[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 67 (Thursday, May 6, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3354-S3355]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TRIBUTE TO MAYOR LUKE RAVENSTAHL
Mr. SPECTER. Mr. President, I would like to congratulate Pittsburgh
Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, the residents of the city of Pittsburgh and all
the citizens of southwestern Pennsylvania on Pittsburgh being
recognized yet again, this time by Forbes, as the Nation's most livable
city.
I have been visiting Pittsburgh every few weeks for over 30 years and
I have witnessed its transformation into a progressive metropolitan
area. I am pleased to see people from around the United States and
around the globe recognize the unique quality of life in the Pittsburgh
region. The region has transformed shuttered factories and brownfields
into attractive and bustling riverfront developments and a breathtaking
skyline.
People have always been aware of Pittsburgh's rich history from the
days of the French and Indian wars to the Industrial Revolution and the
birth of Organized Labor, but now people are seeing its transformation
into the new economy as well. Steel mills are still here, but the
region has also embraced and excelled in life sciences, robotics, green
buildings, renewable energy and advanced manufacturing. This
advancement has been spurred by world class universities and healthcare
institutions, fueled by innovative entrepreneurs, and supported by a
vibrant foundation and civic community.
The Pittsburgh region enjoys an abundance of natural resources,
outdoor amenities, world class arts and cultural institutions, low cost
of living, low crime rates, low housing costs, and of course world
champion sports teams.
As many of my colleagues understand, we still face many environmental
and infrastructure challenges with our postindustrial ``Rust Belt''
regions, and we must work together to support their rebirth and
continued growth. I am pleased to recognize Pittsburgh and its people
who exemplify so well the model for 2lst century economic growth and
recovery in America.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Forbes article be
printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
Pittsburgh Tops List of Most-livable Cities in U.S.
(By Francesca Levy)
Each year Carnegie Mellon's Tepper School of Business
attracts some of the brightest master's degree candidates in
the country. But the admissions staff occasionally has to
sway prospective students with their choice of top schools
who wonder why they should relocate to Pittsburgh, Pa.
``Pittsburgh has a really great cultural scene. We have a
great ballet and a great symphony that travels the world and
performs to packed houses, and there's a restaurant scene
that's much more diverse than it ever was when I was growing
up,'' says Wendy Hermann, director of student services for
master's programs and a Pittsburgh native. ``And it's an
easier sell, now that the Steelers and Penguins won their
respective titles.''
Indeed, Pittsburgh's art scene, job prospects, safety and
affordability make it the most livable city in the country,
according to measures studied. The city has rebounded from
its manufacturing past. Disused steel mills have been
repurposed into multimedia art centers, and amid a struggling
national economy, Google Pittsburgh, a test site for the
company's new high-speed broadband network, has expanded its
offices to accommodate more hires.
Pittsburgh's strong university presence--the city has over
a dozen colleges or campuses--helps bolster its livability.
In fact, the key to finding the easiest places to live may be
to follow the students. Most of the metros on our list--
including Ann Arbor, Mich., Provo, Utah, and Manchester,
N.H.--are college towns.
``Universities are large employers in their cities,'' says
Alexander Von Hoffman, senior fellow at the Joint Center for
Housing Studies at Harvard University. ``In the long term,
not only do you have that employment, but you have an
educated population, and you have a large youthful population
which tends to be a consuming population.''
In compiling our list, we measured five data points in the
country's 200 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas:
unemployment, crime, income growth, the cost of living, and
artistic and cultural opportunities.
To find out where jobs were available and incomes were
steadily growing, we ranked cities both by their rate of
income growth over the past five years and the current
unemployment rate, based on data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. The stronger the income growth trend and the
lower the unemployment, the higher each city ranked. Jobs
don't mean everything, though: A city is more livable if a
family's income goes further. Using cost of living data from
Moody's Economy.com, we ranked cities higher that had lower
costs for everyday goods.
Some places are inexpensive, but still not desirable, so we
included a measure for crime, using the Federal Bureau of
Investigation's and Sperling's Best Places reports on the
number of crimes per 100,000 residents, ranking low-crime
cities higher. We also considered a thriving local culture
crucial to livability, so we gave higher rankings to cities
that scored highly on the Arts & Leisure index created by
Sperling's Best Places. We averaged the rankings for each of
these metrics to arrive at a final score.
Ogden, Utah, No. 2 on our list, is home to Weber State
University. Unemployment in the metro is below average, and
incomes have increased by 3.4 percent over the last five
years. Provo, Utah, a city 80 miles away and our No. 3 most
livable, is home to Brigham Young University, the country's
largest private college. The metro has the highest five-year
income growth, 5.2 percent, of all the cities measured.
Lincoln, Neb., (No. 9), home to the University of Nebraska's
main campus, boasts the lowest unemployment rate , 4.9
percent, of all the metros we surveyed. Unemployment is also
at a low 5.9 percent in Omaha, Neb. (No. 5) home to a
University of Nebraska campus and roughly a dozen other
colleges.
Cities once driven by jobs in steel manufacturing,
railroads and textile mills suffered as those industries
dried up in the 1970s. But it's a mistake to write off places
like Pittsburgh, Pa., Harrisburg, Pa., and Manchester, N.H.,
Nos. one, five and seven on our list, respectively.
Manchester, once dominated by textile mills, is revitalizing
itself, converting its maze of mills and foundries into
medical centers, museums and apartment buildings that now
drive the local economy. The city has the second-lowest crime
rate of all the metros we surveyed, incomes have grown 3
percent in five years, and at 7.7 percent, its unemployment
rate is below the national average.
In only a few of our most livable cities does population
growth match prospects for employment and inexpensive living.
Provo saw an 8 percent population boom between 2000 and 2006,
and the head count in Omaha rose by 7.2 percent over the same
period. In most of the cities on the list, however, the
population has shrunk, or grown only by meager percentages,
suggesting that word
[[Page S3355]]
about the quality of life there hasn't yet gotten out. Being
a well-kept secret is just fine for some residents.
``I'm a big proponent of Pittsburgh,'' says Hermann. ``But
I don't want to spread the message too much.''
____________________