[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 156 (Thursday, December 2, 2010)]
[House]
[Pages H8021-H8022]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STOP THE POLITICAL POSTURING
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 6, 2009, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Deutch) is recognized
for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
Mr. DEUTCH. Madam Speaker, the holiday time is upon us when Americans
from all walks of life rejoice in our shared values of generosity, good
will, family, and thankfulness. Yet, this cherished holiday spirit is
absent here tonight as Congress once again finds itself in partisan
gridlock. This is doing absolutely nothing to ease the worry felt by
families across America during these difficult times.
Tonight the clock is ticking for 2 million Americans unable to find
work and on the verge of losing their unemployment insurance. They
worry, and they worry greatly, how they will meet their next mortgage
payment, how they will put food on the table, or how they just may be
able to afford a gift or two for their children this year at this
season.
Likewise, tonight millions of workers across America wonder if a tax
increase is headed their way. They have been suffering from stagnant
wages and fewer hours for years, but without these tax cuts they know
times will get even harder. They are not asking for much, just a few
extra hundred dollars in their paychecks next year, yet they are
holding their breath tonight because those on the other side of the
aisle are holding middle class tax relief hostage in favor of tax cuts
for millionaires, holding off providing tax relief to the middle class
at a time when it is so desperately needed.
Tonight, the retirees in my district and all across America worry
that their needs are going unnoticed by Congress. Already just today in
the United States Senate Democratic efforts to provide some measure of
benefit to seniors who have now gone 2 years in a row without a cost of
living adjustment to their Social Security even as their costs go up
every single year, efforts to provide them with just a payment to help
them through these difficult times were cut off as a result of this
partisanship.
Come January, if the Republicans have their way, health care reform
will be repealed and the donut hole will be reopened, saddling seniors
with massive prescription drug bills. In short, political posturing is
threatening to reverse the progress that this Congress has made, and
more importantly, at this difficult time it is political posturing that
threatens to hold up the middle class tax cuts, that threatens to hold
up an extension of unemployment benefits even as 2 million Americans
are starting to see their benefits end, and it is indeed this posturing
that will make things exceedingly more difficult for our seniors.
So instead of giving middle class Americans some peace of mind this
holiday season--which is what we absolutely ought to be doing--the
Republicans in Congress are demanding another $700 billion for those
who don't need that tax cut right now. At least if there is to be a
debate, a further debate on the merits of that tax cut, let's do what
everyone wants, what everyone knows is necessary, and provide that tax
relief to the middle class, and let's do it now.
Now nothing drove home some of these misplaced priorities--placing
profits all too often ahead of people, and more importantly and
obviously these past few days, putting partisan gain ahead of old-
fashioned compromise, compromise that Americans want us to make--
nothing drove that home for me more than a recent letter I received
from a dear friend, a mother with a child who needed some medical care.
I would like to read this letter on the floor of the House of
Representatives today because I would like to give voice to the
millions of mothers and fathers across America who have felt the
anxiety and the powerlessness that comes when a child is sick and a
health insurance company denies a claim.
The letter reads as follows by my friend Amy. She said, ``Losing
control was a luxury that I didn't have. And yet my hands were shaking
uncontrollably as I held the letter from the insurance company about my
6\1/2\ year old son's third open heart surgery. `Patient. Date of
birth. Description of surgery: Replacement of aortic valve. Elective.'
``Elective? Oh, that's right, we were electing to save my little
boy's life. I felt myself about to explode, literally explode. Blood
and guts and that second bowl of pasta that I should never have eaten
anyway would be splattered all over the over-priced Turkish rug on our
bedroom floor. Three, two, one, and then I held it in because I am a
mommy, and I had to keep it together for my three young, beautiful,
willful boys, one a kindergartner with congenital heart disease whose
heart happened to be failing again, and who just the other day asked,
`Mommy, if I have to go to heaven early, will you go with me?'
``I glanced up from the letter at my husband who had handed it to me
moments ago, my sweet, it-will-all-work-out husband who right now looks
so small and tired and helpless, and I said with all the conviction of
a mother who's got nothing to lose and everything to fight for, `I'm
going to bomb them.' He burst out laughing. `No, seriously. I'm going
to the store to buy vinegar and dish soap and pop rocks--or whatever
you're supposed to mix together.'
{time} 1930
``More uproarious laughter that quickly trailed off when he realized
I wasn't laughing, too. `You are joking, right?'
``And that's when I understood them: those crazy people on the news
who sometimes just snap. I got how someone could wake up one day and
just lose it and how that someone could be me. I defiantly told my
increasingly worried looking husband that the insurance companies
should not mess with the mommy species. When I told one friend about my
violent thought, she offered, `I'll come light the fuse.' Another said
if I was sent to prison, she would go with me in solidarity. Plus, I
could stand to go on a bread and water diet if I'm ever going to fit
into my jeans.
``Truth is,'' my friend writes, ``there's not a single mommy I know
who wouldn't go to jail to protect her kids. Certain things in life
just are not a choice. They are a given. Like,'' she wrote, ``my son's
upcoming surgery. I looked down at the letter and felt another wave of
anger overtake me,'' she writes. ``I mean, I had my issues with our
Nation's health care, but even I didn't think it had gone that far
astray. And yet, how dare they, them in that office building so far
removed from anything our family was going through, call our son's
being hooked up to that damn heart-lung machine for 7 hours . . .
elective?
``Here are some of the only things that I deem elective about fixing
my son's heart:
``After his last open-heart surgery, when he started slipping into a
coma, I elected to kick the nurses and doctors in the Cardio-Thoracic
Intensive Care Unit out of his room and screamed at my son--yes, I
literally yelled at the poor beautiful boy lying there with breathing
and chest tubes and other grotesque wires spilling out of him. `This is
your mommy talking, you hear? Wake up, dammit. Don't you even think
about leaving me. You're just a kid--you don't even know how to swim.'
``Twenty minutes later he miraculously woke up, and we're still
working on the swimming.
``Recently, soon after we had to quarantine our son so that he would
be germ-free for this latest operation, I elected to have Botox
injected over my eyebrows,'' she writes. ``I wanted to make myself look
perkier so no one would think that I was worse for the wear from this
ordeal and, God forbid, feel sorry for me.
``When a child died somewhere in the Midwest, his parents elected to
sign the organ donor form so that my son could have his valve to save
his own life. There are not enough benefits in the world assigned to
that kind of heroism.
``But what of the insurance letter in my hand? `I'll call them
tomorrow,' my husband said. `We'll straighten it out.' And then more
uproarious laugher.
[[Page H8022]]
This time it wasn't my husband laughing, but our three willful boys who
just that second ran into our room shooting one another with Nerf guns.
```I got Evan on the butt,' Noah screamed, exhilarated. `So what?
That tickled.' Evan recoiled on the floor with laughter, but not before
he nailed Benjamin with three foam darts in the back of his head.
``Yes, technically the family rule is not to shoot at a person, but
who were we were to interfere with this kind of unbridled frivolity?
That was something that we would never elect to do.''
I would like to thank my friend, Amy, for allowing me to share her
story tonight.
It was horror stories like these that propelled this Congress to move
forward on health care reform, to reform a system so that no family is
put into a situation where life-saving surgery can be deemed elective.
And as we stand here at this holiday season, the Members of this
Congress, the Members of this House of Representatives, all 435 of
them, the Members of the United States Senate, all 100 of them, all 535
of us who are employed, who have the benefit of working for the
citizens of the United States, have a duty to those citizens, at this
time of year in particular, to ensure that those who don't have jobs
don't see their benefits cut off so that they're not cast aside at this
holiday season unable to pay their mortgage, unable to afford a gift
for their children.
We spend a lot of time on the floor of this House debating the grand
issues of the day, and I look forward to coming back here in January in
the new Congress and having great debates about the future of our
education system, about the war in Afghanistan, about the best ways to
reduce our deficit, about how we reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
These are important debates that we need to have. But how can we let
partisan gridlock, let the obstructionism that we've seen these past
few days, how can we see that stand in the way of extending
unemployment benefits to those who desperately need it, stand in the
way of middle class tax cuts for those whose wages have been stagnant
for so long, and stand in the way of providing just a little bit for
the seniors who are struggling as well in this terribly difficult
economic time?
I heard a lot about what people expect we should learn from the
outcome of this election. And the one thing that's perfectly clear to
me, and should be clear to all of us, is that the American people want
a Congress that works for them, that does their business, and that puts
the Americans' interests ahead of the political interests of those of
us who are privileged to serve here.
When we come back next week, let us resolve to do what needs to be
done at this difficult moment to ensure that those who don't have work
can get by, that those who have been getting by can get the benefit of
a tax break, and that those seniors who have given so much for so long
can receive the benefit of a payment in lieu of two straight years
without a cost of living adjustment.
Madam Speaker, I look forward to coming back to perform that work. I
look forward to casting those votes, and I look forward to having those
debates. The days in this 111th Congress are short, but the people want
us to get this done. It is time that we remember why it is that we have
been sent here. Working together, we have to provide what everyone
knows needs to be provided and to take those first steps as soon as we
can upon our return.
Madam Speaker, that's what's at stake right now. Let us not get so
caught up in this holiday season to think that the joy that so many of
us feel is felt all around the country--not when things are so
difficult for so many. Let us be thankful for what we all have, but let
us work to ensure that everyone has at least a bit of joy this holiday
season.
Thank you, Madam Speaker. I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________