[Congressional Record Volume 156, Number 15 (Tuesday, February 2, 2010)]
[House]
[Pages H440-H442]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1515
NATIONAL STALKING AWARENESS MONTH
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and
agree to the resolution (H. Res. 960) expressing support for
designation of January 2010 as ``National Stalking Awareness Month'' to
raise awareness and encourage prevention of stalking.
The Clerk read the title of the resolution.
The text of the resolution is as follows:
H. Res. 960
Whereas in a 1-year period, an estimated 3,400,000 people
in the United States reported being stalked, and 75 percent
of victims are stalked by someone who is not a stranger;
Whereas 81 percent of women, who are stalked by an intimate
partner, are also physically assaulted by that partner, and
76 percent of women, who are killed by an intimate partner,
were also stalked by that intimate partner;
Whereas 11 percent reported having been stalked for more
than 5 years and one-fourth of victims reported having been
stalked almost every day;
Whereas 1 in 4 victims reported that stalkers had used
technology, such as e-mail or instant messaging, to follow
and harass them, and 1 in 13 said stalkers had used
electronic devices to intrude on their lives;
Whereas stalking victims are forced to take drastic
measures to protect themselves, such as changing jobs,
obtaining protection orders, relocating, and changing their
identities;
Whereas 1 in 7 victims moved in an effort to escape their
stalker;
Whereas approximately 130,000 victims reported having been
fired or asked to leave their job because of the stalking,
and about 1 in 8 lost time from work because they feared for
their safety or were taking steps, such as seeking a
restraining order, to protect themselves;
Whereas less than half of victims report stalking to police
and only 7 percent contacted a victim service provider,
shelter, or hotline;
Whereas stalking is a crime that cuts across race, age,
culture, gender, sexual orientation, physical and mental
ability, and economic status;
Whereas stalking is a crime under Federal law and under the
laws of all 50 States, the United States Territories, the
District of Columbia, and the Uniform Code of Military
Justice;
Whereas there are national organizations, local victim
service organizations, prosecutors' offices, and law
enforcement agencies that stand ready to assist stalking
victims and who are working diligently to craft competent,
thorough, and innovative responses to stalking;
Whereas there is a need to enhance the criminal justice
system's response to stalking and stalking victims, including
aggressive investigation and prosecution, and increase the
availability of victim services across the country tailored
to meet the needs of stalking victims;
Whereas, 2010 marks 10 years in which the Stalking Resource
Center has increased national awareness of stalking and
enhanced local responses to stalking victims through training
over 35,000 law enforcement, prosecutors, victim service
providers, and other community stakeholders, and provided
assistance to jurisdictions working to enhance their stalking
laws; and
Whereas January 2010 would be an appropriate month to
designate as ``National Stalking Awareness Month'': Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) supports the designation of ``National Stalking
Awareness Month'' to educate the people of the United States
about stalking;
(2) encourages the people of the United States to applaud
the efforts of the many victim service providers, law
enforcement, prosecutors, national and community
organizations, and private sector supporters for their
efforts in promoting awareness about stalking;
(3) encourages policymakers, criminal justice officials,
victim service and social service agencies, colleges and
universities, nonprofits, and others to recognize the need to
increase awareness of stalking and the availability of
services for stalking victims; and
(4) urges national and community organizations, businesses
in the private sector, and the media to promote awareness of
the crime of stalking through ``National Stalking Awareness
Month''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Georgia (Mr. Johnson) and the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Poe) each will
control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Georgia.
General Leave
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all
Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and
include extraneous material on the resolution under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Georgia?
There was no objection.
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, H. Res. 960 expresses support for January 2010, being
designated as ``National Stalking Awareness Month.'' Every year, Mr.
Speaker,
[[Page H441]]
an estimated 3.4 million people are the victims of stalking. Stalking
occurs through many different behaviors, such as unwanted phone calls,
letters or emails, the victim being followed, or a stalker showing up
at places without a legitimate reason. While these individual acts may
not be criminal in and of themselves, collectively and repetitively
these behaviors can cause a victim to fear for his or her safety.
This crime of stalking can be extremely dangerous. The fear and
mental anguish that stalking causes can leave a victim's life in
shambles. Anxiety, insomnia, or severe depression is much more
prevalent among stalking victims than within the general population.
This is especially the case if the stalking involves being followed or
having one's property destroyed.
Over 12 percent of employed stalking victims report losing time from
work as a result of their victimization, and more than half lose 5 days
of work or more. In fact, many stalking victims have been forced to
relocate their residences, and they often need psychological
counseling. Stalking is often a precursor to physical attacks on a
victim. This is why stalking is a crime in all 50 States and in the
District of Columbia and is a crime under Federal law as well. Over 75
percent of women murdered by an intimate partner had been stalked by
that partner before being killed. Victims are increasingly vulnerable
to the crime of stalking, with advances in technology giving stalkers
more access to the victims' personal information.
I would like to thank my Judiciary Committee colleague, the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. Poe), for introducing this bipartisan resolution; and I
urge my colleagues to join me in supporting House Resolution 960.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. POE of Texas. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I'm proud to be the sponsor of this legislation.
Stalking is described as repeated harassment or threatening behavior
toward somebody else. The stalker can be a stranger or someone the
victim knows very well--an ex-partner, a family member. Laws vary from
State to State, but stalking is usually considered under the law to be
any unwanted contact between the stalker and the victim, that he or she
either directly or indirectly communicates a threat or places fear in
the victim. Some examples include, but are not limited to, unwanted
phone calls; letters; emails; instant messages; following the victim;
showing up at the location where the victim is without any reason;
leaving unwanted items or presents; and spreading false information or
rumors about the victim.
Stalking can turn any ordinary day and any ordinary activity, like
walking to your car, into a terrifying experience for the victim.
Victims of stalking will never really know if they are safe whether
they are at home, in their cars, at their work, or even just walking
down the street. Stalkers show up at the oddest places. They will be
sitting out in front of someone's home; they'll be there when the lady
drops her child off at school; when she picks him up in the afternoon;
when she goes to church. The stalker is everywhere.
One example is a wonderful young lady from Maryland by the name of
Yvette Cade. Yvette Cade was severely burned by her husband shortly
after a restraining order against him was removed by the judge. Just 3
weeks before, she begged a judge to reinstate a restraining order that
had been ordered against her husband. And she told him, the judge, that
she feared for her life. But the judge, in his incompetence, refused to
reinstate the restraining order. The judge has been reprimanded for
that conduct--for refusing to listen to Mrs. Cade's case--which could
have prevented the horrible tragedy.
Let me make it clear: when the judge refused to reinstate the
restraining order, her husband followed her to the store that she
worked in. He walked in the store. He had a bottle of gasoline. He
poured it over the top of her head and he set Yvette Cade on fire, all
because he had been stalking her, but also a judge had the ability to
intervene and prevent that activity--and he did not do so.
Yvette Cade survived those injuries, and she is an advocate for
victims' rights to this day. This case is a reminder why we must
educate law enforcement and others, including judges, about stalking
and domestic violence in order to help them recognize situations as
happened to Mrs. Yvette Cade. During a 12-month period, an estimated
3.4 million people ages 18 and older are victims of stalking.
There's a similar story of a woman named Peggy Klinke. She lived in
Albuquerque, New Mexico, and broke up with her boyfriend, named Patrick
Kennedy, after dating him for 3 years. He couldn't handle not being
with Peggy and stalked her outside of her work. He waited for her
outside of her gym. He followed her everywhere she went. And she could
always find his truck wherever she showed up.
She filed stalking charges against him and had a protective order put
out against him. Eventually, Peggy started dating someone else and
tried to move on with her life. Patrick set her boyfriend's house on
fire and flew to Peggy's mother's house in Ohio and spray painted her
house with profanity. The police then thought they had enough evidence
to take him to court. Six months before the trial began, Peggy moved to
California to hide from Patrick. He hired a private investigator to
find her, and he did so in California. Two weeks before the trial, he
located her and then killed her and then killed himself.
The most effective way of preventing stalking is making people aware
it exists and how dangerous it can be. While not every instance of
stalking ends in violence, many do. Stalking must be taken seriously
and decisive measures must be taken by law enforcement officials as
soon as the behavior begins in order to prevent the escalation into a
violent situation.
House Res. 960 expresses support for the designation of January 2010
as National Stalking Awareness Month to raise awareness and encourage
the prevention of stalking. I support this bill and urge my colleagues
to support it as well.
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. POE of Texas. I yield 5 minutes to the original author of the
national stalking criminal legislation some years ago, the gentleman
from California (Mr. Royce).
Mr. ROYCE. My colleague, Judge Poe, the Representative from Texas,
has told you some of the examples about women who have found themselves
in this dire situation. We had in my county, Orange County, California,
a total of four young women in 1990 who were, in the span of 6 weeks,
all confronted by the same situation. They were being stalked by an
acquaintance or a former beau, someone they knew. Each knew they were
going to be attacked. Each had been threatened that they would be
attacked.
I spoke after the attack with a law enforcement officer there who
said it was the hardest thing he ever had to do in his life was to tell
one of these young women, I know you feel he's going to attack you, but
there's nothing we can do until you're physically attacked. Despite the
threats he's made, there's nothing we can do. So he said, I took it
upon myself to follow this individual because I knew he intended to
carry out that attack. He said, I came within 2 minutes of preventing
him from killing her. But, unfortunately, he took her life, and then
when he saw me, he took his own. This was the example given in this one
case, but there were four cases within that 6 weeks in 1990.
I had previously passed legislation in the State senate on terrorism
as it related to credible threats made against synagogues and churches
by those who threatened to blow up synagogues. And I thought, Well,
perhaps we can extend this and actually give law enforcement the chance
to step in. Since that other law had been upheld by the State supreme
court, perhaps it would uphold a law if we passed an anti-stalker law
that said if you threatened the victim with a credible threat of great
bodily harm, it became a stalking crime, and thereby perhaps you would
have the deterrent effect of having law enforcement able to go to these
victims or go, more importantly, to perpetrators and tell them, You may
not understand this, but under this new law you face 3 years or more in
State prison if you do this.
We passed the legislation in California after some debate. We had
particularly effective testimony from one young woman who had been
stalked for
[[Page H442]]
years by a high school acquaintance who she didn't even know, and
finally taken at knifepoint. There was a 12-hour standoff. But because
he didn't drag her more than the allotted number of feet, it was not a
kidnapping. So, finally, with her testimony, we got that through the
State house.
And then we found that the very advice we were giving these victims--
get away from your stalker; move, because there's little we can do--
meant that when they moved from the State of California to another
State--let's say Florida, an example that I'm familiar with--the
restraining order was no longer in effect, which meant that he couldn't
be charged with stalking.
So the answer to that was a Federal law. By that time, we had used
the California law as a template. We passed it in all 50 States. Japan
had adopted the law. Parliaments in Europe adopted the law. But the
question was: How do you protect those who go from State to State when
those restraining orders are no longer in effect?
So in the United States House of Representatives I introduced that
legislation. As a result, this new law provides a uniform Federal law
protecting stalking victims when they cross State lines either to
travel or work or to get away from their stalkers, or for any other
purpose; and when they're on Federal property; if they're on a military
base, for example; if they're at a post office.
It was signed into law in 1996. And I will tell you now why I am
appreciative of these Members bringing this law up to date, of which I
am a cosponsor. Our key problem is getting people aware of the
existence of this law. Our key challenge today is deterrence. As
mentioned, you have a case today where one out of every four young
women who is killed is being murdered by someone who formerly stalked
her. And there is a deterrent effect to law enforcement coming to you
and saying you could be serving 3 years in a Federal penitentiary or in
jail. You've got 3.4 million people being stalked every year, according
to the Department of Justice.
{time} 1530
If we had those in law enforcement, if judges were more cognizant of
the challenges of this problem, we'd be better able to handle this
situation.
Many communities have come to understand that stalking is a serious
problem. Many have come up with programs that can support victims and
combat this crime, but we really need law enforcement to have more
focus because how many times can you look at a situation and say, All
right. There's something we could have done to help deter this. We know
the incidences where that has been effective here.
Most stalkers are known by their victims. It isn't always the case,
but most are known.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman from California
has expired.
Mr. POE of Texas. I yield to the gentleman for 1 additional minute.
Mr. ROYCE. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
And in today's world, stalkers, unfortunately, are using a very new
and upgraded type of technology from what, traditionally, they used. It
used to be that, you know, they'd leave a message on the phone. Today
it's computers, it's GPS units, it's cell phones, it's social
networking, and all of this can be used to harass victims.
If anyone would like more information on National Stalking Awareness
Month, I urge you to visit www.stalkingawarenessmonth.org, and try--for
those out there in law enforcement--try to understand just how
devastating this can be to victims, and try to give them a hand, and
try to deter these attacks before they occur.
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. I will close just after making this
statement. My sister Lynnette Maria Johnson was murdered back on May
30, 1973. That happened right here in Washington, D.C.
From high school sweethearts to college, these two individuals, my
sister and this gentleman who stalked her and killed her, were an item.
But when she went to college, she started meeting new people and her
interests changed, and the gentleman just could not take it and so he
continued to stalk her. Finally, it resulted in him killing her. At
that time, I don't think there were any stalking laws that would have
prevented his misconduct, and so I personally have a zero tolerance
level for stalkers.
I am proud to support this bill. Representative Poe, a trial lawyer
and a trial judge who has seen so many cases like these in his career,
I'm sure. And Mr. Royce of California spoke eloquently on this issue as
well. So I want to congratulate him for introducing the Federal
legislation that came before this.
I would advise all victims that as soon as it starts happening, let
the police know and go get some counseling so that you don't allow this
thing to get out of control. If you hit it hard when it first rears up,
I think that the chances are much better that the result down the line
will be positive and not negative.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I am ready to yield but I did want to
make comments regarding my colleague Mr. Johnson.
I appreciate his comments about his family and how stalking violence
can happen anywhere in the United States to anybody. We, as a body,
must be aware that victims throughout the country go through terrible
tragedies in their lives. This legislation brings awareness of stalking
to the national front.
Stalking laws are imposed to protect the right to be left alone, and
that's a right that all people have in this country, to be left alone.
I want to thank the victims groups that have supported this legislation
and, as chairman of the Victims' Rights Caucus, all of the numerous
members of the caucus who also support this. I urge its adoption.
Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of S.
2950, ``To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain
criminal history background checks and for other purposes, introduced
by my distinguished colleague from New York, Senator Schumer. ``The
Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2009,'' will
be revising the 78-month requirement to a 92-month requirement.
This act is particularly important to protect our children as they
participate in so many activities throughout the community.
Mr. POE of Texas. I have no further requests for time, and I yield
back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Johnson) that the House suspend the rules
and agree to the resolution, H. Res. 960.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds
being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.
Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the
ground that a quorum is not present and make the point of order that a
quorum is not present.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX and the
Chair's prior announcement, further proceedings on this motion will be
postponed.
The point of no quorum is considered withdrawn.
____________________