[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 88 (Monday, June 14, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Page S4882]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OBJECTION TO EXECUTIVE NOMINATIONS
Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, pursuant to a public letter to
Secretary Sebelius dated September 24, 2009, there is a pending
objection to unanimous consent requests for the following nominees: Jim
Esquea, nominated for HHS Assistant Secretary for Legislation, and
Richard Sorian, nominated for HHS Assistant Secretary for Public
Affairs. I ask unanimous consent that a public letter dated September
24, 2009, be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
September 24, 2009.
Hon. Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services,
Washington, DC.
Dear Secretary Sebelius: America's 11 million seniors
enrolled in the Medicare Advantage program deserve to be
informed of any actions by the federal government that could
affect this program and its broad implications. Medicare
Advantage Plans and Prescription Drug Plans that provide
services through the Medicare program have a constitutional
right to provide information about these Medicare programs to
their customers. Therefore, I hope you can understand our
grave concern with the recent Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services directive barring all such providers from
any and all communications of this kind with America's
seniors. This gag order must be immediately lifted.
As the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized, our
constitutional tradition is one of ``a profound commitment to
the principle that debate on public issues should be
uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.'' Health plans, of
course, have the right to speak on matters of public
concern--a fundamental principle that your Department, until
recently, had recognized and respected. Specifically, the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) previously
noted that there was no legal authority to justify
prohibiting a health plan ``from informing its members of
proposed legislation and exhorting them to express their
opinions'' about it. In fact, HHS had previously determined
that shutting down communication of this sort ``would violate
basic freedom of speech and other constitutional rights of
the Medicare beneficiary as a citizen.''
Now, the Obama administration has reversed this
longstanding HHS decision--in the midst of a critical debate
about the future of health care services in our country--to
shut down communication between private companies and
America's seniors on an issue that has a direct impact on
their health care. And your Department has done so by
imposing an industry-wide gag order without apparent
justification or basis in law and completely contradictory to
your past public guidance and the plain language and spirit
of the First Amendment, among the most sacred tenets of our
democracy.
America's seniors and the health plans that serve them
deserve to have their free speech rights respected. Their
rights should not be subject to the whims of any
Administration, and the health plans that serve them should
not be threatened with punishment if they speak out on a
matter of public concern simply because the Administration
disagrees with their position.
Until your Department rescinds its gag order and allows
seniors to receive information about matters before Congress,
we will not consent to time agreements on the confirmation of
any nominees to your Department or associated agencies.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter of such
great importance to America's seniors.
Signed,
Mitch McConnell.
Jon Kyl.
Lamar Alexander.
John Cornyn.
Lisa Murkowski.
John Thune.
Michael B. Enzi.
Chuck Grassley.
____________________