[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 94 (Tuesday, June 22, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5219-S5220]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEFICIT SPENDING AND UNEMPLOYMENT
Mr. DURBIN. The minority leader, Senator McConnell, is right.
Deficits are important. So are facts. Let's mention a few facts on the
floor of the Senate. When was the last time the U.S. Government ran a
surplus? A surplus. Collected more money than it spent? Well, it
happened to be in the last year of President Bill Clinton's
administration. So when President George W. Bush was elected, President
Clinton said: Welcome to Washington. Here is a $230 billion surplus,
and if you follow the spending patterns we have laid out over the next
10 years, you will generate a $5 trillion surplus in the Treasury--$230
billion now, plan for a $5 trillion surplus. At that time the debt of
America, the accumulated debt of America, from George Washington
through Bill Clinton, all of the debt we had amassed, $5 trillion.
George W. Bush. Welcome to Washington. A surplus. A plan to increase
the surplus. A plan to spend down the national debt. But what happened
in 8 years of Republican rule, fiscally conservative Republican rule? I
will tell you what happened. The national debt went from $5 trillion to
$12 trillion.
How do you do that in 8 years? Well, you wage two wars that you do
not pay for, and you give tax breaks to the wealthiest people in
America, and you have a prescription drug plan that is not paid for as
well under Republican Presidents.
The national debt from Bill Clinton, $5 trillion; to the end of
President George W. Bush, $12 trillion, and a little gift that
President George W. Bush left to President Barack Obama as he left
office. No, he did not leave him the $230 billion that he was given as
he came into the presidency. No, he handed off to President Obama a
$1.3 trillion deficit. Welcome to Washington, President Obama. And when
you take your hand off the Bible at the swearing in, let's mention too
that the Bush economic policies have now cost us, that month, January,
that month in 2009, 750,000 American jobs. Now we hear from the
Republican side of the aisle these pious incantations about our budget
deficit.
Well, it is a problem. But let's put the blame where it belongs. When
the Republicans had their chance, they took a surplus and turned it
into the biggest deficit in the history of the United States. When
President Bush had his economic policies in place, we doubled the
national debt. When President Bush left office, he left the economy in
the worst recession we have had since the Great Depression.
Now come the Republicans and say: We need to cut spending. Well,
let's go back and look at another lesson in history. This goes even
further back--80 years, the worst economic situation in modern times in
America, the Great Depression. I heard about it as a kid. But it was
not as if my parents were giving me a history lesson, they were giving
me a story about our family, how my mom and dad got married in 1928,
had their first baby in 1929, and their second baby in 1931, and tried
to raise a family in the Great Depression. Their lives were changed
forever. Their view of the world changed forever. My
[[Page S5220]]
mom, an immigrant to this country, and my dad, from a farm family,
never borrowed money, scared to death of debt, because they saw the
Great Depression and they saw it destroy people. Franklin Roosevelt
came in as President in those days. He came in in March of 1933. He
said, we are going to change this. We are going to get America back on
its feet. You have nothing to fear but fear itself. We are going to put
people back to work. We are going to give them government jobs if we
cannot find them jobs in the private sector. We are going to tell our
farmers, you are going to survive because we are going to basically
stand behind you through the tough years. Whether it is a drought or a
flood, we are going to be around to help you get through to the next
year. We are going to make sure that banks do not fail. We are going to
inject government into this economy and get America back on its feet.
At that time the unemployment rate in America was 25 percent. When
the New Deal got started, they brought it down 13 percent, cut it in
half because of government investment in this economy. People went back
to work. They left the long lines waiting for soup and bread and
started earning some money. They built highways. They built bridges.
They built stadiums. They built parts of America we still use today. It
was an investment by the government in our economy to bring us out of
the worst depression we had ever faced.
Then, after a few years what happened? Republican critics came
forward and said, wait a minute. This is deficit spending. We are
spending money we do not have. We have got to stop. And they prevailed,
just as Senator McConnell wants to prevail today. Hit the brakes. Stop
spending. You know what happened? They prevailed with that argument.
You know what happened with the unemployment rate? It went from 13
percent back to 19 percent, and the sick economy continued for years
until the war came along, World War II, and we had a massive investment
in our Nation to protect our Nation, to give our troops what they
needed, and we put people back to work.
Now we are about to repeat history. The Republicans come to us now
and say, we have got to stop putting money back into the economy. It
creates deficit. Yes, it does. But if you do not get the 14 million
unemployed Americans back to work, the deficit will get worse. They
will not be paying taxes, they will be drawing on government services.
We want them back to work. And it means making sure we make
investments in America that count--helping small businesses; tax
credits and tax deductions for small businesses; credit for small
businesses; government actively moving forward to give small businesses
a chance to keep their employees and hire more.
That is what we believe in on the Democratic side of the aisle. The
Republicans say: Oh, deficit spending. Stop. We cannot do that. Then
what happens? The business fails. The jobs are lost. The people draw
unemployment and, in desperation, wait for something to happen.
You know what the Republicans are up to now? Last week we asked them:
Would you please extend unemployment benefits for these millions of
Americans who are out of work. In my State the unemployment rate is
10.8 percent. It has been around that for several months now. Boone
County, 16.6 percent; Pulaski County, way down south, 12 percent;
western edge of our State, Hancock County, 11.8 percent; and in Clark
County, in the southeastern end of our State, 13.7 percent. There are
717,000 people in Illinois officially unemployed.
The Republicans say: Cut off their unemployment benefits. That is
what they voted for last Thursday. And 80,000 of those 717,000
unemployed will lose their unemployment benefits.
What happens to the unemployment check? It is the most quickly spent
government check ever sent out. Desperate people out of work take that
check and turn it into groceries and clothes and shoes and gas in the
car and utility bills and rent and mortgage payments as quickly as they
receive it. It is money right back into the economy. They want to cut
it off because we have a deficit.
I understand this deficit. I am on the Deficit Commission, and I
understand taking it seriously. But let's take seriously putting
America back to work. This Republican approach of cutting the
unemployment compensation for people who lost their jobs through no
fault of their own is a strategy that failed in the 1930s and is going
to fail us now.
We have to believe in America and a better day when people are back
to work and this economy is moving forward. We will deal with this
deficit with a strong economy, with Americans working, not by quaking
and quivering and saying we cannot put money back into the hands of
those who are out of work. That is one of the fundamentals in this
government. It is the way we take this great free market system of
ours, when it falls on hard times, and move it forward again.
All of the speeches we will hear from the other side of the aisle
about deficits are going to overlook the obvious. Were it not for the
failed economic policies of the Bush administration, we would not be
where we are today. Were it not for the doubling of the national debt
under the last Republican President, we would not be where we are
today.
It seems that those on the other side of the aisle have, I guess, an
extreme sensitivity to deficits when there is a Democratic President,
and are oblivious to them when there is a Republican President. The
American people know what the facts say. They know the history. I hope
they do not embrace the Republican approach which will drive us further
into unemployment and recession.
I yield the floor.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Maryland.
____________________