[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 165 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[House]
[Pages H8307-H8308]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FOR VETS ACT OF 2010
Ms. CHU. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill
(S. 3794) to amend chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code, to
include organizations whose membership comprises substantially veterans
as recipient organizations for the donation of Federal surplus personal
property through State agencies.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
S. 3794
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Formerly Owned Resources for
Veterans to Express Thanks for Service Act of 2010'' or ``FOR
VETS Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. RECIPIENTS OF CERTAIN FEDERAL SURPLUS PERSONAL
PROPERTY.
Section 549(c)(3)(B) of title 40, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in clause (viii), by striking ``or'' after the
semicolon;
(2) in clause (ix), by striking the period and inserting
``; or''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(x) an organization whose--''
``(I) membership comprises substantially veterans (as
defined under section 101 of title 38); and
``(II) representatives are recognized by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs under section 5902 of title 38.''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from
California (Ms. Chu) and the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Chaffetz) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from California.
General Leave
Ms. CHU. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentlewoman from California?
There was no objection.
Ms. CHU. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform, I present S. 3794, the FOR VETS Act of 2010. The
measure authorizes the transfer of Federal surplus property to State
agencies for donation within the State for veterans organizations.
S. 3794 was introduced by our colleague in the other Chamber, Senator
Patrick Leahy of Vermont, on September 16, 2010. It was referred to the
[[Page H8308]]
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and
agreed to in the Senate, with amendment, by unanimous consent. The bill
was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
on November 15, 2010.
This bill, which was originally known as the Formerly Owned Resources
for Veterans to Express Thanks for Service Act of 2010, adds veterans
groups to the list of entities already eligible to receive the transfer
of surplus Federal property from State agencies through donation. Under
this measure, eligible groups will include education or public health
organizations whose membership is substantially comprised of veterans
and whose representatives are recognized by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs.
Mr. Speaker, S. 3794 provides unneeded and unutilized Federal
property to assist our veterans in their daily lives. This is a small
token of our gratitude for their sacrifices on behalf of our country,
but one that can make a great difference to those proud men and women
who have given so much for us. I would like to thank Senator Leahy,
Chairman Towns, and Ranking Member Issa for their hard work on this
bill; and I encourage my colleagues to join me in supporting this
commonsense legislation.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. CHAFFETZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I rise today in support of S. 3794, the FOR VETS Act of 2010. Mr.
Speaker, this is a simple bill that is long overdue. The FOR VETS Act,
known as the Formerly Owned Resources for Veterans to Express Thanks
for Service Act--that's a great acronym right there--makes
organizations whose membership is comprised primarily of veterans
eligible to receive excess personal Federal property. I think it's
appropriate that we draw a distinction between personal property and
real property. There are major differences, and the value is certainly
one of them.
Every day, Mr. Speaker, the General Services Administration, through
State agencies, donates surplus goods, such as computers and home
appliances, to a wide variety of organizations such as hospitals,
schools, and public libraries. The FOR VETS Act simply adds veterans
organizations to this list of eligible recipients who can receive the
excess Federal personal property. The property being donated under the
FOR VETS Act will be items that the Federal Government is no longer
using. I can't imagine a more deserving segment of the population to
which we should be donating this excess property.
{time} 1510
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Ms. CHU. Mr. Speaker, I again urge my colleagues to join me in
supporting this measure, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Chu) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, S. 3794.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________