[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 27 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Senate]
[Pages S825-S826]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COSTLY INACTION
Mr. REID. Mr. President, every night too many out-of-work Nevadans
and Americans, people who want to work, who need to support their
families but can't find a job, go to bed with at least the comfort of
having unemployment insurance and health benefits. Last night, more
than a million people throughout America who went to sleep relying on
those benefits woke up without the confidence they will be there now.
Early this morning, when they would rather be spending their mornings
working, mothers and fathers in every State woke up to line up at the
unemployment office in a long line. News reports today are that these
lines
[[Page S826]]
are very long today, all over the country, from Virginia to Nevada to
Kentucky. They are long because these people are worried about how they
are going to put food on the table and pay the bills. For far too many
Americans, those benefits were set to expire last night. So six times
last week, Democrats asked to extend their unemployment benefits for a
short time while we work on a longer extension. Six times, Republicans
said no. They didn't say no to us; that is, Members of the Senate, they
said no to the families in their own States and all States who count on
us to act when we need action, who count on us to respond in the event
of an emergency. This is an emergency.
Republicans in the Senate are standing between these families and the
help they need while these benefits expire. It might work because under
the Senate rules they can do that, but it certainly doesn't work for
working families whose need to buy groceries does not expire. The need
to heat your homes, put gas in the car, make payments for furniture you
buy, the car you bought, your house payment, the need to take medicine
or support an aging parent or to take care of your kids, they don't
expire.
Those opposed to helping our fellow citizens at their time of
greatest need want to talk about process. My Republican colleagues came
to the floor and talked about process. They had a right to do that.
Under the rules, I guess that is true. But if you can't afford to feed
your kids, process doesn't mean anything to you.
We often talk about the cost of inaction. It is the reason we insist
on creating jobs and making health care more affordable and on
strengthening national security. When we talk about the cost of
inaction, it is more than just rhetoric; it comes with dire
consequences. Americans who woke up this morning without the benefits
they need now know that better than anyone else.
The Associated Press runs all over the country--a newswire. Among
other things, this article says this morning:
Two thousand federal transportation workers will be
furloughed without pay [today].
The reason we are talking about 2,000, this doesn't count the
thousands and thousands, up to 1 million people who are not going to
have jobs as a result of not extending the highway bill. That is what
we want to do--let these people work--because what has happened is that
even the inspectors can't go out and do their jobs, so people are just
walking away from these jobs. Secretary LaHood, the Secretary of
Transportation--a Republican Congressman until he was appointed--said
construction workers will be sent home from jobsites because Federal
inspectors must be furloughed. They named a long list of construction
sites that will be halted: George Washington Parkway in Virginia, the
Humpback Bridge--I don't know where that is in Virginia--bridge
construction in Coeur d'Alene, ID. All over the country, this is
happening. The safety inspectors have no pay, so they have to leave.
Nothing is happening. This is going to lead to untold numbers of
people--I said up to 1 million people--who will not be able to work.
It is really wrong what has taken place here. It is not too late to
right that wrong. I hope Republicans will reconsider, think about their
constituents standing in the unemployment lines as we speak. I hope
they reconsider.
____________________