[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 75 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[House]
[Pages H3516-H3517]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OIL SPILL IN THE GULF OF MEXICO
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Capps) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mrs. CAPPS. Mr. Speaker, I rise this evening to speak about the
unfolding catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico. It's painfully clear that
British Petroleum's oil spill could dwarf any environmental disaster in
our Nation's history. This horrific tragedy has claimed 11 lives and
contaminated gulf waters with millions of gallons of oil. It's still
belching thousands of barrels of oil into the water every day, and now
the oil has reached the shores of Louisiana. It's impacting the
livelihoods of millions in the Gulf Coast States and threatens even
more.
The first steps, of course, are to stop the leaks, contain the spill,
and attend to the devastating aftermath on the people and their
environment. The Obama administration deserves high marks for its swift
response from day one to the BP disaster. It mobilized the government's
resources to minimize the harm on the health, the economy, and the
environment of the Gulf Coast.
Last week, the President sent to Congress legislation that would do
three things: First, provide additional resources to mitigate the
damage caused by the spill; second, provide assistance to the people
and the businesses affected most by the crisis, and; third, to ensure
that companies like BP that are responsible for oil spills are the ones
that pay for the harm they cause, not the taxpayers.
{time} 1945
In addition, Interior Secretary Salazar is conducting a top-to-bottom
reform of the Minerals Management Service. He has proceeded splitting
the MMS into two distinct agencies: one responsible for leasing and
collecting royalties; and one responsible for inspections and safety.
He has also ordered immediate inspections of all deepwater operations
currently in the gulf, and he announced that no new permits for
drilling new wells will go forward until a safety and environmental
review is completed.
Finally, the Obama administration is closing loopholes that allowed
some oil companies to bypass critical environmental reviews, and is
examining all of the environmental procedures on oil and gas
activities.
While these are important and necessary steps, I believe that more
must be done, and that's why I strongly support President Obama's
announcement that he will establish an independent commission to
investigate the BP oil disaster. This commission, which he will create
by Executive order, will mirror legislation that Mr. Markey and I
introduced earlier this month, the BP Deepwater Horizon Inquiry
Commission Act.
I believe this commission should have four goals. First, it should
examine the causes of the current spill, as well as the adequacy of oil
spill containment and cleanup measures. Second, it should determine
whether and how such spills can be avoided in the future. Third, it
should assess the implications of its findings for drilling in, or
adjacent to sensitive or ecologically important areas, including in the
Arctic. And four, it should make recommendations on how to strengthen
laws, regulations, and reform agency oversight in order to keep this
from happening again.
This commission will serve as an important long-term addition to the
Obama administration's excellent short-term efforts to investigate and
respond to the oil spill.
Mr. Speaker, I have lived in Santa Barbara, California, since 1964. I
saw firsthand the devastating consequences of the blowout on platform A
just a few miles off our coastline in 1969. That was 40 years ago. That
spill dumped millions of gallons of oil into the Santa Barbara Channel.
It killed untold amounts of wildlife and polluted our beaches for
years. But it also galvanized a burgeoning environmental movement, and
it spurred the first Earth Day. It was true then, as it is true today,
our response to this disaster cannot be that we simply have to keep
drilling in the gulf and other offshore areas because we have no
alternative.
The truth is we do have options that can move us further and faster
toward energy security. Today our economy stills relies on fossil fuels
for energy, and every day we pay a price in volatile prices, source
instability, and in unnecessary pollution. The best way to beat this
addiction is by reducing overall demand, by promoting renewables, and
developing alternatives.
And since America is not exactly awash in oil, reducing our
dependence on it would be good not only for our environment, but for
our economy and, perhaps most importantly, for our national security.
That's exactly what Democrats have done. We have enacted legislation,
the Energy Independence and Security Act, and we have passed the
Recovery Act to provide an immediate jolt to the clean-energy economy.
The House has also passed comprehensive legislation that caps global
warming pollution and invests in clean-energy solutions that create
jobs here in America. Developing clean power and energy-efficient
technologies, while combating global warming, these are the initiatives
that will meet our goals.
As bad as things are--and may yet become--the disaster in the gulf
will be even more tragic if we fail to learn from it. Some of our
colleagues continue to claim we have to choose between endangering our
precious coast and relying on oil imports from dangerous regimes. I
believe it is time to reject that false choice. Let's pass
comprehensive energy legislation so America can take control of our
energy situation.
[[Page H3517]]
____________________