[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 84 (Monday, June 7, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4601-S4602]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OILSPILL CLOSES IN
Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, my worst fears are coming true.
The wind that had so blessed us in our State of Florida for going on 7
weeks now shifted a few days ago, and this big spill of oil is moving
to the east and to the northeast, and it is closing in on the gulf
coast, the northwest gulf coast of Florida.
Thus far, most of the more concentrated oil is well off shore. Under
the command of the Coast Guard, there are skimmers 25 to 50 miles out
from the coast that have a boom that goes out from a fairly decently
sized ship that then scoops up that oil into a concentrated area. Then
they have what is kind of like a vacuum pump. It is almost like a
vacuum cleaner. It sits and floats on top of the water, on top of the
oil, and it sucks it up into a pipe, and that goes into a tank or a
rubber bladder on top of the ship. Thus far, they have been able to
take care of a good bit of that oil.
Of course, that is the strategy--to keep the oil offshore; don't let
it get to shore because when it does, it messes up your beach and, even
worse, it messes up the wetlands. As a matter of fact, when oil gets
into wetlands, into marsh grass, into mangroves, you have a problem.
More than likely, it is going to take a while for that marsh grass to
come back. Mangroves and oil do not mix. Of course, then we are talking
about these unique estuaries that spawn so much of our marine life in
the Gulf of Mexico. So what we have is a nightmare that potentially is
coming to reality.
There are a lot of people who are working awfully hard. The Coast
Guard is working hard, but right now the Coast Guard is stretched to
the limit. There are only so many Coastguardsmen. They still have to do
all the things the Coast Guard has to do all over the world, including
the gulf coast. They still have to do rescue. They still have to do
search missions. Down in south Florida, we still have to have the Coast
Guard there going after the drug runners. So there is a limited amount
we can have. As good as those men and women are, they are stretched to
the limit. They are going around the clock.
As the oil continues to gush, this problem is going to become more
and more acute. It could become acute in a number of ways. We are being
told--and I can certainly say this Senator has become a skeptic about
what is correct information. Remember when we were told it was only
1,000 barrels of oil a day that was gushing into the gulf? A couple of
weeks later, that was revised to 5,000 barrels of oil a day, and then
that was revised to 12,000, but the report was omitted that said it
could be as high as 25,000.
Now we are told that this attempt called the top hat; that is, an
attempt to put a cap on the top of that blowout preventer where they
cut off the riser pipe, and the oil is going up to the surface to a
tanker--they are saying that is now 10,000 barrels a day, but look at
the live video and see how much of it is still gushing outside of that
top hat.
So how much is going into the gulf? Well, if it is 25,000 barrels a
day, if that is the accurate figure, there is still 15,000 barrels of
oil a day going into the gulf. And if it keeps going--and the Coast
Guard admiral said yesterday it is going to go until September, until
they can get the relief wells down and try to plug it with cement down
near the oil reservoir, which is some 18,000 feet below the seabed. If
it keeps gushing that amount all the way to September, it will be close
to the largest oilspill there has ever been on planet Earth in the sea,
which was the Ixtoc in the Bay of Campeche spill that spewed for 10
months. By the way, it was only in 150 feet of water, and they couldn't
get it stopped. This is in 5,000 feet of water.
[[Page S4602]]
If I sound a little distressed and frustrated, it is that I am
because this Senator is reflecting the feelings of his people.
What about the fishermen--those fishermen who have offered to use
their boats for BP but have not been contracted to use them, but they
can't use their boats because the waters are closed or even if the
waters are not closed, the fish houses won't buy their fish because
fish houses from all over the country are calling in and saying: We
don't want your gulf fish; we think it is tainted.
What about those charter boat captains, in the height of the season,
summer, on the gulf coast of Florida? Those boat captains don't have
the recreational fishermen coming and chartering their boats to go out
because over a third of the gulf is closed, and for the same reasons--
they are worried about the fish. Are they getting hired by BP? Why are
they hiring people from Tennessee and Arkansas and North Carolina with
boats? Why aren't they hiring the Florida fishermen whose livelihoods
have vanished?
I am expressing some of the frustration my people are expressing to
me.
What about the poor hotel owners? They are at the height of the
season. It starts Memorial Day and goes all the way to Labor Day. What
about them? What about the restaurants that are in the height of the
season? We hope people will come, because the beaches are still some of
the most beautiful in the world. But the fact that they now see these
silver-dollar-size tar balls--in some cases, hamburger-patty-size tar
balls--that are all over the beach, are they still going to come and
honor their reservation at the hotel? Will they go to the local
restaurant? And if they do go there, will they order the local seafood?
There are a lot of frustrated folks. By the way, Mr. President, the
Presiding Officer is the former chief executive of his State. What
about the local and State revenues? The State of Florida doesn't have
an income tax. The State of Florida has a sales tax. The sales tax--if
people are not staying in hotel rooms, and they are not buying meals in
restaurants, and if they are not buying down at the local stores, the
revenue is starting to dip. What is going to happen to the budgets of
the local and the State governments and the revenues they come to
expect?
In the midst of all of this, we hear that BP says it will be
accountable. Yet, we come out here on this floor--Senator Menendez,
Senator Lautenberg, and I--and ask unanimous consent that in order to
eliminate the artificially low cap of $75 million on liability for
economic losses, there is always an oil State Senator who will stand up
and object to our consent request to raise this artificially low cap.
BP says it is going to, in fact, take care of legitimate expenses. But
at the same time, BP was quick to point out in hearings that have gone
on for several weeks--and certainly the nine hearings this week will go
on--it will point out that there is a certain responsibility of the
operator of the rig, Transocean, and the operator of putting the cement
down into the well, around the casing that was supposed to be set, but
obviously was imperfect--that operator was Halliburton.
So, in effect, what we are going to have, and already have, is people
pointing both ways. There are going to be so many lawsuits that will go
on by the time they get to the bottom of this. And the investigation is
going to go on for so long. In the meantime, what about our people and
their livelihoods? What are they going to do?
I was told by the fishermen that you have to have 14 days in which to
actually send in the requisition after you have done your work, once
you have been signed up, and you then expect to be paid within 14 days
after you submitted your request for payment. Plus 14 is 28, so where
is the fisherman going to get any money within that month in order to
pay his deckhands, his assistants, and to pay his bills? It can
continue to multiply. You wonder why I sound frustrated? There is so
much uncertainty and people are scared.
In the meantime, BP indeed has given some money for an advertising
campaign--and that is a good thing--for Florida to run advertisements
to say that our beaches are open, come on. But you know the reality of
what they are hearing. I hope people will, because I can tell you those
tar balls that are there--if people will get out there and clean it
up--oh, by the way, it has to be an appropriately recognized group to
go out and clean up the tar balls contracted by BP. Why can't we get
our local governments to go out there and get those tar balls off the
beach, so our guests and visitors can enjoy our God-given assets?
All of these are questions that are still to be answered. So I am
going to try several times with my colleagues to continue to get this
artificially low cap raised so it will send a message to any oil
company that in the future you better not cut corners. You better not
have that cozy, incestuous relationship with the government regulator
you have had for the last two decades. You better not think you are
going to influence the government regulator as you have--as has been
stated by the inspector general's report in 2008--with sex, drugs,
booze, gifts, trips. And the revolving door, as stated by the most
recent IG report last month--the revolving door, where they come out of
the industry, the door revolves, and they come in as the MMS, the
Minerals Management Service, the government regulator; and then the
door revolves and they go right back into the employ of the oil
industry. That is a conflict of interest. That is not government
oversight of an industry, and it has led to this circumstance, where
three apparatuses did not work as back-up mechanisms on the blow-out
preventer, and it has led to the sad condition that we now have, where
oil is gushing, and has been for 49 days, into the Gulf of Mexico and
is ruining a culture and a way of life.
I want to say that the Presiding Officer's State is not immune, and
the other Senator on the floor right now, his State--an Atlantic coast
State as well--is not immune, because, sadly, sooner or later the winds
are going to continue to carry this oilspill to the South. It is going
to get in what is known as the Loop Current and some of it is already
entrained in the Loop Current.
The Loop Current goes up into the northern Gulf of Mexico and loops
back South, all the way down around the Florida Keys, and it becomes
the gulf stream. It then moves North as the gulf stream up the coast of
Florida, off the Keys. It then comes in and hugs the southeast coast of
Florida quite close--very close--mostly in places less than a mile off
the beach. It continues on up to the middle of the peninsula of
Florida, and then it takes a turn to the Northeast and parallels the
east coast of the United States. It goes up to Cape Hatteras, NC, and
depending on winds, I would say to the two Senators who are hearing my
words, even though that current, called the gulf stream, that goes off
of Cape Hatteras across the Atlantic to Scotland--depending on winds
and wave action, it can carry some of that oil to the rest of the
Atlantic seaboard and to the States represented by the two very
distinguished Senators here on the floor. So this could have profound
effects.
The question is, how do we get it stopped and, thus far, nothing has
happened. So I think it is time for all hands on deck. I think it is
time to realize that we have to throw in every asset we have to try to
keep this oil off the coast, and especially out of the wetlands, and
don't let what happened to Louisiana happen to the rest of our States,
especially those delicate wetlands where you cannot get oil out of
them. Then maybe this nightmare will be over.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Kaufman). The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________