[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 111 (Tuesday, July 27, 2010)]
[House]
[Pages H6100-H6101]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1400
SECURING AIRCRAFT COCKPITS AGAINST LASERS ACT OF 2010
Mr. SCOTT of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and
pass the bill (H.R. 5810) to amend title 18, United States Code, to
provide penalties for aiming laser pointers at airplanes, and for other
purposes, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 5810
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Aircraft Cockpits
Against Lasers Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST AIMING A LASER POINTER AT AN
AIRCRAFT.
(a) Offense.--Chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 39A. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft
``(a) Whoever knowingly aims the beam of a laser pointer at
an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the
United States, or at the flight path of such an aircraft,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5
years, or both.
``(b) As used in this section, the term `laser pointer'
means any device designed or used to amplify electromagnetic
radiation by stimulated emission that emits a beam designed
to be used by the operator as a pointer or highlighter to
indicate, mark, or identify a specific position, place, item,
or object.
``(c) This section does not prohibit aiming a beam of a
laser pointer at an aircraft, or the flight path of such an
aircraft, by--
``(1) an authorized individual in the conduct of research
and development or flight test operations conducted by an
aircraft manufacturer, the Federal Aviation Administration,
or any other person authorized by the Federal Aviation
Administration to conduct such research and development or
flight test operations;
``(2) members or elements of the Department of Defense or
Department of Homeland Security acting in an official
capacity for the purpose of research, development,
operations, testing or training; or
``(3) by an individual using a laser emergency signaling
device to send an emergency distress signal.
``(d) The Attorney General, in consultation with the
Secretary of Transportation, may provide by regulation, after
public notice and comment, such additional exceptions to this
section, as may be necessary and appropriate. The Attorney
General shall provide written notification of any proposed
regulations under this section to the Committees on the
Judiciary of the House and Senate, the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure in the House, and the
Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in the
Senate not less than 90 days before such regulations become
final.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 39
the following new item:
``39A. Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft.''.
SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH PAYGO.
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall
be determined by reference to the latest statement titled
``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act,
submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the
Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of
Representatives, provided that such statement has been
submitted prior to the vote on passage.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Cummings). Pursuant to the rule, the
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott) and the gentleman from California
(Mr. Daniel E. Lungren) each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Virginia.
General Leave
Mr. SCOTT of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all
Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and
to include extraneous material on the bill under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Virginia?
There was no objection.
Mr. SCOTT of Virginia. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5810 establishes criminal penalties for knowingly
aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft or its flight path.
Incidents involving lasers aimed at aircraft have raised concerns
over the potential threat to aviation safety and national security.
Some are concerned that terrorists might use high-powered lasers to,
among other things, incapacitate pilots. There is also concern that
laser devices can distract or temporarily incapacitate pilots during
critical phases of a flight.
Lasers pose a safety hazard to flight operations. Even brief exposure
to a relatively low-powered laser beam can cause discomfort and
temporarily affect the pilot's vision. The visual distractions of a
laser can also cause a pilot to become disoriented or lose situational
awareness while flying.
High-powered laser devices can incapacitate pilots and inflict eye
injuries when viewed at closer ranges. In fact, the National
Transportation Safety Board documented two cases in which pilots
sustained eye injuries and were incapacitated during critical phases of
a flight.
In one of those cases, after a laser was pointed at a pilot's plane,
he experienced a burning sensation and tearing in his eyes. A
subsequent eye examination revealed multiple flash burns in the pilot's
cornea. The FAA researchers have compiled a data base of more than 400
incidences between 1990 and 2005 in which pilots have been startled,
distracted, temporarily blinded, or disoriented by laser exposure.
Government officials at FAA, Defense Department, and Department of
Homeland Security are exempted from the prohibition of this bill, as
are individuals using lasers to send an emergency distress signal.
[[Page H6101]]
Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to support the bill. I thank
the gentleman from California for his leadership in bringing this bill
to our attention.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such
time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, first, I would like to thank my friend, Mr. Scott from
Virginia, the chairman of the Crime Subcommittee, for working with
dispatch to get this bill to the floor.
The danger of shining a laser beam into someone's eyes is not a new
concept. It is reported that the power density from a 1 milliwatt
laser, a power common in the laser pointers we have become familiar
with, focused to a point, is brighter than the equivalent area of the
sun's surface. Understandably, this can cause temporary or permanent
eye damage. The danger from shining a laser at the cockpit of a
commercial aircraft, especially during a takeoff or a landing, is a
tragedy waiting to happen.
This bill will help prevent such a disaster from being realized. In
2005, when a similar bill was passed by this body, this emerging threat
was estimated at 400 reported incidents over the previous 15 years. By
contrast, in 2009 alone, there were almost 1,600 episodes reported. In
2010, there have been approximately the same number of incidents from
2009 in just the first half of the year. In my home State of
California, there have been over 570 incidents so far in 2010.
Mr. Speaker, we have discovered that a number of those incidents were
reported to the regional air traffic control system unit in Sacramento
within my district.
Since the Judiciary Committee first began examining this issue, the
effects of pilots being hit by a beam of a laser pointer have varied
from causing the pilots to become distracted, to requiring emergency
evasive maneuvers. Emergency maneuvers, to prevent a perceived mid-air
collision, resulted from a wide variety of mistaken beliefs, including
that the aircraft was about to strike the warning light on a tower or
that the laser beam was actually the lights of an approaching aircraft.
Law enforcement pilots are frequently targeted and have to consider
the possibility that they are being illuminated by a laser scope
attached to a rifle. Law enforcement pilots have, on occasion, been
required to discontinue a response to a crime, a crime in progress, due
to being hit by a laser.
Some Federal prosecutors have declined to pursue cases under current
law, believing that the current Destruction of Aircraft statute does
not fit the facts of their particular laser case. Some States have
statutes that have been successfully used to address this problem, but,
unfortunately, many do not.
This bill specifically addresses the incident of shining a laser
pointer into an aircraft cockpit and will make, therefore, aircraft
travel safer for pilots and for the public. While a number of laser
pointers being aimed at aircraft cockpits has dramatically increased
during the past 5 years, the power of the current generation of laser
pointer devices has also significantly increased.
The cost, on the other hand, has gone down, making them much more
widely available. Additionally, there are ways to increase the power of
certain lasers by replacing the diodes with those intended for other
purposes.
The problem of lasers being shone into cockpits is so prevalent in
the Sacramento area that the FBI, FAA, Federal Air Marshal Service, as
well as State and local law enforcement, have established a Laser
Strike Working Group to address the problem, with other working groups
expanding to other areas. This bill provides an important tool for
securing the safety of air travel and is endorsed by the Air Line
Pilots Association.
I received a letter dated July 27 from the Air Line Pilots
Association, International, wherein they say: ``The inappropriate use
of widely available lasers against airborne flight crews is a genuine
and growing safety and security concern. A laser illumination event
can, at a minimum, be an unwanted flight crew distraction; and in
serious cases can even lead to eye damage and temporary
incapacitation.''
Going on, the Air Line Pilots Association, International states that
``your legislation is greatly needed to ensure that such reckless and
malicious activity will, in fact, be classified and prosecuted as a
Federal offense. We have worked with numerous Federal law enforcement
organizations over the past years on this issue and there is strong
agreement that such crimes should be addressed by Federal statute and
not be adjudicated solely by State laws. H.R. 5810 will also help put
the public on notice that shining laser lights into aircraft cockpits
is a serious offense which will be met with serious consequences for
those convicted of such crime.''
{time} 1410
And in conclusion, the Airline Pilots Association, International
states: ``We urge Congress to expeditiously pass this legislation and
thereby enhance the safety and security of all commercial airline
passengers and crew members.''
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this
important legislation.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. SCOTT of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume just to thank the gentleman from California for his leadership.
This is an extremely important piece of legislation, and I urge my
colleagues to support the bill.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 5810, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________