[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 86 (Wednesday, June 9, 2010)]
[House]
[Pages H4300-H4302]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FHA REFORM ACT OF 2010
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 1424 and rule
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House
on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill, H.R. 5072.
{time} 1739
In the Committee of the Whole
Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the
Whole House on the State of the Union for the consideration of the bill
(H.R. 5072) to improve the financial safety and soundness of the FHA
mortgage insurance program, with Mrs. Halvorson in the chair.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The CHAIR. Pursuant to the rule, the bill is considered read the
first time.
The gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) and the gentlewoman from
West Virginia (Mrs. Capito) each will control 30 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from California.
Ms. WATERS. Madam Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Chairwoman, I stand in strong support of H.R. 5072, the FHA
Reform Act of 2010.
This bill is the product of three hearings on FHA in the past 6
months and bipartisan work with the ranking member of the Subcommittee
on Housing and Community Opportunity, Congresswoman Capito. In fact,
this bill contains most of the provisions Congresswoman Capito included
in her bill on FHA introduced earlier this year.
Moreover, I am proud to say that this bill passed out of the
Financial Services Committee on a simple voice vote back in April.
The FHA Reform Act is critical, timely, and important for households
across the country. The act will enable the FHA to respond to the
current housing and economic crisis and continue its mission of
providing homeownership opportunities to millions of Americans.
We know that now, more than ever, preserving this mission is
critical. As the private market has contracted, FHA has stepped into
the void and injected much-needed credit into our mortgage system.
Increasingly, it is the only option available for American homebuyers
with less than a 20 percent down payment.
FHA insurance has been particularly important for minority
communities, low-income families, and first-time homebuyers. The bill
would provide FHA with more flexibility to adjust their annual mortgage
insurance premium.
As I understand it, if FHA limits the premium increase to 0.90
percent, as Commissioner Stevens has indicated, new borrowers will see
their monthly payments rise by about $42 a month.
Now, while I am reluctant to support providing FHA with more
flexibility, I believe that this provision is needed to keep FHA
financially healthy. We have also taken steps to ensure that FHA
requirements are not excessively onerous for homebuyers.
Secondly, this bill provides FHA with the authority to crack down on
lenders that use fraud or misrepresentation or don't originate or
underwrite loans in accordance with FHA guidelines. FHA has already
taken steps to increase its lender enforcement activities, and the
provisions included in this bill will empower them to rout out the bad
actors while reserving the program for the lenders that follow the
rules.
Thirdly, this bill empowers FHA to improve their internal controls
that improve data tracking, risk management, and reporting to the
public and to Congress. This includes improving monitoring of early
defaults and claims, tracking mortgage information by loan servicers,
providing FHA with the ability to contract out for additional credit
risk analyses, requiring mortgagees to report to FHA when they stop
buying loans from other mortgagees, and requiring a GAO study on FHA.
The bill also creates a new Deputy Assistant Secretary at FHA for
risk management and regulatory affairs.
I believe the bill in front of us today is critical for ensuring a
strong future for FHA, and I request my colleagues' support.
I reserve the balance of my time.
{time} 1745
Mrs. CAPITO. Madam Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I would like to thank the chairwoman, Chairwoman Waters, and the
chairman of the full committee, Chairman Frank, and Ranking Member
Bachus for their good, hard work on this legislation.
[[Page H4301]]
As I am an original cosponsor of this legislation, I rise in full
support of H.R. 5072, the FHA Reform Act of 2010. H.R. 5072 amends the
National Housing Act to include enforcement and premium changes to the
FHA single-family mortgage insurance program that will improve the
insurance fund's financial condition and enhance certain enforcement
tools to protect against fraudulent or poorly underwritten and insured
loans.
The bill incorporates a majority of the provisions in a bill that I
introduced, H.R. 4811, the FHA Safety and Soundness and Taxpayer
Protection Act. H.R. 4811, my bill, went further than the proposals put
forth by the administration. My legislation included some additional
enforcement, fiscal and risk-assessment tools necessary to adequately
administer the program, detect fraud and abuse, strengthen underwriting
standards, and protect the taxpayer. I appreciate Chairman Frank and
Chairwoman Waters' willingness to include the additional provisions
that were part of my bill which I believe made H.R. 5072 a stronger
bill and one that is more able to address the pressing challenges
before the FHA today.
I would also like to thank Secretary Donovan of HUD and Commissioner
Stevens of the FHA for testifying before our committee, and also for
working with me and my staff and the majority staff to formulate what I
think is a very good bill.
The FHA was established by the National Housing Act of 1934 to
broaden homeownership, protect lending institutions, and stimulate the
building industry. I did not realize this, but prior to the creation of
FHA, home mortgages did not exceed 50 percent of the home value and did
not extend past the fifth year. At the end of 5 years, mortgages had to
be either paid or renegotiated. But during the Great Depression,
lenders were unable or unwilling to renegotiate many of the loans that
came due. Consequently, many borrowers lost their homes and lenders
lost money because property values declined significantly. The FHA
program was established originally to provide stability and liquidity
in the market. Its creation fostered the 30-year mortgage product and
led to standardized mortgage instruments.
Once again, today, FHA has played an important role in a difficult
housing market. As private sector lenders have scaled back their
activities during the past 2 years, the FHA has significantly increased
its share of the single-family mortgage market from less than 5 percent
to more than 30 percent, but increased delinquencies and foreclosures
across the Nation have had a detrimental effect on the financial health
of the FHA program. An independent actuarial report which was published
on November 12, 2009 showed that the capital reserve ratio for the
Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, the MMIF, dropped below the
congressionally mandated threshold of 2 percent to a less-than-expected
.53 percent, a serious red flag. The actuarial review also indicated
that the economic value of the FHA declined over 75 percent from last
year to $2.73 billion. In light of these facts, it is essential that
Congress and the FHA enact reforms to ensure that a bailout of FHA is
not and will not be necessary.
Madam Chair, the provisions of this bill are an important step in
providing HUD with the tools it needs to supervise and monitor the FHA
program and adequately assess risk. As the chairwoman has said, of the
many important provisions included, H.R. 5072 authorizes FHA to
increase annual insurance premiums and requires indemnification by
lenders for loss on loans they originate.
The program is intended to be self-funded. Proceeds from the premiums
paid by the homeowners for the FHA guarantee are used to operate the
program and pay losses when loans default. The ability to increase
annual premiums will allow HUD the ability to raise annual premiums
above the .55 percent cap, which will allow FHA to more adequately
price for risk and to build up its reserve ratio which, as we know, has
fallen below its congressionally mandated level. The indemnification
provisions in H.R. 5072 will give HUD the ability to seek restitution
against unscrupulous lenders who make loans they never should have
made.
H.R. 5072 is an important and necessary bill; it gives HUD the tools
it needs to raise the annual premiums so that HUD can begin the process
of putting the FHA program back on the road to a program that has an
adequate reserve ratio and enough capital for the program to run in a
safe and sound manner.
However, let me be clear: H.R. 5072 is not a panacea. The Department
and this Congress and future Congresses must be ever vigilant in our
oversight of this program to make certain that the program is operated
in a way that assures the taxpayer is protected.
Recent reports indicate that FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are
responsible for 100 percent of today's new mortgage originations, which
means that the exposure for the taxpayer continues to grow day by day.
That is why it was and still is imperative that reform of Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac be part of any attempt to fix our financial and
regulatory system. Fannie and Freddie were a big part of what caused
the financial collapse, and they must be part of the solution.
There are numerous issues currently being debated as part of the
regulatory reform package such as risk retention, qualified mortgages,
derivatives, hedge funds--and the list goes on--that could have
significant implications for the future of the mortgage market as well
as the direction of reform for Fannie and Freddie. H.R. 5072, the bill
we are considering today, is extremely important because it provides
the administration with the ability to increase the premiums which will
improve FHA's current financial situation and prevent the need for any
taxpayer bailouts.
I urge my colleagues to fully support H.R. 5072.
Madam Chair, I yield 3 minutes to a distinguished member of the
Financial Services Committee and the Housing Subcommittee, my friend,
Mr. Lee, from New York.
Mr. LEE of New York. I thank my friend from West Virginia for
yielding.
I rise today in support of H.R. 5072, the FHA Reform Act of 2010.
This legislation before us today clearly takes important steps towards
restoring stability into our housing market.
I share the frustration that I hear, though, from my constituents in
western New York who have been responsible homeowners but who are
increasingly paying the price for the fraud and abuse throughout our
mortgage system. No one--no business and no person--should be able to
take risks without having to accept the consequences.
We've all seen the consequences of the actions taken by irresponsible
lending practices, and Congress has rightfully looked at outdated
mortgage structures to ensure responsible homeowners have access to
safe and affordable mortgages without forcing them to pay for the
irresponsibility of others.
Earlier this year, I joined my friend from New Jersey (Mr. Adler) in
introducing H.R. 3146, the 21st Century FHA Housing Act, which took
much of what we have learned from past FHA shortages to ensure they
don't happen again. I am pleased that the bill before us today does
this as well and includes many of the reforms that we proposed last
year. H.R. 5072 will help ensure that FHA will be a stabilizing force
in the market and support responsible homeownership for first-time
buyers and underserved markets.
Given that FHA is now one of the primary facilitators of mortgage
financing, it is absolutely necessary that we get this reform right.
FHA must have the resources it needs to effectively oversee mortgages
and ensure that no bad actors are allowed to function in the
marketplace.
We need a responsive, efficient, and capable FHA to help ensure that
owning a home remains part of the American Dream. I believe the bill
before us today will help keep that dream alive. I urge my colleagues
to support its passage.
Mrs. CAPITO. Madam Chair, I would just reiterate that this bill has
my support. It passed out of the committee by voice vote. I think we
did a good job meeting each other halfway on certain issues that we
might have had some disagreement on, and I look forward to the passage
of this bill.
Madam Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
Ms. WATERS. Madam Chair, I would simply like to close by thanking
Mrs. Capito for all of the work that she put
[[Page H4302]]
into this legislation and the cooperation that she gave to me and her
staff to my staff.
This is a good bill. The differences have been worked out between
both sides of the aisle. We worked hard to make sure that we maintained
FHA, but that we keep a close watch on it; that, in fact, we give it
flexibility, but at the same time ensure the continuity and the
consistency of FHA that should be there to provide the guarantees for
our citizens that so desperately need them.
Madam Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
The CHAIR. All time for general debate has expired.
Ms. WATERS. I move that the Committee do now rise.
Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr.
Schiff) having assumed the chair, Mrs. Halvorson, Chair of the
Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, reported that
that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 5072) to
improve the financial safety and soundness of the FHA mortgage
insurance program, had come to no resolution thereon.
____________________