[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 128 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7310-S7311]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TAX POLICY
Mr. JOHANNS. Mr. President, I rise today to speak about something
that is enormously important, and that is tax policy and the economy.
Over the most recent break, I had the opportunity to go out across
the State of Nebraska. I traveled throughout the State and I conducted
14 townhall meetings. I listened to a lot of concerns, but there was
one issue that dominated all of the discussion and that was the state
of our Nation's economy. Nebraskans, like all Americans, are wondering
when the economy will turn around. They are wondering when this
administration is going to actually take action to support job creators
instead of just talking about it.
A recent CNN poll shows that 57 percent of Americans disapprove of
the President's handling of the economy. The President's job agenda to
date has simply failed to produce the results that were promised.
Take a look at the economic stimulus that cost taxpayers $862
billion--$1 trillion if you add interest--and it has come up short.
Instead of more government spending that fails to create jobs, we need
to create a progrowth environment that fosters job creation that is so
desperately needed in every part of this great Nation. In order to do
so, we must first and foremost give individuals and businesses some
degree of certainty about the future. Unfortunately, the health care
bill and the financial bill are doing exactly the opposite. Businesses
are actually fearful of the regulatory environment and the list of
pending tax hikes, causing them to wait out the anxiety and stay on the
sidelines.
The National Federation of Independent Business describes it this
way:
[[Page S7311]]
Uncertainty about the economy and looming tax hikes have
kept this sector from hiring new workers, resulting in a weak
economic recovery and slow to nonexistent job growth.
But the NFIB doesn't stop there. They further describe this:
Congress can take an important step to address the
uncertainty by holding a vote and passing legislation
extending all of the expiring tax rates. No small business
owner should face higher taxes.
At a time when Americans are struggling in their businesses to meet
next month's payroll, they don't need more uncertainty from Washington.
What they need are assurances from their government that there will be
no more taxes or unnecessary regulatory burdens piled on top of them at
a time when their plates are already overflowing.
Even White House economic adviser Larry Summers recently acknowledged
the importance of providing businesses with certainty about the future.
He said something actually quite profound:
Confidence is the cheapest form of stimulus, and we've got
to be very attentive to creating an economic environment in
which there is confidence.
I agree with him.
One way to help eliminate this uncertainty and bring confidence back
to the economy is to continue the current tax rates. Failing to do so
will only cause further uncertainty and inadequate growth. Most
alarmingly, letting these tax rates increase will result in the largest
tax hike in American history. Let me repeat that: One hundred days from
today, the largest tax hike in history will take effect, unless
Congress acts.
Considering the state of our economy, with a lackluster growth rate
of 1.6 percent and unemployment at 9.6 percent, with real unemployment
in the double digits, tax increases are the last thing Americans need.
Tax increases are the last thing our job creators need.
It is no surprise that businesses aren't willing to take the chance
to expand and to hire. We keep hearing the President and his
administration tell businesses to create jobs, to get off the
sidelines. We keep hearing the President say that. Meanwhile, the same
administration has increased taxes, imposed mandates, created
uncertainty, and now is willing to allow this massive historic tax
increase to hammer our job creators. It simply makes no sense. Why
would an administration that is supposedly committed to small
businesses try to take more of their money while at the same time
urging them to spend more money on expanding and creating jobs? Maybe
it is because they claim that only rich Americans--rich Americans--
would be impacted.
As small business owners across the country can tell us, this is
simply a false notion. Many small business owners file as individuals
and, therefore, report income above $200,000. We rely heavily on these
small businesses to use that capital to create jobs to boost our
economy.
Over the past 15 years, small businesses have been responsible for
generating--get this--64 percent of all of our new jobs. Under the
administration's proposal, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates
that nearly 750,000 taxpayers with small business income will be hit
with a tax increase 100 days from today. I don't get it. I can't fathom
why we would raise taxes on job creators when we are facing record
unemployment and a sputtering economy.
It is not just small businesses. It is also family farms and ranches
that would be caught up in the net of this massive tax increase.
Suddenly, they would all find themselves classified as the ``rich''
people this administration claims are the only ones impacted by this
foolhardy policy.
It is unfair and unwise policy I am speaking about. What our small
businesses, farms, and ranches need now is a stable economic
environment, not tax increases from their government. It is time for
government to stop suppressing businesses and give them a chance to
grow in a certain environment--to expand, create jobs, to buy new
equipment--because that is what will fuel job growth in this Nation.
Our small businesses are the heart of our economy. We need to give them
the opportunity to move our economy forward, not be stifled by
government policies.
The original intent of the tax cuts when instituted nearly 10 years
ago was to free up capital for these entities to grow, to hire, and to
produce. In fact, in 2007, once these tax breaks had taken effect, our
tax collections achieved an all-time high in this Nation. Let me repeat
that. In 2007, once these tax rates took effect--they were fully in
place--our tax collections achieved an all-time high. The reason is
obvious. When you have people working, they pay taxes, they add to the
economy, they fuel economic growth.
The bottom line is that tax breaks help to get our economy moving
which, in turn, generates revenues. We saw it in 2007. Even Christina
Romer, the former chairwoman of the President's Council of Economic
Advisers, recently published some research on tax policy. I am quoting:
Tax cuts have very large and persistent positive output
effects.
In contrast, she wrote:
Tax increases appear to have a very large, sustained, and
highly significant negative impact on output.
I couldn't agree more.
Standing idly by while taxes skyrocket at the end of this year, in
100 days, will--and it is very predictable--have a chilling effect on
American businesses and, therefore, hard-working families. It is time
that the actions of this administration and this Congress match the
promises being made about creating an environment that fosters growth
instead of hindering it.
The American people are no longer willing to accept empty words at
face value. They want to see policies that match promises. Fortunately,
it is not too late. This administration and this Congress still have an
opportunity to make good on their promises to small businesses, to
those working families, but it will mean taking action to prevent a
massive tax hike on January 1, 2011.
I ask all of my colleagues to show they are willing to work together
to fulfill their promises to small businesses. Let's deliver on those
promises to provide stability instead of uncertainty. Let's work
together to prevent a huge tax hike on our job creators in 100 days.
The American people--hard-working families--deserve no less.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Burris). The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the
order for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________