[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 70 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[House]
[Page H3298]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IRAQ'S MOST VIOLENT DAY OF THE YEAR
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Madam Speaker, Monday, yesterday, was the most violent
day so far this year in Iraq. In what the Associated Press called a
``relentless cascade of bombings and shootings,'' insurgents killed
more than 100 people, not to mention hundreds of wounded and maimed, in
a series of coordinated attacks. Both civilian and security forces came
under siege: a bombing outside a restaurant in Kut province; another at
the mayor's office in Tarmiya; another at a market in Suwayra; and
security checkpoints throughout Baghdad hit by gunmen disguised as
street cleaners.
At a textile factory in the city of Hillah, the bombing was timed at
the end of a shift, maximizing the bloodshed and the casualties. When
people rushed to help the wounded, a suicide bomber detonated his
explosives in the crowd, just adding to the carnage. According to the
AP account, the wounded in Hillah could be heard cursing their
government for its inability to protect them.
A few years ago, you'll remember we were told the insurgency was in
its ``last throes.'' But it is clearly capable of wreaking havoc--and
doing so with precision and sophisticated planning. The continuing
political instability in Iraq is contributing to the chaos, as the
elections held more than 2 months ago have yet to produce a clear
winner and a new government. There's real danger, Madam Speaker, that
if the Sunnis are not given a stake in the new government, we could see
the kind of sectarian strife bordering on civil war that exploded in
Iraq just a few years ago.
With most of the recent attention on Afghanistan, this onslaught
serves as a chilling reminder of just how dangerous and unstable Iraq
remains. Fear and violence remain a way of life. We can't become
complacent, Madam Speaker. We can't forget about the role of the U.S.-
led military occupation and what role that played in inflaming the
insurgency in the first place and in provoking these kinds of attacks.
Much was made of the supposed blow to the insurgency when two leaders
of al Qaeda in Iraq were killed last month. Yesterday's horror just
goes to show that killing terrorists and killing militants just makes
it easier for al Qaeda to recruit new ones.
Just a few hours ago comes word that top officials are apparently
drawing exactly the wrong conclusion for Monday's attacks. They're
talking about slowing down the pace of the redeployment of our troops
out of Iraq. What we need instead, Madam Speaker, is an acceleration of
the redeployment plan, because our continued military presence is a key
factor in motivating militants to acts of unspeakable terror. We're
doing as much to engender violence as to tamp it down. We're doing as
much to undermine security as we are to contributing to it. Only by
ending our military occupation and replacing it with a civilian surge
can we hope to foster peace, stability, and democracy in Iraq.
The men and women of our armed services have performed their duties
with honor and courage. They are not to blame for a failed policy,
Madam Speaker. But for their safety and for the good of Iraq and for
the good of the future of the Iraqi civilians and their country, let's
bring our troops home.
____________________