 1,400 additional marine combat
forces were deployed, with the possibility of additional mini-surges
during the spring, that would push our troop levels in Afghanistan to
the 100,000 mark.
We're also using heavily armored tanks for the first time, and there
are reports that we're considering expanding the war across the border
in an unprecedented way, with risky and dangerous special operations
ground raids into Pakistan.
Does this sound like a war that's drawing to a close?
Then in a trip to Afghanistan a few weeks ago, the Vice President
suggested to his hosts that the occupation
[[Page H502]]
could extend beyond 2014. ``We're not leaving if you don't want us to
leave,'' he said. He should check out recent polling that indicates the
Afghan people's deep skepticism, if not downright hostility, regarding
the United States' military presence in their country.
Besides, what about what the American people believe? When are we
going to respect their point of view? They're the ones paying for this
war in blood and treasure, and clear majorities believe that this war
has outlived its usefulness and that it's not worth fighting.
It is time, Mr. Speaker, to listen to the American people. There is
only one sensible and humane solution: That is to bring our troops home
and bring them home now.
____________________