[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 112 (Wednesday, July 28, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6345-S6346]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PAPERWORK MANDATE ELIMINATION ACT AMENDMENT
Mr. JOHANNS. Mr. President, I rise to talk about small businesses. I
think we all know and recognize--certainly they do--that small
businesses and businesses in general face a mountain of paperwork to
comply with a whole host of regulations, most notably our very complex
tax laws. Instead of trying to aid that, now Washington is increasing
that paperwork mountain through a new 1099 mandate found in, of all
places, the new health care bill. This mandate has absolutely nothing--
absolutely nothing--to do with improving health care of this country,
and it
[[Page S6346]]
should not be a part of that law or any other law, for that matter.
Thus, I am offering an amendment to repeal this mandate.
The amendment says no to piles of unnecessary paperwork which the IRS
itself admits is going to be virtually useless. Any taxpayer with
business income will be required to issue 1099 forms to all vendors
from whom they buy more than $600 of goods or services in any year. So
now the most routine business expenses will be subject to this new
burdensome paper trail.
Let me give my colleagues some examples. A laundromat that buys soap
each week would now have to issue a 1099 to their supplier and the IRS
at the end of the year. A landscaper who buys lawn fertilizer a couple
of times a month will now be forced to issue 1099s to the companies
they do business with, and no one is excluded. The law applies equally
to businesses and churches and charities and even State and local
governments.
A recent cnnmoney.com article suggests that the cost of the new paper
trail could literally swamp small companies. One small business
organization conducted a survey and found that their members currently
average about 10 1099 filings per year. The new rules would push that
average to more than 200 filings--200 filings--per year, an almost
2,000-percent increase. Of course, their costs for that would
skyrocket.
According to the National Federation of Independent Business:
At $74 per hour, tax paperwork is the most expensive
paperwork burden placed on small businesses by the Federal
Government.
Small businesses have been hit so hard by this recession, they just
simply cannot afford this new burden. We need to give them a break.
They are imploring us to do something to help them.
According to the National Taxpayer Advocate, which is part of the
IRS, this provision will affect--get this--40 million businesses in the
United States, including 26 million of our very smallest businesses,
our sole proprietorships.
Americans are desperately searching for jobs. They want to work.
These businesses should be focused on growing, not be wasting their
resources on unnecessary paperwork that the government won't even
utilize.
The amendment I introduced is clear. It simply repeals the section of
the law requiring the extra paperwork. I might add, it is paid for. It
identifies two areas within the health care law to fully offset the
repeal of this mandate. First, by lowering the affordability exemption
from the new individual mandate from 8 percent to 5 percent, fewer
individuals will be subject to the individual mandate.
The new health care individual mandate infringes on individual
freedoms of Americans and, in my view, it has constitutional problems.
People who did not want to buy government-approved insurance in the
first place are compelled to buy it under the new law. Thus, exempting
more people, especially the poorest among us, from this absolutely ill-
advised mandate is a good thing. These folks may be living paycheck to
paycheck and requiring one more thing to come out of that paycheck
instead of making the mortgage payment or buying the groceries is not
right. Thus, allowing more people to decide for themselves whether they
buy health insurance when they look at all their other obligations is a
positive.
Let's be clear. My amendment does not restrict these individuals from
buying health insurance or signing up for government subsidies. My
amendment simply says, if they don't want to, they don't have to.
Second, the new health care law establishes a $15 billion, what I
would regard as a slush fund for a long list of potential uses by the
Obama administration, including the Community Transformation Grants
Program. I generally support wellness programs. I believe in wellness.
Who doesn't believe in wellness? However, concern has been raised that
this fund will be used for a number of purchases that aren't
specifically related to healthy outcomes. Thus, my amendment proposes
that this fund not be allocated resources until 2018 to help offset
removing this 1099 provision. It decreases the amount in this $15
billion fund; it doesn't eliminate it, but it does give us time to get
it right. Besides, this delay gives us more time to ensure that only
worthy projects utilize taxpayer money. These outlined pay-fors will
cover any government revenue that might be lost by this ill-advised
1099 provision. With record deficits, we must be accountable for tax
dollars, so this amendment is fully offset.
Small businesses generate 64 percent of our job growth in this
country. We need them. We need them to move us toward economic
recovery. Let's send a message that we want them to focus their time
and money on hiring workers, on expanding our economy, not filling out
unnecessary paperwork that even the IRS acknowledges is so overwhelming
it will not be utilized.
My hope is, we will get a vote on this amendment later today, and I
ask my colleagues to stand for small businesses, to stand by them, and
to send the message to them that we want them creating jobs. I ask my
colleagues to support this very commonsense amendment.
I yield the floor and I note the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so
ordered.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I am going to proceed in my leader
time.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The leader has that right.
____________________