[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 116 (Tuesday, August 3, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6652-S6653]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS
By Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Sanders):
S. 3694. A bill to prohibit the conducting of invasive research on
great apes, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works.
Ms. CANTWELL. Mr. President, I rise today to introduce legislation to
end the use of Great Apes in invasive research and urge my Senate
colleagues to support the Great Ape Protection Act.
[[Page S6653]]
The Great Ape Protection Act would prohibit invasive research on all
Great Apes, including chimpanzees--the only Great Ape used in invasive
research today. The bill would require the retirement of 500 federally-
owned chimpanzees to appropriate sanctuaries.
Today about 1,000 chimpanzees--half of them federally owned--languish
at great taxpayer expense in 6 research laboratories across the nation.
These chimpanzees are being held or used for invasive biomedical
research, research that may cause death, bodily injury, pain, distress,
fear, and trauma. Invasive research practices include techniques such
as injecting a chimpanzee with a drug that would be detrimental to its
health, infecting a chimp with a disease, cutting a chimp or removing
body parts, and isolation or social deprivation.
The vast majority of these animals--between 80 and 90 percent--aren't
actually being used in research, but instead are warehoused, simply
wasting away in these facilities. For example, approximately half of
the government-owned chimpanzees have been held for the past 9 years in
a facility in New Mexico where no research is being conducted.
Some chimpanzees have been in labs for more than 50 years, confined
in steel cages for most of their lives and enduring sometimes painful
and distressing experimental procedures.
The fact that the vast majority of federally-owned chimpanzees are
not being used in active research, but instead are warehoused in labs
at the taxpayer expense, underlines the futility of their continued
confinement.
Chimpanzees are poor research models for human illness, and they have
been of limited use in the study of human disease. Despite how similar
they are to us, significant differences in their immunology and disease
progression make them ineffective models for human diseases like HIV,
cancer and heart disease research.
For example, research published in the Journal of Medical Primatology
in 2009 on Hepatitis C indicates that use of chimpanzees has produced
poor results. And the National Center for Research Resources under the
National Institutes of Health has prohibited breeding of government-
owned and supported chimpanzees for research.
Significant genetic and physiological differences between nonhuman
Great Apes and humans also make chimpanzees a poor research model for
human diseases. We have spent millions of dollars over several decades
on chimpanzee-based HIV and Hepatitis C research with no resulting
vaccines for those diseases. Chimpanzees largely failed as a model for
HIV because the virus does not cause illness in chimpanzees as it does
to humans.
These are very social, highly intelligent animals--with the ability,
for example, to learn American Sign Language. Their intelligence and
ability to experience emotions so similar to humans underscore how
chimpanzees suffer intensely under laboratory conditions.
Their psychological suffering in laboratories produces human-like
symptoms of stress, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after
decades of living in isolation in small cages.
Given their social nature and capacity for suffering and boredom due
to lack of stimulation, the 500 privately-owned chimpanzees and 500
federally-owned chimpanzees being held in research laboratories would
be significantly better off in sanctuaries. And by doing so we would
save more than $170 million taxpayer dollars throughout the
chimpanzees' lifetimes. This is because the cost of caring for a
chimpanzee in a sanctuary is a fraction of the cost of their housing
and maintenance in a laboratory. And many in the scientific community
believe this money could be allocated to more effective research.
In my home State of Washington, I am proud that we have Chimpanzee
Sanctuary Northwest. Chimpanzee-Sanctuary Northwest provides
sustainable sanctuary for seven chimpanzees retired in 2008 from
decades in research facilities.
The United States is currently behind the rest of the world in
outlawing this sad practice.
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand,
Sweden, and the United Kingdom have all banned or severely limited
experiments on Great Apes. And several other countries and the European
Union are considering similar bans as well.
We are the only country--besides Gabon in West Africa--that is still
holding or using chimpanzees for invasive research. It's past time for
the United States to catch up with the rest of the world by ending this
antiquated use of this endangered species.
We are lagging behind in action, but the desire to end invasive
research on Great Apes has been present for more than a decade. In
1997, the National Research Council concluded that there should be a
moratorium on further chimpanzee breeding. And the National Institutes
of Health, NIH, has already announced an end to funding for the
breeding of federally-owned and supported chimpanzees for research, but
this should be codified.
Government needs to take action to make invasive research on
chimpanzees illegal.
That is why today I am introducing the Bipartisan Great Ape
Protection Act, along with my colleagues Senators Susan Collins of
Maine and Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
The Great Ape Protection Act is a common-sense policy reform to
protect our closest living relatives in the animal kingdom from
physical and psychological harm, and to help reduce government spending
and our federal deficit.
Specifically, this bill will phase out the use of chimpanzees in
invasive research over a three-year period, require permanent
retirement to suitable sanctuaries for the 500 federally-owned
chimpanzees currently being warehoused in research laboratories, and
codifies the current administrative ban on breeding of Government-owned
and supported chimpanzees.
We have been delaying this action for too long. It is time to get
this done and end this type of harmful research and end this wasteful
Government spending.
______
By Mr. CASEY:
S. 3696. A bill to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act with regard to
certain exemptions under that Act for direct care workers and to
improve the systems for the collection and reporting of data relating
to the direct care workforce, and for other purposes; to the Committee
on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, today I am introducing the Direct Care
Workforce Empowerment Act.
Next year the baby boom generation will start turning 65 and by 2030,
all 78 million will have reached that age. We must ensure this
generation that fought in our wars, worked in our factories, taught our
children and who gave us life and love are cared for. This will require
an investment in the health care workforce that was begun under health
care reform and must continue into the coming decades.
It is the direct care worker that provides most of this care to our
loved ones. Unfortunately, they are often not given the respect they
deserve for the work they do. Direct care workers help more than
250,000 Pennsylvanians and their families every day. This is also one
of the fastest growing professions, according to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. It is now our responsibility to make sure these jobs, while
often personally rewarding, provide opportunity for advancement and
economic stability for the workers.
This bill will do three key things.
The bill will ensure that home care workers receive the Federal
minimum wage and overtime protections of the Fair Labor Standards Act;
improve Federal and State data collection and oversight with respect to
the direct care workforce; and establish a grant program to help states
improve direct care worker recruitment, retention, and training.
I hope my colleagues join me in supporting this important
legislation.
____________________