[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 173 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Page S11027]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ALASKA CONSERVATION PARITY ACT
Mr. BEGICH. Mr. President, I want to take this opportunity to discuss
an issue of importance to Alaska Native communities. The legislation
currently under consideration would extend through 2011 the enhanced
tax incentive for donations of qualified conservation easements.
Unfortunately, Alaskan Native communities are ineligible under this
provision and, as a result, do not have access to the tools they need
to permanently protect historical or critical habitat.
For thousands of years, Alaska has been home to Native communities,
whose rich heritages, languages, and traditions have thrived in the
region's unique landscape. These communities continue to engage in a
traditional subsistence lifestyle and harvest their food from the land.
Nearly 70 percent of Native communities' food comes from the land and,
for many communities, subsistence is an economic necessity considering
the cost and difficulty involved in purchasing food.
I, along with my colleague, Ms. Murkowski, have proposed legislation,
S. 1673, which would provide parity. Our proposal is imperative to the
long-term survival of Alaska-Native communities and Alaska's nature
resources, which makes this critical legislation timely. Development
pressures are increasingly significantly in many parts of Alaska. This
legislation will allow private land owned by Alaska Native communities
to be protected, while facilitating development that will spur needed
economic activity and job growth.
We have worked with the Senate Finance Committee over the past 2
years to ensure that this provision is ready for enactment. It is
widely supported by the conservation community. I was hopeful it would
be included in the end-of-the-year tax package the Senate is currently
considering. Since the Senate was unable to address Alaska Native
conservation parity before the end of the 111th Congress, I would be
interested in learning, from the chairman of the Finance Committee,
what his plans are for advancing the proposal in the 112th Congress.
Mr. BAUCUS. I am happy to respond to Mr. Begich from Alaska. I
support the conservation easement deduction and sympathize with the
Senator's efforts. I will work with Mr. Begich and Ms. Murkowski to
address conservation issues in the new Congress.
Mr. BEGICH. I thank you, Mr. Baucus. I appreciate the Senator's
support on this issue, and look forward to working with him and my
other Senate colleagues to pass this much needed piece of legislation
as soon as an opportunity presents itself in the new Congress.
____________________