[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 154 (Tuesday, November 30, 2010)]
[House]
[Pages H7723-H7724]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF U.S.-AUSTRALIA NUCLEAR ENERGY AGREEMENT
Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 6411) to provide for the approval of the Agreement Between
the Government of the United States of America and the Government of
Australia Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 6411
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT
OF AUSTRALIA CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF
NUCLEAR ENERGY.
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding the provisions for
congressional consideration of a proposed agreement for
cooperation in subsection d. of section 123 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the Agreement Between
the Government of the United States of America and the
Government of Australia Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear
Energy, done at New York, May 4, 2010, may become effective
on or after October 8, 2010, as if all the requirements in
such section 123 for consideration of such agreement had been
satisfied, subject to subsection (b) of this section.
(b) Applicability of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Other
Provisions of Law.--Upon coming into effect, the agreement
referred to in subsection (a) shall be subject to the
provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011
et seq.) and any other applicable United States law as if
such agreement had come into effect in accordance with the
requirements of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
[[Page H7724]]
Tennessee (Mr. Tanner) and the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Poe) each will
control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Tennessee.
General Leave
Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include
extraneous material on the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Tennessee?
There was no objection.
Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 6411 approves the U.S.-Australia
agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation, which replaces the current
U.S.-Australia agreement that expires in January.
I know everyone here agrees that Australia is a close friend and
valued ally to our country. Moreover, Australia provides over 20
percent of the uranium used by U.S. domestic nuclear power reactors.
While the United States does not need a framework agreement for
peaceful nuclear cooperation in force to purchase and receive uranium
fuel supplies, Australian law does require such an agreement in order
to export uranium.
If a new agreement is not passed and does not come into effect this
year, it will have to be resubmitted to the next Congress. Given the
statutory requirement for 90 days of continuous session to elapse, it
would likely be May before the new agreement could come into effect.
If Australia is therefore forbidden by its own law to export uranium
to the United States in the interim, it would stand to lose some $250
million in revenue. But, more importantly, the bill would ensure that
this new agreement comes into force and that we, the United States, can
continue to purchase what we require in this nuclear domestic power
reaction field.
I reserve the balance of my time, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
This companion bill to S. 3844 ensures that the proposed nuclear
cooperation agreement with Australia is approved before the existing
agreement expires at the end of this calendar year.
Since the Australia 123 agreement was submitted on May 5, changes to
the announced House schedule created the possibility that Congress
might possibly adjourn before the agreement met the Atomic Energy Act's
requirement of a review period of 90 days of continuous session.
The direct result would have been a disruption of several months of
our nuclear trade and cooperation with Australia, which supplies the
United States 25 percent of its uranium. But now it appears that the
projected extension of the lame duck session will be sufficient to meet
the 90-day requirement.
However, there are still several reasons the House should still vote
to pass this bill. The most important is the opportunity to express our
strong support and admiration for our close ally, Australia. For seven
decades the United States and Australia have developed ever closer
ties, which have been repeatedly tested in both war and peace.
Beginning in World War II and extending through Korea, Vietnam, Iraq,
and now Afghanistan, the United States and Australian troops have
fought side by side. In fact, Mr. Speaker, Australia has been a loyal
ally in every major war since World War II that the United States has
fought in.
Without its bedrock support, the defense of our interests in the East
and South Asia would be greatly undermined. Reliable allies are rare in
this world, and close friends are even rarer.
This bill also is a recognition of Australia's exemplary record in
preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons worldwide. It has taken
responsibility very seriously and cooperated closely with the United
States on nonproliferation issues across the board, most recently by
joining with us to impose new and tougher sanctions on Iran.
There is another and equally important reason the House should vote
for this bill: Namely, to demonstrate the contrast between this nuclear
cooperation agreement with Australia and that proposed for Russia,
which is also before Congress and which also faces an expiration of the
90-day deadline.
While Australia has been a reliable ally and a partner and honest
with the United States, Russia has worked to undermine our interests
around the world, from Iran to Europe and Venezuela to Syria. Moscow's
overt and covert assistance to Iran's nuclear program has been crucial
to Tehran's progress in developing a nuclear weapons capabilities.
It has built the Bushehr nuclear facility, which is scheduled to come
online in January, and the Russians have said they are ready to
construct several more. Russia has repeatedly acted to protect Iran
from international pressure aimed at halting its nuclear weapons
program.
Its repeated threats to veto any significant U.N. Security Council
effort to impose sanctions on Iran have ensured that only weak measures
have been adopted, which Tehran has laughed at and ignored. Russia has
also signed nuclear cooperation agreements with the rogue regimes in
Burma and Venezuela and continues to market its nuclear wares anywhere
in the world to anyone that has a little money to spend.
Given this record, an intelligent observer might wonder why we are
even considering nuclear cooperation with a country so determined to
undermine our interests, that consistently does not tell the truth.
Well, the answer is that this nuclear cooperation agreement was offered
to Russia first by the previous and then by the current administration
as one of a series of gifts in an effort to bribe Moscow into
cooperating on Iran.
The strategy obviously has not worked, and the agreement certainly
cannot be sold on its merits. Moscow sees this as a way to make money,
but it is difficult to identify how the United States might benefit
from the agreement.
By voting for this bill, the House will reaffirm its strong support
for the United States' alliance with our friends and allies, the
Australians.
It will thereby demonstrate that we will support nuclear cooperation
agreements only with those countries which have earned our trust, which
have not aided our enemies, and which have consistently acted to
prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Russia meets none of these
conditions, and we must not reward it for its actions that, either
recklessly or deliberately, have greatly undermined the security of the
American people and that of the world as a whole.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. TANNER. Do you have any more speakers?
Mr. POE of Texas. We have no other speakers, Mr. Speaker.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will address the Chair.
Mr. POE of Texas. I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. TANNER. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. Tanner) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 6411.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________