[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 58 (Thursday, April 22, 2010)]
[House]
[Page H2826]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
VOTING RIGHTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton) is recognized
for 5 minutes.
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, this week a historic vote to give the
600,000 residents of the District of Columbia here in the Nation's
capital voting representation in the House was due on the floor and had
to be pulled down but only for now. I come to thank the majority of
Members of Congress, of this House, who have voted for the right of the
people of the District to have a vote on this floor, especially the 22
Republicans and the 219 Democrats, who gave the D.C. House Voting
Rights Act a straight-up vote in 2007 when it passed 241-177.
I thank Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Hoyer for their invaluable
and unfailing support until the very end. I thank Majority Leader Harry
Reid for bringing a historic first-time vote for the bill where it
passed the Senate. I thank Chairman John Conyers for his unyielding
support of D.C. voting rights. I thank former Representative Tom Davis
whose idea it was to pair Democratic D.C. with Republican Utah, the
most perfect example of a bipartisan bill ever to hit this floor where
each side benefits equally. I thank Ilir Zherka of D.C. Vote and the
coalition he put together and Wade Henderson of the Leadership
Conference on Human and Civil Rights, who were steadfast and creative
throughout this process.
The Senate for the first time, in fact, enacted the bill, but it had
a gun amendment that took down the District's gun safety laws, yet the
District's gun safety laws have been held to be constitutional now by
the courts. When the bill came here to the House, I sought a clean vote
and almost got it. I thank the House for being willing to put the D.C.
House voting rights bill on a must-pass bill. The Senate did not agree,
so I spent months trying to negotiate a compromise that would have left
at least some of D.C.'s gun laws intact.
Finally, and reluctantly, I agreed to the same amendment that passed
the Senate to, in fact, alter the District's gun laws, but I had a set
of strategies for returning the District's public safety laws.
However, we were hit with a new over the top revised gun amendment
that gun forces sprung on us that was worse than anything we could have
imagined. Ultimately, people would have been allowed to carry guns in
the Nation's capital. The city could not prohibit guns in its own
publicly owned buildings. Owners of residential and commercial property
could not ban guns in their own property to those who rent or lease.
We expect the gun forces to return. We are ready for them. For the
sake of post-9/11 Washington and hometown D.C., they must not succeed
in overturning the public safety gun laws of the Nation's capital. I
promise you this, we will redouble our efforts to finally give the
American citizens who pay taxes at a rate of second per capita in the
United States, the citizens who live in our own capital, the vote in
Congress they have sought for two centuries and that every American who
believes in the founding principles of the Framers and our country know
must have. Let's do it, and let's do it this year.
____________________