[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 128 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7336-S7337]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                   UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUEST--S. 510

  Mr. REID. Mr. President, America has one of the safest and most 
abundant food supplies in the world, but it is not perfect. Foodborne 
illnesses sicken one in every four people every year. Twenty-five 
percent of people get sick from foodborne illnesses every year. As many 
as 5,000 Americans die from food poisoning every year.
  The bill we are attempting to bring to the floor today is a very 
simple bill. It will make our food safer. It is a bipartisan bill that 
was reported out unanimously from the HELP Committee, and there have 
been negotiations going on for a long time--months and months.
  People often think of food poisoning as an upset stomach that goes 
away in a few hours or maybe a day or two. Sometimes that is all it is, 
but sometimes it is much worse. I have met with families from Nevada 
who have been seriously sickened by food they have eaten, people who 
have been hospitalized for weeks and months and a number of whom came 
very close to dying. In some of these cases, they will deal with the 
results of their food poisoning for the rest of their lives.
  One of the little girls I met with is named Rylee Gustafson. She is 
from Henderson, NV. This little girl, when she was 9 years old, was 
doing what her mom asked her to do: eat her salad. The salad had 
spinach in it. E. coli was in there with the spinach. She got so very 
sick. I have seen her on a number of occasions. She is a beautiful 
child, but she is going to be small all of her life because of that 
illness. She was hospitalized for a long, long time and survived. Three 
others got E. coli from fresh spinach, and they died. She didn't.
  I also had the opportunity to meet with the Rivera family in Las 
Vegas. Linda Rivera also became sick from E. coli from cookie dough. 
Last October, she was in a coma and on life support, and doctors didn't 
know if she would survive, but she did. She is still recovering. The 
effects will be with her for the rest of her life. It is food 
poisoning. It will be a long road back to full health for Linda. We 
hope she arrives to that.
  Last month, there was another big recall. This time, it was eggs 
contaminated with salmonella. More than 2,000 people have been sickened 
during this outbreak.
  The egg recall and stories such as Rylee's and Linda's and their 
families and what they went through illustrate the need for food safety 
legislation. People in Nevada and across the country are asking for 
this legislation. They want to know what food they can put on the 
family's dinner table, what they can pack in their children's lunches, 
and is it safe.
  There is no excuse to wait any longer. Our current food safety system 
hasn't been updated in almost a century. It is not keeping up with 
contaminants that cause these problems, and new ones come along all the 
time. The FDA doesn't have the authority or resources it needs to keep 
up with the modern advances and expansion in food processing, 
production, and marketing.
  This bill will fix that. The bipartisan bill called the FDA Food 
Safety Modernization Act would improve the system while minimizing the 
regulatory burden.
  It gives the FDA mandatory recall authority of contaminated foods, 
sets up a system to allow the FDA to keep track of foods so we can find 
out where the contaminated food came from and stop it quickly from 
getting to grocery stores. It strikes the right balance between 
assuring consumers that food is safe, without overburdening farmers 
with new regulations. It makes no changes to the current organic 
program run by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
  Nothing could be more important than using our time here in these 
waning days before the election to help our constituents. Nothing 
should be less controversial than keeping them out of harm's way. So 
let's move to this commonsense bill and pass it. That is why we are 
here--to do things to help the American people. This would do that.
  I also add that the committee has worked very hard. They have 
negotiated and negotiated and negotiated. They had different versions. 
They kept moving forward, and finally it was all done. We thought we 
were going to be able to get this done. But it appears we have one 
person who doesn't want this bill to pass, and that is unfortunate.
  Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that at a time to be 
determined by me, following consultation with Senator McConnell, the 
Senate proceed to the consideration of Calendar No. 247, the FDA Food 
Safety Modernization Act, S. 510, and that when the bill is considered, 
it be under the following limitations: that general debate on the bill 
be limited to 2 hours, equally divided and controlled between Senators 
Harkin and Enzi or their designees; that the only amendments in order, 
other than the committee-reported substitute, be those listed in this 
agreement, with debate on each of the listed amendments limited to 30 
minutes, with the time equally divided and controlled in the usual 
form; further, that when any of the listed amendments are offered for 
consideration, the reading of the amendments be considered waived, and 
the amendments not be subject to division: Harkin-Enzi substitute 
amendment; Tester amendment regarding small farms and facilities; 
Harkin-Enzi amendment--I add editorially that these are the chairman 
and ranking member of the committee, who are both extremely easy to 
work with and good legislators--
  Harkin-Enzi amendment regarding technical and conforming, and that 
once offered, the technical amendment be considered and agreed to and 
the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table; Coburn amendment 
regarding offset for cost of bill; Feinstein amendment regarding BPA; 
Leahy amendment regarding criminal penalties; that upon disposition of 
the listed amendments, the use or yielding back of all time, the 
Harkin-Enzi substitute amendment, as amended, be agreed to; that the 
committee-reported substitute amendment, as amended, be agreed to; and 
that the bill, as amended, be read the third time and the Senate then 
proceed to vote on passage of the bill.
  Before the Chair rules, I should have mentioned earlier in my remarks 
that the person who has been heard on this for months has been Senator 
Durbin. This is something he believes in, as he can come to believe in 
things so intently. I respect the work he has done on this bill, 
keeping it always at the front of my attention list.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Mr. COBURN. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, and I will 
not object if the Senator changes the proposed agreement to say that 
the only amendments in order, other than the committee-reported 
substitute, will be these three: Harkin-Enzi substitute amendment, 
which is fully offset and has been agreed to by both managers, which 
will be agreed to as original text for the purpose of further 
amendment; the Harkin-Enzi technical amendment; and the Tester 
amendment in regard to small farms.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Does the leader so modify his request?
  Mr. REID. It is my understanding that my good friend from Oklahoma 
would have no amendment.
  Mr. COBURN. I would not need one because the bill would already be 
offset.
  Mr. REID. What I say to my friend, I think this is something I would 
like to take a little time--not a lot of time--to talk to my friends, 
Senators Durbin, Harkin, and Enzi, and see if there is something we can 
do to move this down the ballfield; if not, we can come back again and 
talk about this.
  In light of my friend's request to modify my unanimous consent 
request and my inability to intelligently respond to it because it is 
something I had not anticipated, I will be happy to withdraw my 
request, and I will renew it at a later time if I can come up with 
something that is more appropriate.
  Mr. COBURN. I thank the leader.
  I ask unanimous consent to be recognized for 15 minutes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The unanimous consent request is withdrawn.
  The Senator from Oklahoma is recognized.

[[Page S7337]]

  Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, I wonder if the Senator will modify his 
request so I might be recognized following his 15 minutes.
  Mr. COBURN. I have no problem.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. COBURN. Mr. President, there is nobody in this country who 
doesn't want our food to be safe. There is no question, we all rely on 
the intent that the vast majority of food is safe in this country. 
There is no question that we have some problems with food safety. But 
the biggest problem we have is in fixing the symptoms of the problem 
rather than the problem itself.
  I hope America will pay attention to this. Ask yourself why it took 
the Food and Drug Administration 10 years to give us an egg safety 
standard and that no oversight committee of either the House or the 
Senate, through the previous 10 years, held an oversight hearing to ask 
why it has taken 10 years to get that egg safety standard. It came out 
10 days afterwards, coincidentally, to the salmonella infection we have 
recently seen.
  As a practicing physician who has treated Shigella, Salmonella, 
Yersinia pestis, Campylobacter, and Listeria monocytogenes, which are 
infectious gastrointestinal bacterial diseases that can come from food, 
I want it to be safe. What I want more than that is for the 
organization that is supposed to keep it safe to do its job. The 
problem with this bill, besides it not being paid for, is it doesn't 
fix the real problem.
  The American public should know, if you go to the grocery store 
anywhere in this country and buy a pepperoni pizza, the FDA is 
responsible for food safety. But if you buy a cheese pizza, it is the 
USDA. How does that make any sense to anybody in America?
  What happened on the farms in Iowa, as far as eggs, is the USDA knew 
there was a problem, but they didn't tell the FDA because the FDA is 
only responsible for the egg once it gets out of the chicken. Which 
came first, the chicken or the egg? It was then shipped and was the 
responsibility of the FDA.
  This bill doesn't address any of those problems. As we look to solve 
a very critical and real problem--and I acknowledge Senator Durbin's 
work on this and that of our chairman and ranking member. I had a staff 
member at every meeting they had raising these same objections. We now 
have a bill that will cost the American public $1.5 billion over the 
next 5 years that doesn't fix the real problem.
  The real problem is the lack of focus of the agencies to do their 
job. It does not eliminate the crossover and lack of consistency. If 
you buy red meat in the store, you only have to trust one agency. But 
if you buy an egg, you have to trust two. If you buy a salad or 
lettuce, you have to trust two. They are not talking to one another. 
There is nothing in this bill that makes them do that.
  What we have done is we have created a lot of new regulations, with a 
lot of money, without solving the real problem. The only way we get to 
the real problem is to have the FDA up here once a week for the next 4 
weeks and have the USDA up here once a week for the next 4 weeks, 
talking about these critical crossover issues.

  In the bill, it actually states that nothing in this act or an 
amendment made by this act shall be construed to alter the jurisdiction 
between the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services. In other words, there is a prohibition to alter the 
responsibility so we might have safe food--in other words, to hold one 
agency accountable, rather than two so one can point the finger at the 
other. We had a House hearing today on the egg recall, and the fact is 
that is what happened. USDA knew there were problems. But the FDA 
didn't know there were problems until after somebody got sick.
  So we create a high level of additional regulation, a high level of 
various inspections--and I am not against inspections. I eat salad like 
the rest of us. Sometimes I am not accused of being human, but, in 
fact, I consume the same food everybody else does. I don't want to get 
sick from it. But we can't continue to pass bills that pile on 
regulations that cost the American people $1.5 billion and don't fix 
the real problem. That is the problem. My objection is it is not paid 
for.
  I will hear the objection that it is an authorizing bill. Oh, really. 
It is just an authorizing bill. So that means there is not any money 
going to be spent? Then we aren't passing the bill to do what we want 
it to do. Because if we say we are not responsible for spending another 
$1.5 billion, then there is no problem. It is not spending money. If it 
is not spending money, it is not going to do anything. But if it is 
spending money, we ought to decrease the priority somewhere else within 
the waste of the USDA--which there are billions--and within the FDA, 
which has tons of properties they are not using that could pay for this 
bill easily. We ought to eliminate the things that are not working.
  So I want our food to be safe. As a practicing physician, I know the 
public health aspects of this bill. But I refuse to go forward when we 
continue to make the same mistakes that have given us a $1.4 trillion 
deficit and have given us lack of control and oversight of the 
bureaucracies. The biggest thing is, we are not holding anybody 
accountable for this because we will pass this. Then, the next time 
there is a food problem, in terms of contaminated food, we will pass 
something else. In between times, there will not be the first oversight 
hearing to say: What did we do that didn't work and show us a result 
that works. Is it efficient, effective, and did it improve the safety 
of the food? We will not do that. We will just react and pass another 
bill.
  I am through passing bills that don't solve the real problems. I am 
through spending the next two generations' money, when we can't make 
the priority choices. The fact that we have refused to say we are going 
to eliminate something that is very low priority to be able to have a 
food safety bill, then that tells the American people we are not up to 
the task of getting us out of our problems.
  I know everybody in this body wants safe food--even me. I am not 
tired of taking the hits for holding up this bill. We can't be perfect 
on food, but we can be a whole lot better. This bill can solve some of 
the problems, but it is not complete. It hasn't looked at the levels it 
needs to straighten out the bureaucracy on food safety. It hasn't 
eliminated the overlap. Nobody with any common sense says you will have 
pizzas in the grocery store, one controlled by the USDA and one by the 
FDA.
  It is clueless. It does not fit. The reason the one that does not 
have any meat on it is controlled by the FDA is because it has a milk 
product. It has cheese. But the one that has pepperoni on it has cheese 
too. How did we get there? Where are we going to establish 
responsibility and accountability with the agencies that are 
responsible for food safety?
  I look forward to working with the majority leader. I will take a 
less than perfect bill anytime. But I will not take a bill that is not 
paid for and does not come out of the hides of our children and 
grandchildren.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from North Dakota.

                          ____________________